reproduction
play

Reproduction & Recovery - Energetics Iteroparity & - PDF document

11/20/2014 Reproduction & Recovery - Energetics Iteroparity & Semelparity Iteroparity- (perennial) reproduces more than once. Semelparity- (annual) reproduces only once. 1 11/20/2014 Crespi, B.J. and R. Teo. 2002.


  1. 11/20/2014 Reproduction & Recovery - Energetics Iteroparity & Semelparity • Iteroparity- (perennial) reproduces more than once. • Semelparity- (annual) reproduces only once. 1

  2. 11/20/2014 Crespi, B.J. and R. Teo. 2002. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of semelparity and life history in salmonid fishes. Evolution 56(5). 1008-1020. • Which strategy evolved first? • Lower degree of repeat breeding linked to higher reproductive investment. • Tradeoff between high juvenile survival and adult survival…at least in salmonids. Energy & Reproduction • Evolution of diadromy (anadromy, catadromy, amphidromy) • Energy investment • Lifetime reproductive fitness 2

  3. 11/20/2014 Fish Energy • Lipid (26.4 kJ/g) • Protein (20.1 kJ/g) Lipid • Very little carbs Protein Fleming, I.A. and J.D. Reynolds. 2004. Salmon breeding systems. Pages 264-294 In A.P. Hendry and S.C. Stearns. Evolution illuminated salmon and their relatives. Oxford University Press, USA. 3

  4. 11/20/2014 Fleming, I.A. 1998. Pattern and variability in the breeding system of Atlantic salmon, with comparisons to other salmonids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55 (Suppl. 1):59-76 Fleming, I.A. and J.D. Reynolds. 2004. Salmon breeding systems. Pages 264-294 In A.P. Hendry and S.C. Stearns. Evolution illuminated salmon and their relatives. Oxford University Press, USA. Gray — Anadromous Open — Resident 4

  5. 11/20/2014 Anadromous vs. Resident • Why do you think some salmonid populations have both anadromous & resident individuals within the same population? Anadromous vs. Resident • Why do you think some salmonid populations have both anadromous & resident individuals within the same population? “All juveniles do not grow & accumulate [energy] equally in freshwater due to differences in genetics & environment.” “Get a fish fat enough and it won’t move because the need has been quelled. In contrast, a hungry fish will move as far as necessary to get fat.” J.R. McMillan 5

  6. 11/20/2014 Costs of Reproduction • Gonadal maturation - It costs more to build eggs than sperm • Migration • Fasting • Competition • Guarding Post-spawning • Semelparity = no recovery • Iteroparity = energy replacement via feeding • Gonadal recrudescence (renewed activity) 6

  7. 11/20/2014 Rideout, R.M., and Tomkiewicz. 2011. Skipped spawning in fishes: More common than you might think. Marine and Coastal Fisheries Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 3:176-189. • Consecutive (annual) vs. skipped spawning Reasons for skip spawning: 1. Sterility 2. Intersex (when it is not supposed to be) 3. Disease, parasites, etc. 4. Physiologically & energetically not ready Skipped Spawning & Population Dynamics • Not accounting for skipped spawners could result in a overestimation of annual production (4 - 41%). • Adjusting the SSB for skipped spawners in Atlantic cod did not improve the stock- recruitment relationship. • Why? 7

  8. 11/20/2014 Physiology of Spawning & Recovery in Snake River Steelhead trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) Steelhead • Anadromous • Iteroparous • Degree of iteroparity is highly variable (<1.0% to >70%) • In Snake River <2.0% 8

  9. 11/20/2014 Steelhead Kelt Research • Conservation tool • Increase gene flow • Reconditioning • Historically low? Energy Use & Recovery Goal: Evaluate how much energy & what type of energy is used during reproduction. • Where is the bulk of energy used? • How much energy remains? • What is the physiological capacity for recovery? 9

  10. 11/20/2014 Energy use 10

  11. 11/20/2014 Reproduction vs Feeding • Many species, not just migratory fish reduce feeding at the time of reproduction • Steelhead studies showed GI stasis and lack of structure for absorption at the time of maturity. mature Good kelt 11

  12. 11/20/2014 Profile of Energy Storage • Use of destructive sampling of tissues • Use of blood metrics – non lethal approach Proximate analysis • Mass Balance • H 2 O – Lipid – Protein – Ash PROTEIN ASH H 2 O LIPID 12

  13. 11/20/2014 Total energy • Lipid + Protein PROTEIN ASH H 2 O LIPID Predicting Energetic Status Model: White Total Body Energy = β o + β 1 * Muscle Reconstructing Steelhead Bodies Fillet & Carcass Total Body 13

  14. 11/20/2014 Total Body vs White Muscle Energy Total Body Energy (kcal/gram wet wt.) 2600 r 2 = 0.963 2400 Model: Total Body Energy 2200 = -591.311+1.6267 *(White Muscle Energy) 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 LGR Kelt (N=11) Celilo (N=7) 800 Linear Regression 600 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 White Muscle Energy (kcal/gram wet wt.) Total Body Energy vs. White Muscle Lipid 4000 Total Body Energy (kcal/g wet wt.) Lethal Samples SY09-SY11 (N=429) 3500 Linear Regression (r-square=0.80) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 White Muscle Lipid (%) 14

  15. 11/20/2014 Total Body Energy vs. White Muscle Protein Total Body Energy (kcal/g wet wt.) 3000 Lethal Samples SY09-SY10 (N=429) Linear Regression (r-square=0.80) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 White Muscle Protein (%) Total Body Energy vs Water 3000 Coefficients: Total Body Energy (kcal/g wet wt.) 2500 b[0]� 9396.9324981568 b[1]� -103.1956545736 r ²฀ 0.9421923762 2000 1500 1000 500 0 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 White Muscle Water (%) 15

  16. 11/20/2014 Energy Profile By Phase 3000 Total Body Energy (kcal/g wet wt.) 2500 JAN-MAY (N=186) 2000 JUN-SEP APR-JUL (N=14) (N=153) 1500 OCT-DEC 1000 (N=60) 500 0 Early Early-Mid Spawners Kelt Blood • Non-lethal Plasma Factors: • Nutritional • Stress • Tissue Damage • Electrolytes 16

  17. 11/20/2014 Total Energy vs. Plasma Protein 3000 Total Energy (kCal/g wet wt.) 2500 2000 1500 Below 1000 Detection Limit (BDL): Gritman & Logarithmic Regression (R-square = 0.48) PAL Early (N=10) 500 (<2.5 g/dL) Early-Mid (N=55) Spawning (N=151) Kelt (N=152) 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Protein (g/dL) Total Energy vs Plasma Cholesterol 3000 Total Energy (kCal/g wet wt.) 2500 2000 1500 Below Detection Limit (BDL): 1000 Gritman & PAL Logarithmic Regression (R-square = 0.68) (<10mg/dL) Early (N=10) 500 Early-Mid (N=55) Spawning (N=151) Kelt (N=152) 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Cholesterol (mg/dL) 17

  18. 11/20/2014 Total Energy vs Plasma Triglycerides 3000 Total Energy (kCal/g wet wt.) 2500 2000 1500 Below Detection Limit (BDL): 1000 Gritman & Logarithmic Regression (R-square = 0.70) PAL Early (N=10) (<10mg/dL) 500 Early-Mid (N=55) Spawning (N=151) Kelt (N=152) 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Triglycerides (mg/dL) Selective comparison with shorter distance migratory stocks 18

  19. 11/20/2014 Coastal vs Inland • Situk River, AK • Snake River, WA & ID Plasma Comparisons • Good female kelts System N Length (cm) Snake 50 Median 60.5 Range 52.0 - 83.0 • Natural origin (adipose intact) Potlatch 47 Median 68.9 Range 60.0 - 76.0 Clearwater 25 Median 75.0 Range 62.0 - 81.0 Situk 24 Median 79.5 Range 61.0 - 87.5 19

  20. 11/20/2014 Tissue Sampling • All sexes Poor Instream condition kelt System kelts mortalities • Fresh mortalities Situk 0 11 Potlatch 0 5 Upper Clearwater 0 0 • Poor condition Lower Granite Dam 31 0 kelts Total 31 16 Plasma Protein (Chi-Square) Above Below detection detection Significance α = 0.05 System N limits % limits % Situk River 24 92 8 No difference Upper Clearwater weirs 25 72 28 Lower Granite Dam 50 26 74 No difference Potlatch weirs 46 30 69 20

  21. 11/20/2014 Plasma Cholesterol 300 250 Cholesterol (mg/dL) 200 N = 24 N = 25 150 N = 47 N = 50 100 50 0 L. Granite Potlatch U. Clearwater Situk System Plasma Triglycerides 700 Triglycerides (mg/dL) 600 500 400 N = 24 300 200 N = 41 N = 46 N = 25 100 0 L. Granite Potlatch U. Clearwater Situk System 21

  22. 11/20/2014 Plasma Calcium 20 Calcium (mg/dL) 15 N = 24 N = 47 N = 25 N = 50 10 5 0 L. Granite Potlatch U. Clearwater Situk System Plasma Glucose 300 250 Glucose (mg/dL) 200 N = 24 N = 25 150 N = 50 N = 46 100 50 0 L. Granite Potlatch U. Clearwater Situk System 22

  23. 11/20/2014 Electrolytes Comparison of Weir Fish 22 3.5 a a b 20 18 3.0 Phosphorous (mg/dL) Magnesium (mg/dL) 16 14 2.5 12 10 2.0 8 6 1.5 4 2 1.0 200 220 a b a a b a 180 200 Chloride (mmol/L) Sodium (mmol/L) 160 180 140 160 120 140 100 80 120 Potlatch R. Fish Cr. Situk R. Potlatch R. Fish Cr. Situk R. Migratory Mortality Snake vs Situk Total Body Energy (kcal/g wet wt.) 1400 1200 1000 800 WEIR MORT WEIR MORT (N=5) Males only POOR ONLY 600 (N=11) (N=3) POOR ONLY At ~ 1000 kcal/g of wet tissue wt. POOR ONLY (N=19) 400 (N=9) kelts may be at the limits of their energy reserves regardless of 200 the system they come from. LGR SY09 LGR SY10 LGR SY11 Potlatch Situk 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend