Recognize common presentations of pediatric orthopedic emergencies - - PDF document

recognize common presentations of pediatric orthopedic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Recognize common presentations of pediatric orthopedic emergencies - - PDF document

Andrea Marmor, MD Associate Clinical Professor, Pediatrics UCSF San Francisco General Hospital Recognize common presentations of pediatric orthopedic emergencies Practice evidence based diagnosis and treatment strategies for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Andrea Marmor, MD Associate Clinical Professor, Pediatrics UCSF – San Francisco General Hospital

 Recognize common presentations of

pediatric orthopedic emergencies

 Practice evidence‐based diagnosis and

treatment strategies for pediatric orthopedic emergencies

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Panda is a 16 mo old girl brought to the ED

for “crying nonstop”

 She has been “not herself” for about a week,

refusing to walk, always wants to be held, screams with diaper changes, and sleeping poorly

 This evening, unable to fall asleep, so brought

to ED

 T= 38, P 160 (crying), R 32, BP 100/60  Well‐appearing, consolable when held, non‐

toxic, supple neck

 Full rotation at knee, ankle, hip  No tenderness or swelling of joints or bones  Screams when put on back on table, and

when manipulating legs

 ? tenderness over middle of spine, normal

neuro exam

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • A. CBC, CRP, ESR
  • B. AP and frog‐leg view of hips
  • C. Aspiration of hip
  • D. Plain films and MRI of spine
  • E. Lumbar puncture

MRI lumbar spine: diffuse bony edema of L4 and L5, with enhancement of the disc. T1 +contrast (left) and T2 (right). (from Arthurs et al, 2009)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 Inflammatory/infectious etiology

  • Diagnosis commonly delayed
  • Refusal to walk/sit/limp/crying > back pain

 Recent 18 year series (Fernandez, 2000)

  • Mean age: 2.8 years
  • Only 28% febrile
  • Mean days of symptoms = 22

Fernandez, Pediatrics, 2000

 Diagnostic pearls:

  • Inflammatory markers poor predictors (may be normal)
  • MRI best sensitivity/specificity

▪ 76% seen on plain film (narrowing of disc @ 2‐4 wks)

  • Consider scintigraphy – sensitive but non‐specific

 Management

  • Blood cultures rarely positive
  • Parenteral antibiotics (vanco, clinda) recommended

▪ In some series, patients did well without antibiotics

  • Follow ESR/CRP
slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Kodiak is a 4 week old boy brought in for

“crying nonstop”

 Seen by PCP yesterday, told it was colic  Not feeding well, and seems to cry more with

the 5 S’s….

 PMH: ex‐ 32 weeker, got “a few days” of

antibiotics after birth, no other illnesses

 T= 36.0, P 190, R 50, BP 90/50  Very fussy, inconsolable  Flat fontanelle, well‐perfused, no rash  Slight erythema/warmth/swelling of left calf

slide-6
SLIDE 6

NEXT STEPS?

 This is an ill‐appearing,

hypothermic neonate

 You obtain blood

cultures, a CRP/ESR and an LP

 Plain film of left leg:  Osteomyelitis of the tibia

 Hematogenous most likely cause in pediatrics  Multifocal disease > in neonates/S. aureus  Diagnosis:

  • CBC: most helpful to R/O other conditions
  • ESR/CRP: variable sensitivity (normal reassuring if

low suspicion); PCT may be better

  • Blood cultures: poor sensitivity, but helpful if +
  • Plain films: may show findings earlier in neonates
  • MRI: 97% sensitive/92% specific
slide-7
SLIDE 7

 Neonatal:

  • S. aureus (MRSA), E, Coli, GBS (late‐onset)
  • Vancomycin and cefotaxime

 Infants/kids:

  • S. aureus (MRSA), GAS: vancomycin
  • Kingella? Add cefazolin
  • Sickle cell? Add ceftriaxone

 Gobi is a 6 mo old girl, brought in for “crying

nonstop”

 Usually consolable when held, but now it

seems to make her cry more

 Dad notes that she seems to be breathing

fast, but otherwise has been afebrile, eating well, and no other symptoms

 No PCP identified, but has been “healthy”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 T 37.3, P 130, R 45, O2 sat 99%  Well‐nourished, comfortably tachypneic, no

rashes/bruises, smiles and coos when sitting in dad’s lap

 Screams when you pick her up, and will not

lie on her back

 You are able to range all of the limbs without

difficulty, the rest of the exam is normal

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Virtually

pathognomonic for abuse

 Can be missed on

plain films

 Let radiologist

know what you are looking for…

 Thoracic cage, sternum, scapula, spine  Metaphyseal corner lesions (MCL)/bucket

handle fractures

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“TODDLERS’ FRACTURE”

 Consider in infant/toddler

with limp

 May be due to unrecognized

trauma

  • When stable, minimal

symptoms

 Imaging: Multiple views may

be necessary

 Consider child abuse if:

  • Multiple fractures, < 12 mo,

mid‐shaft fracture

 13 yo Atlas has been limping for 3 mo  Complaining of L knee pain 4 months ago,

but able to play soccer

 Exam:

  • Well‐appearing, mildly obese male
  • Tanner IV, VS WNL for age
slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Lies with L leg

flexed and externally rotated

 Obligate external

rotation on flexion

  • f L hip

 Internal rotation of

L hip severely limited

 Knee exam normal

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Normal Abnormal

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 Fast facts:

  • Average age 11.2 in girls/12.7 in boys – decreasing?
  • Usually idiopathic, 20% bilateral
  • Black > Hispanic > Asian > Caucasian

 Diagnosis: AP and bilateral frog‐leg views  Management: surgical

  • Stable (90%) = able to weight bear
  • Unstable = NWB immediately (20‐50% risk of
  • steonecrosis)

 AP view  Frog’s Leg view

slide-14
SLIDE 14

 Avascular necrosis of the femoral head

  • Ischemia ‐> collapse ‐> remodeling
  • More common in boys, age 4‐8 at onset
  • Etiology: unknown (trauma, radiation, steroids

may also cause ANFH)

 Treatment: Immediate orthopedic referral  75% of cases resolve spontaneously with

remodeling of femoral head

 Ussuri is a 5 year old boy with 1 week of R

knee pain and limp

 Maybe fell playing soccer last week: not

getting better, knee seems swollen

 No previous bone/joint problems

slide-15
SLIDE 15

 T39.1, non‐toxic, pain with weight on R leg  R leg: knee is swollen, erythematous and

warm, with decreased extension/flexion

 Full ROM hip and ankle  Plain films show a small joint effusion  Labs:

  • WBC =12,000, ESR = 15, CRP =75 mg/dL

 TS = Self‐limited inflammation of hip/knee  Differentiation from septic arthritis?  Kocher criteria:

  • WBC > 12, ESR > 40, CRP > 2mg/dL, temp >38.5,

unable to bear weight

  • Validation? Variable PPV/NPV

 General principles:

  • No prediction rule has 100% NPV
  • If suspicion is low, and BOTH ESR/CRP are normal

(<20; <2) ‐> SA unlikely

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Most common cause of hip pain in kids 3‐10

years of age

 Etiology unknown  Management: NSAID’s, rest  1‐2% develop LCP  Joint aspiration reveals 40,000 WBC  What is your next step?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 Steroids prior to abx:

  • Reduce duration of sx, treatment and

hospitalization and improve long‐term outs

 Antibiotic choice

  • Vancomycin for good MRSA/GAS coverage
  • + cefotaxime in neonate (E Coli)
  • + consider cefazolin for Kingella in kids < 3
  • + ceftriaxone in teens/sickle cell

Harel 2011; Odio 2003

 Nandi is a 15 yo girl complaining of R knee

pain for 2 months

 Pain is intermittent, improves at night  Told she has “growing pains”  No specific trauma, but has been unable to

play basketball

 Exam: tender mass distal R thigh, otherwise

normal

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • A. Age 15
  • B. Improves at night
  • C. Unable to play basketball
  • D. Mass/tenderness on exam
  • E. All of the above

Osteosarcoma of distal femur

Calcified soft tissue mass Codman’s triangle

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 Osteosarcoma > Ewing’s  Peak age: 13‐16, boys:girls = 1.5:1  Delay in dx common: average 2‐3 mo  Clinical:

  • Intermittent pain, improves at night
  • Mass in 30‐40%
  • Long bones most frequently involved
  • Constitutional symptoms are rare

Ewing’s Sarcoma: Onion‐skinning

Pelvis> long bones

Osteosarcoma: sunburst reaction

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 Pedi orthopedic emergencies may present as crying,

limp or refusal to walk

  • Consider in neonates/infants with unexplained fever

 Diagnosis/Treatment:

  • MRI = study of choice for discitis, OM
  • Plain films sufficient to diagnose SCFE, LCP and

bone malignancies (but get the right views!)

  • CRP/ESR: if normal = reassuring against septic

arthritis (but get fluid if concern is high)

  • Steroids before antibiotics in SA enhances recovery
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Andrea Marmor, MD UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine May, 2014 FAST FACTS AND PEARLS FOR PEDIATRIC ORTHOPEDIC EMERGENCIES UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine, May 23, 2014 ▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 1. DISCITIS

Epidemiology:  Mean age of 2.8 years,  Duration of sx shorter with discitis than OM; less likely to be febrile than OM  Infectious etiology? Unclear. Organism rarely recovered  Delay in diagnosis is common (1‐2 weeks average) Clinical:  Infant: refusal to sit, uncomfortable with diaper change  Toddler: refusal to walk, progressive limp (63‐85%), may have back pain (27% in one study)  Crying/uncomfortable child, refusing to walk/sit, with normal hip/knee exam should raise concern for discitis  May be afebrile: more likely to be febrile with vertebral osteomyelitis (Fernandez, 2000) Labs:  ESR correlated best among inflammatory markers, but some patients have mildly elevated or normal ESR Radiography:  Plain film: disc narrowing usually visible 2‐4 wks after onset of sx

  • Fernandez, 2000: 76% had abnormal radiographs

 MRI: diagnostic in most (85‐100%), and may improve time to diagnosis Treatment:  Anti‐staphylococcal antibiotics (clinda or vanco in MRSA area) for 6 weeks  Case series have reported as high as 50% resolution without antibiotics (eg: Fernandez, 2000) ▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 2. OSTEOMYELITIS

Epidemiology  Incidence highest in 1st 5 years of life (1/2 are younger than 5)  In kids, a disease of healthy population Pathophysiology  Hematogenous source is most common type of OM in peds

  • Direct incolulation: rare in kids, most likely in foot (pseudomonas)

 Organisms vary by age: S aurus, H flu, GAS and GBS, enterobacter  S aureus may be associated with multiple sites  Long bones (femur, humerus, tibia) most often involved Clinical facts by age:  Neonate

  • Typically occurs in those with risk fx, including prematurity and previous infection (50%)
  • Multi‐focal disease more common (likely due to MRSA)
  • Fever may be absent
  • S aureus, GNR, GBS

 Toddlers:

  • Fever in 40‐80%, localized pain in 56‐95%
  • Limp often a presenting complaint: decreased mobility in 50‐85%
  • Unlike those with SA, passive ROM of joint may be normal
  • Vertebral infections: more likely involve the disc

Pearl: Consider discitis in the uncomfortable infant or toddler refusing to walk or sit, with a normal joint/bone exam

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Andrea Marmor, MD UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine May, 2014

  • S aureus and GAS

 Older Kids:

  • More likely to have localized pain
  • Brodie’s abscess: occurs most commonly in teens

Differential dx:  Neonate/Infant: occult fx, other infection, malignancy (rare) NM disorder,  Toddler/kid: septic arthritis, cellulitis, malignancy, bone infarction, Caffey’s disease (infantile cortical hyperostosis)/fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive Labs  Labs should be interpreted in light of clinical suspicion  ESR:

  • 70‐100% sensitive; lower sens in puncture‐related OM (Harris, 2011)

 CRP:

  • Prospective trial (Unkila‐Kallio): CRP performed as well as ESR
  • Jaakkola and Kehl: only 47% sensitive

 PCT better predictor of OM than other bone/joint infections, but sensitivity still poor

  • Butbul‐Aviel, 2005: PCT value was elevated in 7 patients (58.3%) with osteomyelitis, only

3 children (27.2%) with septic arthritis and NO children with other (benign) diagnoses  CBC

  • Generally lacks sens/spec, but may identify other conditions (eg: leukemia)
  • Lower sensitivity (12‐58%)

 Blood cultures

  • Poor sensitivity (< 50%) – but may be helpful in isolating organism (eg: Kingella –

fastidious org, longer to grow)

  • Only 40‐60% of bone cultures are +

Imaging:  Plain film: evidence by 10‐21 days (in neonates, may be apparent by 7‐10 days)  Scintigraphy may be useful when attempting to localize infection (80‐100% sens/70‐96% spec)  MRI: best imaging modality 97% sens/92% spec Treatment  Neonate: cefotaxime + vanco  Older infants/kids: vancomycin (+nafcillin if known MSSA)

  • Kingella; susc to cephalosporins but resistant to vanco/clinda: consider adding cefazolin

if suspected  Sickle cell; add ceftriaxone for salmonella/H. flu ▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 3. TODDLERS’ FRACTURE:
  • Definition: a spiral fracture of the distal tibia, typically associated with the accidental twisting of

the distal leg that occurs when a toddler catches their foot while running/walking

  • Toddlers’ fracture may be a subset of CAST fractures (childhood accidental spiral tibial fractures)
  • Accidental fractures typically occur in distal ½ of tibia, without displacement

Age:

  • In one series, 1/3 occur in kids < 3, NONE in kids < 12 mo (Mellick, 1999)
  • Overall, the majority of fractures of abuse occur in kids < 12 mo:

Pearl: Consider osteomyelitis in neonates with FWS, and cover empirically for GBS, enterococcus and S. aureus Pearl: Osteomyelitis is most often hematogenous in the pediatric population

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Andrea Marmor, MD UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine May, 2014

  • Accidental fx are RARE in kids < 12 mo

Diagnosis:

  • Initial radiographs may be normal in 43% of cases
  • Internal oblique view best for visualizing the spiral fracture

▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 4. SCFE

Epidemiology:  Average age: 12.7 years for boys and 11.2 years for girls,

  • Near the end of linear growth, prior to menarche/ Tanner IV
  • Age decreasing over time: earlier puberty?

 Lehmann (2006):

  • Rates almost 4 x higher in blacks, 2.5 x higher in Hispanics and 1.62x higher in

Asian/Pacific Islanders compared to white children  Obesity is recognized as a strongly associated factor of SCFE.

  • Increased BMI increases the shear stress across the physis, thus weakening it and

causing a slip. The varying surge and level of hormonal activity associated with adolescent growth spurt may also contribute to the cause of SCFE  Commonly bilateral (~20%)  Rarely the result of an endocrine or metabolic disorder  Delay in diagnosis worsens prognosis Clinical Factors:  History

  • Typically present with knee, hip, groin, thigh pain or all
  • May be trivial trauma or discomfort (painless limp also common)
  • Acute major trauma is rarely involved; gradual onset of symptoms and deformity

(external rotation) is more common  Exam:

  • Limited internal rotation is UNIVERSAL
  • External rotation of extremity
  • Obligatory external rotation with passive flexion of 90 degrees

Diagnosis:  Radiology: plain films diagnostic in most, although may be negative with early/posterior slip

  • AP and frog‐leg lateral (frog‐leg view more sensitive)
  • Important to visualize both hips
  • Klein’s line (AP view): line drawn along femoral neck should intersect the lateral portion
  • f the femoral head – if not, suspect SCFE

Management:  Treatment is surgical, with stabilization across the physis by in‐situ pinning  Urgency based on stability:

  • Stable = able to bear weight (>90%)
  • Manage surgically as soon as possible
  • May progress to a more severe or unstable slip
  • Unstable = unable to bear weight (even with support)
  • Make non‐weight bearing immediately and admit
  • Risk of osteonecrosis 20‐50%)

Pearl: A spiral tibial fracture in a child < 12 months should prompt concern for child abuse Pearl: Always get bilateral hip views in suspected SCFE: 20% are bilateral

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Andrea Marmor, MD UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine May, 2014 ▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 5. LEGG‐CALVE‐PERTHES DISEASE

 Idiopathic avascular necrosis of hip  Epidemiology/Presentation

  • Clinical: Insidious onset of limp, with pain often referred to thigh or knee
  • Peak incidence between 5 and 7 (seen between ages 3 and 12)
  • 10% of cases are familial
  • Male: female ratio = 4:1

 Exam: Limited internal rotation of hip, may result in atrophy of thigh/buttocks

  • Galeazzi test (leg length discrepancy) and Trendelenberg test (for unilateral gluteal

muscle weakness) may be positive

  • Trendelenburg test also abnormal in SCFE, DDH ‐ suggests hip pathology

 Diagnosis:

  • Generally visible on plain film, although initial radiographs may be normal
  • Obtain AP and lateral films, and views of both hips.
  • Repeat if symptoms persistent

 Management: make NON‐WT‐BEARING immediately, and obtain orthopedic consultation ▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 6. SKELETAL MALIGNANCIES: OSTEOSARCOMA VS EWING’S SARCOMA

Osteosarcoma Ewing’s Sarcoma “Growing pains” Origin Primitive bone mesenchyme Poorly differentiatiated (?mesenchyme?) Unknown (NOT caused by growth!) Gender Boys > girls (1.5:1) Boys > girls (1.5:1) Girls> boys Age Peak 13‐16 (growth spurt) Adults > 65 Peak 13‐16 Can be seen into 40’s 2‐12 years Race Black> Caucasian Caucasian> Black/Asian None Frequency Rare; most common bone malignancy Rare; 2nd most common bone malignancy Common (10‐20%) Location Metaphyses of long bones (distal femur> proximal tibia, proximal humerus) Pelvis > metaphysis/diaphysis of LE long bones > spine More common in lower extremities Clinical Signs/ Symptoms  Intermittent local pain/ tenderness  Rarely at night  +/‐ mass (~30‐40%)  Average 2‐3 months duration  Constitutional symptoms rare  Intermittent local pain/ tenderness  Rarely at night  +/‐ mass (~30‐40%)  Average 3‐4 mo duration  Constitutional symptoms: 10‐ 20%  Nightly bilateral, deep pain in thigh/calf  Absent during day  No physical findings  Chronic, episodic pattern  Otherwise normal activity Radiographic appearance  Lytic/sclerotic mass  Calcified soft tissue mass  “Sunburst” periosteal reaction  “Moth‐eaten” lytic/sclerotic mass  “Onion‐skinning” of periosteum None Pearl: Findings suggestive of a SCFE in younger child (5‐7 years of age) should prompt concern for Legg‐Calve‐Perthes Disease

Pearl: “Growing pains” should never cause pain during the day, or interfere with activity

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Andrea Marmor, MD UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine May, 2014 ▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 7. SEPTIC ARTHRITIS

Epidemiology/Pathophysiology  80% lower extremity (hip and knee most common)  10 % more than one joint Causes  Neonates/infants = GBS, N. gonorrhea, E.coli, S. aureus  Infants/Toddlers: S. aureus (including MRSA) + Kingella kingae

  • Kingella = gram negative coccobacillus, an emerging pediatric pathogen
  • Nationwide study of Kingella (Dubnov‐Raz, 2010):
  • 96% of children with Kingella were <3
  • 53% of infections were skeletal infections
  • 43% of infections were bacteremia

Diagnosis  Also consider: Toxic Synovitis, JIA, post‐strep arthritis, serum sickness, trauma, SCFE, LCP  Labs:

  • ESR and CRP better negative than positive predictors
  • Eg: CRP < 1 mg/dL has NPV of 87% (Levine 2003)
  • CRP peaks 36‐50hrs after onset of infection
  • PCT a poor predictor: only 27% sensitivity in one study (Butbul‐Aviel, 2005)

 Radiography

  • Plain radiographs:
  • May demonstrate joint effusion, but not sensitive
  • Frog leg view of hips: may increase sensitivity for joint effusion
  • Better to R/O other bone abnormalities
  • Ultrasound:
  • May identify and quantify joint effusion, high NPV for hip arthritis
  • Bone scan:
  • Generally not indicated, unless searching for a source of fever, or osteo

suspected

  • MRI:
  • May help distinguish b/w SA and TS/
  • Can evaluate comcominant osteo or abscess

 Fluid:

  • Best diagnostic test, but studies inconsistent due to varying gold standards
  • Higher WBC associated with higher likelihood of SA
  • WBC > 50 K with > 90% neuts suggests SA, but is not 100% sensitive or specific

Treatment  Antibiotics

  • Neonate (< 3 mo):
  • Bugs: S. aureus, GBS, E. Coli
  • Drugs: vanco + ceftriaxone or cefotaxime
  • Consider gonorrhea if risk factors present
  • Infants/kids (> 3 mo):
  • Bugs: S. aureus, GAS (Kingella in kids < 3 yrs)
  • Drugs: vancomycin or clindamycin
  • Consider adding cefazolin for Kingella in kids < 3 years
  • Consider adding CTX in teens (N. gonorrhea) or sickle cell (Salmonella spp)

 Corticosteroids:

  • Dexamethasone before antibiotics speeds recovery and improves long‐term outcomes
  • Harel 2011: Shortened duration of fever, inflammation, parenteral therapy and

hospital stay

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Andrea Marmor, MD UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine May, 2014

  • Odio 2003: Shortened hospital stay and reduction in residual dysfunction at 6

and 12 months

  • Recs: Dexamethasone 0.15mg/kg IV before antibiotics, and q6h for 4 days

▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

  • 8. SEPTIC ARTHRITIS (SA) VS TRANSIENT SYNOVITIS (TS)
  • Both present with similar symptoms, in similar joints, and in similar patient populations
  • Multiple studies have attempted to develop a clinical prediction rule that can identify children at

low risk of SA Kocher Criteria

  • Kocher (1999) found that 5 findings were associated with septic arthritis (99.7% positive

predictive value, AUC of .96)

  • 1. Fever ≥38.5º C (101ºF)
  • 2. Inability to bear weight
  • 3. White blood cell count >12,000/mm3
  • 4. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate >40 mm per hour
  • 5. C‐reactive protein > 2.0 mg/dL (20 mg/L)

Subsequent Validation of Kocher criteria:

  • PPV varies from 59‐93% in retrospective and prospective studies (Kocher 2004, Luhmann 2004,

Caird 2006),

  • NPV only 83% (Caird)

Other predictive models:  Luhmann, 2004 (retrospective)

  • 3 variables had PPV of 71% for septic arthritis:
  • 1. History of fever
  • 2. WBC of >12K
  • 3. Previous health‐care visit

 Singhal, 2007 (retrospective)

  • A CRP > 20 mg/l had OR of 81.9
  • 2 determinants
  • 1. Weight‐bearing status
  • 2. CRP > 20 mg/l
  • Absence of both: < 1% had septic arthritis
  • Presence of both: 74% had septic arthritis

 Pakkonen, 2010 (prospective)

  • Best sensitivity (98%) for SA with combined ESR (>20) and CRP (>20 mg/L)

 Caird 2006 (prospective)

  • C‐reactive protein level of >2.0 mg/dL (>20 mg/L) was a strong independent risk factor and

a valuable tool for assessing and diagnosing children suspected of having septic arthritis of the hip. Pearl: In differentiation SA and TS, take into account the entire clinical picture

  • If suspicion is high, obtain hip ultrasound and arthrocentesis even if labs are normal
  • If suspicion is low, and CRP/ESR are normal, unlikely to have SA
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Andrea Marmor, MD UCSF High Risk Emergency Medicine May, 2014 ▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪ REFERENCES: 1. Arthurs OJ, et al. The toddler refusing to weight‐bear: a revised imaging guide from a case series. Emerg Med J 2009;26:797‐801 2. Bhatia NN, Pirpiris M, Otsuka NY. Body mass index in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Mar‐Apr;26(2):197‐9. 3. Brown R, Hussain M, McHugh K, et al. Discitis in young children.J Joint Bone Surgery (Br)2001;83‐B:106– 11. 4. Butbul‐Aviel Y, et al. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic aid in osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. Pediatr Emerg

  • Care. 2005 Dec;21(12):828‐32.

5. Caird MS, et al. Factors distinguishing septic arthritis from transient synovitis of the hip in children. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1251‐7. 6. Dodwell ER. Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in children: current concepts. Curr Opin Pediatr 2013; 25(1): 58‐63 7. Dubnov‐Raz G, et al. Invasive pediatric Kingella kingae infections: a nationwide collaborative study. Pediatr Infect Dis 2010; 29(7): 639‐43 8. Fernandez M, Carrol CL, Baker CJ Discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis in children: an 18‐year review.

  • Pediatrics. 2000;105(6):1299

9. Gholve PA, Cameron DB, Millis MB. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009 Feb;21(1):39‐45.

  • 10. Harris JC, et al. How useful are laboratory investigations in the emergency department evaluation of

possible osteomyelitis? Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Jun;23(3):317‐30

  • 11. Harel L, et al. Dexamethasone therapy for septic arthritis in children: results of a randomized controlled
  • study. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31(2): 211‐5
  • 12. Karabouta Z, et al. Discitis in toddlers: a case series and review. Acta Paediatrica 2005; 94(10): 1516‐1518
  • 13. Kocher MS et al. Validation of a clinical prediction rule for the differentiation between septic arthritis and

transient synovitis of the hip in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86‐A(8): 1629‐35

  • 14. Lehmann C, et al. The epidemiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an update. J Pediatr Orth 2006;

26(3): 286‐290

  • 15. Loder RT, Starnes T, Dikos G, Aronsson DD. Demographic predictors of severity of stable slipped capital

femoral epiphyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88:97–105.

  • 16. Luhmann SJ, et al. Differentiation between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children

with clinical prediction algorithms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86‐A(5): 956‐62

  • 17. McCarville MB. The child with bone pain: malignancies and mimickers. Cancer Imaging. 2009 Oct 2;9 Spec

No A:S115‐21.

  • 18. Mellick LB, et al. Childhood accidental spiral tibial (CAST) fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care 1999; 15(5): 307‐9
  • 19. Odio CM, et al. Double blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of dexamethasone therapy for

hematogenous septic arthritis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22(10): 883‐889

  • 20. Pääkkönen M, Kallio MJ, Kallio PE, Peltola H. Sensitivity of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‐reactive

protein in childhood bone and joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):861‐6. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

  • 21. Singhal R, Perry DC, et al. The use of CRP within a clinical prediction algorithm for the differentiation of

septic arthritis and transient synovitis in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Nov;93(11):1556‐61.

  • 22. Sultan J,Hughes PJ. Septic arthritis or transient synovitis of the hip in children: the value of clinical

prediction algorithms. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(9): 1289‐93

  • 23. Widhe B, Widhe T. Initial symptoms and clinical features in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. J Bone

Joint Surg 2000; 82(5): 667‐