Recent progress on anti-kaon--nucleon interactions and dibaryon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Recent progress on anti-kaon--nucleon interactions and dibaryon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Recent progress on anti-kaon--nucleon interactions and dibaryon resonances Yoichi IKEDA (RIKEN, Nishina Center) Recent progress in hadron physics --From hadrons to quark and gluon-- @Yonsei Univ., Korea, Feb.19, 2013. Outline of
Outline of lectures
- Chiral symmetry in QCD
- Chiral effective field theory (chiral perturbation theory)
- Antikaon - nucleon interactions and nature of Λ(1405)
✦ Chiral symmetry and chiral dynamics ✦ Antikaon in nuclei
- Antikaon-nucleon potentials model based on chiral dynamics
- Faddeev equations to handle three-body dynamics (KbarNN - πYN coupled system)
- Possible spectrum of KbarNN - πYN system
✦ Hadron interactions from lattice QCD
- Introduction to lattice QCD
- Hadron scattering on the lattice
- Application to meson-baryon scattering
(2) Antikaon in Nuclei
Kbar-N and Kbar-nuclear physics
✓ KbarN (I=0) interaction is...
- coupled with πΣ channel
- strongly attractive
➡ quasi-bound state of Λ(1405)
- Chiral unitary model --> two-pole structure, (KbarN: bound, πΣ: resonance)
✓ Quest for quasi-bound Kbar-NN systems
- FINUDA, DISTO, J-PARC (E15, E27), ...
√s[MeV]
πΣ : 1330[MeV] ¯ KN : 1435[MeV]
Λ(1405)
Phenomenological construction of KbarN interaction leads to dense Kbar-nuclei Central density is much larger than normal nuclei <-- Λ(1405) doorway process to dense matter
Akaishi, Yamazaki, PRC65 (2002). Dote, Horiuchi, Akaishi, Yamazaki, PRC70 (2004).
✓ KbarN interaction is a fundamental building block for applications
Kbar -- few-nucleon system
Phenomenological parametrization:
Gaussian form of KbarN potential (Akaishi-Yamazaki potential)
V AY
ij
(r) = CI
ijexp
⇥ −(r/a0)2⇤
Free parameters: coupling constant & range parameter 1) KbarN scattering lengths in I=0, 1 from partial wave analysis by Martin (’81) 2) Λ(1405) binding energy with KbarN bound state ansatz
Akaishi, Yamazaki, PRC65 (2002).
i, j = KbarN, πΣ, πΛ Kbar -- few-nucleon dynamics: G-matrix: G-matrix = T-matrix + Pauli blocking Many-body technique applied to Kbar-few-nucleon systems Kbar-nucleus optical potential is constructed...
Kbar -- few-nucleon system (contd.)
“Kaonic nuclear states” in few-body systems Strange dibaryon as KbarNN bound state Binding energy : 48MeV (below KbarNN threshold) Width : 61MeV
Akaishi, Yamazaki, PRC65 (2002).
Phenomenological Kbar – nucleus optical potential These works motivate recent activities... testing ground: KbarNN simplest system Structures of “antikaonic” nuclei : Anti-symmetrized Molecular Dynamics (AMD) Phenomenological construction of KbarN interaction leads to dense Kbar-nuclei Central density is much larger than normal nuclei <- Λ(1405) doorway process to dense matter
Dote, Horiuchi, Akaishi, Yamazaki, PRC70 (2004).
4fm 4fm p
K-
n p
K-
p p
Experimental studies
B.E.=115MeV Width=67MeV
Stopped K- reaction on 6Li, 7Li and 12C targets (FINUDA exp.)
Enhancement ~100MeV below KbarNN threshold
- -> main component is KbarNN?
Enhancement as signal of KbarNN
fit region
pp->pΛK+ (DISTO exp.)
B.E.=105MeV Width=118MeV Enhancement as signal of KbarNN
Kbar -- few-nucleon system
“Kaonic nuclear states” in few-body systems Strange dibaryon as KbarNN bound state Binding energy : 48MeV (below KbarNN threshold) Width : 61MeV
Akaishi, Yamazaki, PRC65 (2002).
Phenomenological Kbar – nucleus optical potential Key issue of this investigation is KbarN-πΣ resonance, Λ(1405) l It will be very important to take into account full dynamics of KbarN-πΣ system in order to investigate energy of strange dibaryon system More realistic calculations: coupled-channel 1) Effective KbarN potential from bare KbarN-πΣ potential 2) Faddeev equations in coupled-channel formalism
Coupled-channel Faddeev approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction
Overview
Variational approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction 48 17-23 40-80 16 61 40-70 40-85 42 Phenomenological optical potential [1] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [2] Phenomenological potential [3] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [4] 50-70 45-80 9-16 90-110 45-75 34-46 Phenomenological potential [5] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-indep.) [6] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-dep.) [7]
[1] Akaishi, Yamazaki, PLB535, 70 (2002); PRC76, 045201 (2007). [2] Dote, Hyodo, Weise, NPA804, 197 (2008); PRC79, 014003 (2009). [3] Wycech, Green, PRC79, 014001 (2009). [4] Barnea, Gal, Liverts, PLB712, 132 (2012).
- Binding energy and width of quasi-bound [Kbar[NN]I=1]
[5] Shevchenko, Gal, Mares, (+Revay,) PRL98, 082301 (2007); PRC76, 044004 (2007). [6] Ikeda, Sato, PRC76, 035203 (2007); PRC79, 035201 (2009). [6] Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, PTP124, 533 (2010).
Coupled-channel Faddeev approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction
Overview
Variational approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction
[2] Dote, Hyodo, Weise, NPA804, 197 (2008); PRC79, 014003 (2009). [3] Wycech, Green, PRC79, 014001 (2009). [4] Barnea, Gal, Liverts, PLB712, 132 (2012).
- Binding energy and width of quasi-bound [Kbar[NN]I=1]
[5] Shevchenko, Gal, Mares, (+Revay,) PRL98, 082301 (2007); PRC76, 044004 (2007). [6] Ikeda, Sato, PRC76, 035203 (2007); PRC79, 035201 (2009). [6] Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, PTP124, 533 (2010).
Energy independent
[1] Akaishi, Yamazaki, PLB535, 70 (2002); PRC76, 045201 (2007).
48 17-23 40-80 16 61 40-70 40-85 42 Phenomenological optical potential [1] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [2] Phenomenological potential [3] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [4] 50-70 45-80 9-16 90-110 45-75 34-46 Phenomenological potential [5] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-indep.) [6] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-dep.) [7]
[6] Ikeda, Sato, PRC76, 035203 (2007); PRC79, 035201 (2009). [5] Shevchenko, Gal, Mares, (+Revay,) PRL98, 082301 (2007); PRC76, 044004 (2007). [3] Wycech, Green, PRC79, 014001 (2009).
Coupled-channel Faddeev approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction
Overview
Variational approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction
[2] Dote, Hyodo, Weise, NPA804, 197 (2008); PRC79, 014003 (2009). [4] Barnea, Gal, Liverts, PLB712, 132 (2012).
- Binding energy and width of quasi-bound [Kbar[NN]I=1]
[6] Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, PTP124, 533 (2010).
Energy dependent
[1] Akaishi, Yamazaki, PLB535, 70 (2002); PRC76, 045201 (2007).
48 17-23 40-80 16 61 40-70 40-85 42 Phenomenological optical potential [1] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [2] Phenomenological potential [3] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [4] 50-70 45-80 9-16 90-110 45-75 34-46 Phenomenological potential [5] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-indep.) [6] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-dep.) [7]
[4] Barnea, Gal, Liverts, PLB712, 132 (2012). [6] Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, PTP124, 533 (2010). [2] Dote, Hyodo, Weise, NPA804, 197 (2008); PRC79, 014003 (2009). [6] Ikeda, Sato, PRC76, 035203 (2007); PRC79, 035201 (2009). [5] Shevchenko, Gal, Mares, (+Revay,) PRL98, 082301 (2007); PRC76, 044004 (2007). [3] Wycech, Green, PRC79, 014001 (2009).
Coupled-channel Faddeev approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction
Overview
Variational approach
B [MeV] Γ two-body input: KbarN interaction
- Binding energy and width of quasi-bound [Kbar[NN]I=1]
Topics covered...
[1] Akaishi, Yamazaki, PLB535, 70 (2002); PRC76, 045201 (2007).
48 17-23 40-80 16 61 40-70 40-85 42 Phenomenological optical potential [1] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [2] Phenomenological potential [3] Effective chiral SU(3) potential [4] 50-70 45-80 9-16 90-110 45-75 34-46 Phenomenological potential [5] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-indep.) [6] Chiral SU(3) potential (E-dep.) [7]
Effective KbarN potential
- KbarN-πY coupled-channel system:
Feshbach projection --> equivalent KbarN single-channel effective potential
tKN-KN
veff veff
+ =
tKN-KN N K N N N N N N K K K K K K
veff
π Y N N K K
= + + + ……
π π Y Y
Equivalent KbarN single-channel effective potential is...
- Highly energy dependent due to presence of Λ(1405)
- Complex (imaginary parts: decay to πY channels)
Hyodo, Weise, PRC77 (2008).
Effective KbarN potential (contd.)
- In chiral SU(3) dynamics, tow-pole structure of Λ(1405) is predicted...
➡ different spectral maxima in KbarN and πΣ channels
Chiral effective KbarN potential must be constructed to reproduce..
- spectral maximum at 1420MeV (NOT 1405MeV)
Hyodo, Weise, PRC77 (2008).
- Chiral KbarN subthreshold amplitude
- Chiral πΣ amplitude
KbarN πΣ Chiral effective potential AY potential
Effective KbarN potential (contd.)
- Above KbarN threshold : good agreement in both models
- KbarN subthreshold : large deviation
➡ Chiral SU(3) dynamics predicts significantly weaker subthreshold attraction
than AY potential
➡ Solve Schrodinger equation for 3-body KbarNN system ➡ Weak binding system of KbarNN (+c.c.) system; B.E.~20MeV
Hyodo, Weise, PRC77 (2008).
Question: 1) Where is 3-body πΣN pole in chiral SU(3) dynamics? 2) If it exists, can the pole affect 3-body spectrum like Λ(1405)?
- -> explicit dynamics of πΣN system is important
- -> Coupled-channel Faddeev approach
Potential model of KbarN interaction
- Starting with Tomozawa-Weinberg term
Weinberg, PRL 17, 616 (1966). Tomozawa, Nuov. Cim. 46A, 707 (1966).
Φ : PS meson fields , B : baryon fields
LTW = i 8f 2 tr[ ¯ Bγµ[vµ, B]]
vµ = Φ(∂µΦ) − (∂µΦ)Φ + · · ·
derive the potentials from tree level amplitudes
Vij(E) = Cij 2f 2
π
(2E − Mi − Mj)
Energy-dependent potential (E-dep.)
Cij = λSU(3)
ij
/(16π2√ωiωj)
Non-perturbative dynamics through Lippmann-Schwinger eq. Phenomenological dipole form factor to regularize loop integrals
Tij(pi, pj; E) = Vij(pi.pj) + X
n
Z dqnq2
nVin(pi, qn)
1 E − En(qn) − ⇥n(qn) + iTnj(qn, pj; E)
Vij → gi(pi)Vijgj(pj)
gi(pi) = ( Λ2
i
p2
i + Λ2 i
)2
Vij = Cij 2f 2
π
(mi + mj)
Energy-independent potential (E-indep.)
...energy dependence is fixed at threshold
dN dm ∝ |tπΣ−πΣ|2pc.m.
Cross section & mass spectrum
Cutoff of dipole form factor is determined to reproduce K-p cross section data
dN dm ∝ |tπΣ−πΣ|2pc.m.
E-dep. potential E-indep. potential
Λ(1405) pole position
two resonance poles
Jido et al., NPA723, 205 (2003). Hyodo, Weise, PRC77, 035204 (2008).
|t| πΣ KbarN
One resonance pole
|t| πΣ KbarN
Vij = Cij 2f 2
π
(mi + mj)
Vij(E) = Cij 2f 2
π
(2E − Mi − Mj)
Pole positions of the Λ(1405) [(ΛKN, ΛπΣ)=(1000, 700)MeV]
Different subthreshold KbarN amplitudes would contribute to the energy of strange dibaryon
Three-body equations
Faddeev Equations
! W : 3-body scattering energy ! i(j) = 1, 2, 3 (Spectator particles) ! T(W)=T1(W)+T2(W)+T3(W) (T : 3-body amplitude) ! ti(W, E(pi)) : 2-body t-matrix with spectator particle i ! G0(W) : 3-body Green’s function
Three-body equations (contd.)
Alt-Grassberger-Sandhas (AGS) equations Xi,j(~ pi, ~ pj; W ) = (1 − i,j)Zi,j(~ pi, ~ pj; W )
+ X
i6=n
Z d~ pnZi,n(~ pi, ~ pn; W )⌧n(~ pn; W )Xi,j(~ pn, ~ pj; W )
Xij Xij τn = +
Faddeev equations
(Separable two-body interactions)
Ti(W ) = ti(W, E(pi)) + X
j6=i
ti(W, E(pi))G0(W )Tj(W )
ti(W, E(pi)) = vi + viG0(W )ti(W, E(pi))
vi = |giii(W, ~ pi)hgi|
Coupled-channel AGS equations
! Z(pi,pj;W) : Particle exchange potentials ! τ(pn;W) : Isobar propagators KbarNN-πYN coupled-channel formalism
π Σ, , Λ$ Λ$ K N N N N N N N K Σ, , Λ$ Λ$ Σ, , Λ$ Λ$ π π
Alt-Grassberger-Sandhas (AGS) equations --> KbarNN - πΣN - πΛN Xi,j(~ pi, ~ pj; W ) = (1 − i,j)Zi,j(~ pi, ~ pj; W )
+ X
i6=n
Z d~ pnZi,n(~ pi, ~ pn; W )⌧n(~ pn; W )Xi,j(~ pn, ~ pj; W )
Xij Xij τn = +
Model space
Three-body couple-channel analysis is performed by taking into account all s-wave 2-body scatterings in KbarNN-πYN system with JP=0- Meson-Baryon KbarN-πΣ (I=0) KbarN-πΣ-πΛ (I=1) πN (I=1/2, 3/2) Baryon-Baryon NN (I=1) ΛN-ΣN (I=1/2) ΣN (I=3/2) Only the mesonic-decay modes are taken into account t
S11 phase shift S31 phase shift Exp. Exp. Our scattering length Our scattering length
Model of pN interactions
Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, PTP124, 533 (2010). Ikeda, Sato,PRC76, 035203 (2007);PRC79, 035201 (2009).
Results on resonance energies
KbarNN : 2370 πΣN : 2267 E (MeV) 100 200 300 Γ (MeV) ~15MeV(shallow) ~55MeV(deep) ~35MeV Blue : E-dep. Red : E-indep.
Vij = Cij 2f 2
π
(mi + mj)
Vij(E) = Cij 2f 2
π
(2E − Mi − Mj)
(E, Γ) = (2312-2326, 34-40) MeV (Energy independent potential) (E, Γ) = (2354-2361, 34-46) & (2281-2303, 244-320) MeV (Energy dependent potential)
- Resonance energies are determined by the pole of 3-body amplitudes
- Two poles in E-dep model are found,
but πΣN pole has huge width (250-320MeV)
Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, PTP124, 533 (2010). Ikeda, Sato,PRC76, 035203 (2007);PRC79, 035201 (2009).
Signature of strange dibaryon
Ohnishi, Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, arXiv:1302.2301 [nucl-th] (2013).
- Examine possible signatures of strange dibaryon in kaon- and photo-productions
( e.g.) E15@J-PARC, LEPS@SPring-8)
- Calculation of “breakup probability” of (KbarN)I=0N-->πΣN reaction
=
X τ g X τ g X τ g X τ g
+ + +
Signature of strange dibaryon (contd.)
- Break-up probability of (KbarN)I=0N --> πΣN reaction
E-indep potential: peak around 2310MeV E-dep potential: bump around 2350MeV
Ohnishi, Ikeda, Kamano, Sato, arXiv:1302.2301 [nucl-th] (2013).
W (MeV) 100 200 300 Γ (MeV) ~15MeV(shallow) ~55MeV(deep) ~35MeV Blue : E-dep. Red : E-indep.
Signature of strange dibaryon (contd.)
Summary -- antikaon in nuclei --
Energy of strange dibaryon:
- Phenomenological potential / E-indep models --> deep quasi-bound KbarNN state
- Chiral SU(3) potential models --> shallow quasi-bound KbarNN state
Effective KbarN potential:
- Start with coupled-channel
- Feshbach projection onto KbarN channel --> effective KbarN potential
√s[MeV]
πΣ : 1330[MeV] ¯ KN : 1435[MeV]
Λ(1405)
Signatures in amplitudes
- Enhancement observed
- Effect of πΣN pole seems quite small due to huge width
- Comparison with experiment: