Reduction of excess sludge production in a conventional activated - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reduction of excess sludge production in a conventional
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reduction of excess sludge production in a conventional activated - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reduction of excess sludge production in a conventional activated sludge system by a new electromagnetic treatment Dr.-Ing. Eric Valette Planet Horizons Technologies SA CTO CH-3960 Sierre, Switzerland Summary Introduction First trials


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dr.-Ing. Eric Valette

Planet Horizons Technologies SA CTO CH-3960 Sierre, Switzerland

Reduction of excess sludge production in a conventional activated sludge system by a new electromagnetic treatment

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Summary

Introduction First trials in a laboratory scale Full-scale installation Full-scale results Perspectives Conclusion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Goal: reduction of excess sludge production Processes:

Physical and chemical treatments Mechanical treatments Biochemical treatments Increase in dissolve oxygen

Alternative way:

Electromagnetic treatment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Laboratory scale trials

Set-up: Ref line EM line

Décanteur

Réfrigérateur E B E R AC Bio V = 22,5 L Bio V = 22,5 L Q0 = 2 L/h Q0 = 2 L/h QL = 2 L/h QL = 2 L/h (1+R).Q

0 = 6 L/h

(1+R).Q

0 = 6 L/h

V = 6 L V = 6 L R.Q0 = 4 L/h R.Q0 = 4 L/h

Décanteur Electrodes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Laboratory scale trials

Electromagnetic device: Electronic command:

  • 2 frequencies (50 Hz to 20 kHz)
  • Tension (< 100 V)
  • Electromagnetic induction: few pico to

few nanoTeslas Antenna:

  • 2 specific wires around the tank
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Laboratory scale trials

Operating conditions:

Different conditions were studied, the following results are obtained

while maintaining the extraction flow constant.

Flow rate of influent: Q0 (l h-1) COD in influent: (mgO2 l–1) COD in effluent: (mgO2 l–1) TS in aeration tank: (gTS L-1) TS in excess sludge: (gTS L-1) REF- line 2 548 ± 11 162 ± 32 4.97 ± 0.9 7.1 ± 1.4 EM-line 2 146 ± 29 4.35 ± 0.8 6.7 ± 1.3

Removal efficiencies of organic substrate: 70% REF-line and 73% EM-line

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Laboratory scale trials

Excess sludge production: reduction of 34%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Laboratory scale trials

Important to underline:

This trial was the better one obtained All trials conducted in different operating conditions shown an

improvement in the reduction of excess sludge production with EM treatment from 0 to 34% It can be explained:

Difficulty to work in a 20L scale pilot (to maintain some parameters

constant, development of filamentous bacteria, etc.)

Duration of trials (30 to 60 days) Modification in EM parameters (frequencies, intensity, nature of

signal, kind and shape of antenna, etc.)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Full-scale installation

Wastewater treatment plant of Penthaz (near Lausanne), Switzerland

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Full-scale installation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Full-scale installation

Electromagnetic device: Electronic command:

  • 2 frequencies (50 Hz to 20 kHz)
  • Tension (< 100 V)
  • Electromagnetic induction: few pico to

few nanoTeslas

  • P < 6,5 kJ.m-3 treated

Antenna:

  • 5 rectangular shape antennas (1m x 2,3

m)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Full-scale installation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Full-scale results

Operating conditions:

The total solids in the aeration tanks and the hydraulic and organic

loading rates were maintained at identical levels in the two lines by extracting excess sludge.

Flow rate of influent: Q0 (m3 d-1) COD in influent: tCOD0 (mgO2 l–1) COD in effluent: tCODL (mgO2 l–1) TS in aeration tank: X (gTS L-1) TS in excess sludge: XE (gTS L-1) REF- line 680 370 17.9 ± 3.6 1.6 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 0.7 EM-line 660 19.7 ± 4.2 1.3 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.7

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Full-scale results

Operating conditions:

Volumetric loading rate (kgCOD m-3 d-1) Specific loading rate (kgCOD kg-1TS d-1) Excess sludge production (kgTS d-1) Apparent sludge retention time (d) REF-line 1.05 0.66 106 3.5 EM-line 0.81 48 6.4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Full-scale results

Removal efficiencies of organic substrate: about 94-95%

20 40 60 80 100 100 200 300 400 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 COD effluent (mg/l) COD influent (mg/L) Time (day) REF EM

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Full-scale results

Excess sludge production: reduction of 55%

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Cumulative slude production (kg TS) Time (day)

REF-line EM-line

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Full-scale results

Switching off the treatment:

2000 4000 6000 8000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Cumulative excess sludge production (kg TS) Time (day)

REF EM

August September

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Full-scale results

Switching off the treatment:

50 100 150 200 250 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Dayly excess sludge production (kg TS/d) Time (day)

REF EM

x3

August September

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Full-scale results

Biological sludge activity: A biomass stress index (BSI) was

defined (ratio ATP extra-cellular over total ATP). This index was similar in the two lines and lower than 0.5 not showing any negative effects on biomass due to electromagnetic treatment.

N and P balance

Ntotal N-NH4

+

N-NO2

  • N-NO3
  • Ptotal

P-PO4

3-

Sample mg · L-1 mg · L-1 mg · L-1 mg · L-1 mg · L-1 mg · L-1 Influent 36 54 0.9 24 3.0 2.6 Effluent REF-line 46 62 0.3 23 1.9 1.4 Effluent EM-line 28 45 0.1 13 1.0 0.6 Excess sludge REF-line 41 53 0.3 12 1.1 0.6 Excess sludge EM-line 33 43 0.2 13 1.0 1.0

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Perspectives

PhD study with University of Savoie - LOCIE (FR) and University of

Grenoble – G2Elab (FR)

  • Influence on the proteinic synthesis
  • Cellular stress and physiological stress
  • Influence on the transfers of electrons
  • Measurement and modelling of EMF

New trials in the wastewater treatment plant of Penthaz

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Perspectives

New trials in the wastewater treatment plant of Penthaz

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusion

Very significant reduction in excess sludge production Fast return on investment with gains in next steps (dehydration,

stocking, transportation, incineration)

Operational costs very weak (only few Watts necessary) No danger (people or installations) No disadvantages comparing to other processes (chemical,

biochemical, mechanical treatments)

It’s still necessary to go ahead with this technology but the potential

regarding the influence on biological behaviour is very interesting in a friendly environmental and economical ways