reducing diesel fuel consumption and climate change
play

Reducing diesel fuel consumption and Climate change emissions in off - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

-1- Reducing diesel fuel consumption and Climate change emissions in off grid applications using VRB Energy Storage Systems Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions -2- The Concept Loading of diesel engines at close to maximum improves


  1. -1- Reducing diesel fuel consumption and Climate change emissions in off grid applications using VRB Energy Storage Systems Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  2. -2- The Concept • Loading of diesel engines at close to maximum improves their efficiency and use of fuel by as much as 35% • Additionally, proper loading reduces fouling and overall maintenance costs on a $/kWh generated basis. • By adding wind turbine generation to a microgrid, it is possible to reduce the use of diesel HOWEVER the amount of wind generation as a percentage of diesel generation is limited for stability reasons to about 20%. Thereafter you must provide electrical energy storage to stabilize wind power output variations. • Because wind power output is variable and because load is variable you require an energy balance or storage device to match demand to supply • If too much wind is added, you can end up with increased diesel usage simply to stabilize the grid. • Applying a VRB Energy Storage System (VRB-ESS) allows you to add significant wind up to 80% penetration and balance the grid, reduce emissions, lower fuel usage, reduce maintenance and extend diesel generator life. Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  3. -3- Diesel Engine fuel usage as a % of full load Fuel consumption in Litres per kWh as a % of Full load - (reference CAT 3516) Litres/kWh 0.45 0.40 ��������������� 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.35-.26)/.35 =25% ������������ fuel usage 0.10 improvement 0.05 0.00 100.00% 75.00% 50.00% 25.00% 10.00% Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  4. -4- Single line for VRB-ESS™ RAPS application Distribution grid n/c or utility Local loads Step up transformer 10 100 480V bus Conventional Genset 8 80 Power [kW] Power [%] 6 60 4 40 DC 1 2 = ~ Average 2 ~ 20 gensets - 2x 0 500kW VRB/ESS - 650 to Potential Wind 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 700kW 4 hours Time of day [Hrs] turbine (s) Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  5. -5- VRB Flow Battery Technology VRB Flow Battery Technology A liquid electrolyte that is separate from the electrode. • An electrochemical energy storage system operating at ambient temperatures • Reversible fuel cell – reduction and oxidation of single unique element: Vanadium • No cross contamination as with other storage systems. Electrolyte never wears out – high residual value • Very low maintenance • Deep cycles (10 to 90%) >10,000 • Low self discharge – indefinite energy storage • Energy can be recovered instantaneously • Battery can recharge as fast as it discharges (1:1) • Power and Energy separately scaleable Oxidation process Reduction process V 3+ + e - � V 2+ Charge V 4+ � V 5+ + e - V 5+ + e - � V 4+ V 2+ � V 3+ + e - Discharge Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  6. -6- Vanadium as mined Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  7. VRB Technology – power and energy are modular and separately -7- scaleable • 5kW – 10MW • VRB controls worldwide patents* (*excludes Japan and Australia) Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  8. -8- What is required – what is the process? Where can this concept be applied – what are the selection criteria • Determination of site specific Wind regimen (over 5m/s required) • Load factor (less than 65% required) • Load growth (must be reasonable or constant) • Where diesel costs are high • Reactive energy Var support (added value) • Local skills development for site support (required training due to access issues) • Detailed load profiles required Options • Diesel and Storage alone • Diesel and wind alone • Diesel - wind - storage combinations • High wind penetration (>20%) requires electrical energy storage of some form • Types of storage – choices. Historically only Lead acid batteries have been considered. However, only storage with the ability to deep discharge thousands of times and recharge very fast is suitable. • Model options using NREL’s HOMER software version 2.5beta Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  9. -9- Limitations of conventional storage solutions have prevented deployment of storage for cycling applications Lead Acid Battery VRB Flow Battery 5KW – 4hrs 5KW – 4hrs 25% Discharge Ideal 100% Discharge Capability 75% “unusable” Life Span – 15-30 years Charge Rate – 1:1 Cycles 100% - tens of thousands Life Span – 3-4 years Scalability – 3.5kW to 10 MW Charge Rate – 5:1 Environmentally Friendly Enviro Rating – Poor • No heavy Metals Scalability – 1W to 500kW • Indefinite Life Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  10. -10- Inside the 2MWh PacifiCorp installation in Moab Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  11. -11- Proven Technology – VRB Power • 250 kW x 8 hour VRB-ESS Grid Enhancement Project PacifiCorp, Castle Valley, Utah • 4 years successful operation • Avoided Capex of US$4m / Ability to “Peak Shave” – Payback 3-4 years Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  12. -12- Proven Technology - Sumitomo • 4 MW x 1.5 hour VRB-ESS Grid-Coupled Wind Smoothing Sapporo, Japan • One of several VRB-ESS installations in Japan Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  13. -13- Ireland – Sorne Hill – 32MW Wind Farm VRB site location 2008 Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  14. -14- Large System Performance - PacifiCorp - 96% Availability Normalised Plant Operating Hours-TD-Dec-06 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o - - b r r n l v c n b r r n l v c y u g p t y u g p t T a a p c o p c o e a u u e e a e a u u e e J J M M A O N A O N F M J A S D J F M J A S D Source: EPRI Run Time Idle Time Unplanned Downtime Planned Downtime Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  15. -15- Daily Wind Output Smoothing at J-Power • The VRB-ESS (blue line) runs continuously to smooth wind farm production (green line) • At only 20% of the wind-farm’s nameplate capacity, the VRB ESS has a significant smoothing effect to total wind-farm + battery output (red line) • The VRB-ESS intelligently recharges throughout the day so that it maintains 50% SOC Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  16. -16- 600 Daily Cycles at 6MW Peak Wind Farm Installation No other technology can economically meet this and no storage technology can technically achieve this cycling Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  17. -17- Case studies of Hybrid systems - Large • Case study 1: Canada 3MW system with HIGH wind penetration • Case Study 2: Alaska 3MW system - Base case – just diesel - Base case Plus 9% wind no battery - Base case plus VRB-ESS no wind - optimised case with 9% wind, and VRB-ESS Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  18. Case Study 1 – Canadian VRB-ESS with high wind -18- penetration • James Bay 3.3 MW diesel powered village • Simulation using wind turbines and 1.5MW x 15hr VRB-ESS to reduce fuel usage and emissions • Energy Cost dropped by 65% • ROI of over 30% / Payback 3-4years • Storage essential at 80% wind penetration • 300 similar communities in Canada alone Production Fraction Component (kWh/yr) Wind turbines 6,555,549 61% Cat 3512 3,451,548 32% Cat D398/379 5,043 0% CAT 3516 667,888 6% Total 10,680,027 100% Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  19. Case Study 1: James Bay – VRB-ESS with very high wind -19- penetration Emissions (kg/yr) Pollutant Emissions (kg/yr) with wind Carbon dioxide 11,754,766 5,285,091 Carbon monoxide 29,015 12,562 Unburned hydrocarbons 3,214 1,392 Particulate matter 2,187 947 Sulfur dioxide 23,606 10,621 Nitrogen oxides 258,903 112,094 Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  20. Case study 2. Alaska 3.5MW Diesel peak: No wind-no -20- VRB Annual electric energy production (Base Case) Production Fraction Levelised cost of energy: 0.419 $/kWh Component (kWh/yr) Cat 3512 309,036 1% Load Factor: 68.1% Cat 3516 100,900 0% Fuel Usage per year US$6.1million (@ EMD 710G 22,778,502 98% US$0.80/litre) (7.6million litres/year) Total 23,188,438 100% 20 year life, DR 6.5%, no fuel cost escalation Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  21. -21- Alaska 3.5MW diesel – low (9%) wind penetration no VRB Annual electric energy production Production Fraction Component Levelised cost of energy: 0.389 $/kWh (kWh/yr) Wind turbines 3,683,168 16% Cat 3512 1,667,687 7% Cat 3516 146,578 1% EMD 710G 18,014,788 77% Total 23,512,220 100% Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

  22. -22- Alaska 3.5MW diesel – with VRB-ESS - no wind Annual electric energy production Levelised cost of energy: 0.376 $/kWh Production Fraction Component (kWh/yr) Cat 3512 2,231,235 9% Cat 3516 135,180 1% EMD 710G 21,177,232 90% Total 23,543,646 100% Energy Storage & Power Quality Solutions

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend