Project Safira Eliminating fatalities in the Upstream Oil and Gas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

project safira
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Project Safira Eliminating fatalities in the Upstream Oil and Gas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Project Safira Eliminating fatalities in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry IADC SAPC Chapter meeting 14 th February 2019 About IOGP Wherever you are IOGPs Members Wherever you go... produce 40% of the Whatever you do worlds oil


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Project Safira –

Eliminating fatalities in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry IADC SAPC Chapter meeting 14th February 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

About IOGP IOGP’s Members produce 40% of the world’s oil and gas - safely, efficiently and reliably

Wherever you are… Wherever you go... Whatever you do… chances are you’re relying

  • n oil and gas for heat,

light, power and mobility

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Who we are

IOGP works on behalf of the world’s oil and gas companies and organizations to promote safe, responsible and sustainable exploration and production The Association encompasses many of the world's leading publicly-traded, private and state-owned oil and gas companies, industry associations and major upstream service companies

slide-4
SLIDE 4

81 Members around the world

Map shows locations of Member Head Offices. Many operate globally

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PROJECT SAFIRA

Eliminating Fatalities in our Industry

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Project Safira – why do we want to do something?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Project Safira – for no more fatalities in our industry

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Eliminating fatalities due to Process Safety Events

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Click image to show video online

slide-10
SLIDE 10

7 fatalities 2015 11 fatalities 2010 31 fatalities 2012 As well as severe environmental and business consequences

Process safety events – high severity, low frequency

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

5 fatalities: Ignited release from flexible hose failure 11 fatalities: Ignited release during well drilling activities 31 fatalities: Ignited release during maintenance activities of pipeline 4 fatalities: Non ignited release during repair activities of pipeline 7 fatalities: Ignited release during production activities 4 fatalities: Ignited release during road tanker loading 4 fatalities: Ignited release during modifications to pipeline

IOGP Members report on average 5 fatal PSEs per year We see a 4+ fatality event on average every 18 months

However…

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ignited [CATEGO RY NAME] Unknown

56 PSEs

Ignited Struck-by Unknown

128 Fatalities

Fatal PSEs are either Ignited or Struck-by events Ignited events are 75% of fatalities Nearly all 4+ fatality events ignited Almost half of PSEs occur during maintenance, inspection and testing – this is equivalent for either Ignited or Struck-by events

  • About 1/3 during drilling, workover and well services
  • Fewer than 20% during normal production ops
  • Causes are NOT the same as Environmental Tier 1/Tier 2 PSE’s
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Air Transport Safety Strategy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The Aviation Safety Staircase

(2006-2016 Global Offshore Helicopters)

This is where we would be as an industry 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Fatalities

Source Data – EASA Safety Risk Portfolio

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Aviation SubCommittee Safira Focus Areas

1. Effective implementation of common industry standards

  • IOGP Aircraft Management Guidelines Work Group (590): aligning 590 with 577

writing style to read more as Recommended Practices (RP) including contractual language

  • IOGP Member commitment to implementation of RP

2. Aircraft design & reliability (enhanced gearbox and rotor failure

detection, maintenance, and design)

  • Industry Collaborative Working Group (ASC, Regulators, Aircraft Operators, OEM’s,

HeliOffshore) – set expectations for design and reliability from end user.

  • ASC role to set end user expectations for aircraft reliability and design. Ensure

end user alignment with initiatives to drive IOGP member implementation.

3. Assured flight path (aircraft loss of control and collision avoidance)

  • HTAWS Development & Implementation (ASC, Regulators, OEM’s, Aircraft

Operators, HeliOffshore)

  • ASC role now is to drive implementation of new technology through 590RP
  • Flight Path Management Work Group (ASC, Aircraft Operators, HeliOffshore)
  • ASC role is end user support of current initiatives and FCOM implementation
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Land Transportation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

31 32 29 28 10 8 15 9 6 6 7 5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Fatalities FAR

6 again in 2017 (tbc)

Since 2005, land transportation-related incidents reported to IOGP resulted in 163 workforce fatalities

After significant fewer fatalities in 2009, little progress has been made

Something needs to change if we want to achieve no fatalities

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Three-point seat belts Safer vehicles Enhanced vehicle technology

Project Safira – for no more fatalities in the Upstream Industry

The IOGP Land Transportation Subcommittee has proposed a strategy to eliminate land transport related workforce fatalities

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Seat belt use is the most important factor in reducing the severity of injuries from traffic collisions. Wearing a seat-belt reduces the risk of fatal injury by: IOGP land transportation fatality data analysis indicates that the lack of using a seatbelt was a contributing factor in 32% of the land transportation workforce fatalities since year 2010.

Three-point seatbelts – “Why”

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Global New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) approach:

  • No loss of life is acceptable
  • People make mistakes
  • People are vulnerable – the starting point for the design
  • f a “Safe System” is human tolerance to forces.

The difference between a five and zero star car – life and death…

Safe(r) vehicles – “Why”

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Provide maximum safety to the vehicle occupants to avoid crash occurring in the first place and/or reducing severity of the

  • utcome in case of a vehicle crash.

Advanced vehicle technologies - examples:

  • Autonomous Emergency Braking
  • Posted speed recognition
  • Roll stability systems
  • Forward collision warning
  • Electronic Stability Control
  • Rollover protection
  • Speed limiters
  • Lane Departure / Keep assist
  • etc.

The appropriate advanced vehicle technology should be based on the outcome of a risk assessment.

Advanced vehicle technology – “Why”

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Update of the IOGP Life Saving Rules

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Common set of industry Life-Saving Rules

for the front-line worker, regardless of who their employer is

Commitment from all IOGP Members

to adopt the Rules so that we have one implemented standardized set in the industry

Feedback from operators and contractors

that implemented, those that went their own way, and those that chose not to at all

Reviewed the last five years of data

(fatalities and high-potential events reported to IOGP)

Revised set of 9 IOGP Life-Saving Rules

launched in the summer

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Goal Within 3 years all IOGP Members use the IOGP Life-Saving Rules Within 5 years, the entire industry

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

But why will one set for an industry help?

  • Means for comparing outcomes resulting from standardized process

implementation within or among organizations

  • Enables investigators to compare data and to interpret the relevance and

efficacy of an intervention

  • Workers are able to relate to one another in meaningful ways (including the

standardization of terms used)

  • As more organisations begin to use the same standard protocols with the

same data fields, the ability to analyse risk will be enhanced

  • Reduces worker cognitive dissonance and thus the risk of human error
  • Building on the same solid foundation, rather than struggling to grasp the

range of safety concepts

  • Allow workers to learn from each other's experiences (i.e. new ideas on how

to address problems—what has worked, what has not worked and why).

Source: WHO in the Int. J. for Quality in Health Care, Volume 26, Issue 2, 1 April 2014, Pages 109–116

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Responding to the challenge: safe and competitive

Inherently safe design Systems & processes Increasing speed & quality

  • f learning

Improving Safety performance

Management Systems Collaboration Design

Standardization

  • f equipment,

processes and procedures

Culture of care & reducing likelihood of human error

Standardization

Operating discipline

Operating discipline

Self verification

Self Verification Human Performance

Future… Last few decades

Digitization & technology reducing risk

Technology

slide-28
SLIDE 28

For more information please contact:

www.iogp.org

Registered Office

City Tower 40 Basinghall Street 14th Floor London EC2V 5DE United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 3763 9700 F +44 (0)20 3763 9701

Brussels Office

Bd du Souverain,165 4th Floor B-1160 Brussels Belgium T +32 (0)2 566 9150 F +32 (0)2 566 9159

Houston Office

16225 Park Ten Place, Suite 500 Houston, Texas 77084 United States T +1 (713) 338 3494 reception@iogp.org

Chris Hawkes Safety Director ch@iogp.org