(Re-)examining the creation of an electronic collection
- n faculty scholarship
(Re-)examining the creation of an electronic collection on faculty - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
(Re-)examining the creation of an electronic collection on faculty scholarship John Sterbenz University of Michigan Kresge Library Services Presentation Overview 2009 Concept and background Workflow and implementation Issues and
2009
– Concept and background – Workflow and implementation – Issues and concerns – (Mostly) fully-realized example – Decision
…then a LOT of things happened…
2018
– What’s changed – What hasn’t changed – Issues and concerns – A final analysis
URLs for research authored by Ross School of Business faculty to load into III’s Millennium ILS
– Aggregators/databases to include ProQuest, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, Ingenta Connect, Oxford University Press
records but also faculty working papers and RSB-authored books
catalog records
– Faculty research and grey literature – Undergraduate and graduate research
create “false hit” problems with OPAC searching
– Identify full-text articles – Export citation data into citation management software (RefWorks) – Create tab-delimited (text) export file in RefWorks – Work with tab-delimited RefWorks export file in Excel – Create MARC records using MarcEdit – Load records into Millennium
ProQuest (“Advanced Search”)
ProQuest (Search results, with selections)
Business Source Complete (“Advanced Search”)
Business Source Complete (Search results, with selections)
– Even when it didn’t (ProQuest), it didn’t pose undue difficulty
between aggregators/databases
Unprocessed RefWorks file
text)
– Article title – Journal title – Year of publication – Abstract – URL – Authors (one author per column)
Exported RefWorks file in Excel (pre-processing)
Exported RefWorks file in Excel (post-processing)
– Use .mrd template (based on number of authors) – Add other fields and subfields (not originally found in citation data) – Additional text cleanup (especially 520)
MarcEdit Delimited Text Translator (with template loaded)
A file of records!
A closer examination
– Use .mrd template (based on number of authors) – Add other fields and subfields (not originally found in citation data) – Additional text cleanup (especially 520)
A completed record
– Use .mrd template (based on number of authors) – Add other fields and subfields (not originally found in citation data) – Final text cleanup (especially 520)
Whoops….
– Use .mrd template (based on number of authors) – Add other fields and subfields (not originally found in citation data) – Final text cleanup (especially 520)
– Overlay based on 245 only
– No matches? Insert record! – One or more matches? Reject record (do not load)
– Insert fields common to all article-level records
– Boilerplate 506, 538 fields common to all electronic titles
– 1,621 Business Source Complete links – 403 ProQuest links – 233 records linked to both ProQuest and Business Source Complete
– Added after loading – 42 Google Scholar – 6 Scopus – Records examined with no “Times cited” link
project was halted
– Level of affiliation – Secondary institutes and centers – Include only from peer-reviewed/scholarly sources? – All authorship?
holdings data
– Five FT and one FTE temporary employees (one librarian)
retention
cataloging and financials only
– Three FT and zero FTE temporary employees (one librarian)
– Millennium: location-based scoping – Koha: Separate database instances
– Millennium: A set of universal displays – Koha: Use of “Bibliographic frameworks”
John Sterbenz Manager, Technical Services, Collections, and Library Automation University of Michigan Ross School of Business Kresge Library Services jsterben@umich.edu (734) 764-5746