Ranavirus SIR Model Angela Peace Department of Mathematics and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ranavirus sir model
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ranavirus SIR Model Angela Peace Department of Mathematics and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ranavirus SIR Model Angela Peace Department of Mathematics and Statistics Texas Tech University March 23, 2016 Global Ranavirus Consortium Course Outline Review basic SIR differential equations model Formulate model for Ranavirus direct


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ranavirus SIR Model

Angela Peace Department of Mathematics and Statistics Texas Tech University March 23, 2016 Global Ranavirus Consortium Course

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Review basic SIR differential equations model Formulate model for Ranavirus

direct transmission environmental transmission necrophagy transmission

Parameterize model

Possible due to lots of work done by: Suzanne O’Regan, Jennifer A. Spatz, Patrick N. Reilly, Rachel D. Hill, E. Davis Carter, Rebecca P. Wilkes, Debra L. Miller, Matt Gray

Model simulations Update model to be more realistic

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Basic SIR Model review β µ

S I R

γ

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Basic SIR Model review β µ

S I R

γ

dS dt = −βSg(I)

  • direct transmission

dI dt = βSg(I)

direct transmission

− µI

  • disease induced death

− γI

  • recovery

dR dt = γI

  • recovery
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Basic SIR Viral Model

β µ

S I R

γ ω η

V

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Basic SIR Viral Model

β µ

S I R

γ ω η

V

ρf(V)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Basic SIR Viral Model

β µ

S I R

γ ω η

V

ρf(V)

dS dt = −βSg(I)

  • direct trans

− ρSf (V )

environmental trans

dI dt = βSg(I)

direct trans

+ ρSf (V )

environmental trans

− µI

  • death

− γI

  • recovery

dR dt = γI

  • recovery

dV dt = ωI

  • shed virions

− ηV

  • degradation
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SI Viral Model without Recovery

β µ

S I

ω η

V

ρf(V)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SI Viral Model with Necrophagy

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SI Viral Model with Necrophagy

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SI Viral Model with Necrophagy

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ αD

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SI Viral Model with Necrophagy

dS dt = −βSg(I)

  • direct

transmission

− ρSf (V )

environmental transmission

− αSg(D)

necrophagy transmission

dI dt = βSg(I)

direct transmission

+ ρSf (V )

environmental transmission

+ αSg(D)

necrophagy transmission

− µI

  • viral induced

death

dD dt = µI

  • viral induced

death

− δD

  • necrophagy

dV dt = ω[I + D]

  • shed virions

− ηV

  • degradation
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Frequency-dependent vs density-dependent transmission

frequency-dependent tranmission per-individual contact rate is independent of population density Total population: N(t) = S(t) + I(t) g(I) = I/N(t) density-dependent transmission transmission scales with population density g(I) = I

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Environmental transmission

The environmental contact rate function takes the following form: f (V ) = V V + κ where κ is the ranavirus ID50

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Parameterization

φ probability of infection c contact rate ρ environmental contact rate β direct transmission rate β = φc ω virion shedding rate µ diseased induced mortality κ ID50 1/δ mean dead tadpole survival time α necrophagy transmission rate α = φc 1/η environmental virion persistence time

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Parameterization

φ probability of infection c contact rate ρ environmental contact rate β direct transmission rate β = φc ω virion shedding rate µ diseased induced mortality κ ID50 1/δ mean dead tadpole survival time α necrophagy transmission rate α = φc 1/η environmental virion persistence time We’ll talk about parameterizing these values today based on recent empirical data.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Contact Rate Experiment

1 infected frog in a 12-L tub with 20 susceptible frog. monitored the number of contacts between infected frog with susceptible frogs over 10 minutes monitored at 2, 4, and 6 hours

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Contact Rate Experiment

1 infected frog in a 12-L tub with 20 susceptible frog. monitored the number of contacts between infected frog with susceptible frogs over 10 minutes monitored at 2, 4, and 6 hours

0" 2" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 14"

Wood"Frogs"" Gray"Treefrogs" Average"#"of"contacts""

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Contact Rate Parameters

Parameter Description unit c contact rate 1/day ρ environmental contact rate 1/day

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Contact Rate Parameters

Parameter Description unit c contact rate 1/day ρ environmental contact rate 1/day average 12 contacts in 10 minutes = ⇒ 1.2 contacts/min c = 1728 / day assume ρ = 1728 / day

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Shedding Rate Parameter

Parameter Description unit ω virion shedding rate PFU/mL/day/individual

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Shedding Rate Parameter

Parameter Description unit ω virion shedding rate PFU/mL/day/individual 1 infected individual in 1L fresh water took water samples at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours measured viral load

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Shedding Rate Parameter

Parameter Description unit ω virion shedding rate PFU/mL/day/individual 1 infected individual in 1L fresh water took water samples at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours measured viral load

! ! !

0! 0.5! 1! 1.5! 2! 72! 96! 120!

PFU/mL!(10^y)! Hours!Past!3!Day!Exposure!

Shedding!Rate!in!Water!

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Shedding Rate Parameter

! ! !

0! 0.5! 1! 1.5! 2! 72! 96! 120!

PFU/mL!(10^y)! Hours!Past!3!Day!Exposure!

Shedding!Rate!in!Water!

Consider slope between 72 and 96 hours = 100.8−100.2 PFU/mL

24 hours

= 5.11 Consider slope between 96 and 120 hours = 101.3−100.8 PFU/mL

24 hours

= 14.36 Average these 2 values to get ω = 9.97 PFU/mL/day/individual

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

Experiment: 1 infected frog (exposed 96 hours ago) Contact with Susceptible frogs Monitored mortality over time

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

Experiment: 1 infected frog (exposed 96 hours ago) Contact with Susceptible frogs Monitored mortality over time

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ αD

µ = disease induced mortality

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ αD

µ = disease induced mortality

1 µ = length of infection period

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ αD

µ = disease induced mortality

1 µ = length of infection period

Above model assumes this is exponentially distributed

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ αD

µ = disease induced mortality

1 µ = length of infection period

Above model assumes this is exponentially distributed This means µ is constant and does not depend on the time spent in the compartment

ie: A frog that has been infected for 1 day is just as likely to die as a frog that has been infected for 3 days. A unrealistic assumption of the model!

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

Fit exponential function y = e−µt

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Model Simulations

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Update Model

Add in a Latent compartment

A frog exposed to the virus isn’t immediately infectious

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Update Model

Add in a Latent compartment

A frog exposed to the virus isn’t immediately infectious

Consider a gamma distribution for mortality

probability of mortality increases the longer the individual resides in the infection class Can achieve this by adding in stages of infection (multiple I compartments) This works because the sum of a sequence of independent exponentially-distributed random variables is gamma- distributed

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Base Model

βI

S I

ρf(V) η

V

ω δ

D

µ αD

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Full Model

∑ ( β I ) nµ

S L V

ρf(V) ω η

D

δ αD

I I

ε n

1

nµ nµ

i i

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Full Model: Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

µ diseased induced mortality

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Full Model: Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

µ diseased induced mortality

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Full Model: Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

µ diseased induced mortality

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Full Model: Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

µ diseased induced mortality

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Full Model: Disease Induced Mortality Parameter

µ diseased induced mortality Using 5 stages we get µ = 0.3329 /day

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Full Model: Incubation Parameter

1/ǫ incubation period

¡

0 ¡ 10 ¡ 20 ¡ 30 ¡ 40 ¡ 50 ¡ 60 ¡ 70 ¡ 80 ¡ 90 ¡ 100 ¡ 0 ¡ 1 ¡ 2 ¡ 3 ¡ 4 ¡ 5 ¡ 6 ¡ 7 ¡ 8 ¡ 9 ¡ 10 ¡ 11 ¡ 12 ¡ 13 ¡ 14 ¡

Survival ¡(%) ¡

Days ¡ ¡

Wood ¡Frog ¡Survival ¡Curve ¡

24hr ¡ ¡ 48hr ¡ 72hr ¡ ¡ 96hr ¡ ¡

We assume 1

ǫ = 1 day

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Base vs. Full Model

time (days)

5 10 15 20

Wood Frog % Survival

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Survival

Base model Full model

time (days)

5 10 15 20

Environmental Virus (PFU/mL)

#104 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Environmental Viral load

Base model Full model

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Full Model Simulations: Vary Contact Rate (density)

time (days)

5 10 15 20

Wood Frog % Survival

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Survival

c=10 c=100 c=1000

time (days)

5 10 15 20

Environmental Virus (PFU/mL)

#104 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Environmental Viral loads

c=10 c=100 c=1000

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Full Model Simulations: Vary Population Size

time (days)

5 10 15 20

Environmental Virus (PFU/mL)

#104 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Environmental Viral loads

N0=5000 N0=10,000 N0=15,000