recent results and surprises from ultrarelativistic heavy
play

Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CMS PHENIX LHCb Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions STAR ALICE Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus, CERN sPHENIX ATLAS XIII. Strong and Electroweak Matter June 2018 Short recapitulation: Basic Concepts


  1. CMS PHENIX LHCb Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions STAR ALICE Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus, CERN sPHENIX ATLAS XIII. Strong and Electroweak Matter June 2018

  2. Short recapitulation: Basic Concepts Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 2

  3. A Heavy-Ion Collision dN ch /d h up to 2000 particles Time particle detection t = 4 cm/c kinetic freeze-out t = 10 fm/c chemical freeze-out hadronization hydrodynamic evolution pre-equilibrium t = ~1 fm/c collision t = 0 fm/c Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 3

  4. Centrality & Glauber • Activity depends strongly on impact parameter b – Few to 1600 nucleon-nucleon collisions Multiplicity vs. b Central Peripheral b ~ 0 b ~ R e.g. “0 - 5%” e.g. “60 - 90%” • Accessible experimentally – N ch and S E T grows with decreasing b • Soft (low p T ) ~ participants (N part ) from Glauber • Hard (high p T ) ~ collisions (N coll ) calculations / MC Plot: A. Toia Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 4

  5. Flow • Overlap region of colliding nuclei is not isotropic • Spatial anisotropy (almond shape)  different pressure gradient  momentum-space anisotropy (particle level) • “Classical” picture: Overlap of nuclei  elliptic flow (v 2 ) • “Today’s” picture y – Initial state density fluctuations  higher-order anisotropies x • Fourier coefficients v n of single-particle distribution wrt n th order participant plane   e 3 dN       A 1 2 v cos n ( )  e 4 n n n d Traditional wisdom: needs significant reinteractions between medium constituents / small Knudsen number Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 5

  6. Particle Production and Hadronization Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 6

  7. Particle Yields in Pb-Pb 5 TeV 12 different particles 7 orders of magnitude p f p L X W K K 0 K * d 3 L H 3 He Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 7

  8. Experimental Effort: Particle Identification Direct particle identification p K p d 3 He 3 H Displaced vertices S  p p (c t = 2.7 cm) K 0 L  p p (c t = 7.9 cm) Invariant mass f  K K K *  K p p X p Cascade L X  L + p  p p p p W  L + K  p p K Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 8

  9. Particle Yields in Pb-Pb 5 TeV Fit with statistical (thermal) model • Relativistic ideal quantum gas of hadrons 3 parameters: V, T, m B • At LHC, m B ~ 1 MeV, fixed by • antip/p ratio T = 153 MeV (3 MeV lower than at 2.76 TeV due to proton yield) Particle yields well described by equilibrium thermal models over 7 orders of magnitude p f p L X W K K 0 K * d 3 L H 3 He Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 9

  10. System Comparison Strangeness enhancement Deuteron enhancement pp K* Suppression p-Pb Pb-Pb p ? Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 10

  11. Particle Yields in Pb-Pb 5 TeV Nuclei! p f p L X W K K 0 K * d 3 L H 3 He Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 11

  12. Nuclei: Production Mechanism • Heavy and fragile objects in agreement with S 3 vs.  s NN thermal model at chemical freeze out • Open puzzle: No re-scattering of anti-nuclei in hadronic phase despite large dissociation cross-section • Naïve coalescence after kinetic freeze-out S 3 = 1 does not describe the data Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 12

  13. Parton-Medium Interactions Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 13

  14. R AA vs. p T R AA Particles • HI collision more than superposition of nucleon- nucleon collisions with incoherent fragmentation? dN / dp R AA = 1  no modification  AA T R AA N dN / dp R AA != 1  medium effects coll pp T • Charged particles up 400 GeV/c • Jets up to 1 TeV R AA vs. p T • p T dependence Jets – Hadrons: consistent with constant D E – Jets: suggest increase of Δ E vs E – More insight: D. Pablos @ QM Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 14

  15. g -Jet Correlations p T, g g • Photon: fixes initial parton energy dN/dx J g vs. x J g p T,jet Significant difference central Pb-Pb vs. pp ATLAS-CONF-2018-009 x J g = p T,jet / p T, g Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 15

  16. dN/dz g vs. z g Jet Substructure PRL 120 (2018) 142302 • Techniques applied in pp collisions extended to Pb-Pb collisions • Resolve inner structure of a jet • Challenge: large background contribution from underlying event • Example: z g of two leading sub jets min( p , p )  T 1 T 2 z  g p p T 1 T 2 asymmetric splittings symmetric splittings  increase  decrease Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 16

  17. v 2 vs. p T Charm • Are there sufficient interactions between medium and heavy quarks? – Charm v 2 > 0 – Charm quarks flow with the medium • How are charmed hadrons formed at freeze out? L c /D 0 vs. p T D s /D 0 vs. p T L c /D ratio larger than in pp – – D s /D 0 ratio larger than in pp L c and D s give large contribution – to total cross-section Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 17

  18. Y Suppression • Sequential suppression for Y family – Y(3S) limit for now • Clear hierarchy, no clear turn-on • Smooth evolution of T with centrality R AA vs. N part R AA vs. N part R AA vs. N part CMS-HIN-16-023 arXiv:1805.04387 Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 18

  19. Parity Violation in the Strong Interaction Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 19

  20. Chiral Magnetic Effect • Spectator charge causes large magnetic field (~10 18 Gauss) Y – Aligns spins • Domains with non-zero topological charge (local)  chirality flip • Leads to charge separation • Experimental correlator – Same sign = signal – Opposite sign = control Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 20

  21. g 112 vs. centrality Earlier Results PRL110 (2013), 012301 • Signal observed increasing with increasing centrality • Magnitude similar at 0.2 TeV (STAR) and 2.76 TeV (ALICE) • Magnitude similar in Pb-Pb and p-Pb g 112 /v 2 vs. N ch PRL118 (2017), 122301 • Issue: Large backgrounds due to local charge conservation (resonance decays, momentum conservation, parton fragmentation) Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 21

  22. Event Shape Engineering nucl-ex/0701025 • Large event-by-event variation of v n • Final-state v 2 correlated with initial-state eccentricities e 2 (hydro with small h /s) • At fixed centrality, split events by event-by-event v 2 (q vector) [Schukraft, Timmins, Voloshin (PLB719 (2013) 394)] v 2 vs. p T elliptic Large q 2  large v 2 round Small q 2  small v 2 PRC 93, 034916 (2016) peripheral central • CME backgrounds proportional to v 2 – Possibility to constrain background Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 22

  23. f CME vs. centrality Latest Results ALICE, PLB 777, 151 • Event shape engineering, modelling of magnetic field + initial state models allows limit on CME • f CME = maximal signal contribution in correlator – Limit set on signal 7% at 95 C.L. • Isobar run planned at RHIC this year – Test Z 2 magnetic field dependence f CME vs. N ch CMS, PRC 97 (2018) 044912 Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 23

  24. Small Systems p-Pb d-Au pp Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 24

  25. Paradigm Shift   dN       A 1 2 v cos n ( )  n n n d Traditional wisdom: needs significant reinteractions between medium constituents / small Knudsen number Significantly challenged in recent years ! Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 25

  26. Two-Particle Correlation Away-side jet + flow ( D ~ p , elongated in Dh ) h f Beam axis Near-side jet + resonances, ... ( D ~ 0, Dh ~ 0) Near-side flow ridge ( D ~ 0, elongated in Dh ) Recent Results and Surprises from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions - Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend