EARLY VS. DELAYED ROM OPTIMIZING POSTOPERATIVE ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

early vs delayed rom optimizing postoperative rotator
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EARLY VS. DELAYED ROM OPTIMIZING POSTOPERATIVE ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EARLY VS. DELAYED ROM OPTIMIZING POSTOPERATIVE ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR Disclosures Royalties and stock options One Direct Health Players Health Consulting income BREG Arthrex Research and education support


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EARLY VS. DELAYED ROM OPTIMIZING POSTOPERATIVE ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

Royalties and stock options

One Direct Health

Players Health

Consulting income

BREG

Arthrex

Research and education support

Arthrex

BREG

The Hawkins Foundation

Foundation for Physical Therapy

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Immobilization alone was only used in 1 RCT
  • ”protected” ROM most common comparison
  • No apparent effect is < 3cm with NO IMMOBILIZATION (Sheps et al 2015)
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Duration of problem
  • Any “pre-op”

rehabilitation?

  • Why did they have

surgery?

  • Goals
  • Cross fit vs laborer vs

golfer

#1 Timing and Expectations?

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Duration of problem
  • Any “pre-op”

rehabilitation?

  • Why did they have

surgery?

  • Goals
  • Cross fit vs laborer vs

golfer

#1 Timing and Expectations?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Timing & Size Matters

 “Successful” clinical outcomes widely reported for

rotator cuff repair

(Wilson ’02; Galatz ’04; Burkhart ’01; Tauro et al ‘98; Gartsman ’98)

  • 25%-95% anatomic failure of cuff repair reported

(Oh et al ‘09; Nho et al JSES ’09; Huijsmans et al ’07; Galatz et al ’04; Harryman et al ’91)

  • When- 98% in 1st 6 months
  • Repairs of tears > 4cm fail < 12 wks

(Miller et al AJSM ‘11)

  • Repairs of tears < 3cm fail 3-6 months

(Iannotti et al JBJS ’13)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Patient Outcome Expectation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What Happens if this Fails?

Arthroscopic/Ope n Repair

Debridement/ tenotomy Reverse Total Ms Transfer

slide-9
SLIDE 9

#2 Education Sets Expectations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 ADL’s

 Common mistakes:

 Door management  Bed mobility & rising from chair

 Toileting & dressing

 Est appropriate functional goals 

ROM for desired tasks

Loading- how much after 12 weeks

Key Early Education

“this is your box” for the next 3 months

slide-11
SLIDE 11

#3 Standardized Post Op Plan

Rehabilitation plan to match the surgery and the patient

slide-12
SLIDE 12

50 100 150 200 250 300 <3cm >3 cm LOS (Days) Tear Size Tenodesis Tenotomy

Biceps & Tear Size Impact Length of Stay

* *

P <0.05

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Visits Over Time

P <0.05 P <0.05

Biceps Tenotomy Biceps Tenodesis

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 High Average Low ASES Change Score Level of Utilization <3cm >3cm

High Utilizers Smaller Improvement with Small Tears

*

P <0.05

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 Calcific tendonitis, adhesive capsulitis, PASTA [partial articular

surface tendon avulsion]-type rotator cuff repair, concomitant labral repair, or single-tendon cuff repair)

 “Additional ROM exercise was effective is preventing stiffness

in 100 consecutive cases”

(Koo et al ’12)

Risk Factors for Stiffness

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Calcific tendonitis, adhesive capsulitis, PASTA [partial articular

surface tendon avulsion]-type rotator cuff repair, concomitant labral repair, or single-tendon cuff repair)

 “Additional ROM exercise was effective is preventing stiffness

in 100 consecutive cases”

(Koo et al ’12)

Risk Factors for Stiffness

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PROM

(Uhl et al ‘10; Gaunt & Uhl JOSPT ‘11)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ER then FE- ROM 1st

Hold vs. cycles….

slide-19
SLIDE 19

When Joint Mobilization?

 Grade III mobilizations assessed in 9 cadaveric shoulders  Measured strains & GAP distances on repaired (0 abd) in

anterior/superior repairs

 < strain at 30 than 0 degrees abd  30 degrees abd mob similar to relaxed positions  Higher with inferior glide  0 mm GAP distances at 30 degrees  1.06-1.46 mm at 0 degrees

Muraki et al. Manual Therapy. 2007 Aug; 12 (3): 231-9.

  • When protocol begins to use AROM
  • To end feel and not beyond
  • Should be comfortable
slide-20
SLIDE 20

#4 Not just initiation of PROM….

➔Increased risk of “re-tear/non healing” with early

AROM

  • < 3cm early 1.63x
  • > 3m early 2.5x
  • > 5cm 6x

➔~ 25% of strength &

stiffness @ 12 weeks

Schlegel et al ‘99; Arnoczky et al ‘88, Rodeo et al ‘93, St Pierre et al ‘95 Hsu et al ‘16

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • All suggested exercises < 40%

rotator cuff EMG 25-50% 40-60% >50%

#5 Controlled Loading & Return to Function

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Great < 90 then Fight Gravity

 Lower trapeizus  Middle trapezius  Serratus anterior  Posterior rotator cuff

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Then more dynamic exercieses

slide-24
SLIDE 24

#5 Matched Return to Activity to Patient

➔No heavy lifting 4-6 months ➔Sport progressions

  • Golf 14-16 weeks
  • Tennis 20-22 weeks
  • Swimming 22-26 weeks

Fealy S et al. ’02; McKee MD et al. 00; Ellman et al ‘86; Charousset et al ‘08) Bjorkenheim, J. M. et al.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Time to Function Healing

slide-26
SLIDE 26

QUESTIONS?

@chuckthigpen charles.thigpen@atipt.com