Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 CP violation effects in multibody - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

frontiers of fundamental physics 14
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 CP violation effects in multibody - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 CP violation effects in multibody B decays Jeremy Dalseno on behalf of the LHCb collaboration J.Dalseno [at] bristol.ac.uk 18 July 2014 CP violation effects in multibody B decays 1 Outline 1. Motivation 2.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

Jeremy Dalseno

  • n behalf of the LHCb collaboration

J.Dalseno [at] bristol.ac.uk 18 July 2014

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • 1. Motivation
  • 2. LHCb Detector
  • 3. B± → K±K+K− and B± → K±π+π− (penguin dominated)
  • 4. B± → π±K+K− and B± → π±π+π− (tree dominated)
  • 5. B± → K±p¯

p and B± → π±p¯ p

  • 6. Summary

Dalitz plot contains all kinematic and dynamic information of decay Amplitude analysis one of the most powerful techniques Extract amplitude-level information rather than amplitude-squared information Interference between intermediate states allows measurement of relative magnitudes and phases

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation

Charmless B → 3h decay channels provide a rich environment for physics observables Unknown heavy particle in the loop could carry a new CP violating phase

b u s q q u

  • W

g

xb

V *

xs

V x x = u, c, t b u s q q u ? g

Tree sensitive to γ = φ3 ≡ − arg

  • VudV ∗

ub

VcdV ∗

cb

  • b

u s u u u

  • W

γ ∝

ub

V β α γ *

ub

V

ud

V *

cb

V

cd

V *

tb

V

td

V

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motivation

In charged B decays, presence of multiple amplitudes may lead to direct CP violation

A(B → f) =

i |Ai|ei(δi+φi)

¯ A( ¯ B → ¯ f) =

i | ¯

Ai|ei(δi−φi)

Strong phase (δ) invariant under CP , while weak phase (φ) changes sign under CP

ACP (B → f) ≡ | ¯ A|2 − |A|2 | ¯ A|2 + |A|2 ∝

  • i,j

sin(δi − δj) sin(φi − φj)

3 conditions required for direct CP violation At least 2 amplitudes Non-zero strong phase difference, δi − δj = 0 Non-zero weak phase difference, φi − φj = 0 Source of weak phase differences come from different CKM phases of each amplitude

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Motivation

Direct CP violation more complicated in B → 3h decay channels compared to 2-body decays There are at least 4 possible sources of strong phase

  • 1. Short-distance contributions (quark level)

BSS mechanism, PRL 43 242 (1979) Penguin diagram (b) contains 3 quark generations in loop If gluon in penguin is timelike (on-shell) Momentum transfer q2 > 4m2

i where i = u, c

Particle rescattering (c) generates a phase difference Tree contribution (a) carries different strong phase

CP violation in 2-body processes caused by this effect

  • eg. B0 → K+π−

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Motivation

Remaining sources unique to multibody decays Long-distance contributions (q¯

q level)

  • 2. Breit-Wigner phase

Represents intermediate resonance states

F BW

R

(s) = 1 m2

R − s − imRΓR(s)

Phase varies across the Dalitz plot

  • 3. Relative CP -even phase in the isobar model

A(B → f) =

i |Ai|ei(δi+φi)

¯ A( ¯ B → ¯ f) =

i | ¯

Ai|ei(δi−φi)

Related to final state interactions between different resonances

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Motivation

Each source of strong phase leaves a unique signature in the Dalitz plot Illustrate with series of examples Consider B± → K±π+π− with only 2 isobars

B± → K±ρ0 and non-resonant (NR) component ρ lineshape a Breit-Wigner, F BW

ρ

ρ0 is a vector resonance, so angular distribution follows cos θ

ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ

A+ = aρ

+eiδρ

+F BW

ρ

cos θ + aNR

+ eiδNR

+ F NR

A− = aρ

−eiδρ

−F BW

ρ

cos θ + aNR

− eiδNR

− F NR

ACP ∝ |A−|2 − |A+|2 ∝ [(aρ

−)2 − (aρ +)2]|F BW ρ

|2 cos2 θ + ... −2(m2

ρ − s)|F BW ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ... +2mρΓρ|F BW

ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ...

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Motivation

ACP ∝ [(aρ

−)2 − (aρ +)2]|F BW ρ

|2 cos2 θ + ... −2(m2

ρ − s)|F BW ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ... +2mρΓρ|F BW

ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ...

