READI JIP Ministry of Petroleum and Energy 24. April 2019 Sector - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

readi jip
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

READI JIP Ministry of Petroleum and Energy 24. April 2019 Sector - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

READI JIP Ministry of Petroleum and Energy 24. April 2019 Sector Board Petroleum READI REquirement Asset Digital lifecycle Information 2 Curren ent d documen entation r n requi uiremen ents a s and w d way of working ng w with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

READI JIP

Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

  • 24. April 2019

Sector Board Petroleum READI – REquirement Asset Digital lifecycle Information

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Curren ent d documen entation r n requi uiremen ents a s and w d way of working ng w with s standa ndards d drive c e cost!

2

  • Oil and Gas operators pay at least 20%-30% more

for the same products, compared to other industries

  • The additional cost on NCS is NOK 50 billion in 2016
  • A significant share of this difference is related to

specifications and documentation requirements

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Information is lost along the asset’s life cycle

Reservoir Complexity Feasibility Operating solution Detail engineering Design specifications Operational phase Construction

Information Requiremen t Information Requiremen t Information Requiremen t Information Requiremen t Information Requiremen t

DG4 DG3 DG2 DG1 DG0

Project knowledge

Source: Marianne Kalvenes, Equinor

Intelligent maintenance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Management of requirements is inefficient throughout the entire value chain

  • Lack of precision
  • Requirements are to a large extent unprecise and give room for different

interpretations resulting in higher prices to compensate for increased delivery risks

  • High complexity
  • Difficult to understand for which context the requirements are relevant and applicable
  • There are lots of examples of contradictory and irrelevant requirements in projects
  • To a large extent there exist divergent company specific requirement
  • Relations between requirements are complex, and hard for human beings to

understand

  • Lack of automation
  • Standards/requirements are analogue and not accessible by computers
  • Verification of requirements is mainly done manually
  • Lack of interoperability
  • Software solutions supporting requirements- and information management processes

are proprietary

  • Information sharing and exchange between different systems are costly
  • Standardization is time consuming
  • Updating of standards requires update of entire standard documents. This is time-

consuming resulting in outdated requirements.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The journey from paper based to “digitalized” standards

Paper based standards Application for business process improvements READI – Common

  • requirements. Machine

readable for automated verification/validation

READI JIP

Industry applications

READI JIP: Knowledge base for Technical Information requirements expressed as rules.

Company specific requirements Updated and common requirements in a digital format

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Value proposition

The open industry platform READI translates diverse company practises into shared digital LCI and technical requirements, and helps the industry to improve safety, cut costs and increase efficiency in business critical processes through automation. READI – governance of digital requirements in the oil and gas industry

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Means to reach the goals of cost reductions and a more competitiveness Oil & Gas industry

  • Support for the definition of machine- and

human-readable requirements.

  • More efficient and automated verification of

requirements.

  • Easily discovery of inconsistent requirements.
  • Remove ambiguity in the definition of

requirements.

  • Better searching capabilities to find requirements
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Global Standard Organisations like: Global Industry initiatives like:

8

READI has global ambitions – bringing the digital platform to the O&G community

IOGP/JIP33/CFIHOS ISO/IEC/ASME/API/W3C

  • Digital requirements
  • RDLs (Common vocabularies)
  • Methods and tools based on W3C
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Interesting findings from READI JIP phase 1:

  • First use case based on DNV GL’s Recommended Practice for Subsea Documentation indicates a potential for >50% reduction

in the number of requirements

  • Application of logic reasoning demonstrate automatic detection of inconsistency in requirements

AIBEL MMD3: 5% cost reduction for bulk material ordered amounts to > 1O0 M€ for a large project

A preliminary business case1) points to significant benefits with digitalized requirements for information management in E&P projects.

Estimated impact for Norwegian Continental Shelf projects: Cost is saved due to:

  • Annual spending 2):

NOK 72 billion

  • Annual savings from 3): 5 – 10 %
  • Annual savings from : NOK 3.6 – 7.2 billion
  • Precise requirements and digital control of

documentation

  • Re-use of concepts
  • More effective and improved quality of engineering

work processes

1)Work lead by Equinor 2) Input from Rystad Energy 3) Input from Aibel

This gives a conservative, first version NPV in the range of NOK 20–35 billion for a 5 year

  • peration period

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Phase 3 Phase 2 10

The READI JIP is executed in phases

Phase 1: Building the platform for digitalisation at a larger scale – Proof of Concept based on concrete pilots; valves (general) and subsea system

2017 2018 2019

Phase 1

2020

Kick-Off DG1 End Initiation DG2 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Initiation

Phase 2: Common DFO requirements and a digital service for management of LCI requirements to Subsea Production Systems (SPS).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

READI purpose, scope and main deliverables

Purpose:

Create the platform for improvements of LCI business processes through common, digital Technical Information requirements

Scope:

  • Z-001: Documentation for Operation (DFO)
  • Z-CR-002: Component Identification System
  • Z-DP-002: Coding System
  • Z-003: Technical Information Flow Requirements
  • Z-018: Supplier’s documentation of equipment

CR = Common Requirements DP= Design Principles

Transform LCI requirements to machine readable format Agree common LCI requirements Establish methodology and tools to enable automated reasoning Establish framework and governance model for future management of digital NORSOK requirements

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Current Participants

Category Company Operators

Equinor ConocoPhillips Aker BP Lundin Shell Eni Norge AS

EPC Contractors

TechnipFMC Aibel Aker Solution

Category Company Equipment and system vendors

ABB Computas Proenco

Authorities

Petroleum Safety Authority Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

Others

Standard Norge DNV GL Sector Board Petroleum

Observers

EPIM POSC Caesar Association

slide-13
SLIDE 13

READI contact information

Project manager: Erik Østby, DNV GL E-mail: Erik.Ostby@dnvgl.com Mobile: +47 906 74 106 www.readi.com

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Main deliverables are standards, technology, services, training and communication

Methodology and digital tools for capturing and structuring requirements Governance and services for digital requirements Updated and digitalise NORSOK standards for technical documentation Z-TI Standardisation of a common language for oil and gas asset vocabularies: ISO 15926 Part 14 Training and external communication

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Semantic modelling will enable machine readable requirements and automated verification processes

Transformation Requirement Development

Stakeholders needs and expectations

Requirements

Transformation Is the set of Requirements consistent?

ASSET MODEL

As-built

DG 1 DG 2 DG n Is the system built right according to the Requirements?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ONTOLOGY

16

Ontology – the enabler to change the industry practice

Common requirements Reference data Asset data BROWSING REPORTING REASONING ANALYTICS ONTOLOGY