IOGP/IADC BOP Reliability Database Mark Siegmund Chairman: RAPID - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

iogp iadc bop reliability database
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

IOGP/IADC BOP Reliability Database Mark Siegmund Chairman: RAPID - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IOGP/IADC BOP Reliability Database Mark Siegmund Chairman: RAPID S53 Oversight Committee IADC DEC Technology Forum RAPID-S53 Overview Online subsea BOP performance reporting database developed by group of seven offshore drilling


slide-1
SLIDE 1

IADC DEC Technology Forum IOGP/IADC BOP Reliability Database

Mark Siegmund Chairman: RAPID – S53 Oversight Committee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

IADC DEC Technology Forum RAPID-S53 Overview

  • Online subsea BOP performance reporting database developed by group
  • f seven offshore drilling contractors became operational in 2015.
  • Database combined with IOGP/IADC efforts, now in third iteration of

Joint Industry Project with 14 contractors, 12 operators, and 3 OEMs.

  • Latest phase branded as RAPID-S53 (Reliability & Performance

Information Database for Standard 53 well control equipment).

  • Over 6000 event reports now in database.
  • 700+ users from 29 participating companies accessing database
  • Management & organizational support provided by IADC as Project

Coordinator.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

IADC DEC Technology Forum JIP Participating Companies

  • Diamond Offshore
  • Dolphin Drilling
  • Ensco plc
  • Maersk Drilling
  • Noble Drilling
  • Pacific Drilling
  • Queiroz Galvão
  • Ocean Rig
  • Ocyan/Odebrecht
  • Rowan Companies
  • Seadrill
  • Stena Drilling
  • Transocean
  • Vantage Drilling
  • Anadarko
  • BP
  • Chevron
  • CNOOC/Nexen
  • Eni S.p.A
  • Equinor
  • ExxonMobil
  • Hess
  • Kosmos Energy
  • Petrobras
  • Shell
  • Total SA
  • Cameron
  • Baker Hughes/GE
  • NOV

Contractors OEMs Operators

slide-4
SLIDE 4

IADC DEC Technology Forum

BOP Event Cause Designations

When Root Cause is known:

  • Design issue
  • Documentation error
  • Maintenance error
  • Procedural error
  • QA/QC manufacturing
  • Wear and tear

When Root Cause is not known:

  • RCFA required (always used when there is a

loss of wellbore integrity)

  • Assessment pending (e.g. used in the case

where stack is still subsea)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

IADC DEC Technology Forum

A total of 2040 events were reported by JIP members in 2017. Of these, 1475 were discovered with the BOP Stack ‘Not In Operation’. This reflects the very positive fact that the bulk

  • f events occurred while

equipment was being inspected, maintained and tested prior to being put into service.

1475 Not In Operation Events 565 In Operation Events 22 Stack Pull Events 2 Loss of Wellbore Integrity Events

slide-6
SLIDE 6

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Drillship, 50 Semi- submersible, 25 Jack-up, 21 Platform, 6

102 total rig-years Rig-Years of Operation by Rig Type - 2017

“Typical Rig”*

  • 20 WCE events/year
  • 14 Not in Operation
  • 6 BOP in Operation
  • 1 in 5 years – Stack pull
  • 1 in 50 years – Loss of

Wellbore Integrity

*Composite example based on reports received in 2017.

BOP types and number of components vary significantly.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Rig Type 2017 Number of rig- years of operation Number of reportable components per rig 2017 Number of component- years of operation Dual-stack Drillship 26 4,200 109,200 Single-stack Drillship 24 2,900 69,600 Single-stack Semi-submersible 25 2,500 62,500 Jack-up Rigs 21 490 10,290 Platform Rigs 6 460 2,760 Totals 102 254,350

Distribution of 2017 BOP Stack & Control System Component-Years of Operation by Rig Type

slide-8
SLIDE 8

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Sum of events associated with a component Event Rate = Sum of component-years for each component active during period

Event Rate as a Metric

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

Event & Stack-Pull Count Event Rate

Event Rate Event Count Stack-Pull Count

Highest Ranked BOP Stack Components by Event Rate

slide-9
SLIDE 9

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Sum of events associated with a component Event Rate = Sum of component-years for each component active during period

Event Rate as a Metric

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 5 10 15 20 25 30

Event Rate Event Count & Stack-Pull Count

Stack-Pull Event Count Event Count Event Rate

Controls System Related Components with 2017 Stack Pulls

slide-10
SLIDE 10

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Initiatives in Development

  • Applying cycle count data to aid in trend analysis and reliability

prediction.

  • Currently collating field estimates of hours in service for

components where cycle count is more appropriate and cycle counts are not available. This will be replaced by estimated cycle counts for the applicable components.

  • When actual cycle count is not known, an algorithm will be used to

estimate cycle count using date equipment was put in service and the date of the event.

  • The goal is to accumulate enough experience data to eventually

predict MTBF for certain components.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Benefits realized by participants

  • Monthly event review by Technical Reference Group provides

valuable opportunity to share information on events experienced.

  • Common issues on similar equipment identified.
  • Increased understanding by OEMs of problem areas needing

rectification.

  • Improved procedures for hoses & fittings reduced leaks and

unplanned stack pulls.

  • Refined RCFA process.
  • Potential problems not previously seen can be anticipated.
  • Increased efforts to improve product design for SPM valves, etc.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

IADC DEC Technology Forum Working with Regulators to Support Industry Compliance

  • Modifications made to database facilitate

failure reporting by operators and contractors to assist in compliance with the BSEE Well Control Rule.

  • Operators and OEMs both receive failure

reports.

  • Agreement with BSEE that reports can be

forwarded directly to Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) - data repository for BSEE.

  • Data reported directly to BTS protected by the

Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act (CIPSEA).

Data collection and failure analysis process Failure data reporting form

  • Now working on data conduit to allow Operators to transmit reports directly to BTS.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Continuous Improvement

As increased data continues to provide new learnings, these are shared for the benefit of all participants. In addition, A number of specific topcs have already been shared with the public:

  • Regulator Valve Improvement Initiative
  • Shuttle Valve Selection for ROV Circuits
  • SPM Valve Spool Poppet Identification
  • Deadman/Autoshear Timing Circuits
  • Improper Subsea Control Valve Design Aspects

www.RAPID4S53.com

slide-14
SLIDE 14

IADC DEC Technology Forum

Continuous Improvement

1.31 0.61 0.68 0.19 0.27 0.25 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Through Sept 30

Unplanned BOP Pulls per Active Floater per 12M Equivalent

slide-15
SLIDE 15

IADC DEC Technology Forum Thank you!

▪ For further information on the JIP, contact: ▪ Steve Kropla, IADC ▪ JIP Project Coordinator ▪ E-mail: steve.kropla@iadc.org ▪ Direct: +1 (713) 292-1959