Only depends on ρ resonance, maximum difference at ρ pole, quadratic in helicity

(GeV)

low
  • π
+ π

m

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 +
  • B
  • B
  • 400
  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

> 0 θ cos

(GeV)

low
  • π
+ π

m

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 +
  • B
  • B
  • 600
  • 500
  • 400
  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

< 0 θ cos

MC

ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ

Only short-distance effects can create aρ

+ = aρ −

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Motivation

ACP ∝ [(aρ

−)2 − (aρ +)2]|F BW ρ

|2 cos2 θ + ... −2(m2

ρ − s)|F BW ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ... +2mρΓρ|F BW

ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ...

Interference term from real part of Breit-Wigner, zero at ρ pole, linear in helicity

(GeV)

low
  • π
+ π

m

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 +
  • B
  • B
  • 400
  • 200
200 400

> 0 θ cos

(GeV)

low
  • π
+ π

m

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 +
  • B
  • B
  • 600
  • 400
  • 200
200 400 600 800

< 0 θ cos

MC

ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ

Caused by long distance effects from final state interactions

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Motivation

ACP ∝ [(aρ

−)2 − (aρ +)2]|F BW ρ

|2 cos2 θ + ... −2(m2

ρ − s)|F BW ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ... +2mρΓρ|F BW

ρ

|2|F NR|2 cos θ...

Interference term from imaginary part of Breit-Wigner, maximum at ρ pole, linear in helicity

(GeV)

low
  • π
+ π

m

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 +
  • B
  • B
  • 400
  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

> 0 θ cos

(GeV)

low
  • π
+ π

m

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 +
  • B
  • B
100 200 300 400 500 600 700

< 0 θ cos

MC

ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ

Caused by long distance effects from Breit-Wigner phase and final state interactions

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Motivation

Last source of strong phase

  • 4. Final state KK ↔ ππ rescattering

Can occur between decay channels with the same flavour quantum numbers

  • eg. B± → K±K+K− and B± → K±π+π−

CPT conservation constrains hadron rescattering

For given quantum numbers, sum of partial widths equal for charge-conjugate decays

KK ↔ ππ rescattering generates a strong phase

Look into rescattering region If rescattering phase in one decay channel generates direct CP violation in this region, Rescattering phase should generate opposite sign direct CP violation in partner decay channel

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LHCb Detector

pp collisions b quark tends to foward/backward direction

Data set: 1 fb−1 @ 7 TeV and 2 fb−1 @ 8 TeV Forward spectrometer Vertex Locater (VeLo) Precision tracking Tracker Turicensis (TT) Tracking, p measurement Ring Imaging Cherenkov (RICH) Particle identification Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL)

e, γ ID

Hadronic Calorimeter (HCL) Hadronic showers Muon Detector Magnet polarity reversal

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

B± → K±h+h−, π±h+h−

B− → K−π+π− B+ → K+π+π− B− → K−K+K− B+ → K+K+K− NSig = 181069 ± 404 (stat) NSig = 109240 ± 354 (stat)

]

2

c [GeV/

π

+

π

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 × )

2

c Candidates / (0.01 GeV/ 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

3

10 ×

LHCb

]

2

c [GeV/

π

+

π

+

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 ×

model

π

+

π

±

K →

±

B combinatorial 4-body → B

±

)K γ ρ ’( η →

±

B

±

π

π

+

π →

±

B

]

2

c [GeV/

K

+

K

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 × )

2

c Candidates / (0.01 GeV/ 2 4 6 8 10 12

3

10 ×

LHCb

]

2

c [GeV/

K

+

K

+

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 ×

model

K

+

K

±

K →

±

B combinatorial 4-body → B

±

π

K

+

K →

±

B

π

+

π

±

K →

±

B

]

2

c [GeV/

  • π
+

π

  • π

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 × )

2

c Candidates / (0.01 GeV/ 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

3

10 ×

LHCb

]

2

c [GeV/

  • π
+

π

+

π

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 ×

model

±

π

π

+

π →

±

B combinatorial 4-body → B

π

+

π

±

K →

±

B

]

2

c [GeV/

  • π
+

K

  • K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 × )

2

c Candidates / (0.01 GeV/ 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

3

10 ×

LHCb

]

2

c [GeV/

  • π
+

K

+

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 ×

model

±

π

K

+

K →

±

B combinatorial 4-body →

S

B 4-body → B

K

+

K

±

K →

±

B

π

+

π

±

K →

±

B

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 4

4 Penguin Tree B− → π−π+π− B+ → π+π+π− B− → π−K+K− B+ → π+K+K− NSig = 24907 ± 222 (stat) NSig = 6161 ± 172 (stat)

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

B± → K±h+h−, π±h+h−

Global direct CP asymmetry

ARaw

CP = NB− − NB+

NB− + NB+

Correct for B± production asymmetry and unpaired hadron (eg. B± → K±π+π−) detection asymmetry

ACP = ARaw

CP − AP − Ah D

AP and AK

D from B± → J/ψ[µ+µ−]K±, PRL 108 201601 (2012)

D from prompt D+ studies, PLB 713 186 (2012)

ACP (B± → K±π+π−) = +0.025 ± 0.004 (stat) ± 0.004 (syst) ± 0.007 (J/ψK±) (2.8σ) ACP (B± → K±K+K−) = −0.036 ± 0.004 (stat) ± 0.002 (syst) ± 0.007 (J/ψK±) (4.3σ) ACP (B± → π±π+π−) = +0.058 ± 0.008 (stat) ± 0.009 (syst) ± 0.007 (J/ψK±) (4.2σ) ACP (B± → π±K+K−) = −0.123 ± 0.017 (stat) ± 0.012 (syst) ± 0.007 (J/ψK±) (5.6σ)

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 4

4

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

B± → K±h+h−, π±h+h−

Dalitz plot background subtracted and effiency corrected with ∼ (NB+ + NB−) in each bin

B± → K±π+π− B± → K±K+K−

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

]

4

c /

2

[GeV

  • π
+

π 2

m 5 10 15 20 ]

4

c /

2

[GeV

  • π
+

K 2

m 5 10 15 20 25

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

LHCb (a)

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

]

4

c /

2

[GeV

low

  • K
+

K 2

m 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 ]

4

c /

2

[GeV

high

  • K
+

K 2

m 5 10 15 20 25

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

LHCb (b)

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

]

4

c /

2

[GeV

low

  • π
+

π 2

m 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 ]

4

c /

2

[GeV

high

  • π
+

π 2

m 5 10 15 20 25

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

LHCb (c)

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

]

4

c /

2

[GeV

  • π
+

K 2

m 5 10 15 20 25 ]

4

c /

2

[GeV

  • K
+

K 2

m 5 10 15 20 25

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

LHCb (d)

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 4

4 Penguin Tree

B± → π±π+π− B± → π±K+K− CP violation effects in multibody B decays

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CP Asymmetry by Interference

Project onto mππ of B± → π±π+π− ]

2

c [GeV/

low

π

+

π

m

0.5 1 1.5

)

2

Yield/(0.05 GeV/c

200 400 600 800

LHCb

+

B

B ]

2

c [GeV/

low

π

+

π

m

0.5 1 1.5

+

  • B
  • B
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300

LHCb ]

2

c [GeV/

low

π

+

π

m

0.5 1 1.5

)

2

Yield/(0.05 GeV/c

0.5 1 1.5

3

10 ×

LHCb

+

B

B ]

2

c [GeV/

low

π

+

π

m

0.5 1 1.5

+

  • B
  • B
  • 100

100 200 300

LHCb

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 4

4

ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ ρ

+

π

  • π

+

K θ

Sign-flip and zero around ρ0 pole, CP asymmetry may be dominated by real part of Breit-Wigner

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CP Asymmetry by Rescattering

ππ ↔ KK rescattering region: 1.0 − 1.5 GeV/c2 B± → K±π+π− B± → K±K+K−

]

2

c [GeV/

π

+

π

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 × )

2

c Candidates / (0.01 GeV/ 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8

3

10 ×

LHCb

]

2

c [GeV/

π

+

π

+

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 ×

model

π

+

π

±

K →

±

B combinatorial 4-body → B

±

)K γ ρ ’( η →

±

B

±

π

π

+

π →

±

B

]

2

c [GeV/

K

+

K

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 × )

2

c Candidates / (0.01 GeV/ 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4

3

10 ×

LHCb

]

2

c [GeV/

K

+

K

+

K

m 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 ×

model

K

+

K

±

K →

±

B combinatorial 4-body → B

±

π

K

+

K →

±

B

π

+

π

±

K →

±

B

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 4

4

ACP (B± → K±π+π−) = +0.121 ± 0.012 (stat) ± 0.017 (syst) ± 0.007 (J/ψK±) ACP (B± → K±K+K−) = −0.211 ± 0.011 (stat) ± 0.004 (syst) ± 0.007 (J/ψK±)

Clear opposite sign CP asymmetry in KK/ππ - related channels

KK ↔ ππ rescattering would require this by CPT conservation

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

B± → K±p¯ p and B± → π±p¯ p

Another new preliminary result based on full data set

B± → K±p¯ p

penguin dominated

B± → π±p¯ p

tree dominated Similar physics to non-baryonic 3-body charmless decays

p¯ p ↔ h+h− rescattering expected to be smaller than KK ↔ ππ rescattering CP asymmetry could be less pronounced

Threshold enhancement in low mp¯

p typical in B → p¯

pX

decays Need to better understand dynamics of these decays Previous publication based on 1 fb−1 No evidence of CP violation PRD 88 052015 (2013)

u u u d p d u p b

+

B d , s u u

+

π ,

+

K W u u u d p d u p b

+

B d , s u u

+

π ,

+

K W

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Signal Yield

B± → K±p¯ p NSig = 18721 ± 142 (stat)

]

2

[GeV/c

±

K p p

m

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5

)

2

Candidates / (0.01 GeV/c

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

LHCb

Blue: Signal Red: Combinatorial

B± → π±p¯ p NSig = 1988 ± 74 (stat)

]

2

[GeV/c

±

π p p

m

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5

)

2

Candidates / (0.01 GeV/c

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

LHCb

Green: Partially reconstrcuted Purple: Cross-feed

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 3

4

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Dalitz Plot

Background subtracted and efficiency corrected using calibrated MC

B± → K±p¯ p

]

4

/c

2

[GeV

2 p p

m

5 10 15 20

]

4

/c

2

[GeV

2 Kp

m

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

)

8

/c

4

Signal yield /(0.16 GeV

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000

LHCb

B± → π±p¯ p

]

4

/c

2

[GeV

2 p p

m

5 10 15 20 25

]

4

/c

2

[GeV

2 p π

m

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

)

8

/c

4

Signal yield /(0.20 GeV

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

LHCb

✻ ✁ ✁ ✁ ✁ ✁ ✁ ✕

✏✏✏✏✏✏✏ ✶

Low mp¯

p threshold enhancement

Charmonimum resonances Define mp¯

p < 2.85 GeV/c2 as charmless region

Λ(1520) → pK

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 3

4

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Forward-Backward Asymmetry

AFB = N(cos θ > 0) − N(cos θ < 0) N(cos θ > 0) + N(cos θ < 0)

Meausure forward-backward asymmetry in bins of mp¯

p

Gives hint on p¯

p waves that might contribute

p p

+

h θ

B± → K±p¯ p

]

2

[GeV/c

p p

m

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8

FB

A

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

LHCb

B± → π±p¯ p

]

2

[GeV/c

p p

m

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8

FB

A

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

LHCb

Ap¯

pK FB (mp¯ p < 2.85 GeV/c2) = +0.495 ± 0.012 (stat) ± 0.007 (syst)

Ap¯

pπ FB (mp¯ p < 2.85 GeV/c2) = −0.409 ± 0.033 (stat) ± 0.006 (syst)

Large asymmetries indicate dominance of non-resonant p¯

p scattering, J Phys G 34 283 (2007)

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 3

4

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Direct CP Asymmetry

Measure ACP in Dalitz plot bins Same number of events in each bin

ACP (mp¯

p < 2.85 GeV/c2, m2 Kp > 10 GeV2/c4)

= +0.096±0.024 (stat)±0.004 (syst) (4.0σ)

First evidence of CP violation in any B decay involving baryons

B± → K±p¯ p

]

2

)

2

[(GeV/c

p p 2

m

5 10 15 20

]

2

)

2

[(GeV/c

Kp 2

m

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 CP

Raw A

  • 0.2
  • 0.15
  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟✟ ✯ ✻

)

4

/c

2

(GeV

p p 2

m

4 6 8

)

4

/c

2

)/(0.33 GeV

+

)-N(B

  • N(B
  • 150
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150

)

4

/c

2

(GeV

p p 2

m

4 6 8

)

4

/c

2

)/(0.33 GeV

+

)-N(B

  • N(B
  • 150
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150

P r e l i m i n a r y

L H C b

  • P

A P E R

  • 2

1 4

  • 3

4

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary

New preliminary results with the full LHCb data set

B± → K±h+h− and B± → π±h+h−

Evidence of global direct CP violation Large localised CP asymmetries across the Dalitz plot Long-distance effects play an important role in generating a strong phase

B± → h±p¯ p

Large forward-backward asymmetries indicate dominance of non-resonant p¯

p scattering

First evidence CP violation in decays involving baryons Sign-flip of CP asymmetry probably generated by interference of long-distance p¯

p waves

Look forward to amplitude analyses on all these channels

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Backup

CP violation effects in multibody B decays

24