Raising Awareness for In-Kind Contributions to ESS Expressions of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Raising Awareness for In-Kind Contributions to ESS

Expressions of Interest and Partner and Industry Campaign of ESS

Allen Weeks Communications, External Relations & In-Kind Division

www.europeanspallationsource.se

4 November 2015

2

2 GeV, 5 MW Accelerator Rotating Tungsten Target 16 Public Instruments 75 Hectare site

3

2013: The Challenge

IKC partners identified

✖

Funding commitment by partners

✖

Technical Design Report

✔

Cost Book €1.834B

✔

4

2013: Objectives for success

Secure political and financial commitment Promote the socio-economic returns and business

• pportunities

Identify potential IKC partners Create a joint

• wnership among

the Stakeholders

ESS is a Project ESS is an Idea ESS is an Commitment ESS is an Facility

Life Cycle

6

The long time-frame is crucial for communication strategy

2014

Construction work starts on the site

2009

Decision: ESS will be built in Lund

2025

ESS construction complete

2003

First European design effort of ESS completed

2012

ESS Design Update phase complete

2019

First neutrons on instruments

2023

ESS starts user program

7

Partner institutions involved in the design & construction of ESS

Aarhus University Atomki - Institute for Nuclear Research Agder University Budapest Neutron Centre CEA Saclay, Paris Centre for Energy Research, Budapest Centre for Nuclear Research – NCBJ, Poland CERN, Geneva CNR, Rome CNRS Orsay, Paris Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury DESY, Hamburg Delft University of Technology Edinburgh University Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste ESS Bilbao Forschungszentrum Jülich Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Huddersfield Univesrity IFJ PAN, Krakow INFN, Catania INFN, Legnaro INFN, Milan Institute for Energy Research - IFE Institut Laue-Langevin - ILL ISIS, Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Oxford LLB (Laboratoire Léon Brilouin) Lodz University of Technology Lund University Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR Oslo University Paul Sherrer Institute Tallinn Technical Univesrsity Technical University of Denmark Technical University Munich Science and Technology Facilities Council – STFC University of Tartu Uppsala University Wroclaw Univesrity of technology Warsaw University of Technology

8

2009: Major decision for ESS

15

Countries

2

Host countries

70:30

In-kind vs. cash

€1.84B

Construction Cost

9

Financing includes cash and deliverables

Host Countries of Sweden and Denmark

Construction 47.5% Operations 15%

Non Host Member Countries Construction 52.5%

Operations 85% In-kind Deliverables ~ 3% Cash Investment ~ 97% In-kind Deliverables ~ 70% Cash Investment ~ 30%

38.9%

Partner and Industry Days Campaign

The Partner and Industry Campaign

Secure the Partner Countries’ political and financial commitment to ESS

11

Create a sense of “joint ownership” and responsibility among all the partners Identify potential IKC partners in the ESS Partner Countries Raise awareness about the ESS and its imminent construction

Objectives

The Partner and Industry Campaign

12

Target Groups

Decision makers in national research institutes and universities National neutron user communities Potential supplier industry Decision makers in national research ministries Specialised media

“Do I see myself in ESS?”

13

Results:

40

Events

2500

Participants

17

Countries

14

2013: Call for Expression of Interest

Results:

196

Organisations

1165

Individual submissions

24

Countries

ESS In-kind Goals

15 € 37 € 101 € 228 € 382 € 37 € 54 € 122 € 128 € 00 € 100 € 200 € 300 € 400 € 500 € 600

Controls Target Instruments (NSS) Accelerator Cash IKC

€ 510 M € 350 M € 155 M € 73 M

Construction cost: € 1.84 Billion In-kind: € 747.5 Million

40.5%

20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000 120.000

11 12 13

WBS L2 Sum of 2014 Sum of 2015 Sum of 2016 Sum of 2017 Sum of 2018 Sum of 2019 Sum of 2020 Sum of 2021 Sum of 2022 Sum of 2023 Sum of 2024 Sum of 2025 Sum of Total Accelerator

2,624 11,552 69,941 108,041 88,498 41,517 13,502 6,157 2,309 344,140

Target

4 4,214 25,096 46,117 29,501 2,929 107,861

NSS

94 3,812 24,824 27,012 27,505 28,488 22,449 16,238 15,883 9,561 4,857 1,320 182,044

ICS

411 6,956 9,775 10,933 2,588 30,662

Grand Total

2,723 19,988 126,817 190,945 156,437 75,522 35,951 22,395 18,192 9,561 4,857 1,320 664,707

Accelerator Target NSS ICS

In-Kind Project Profile

In-Kind by Project

17

Accelerator Target NSS ICS Total Cost Book € 510.228,00 € 159.290,00 € 349.945,00 € 72.905,00 € 1.092.368,00 IKC € 385.000,00 € 103.538,50 € 227.464,25 € 36.452,50 € 752.455,25 Planned € 293.235,00 € 84.253,00 € 81.272,00 € 5.100,00 € 463.860,00 Estimated € 305.000,00 € 101.300,00 € 189.992,00 € 6.100,00 € 602.392,00

€ - € 200.000,00 € 400.000,00 € 600.000,00 € 800.000,00 € 1.000.000,00 € 1.200.000,00 Value in kEuro

In-Kind Status

Accelerator € 305,000 Target € 101,300 NSS € 189,992 ICS € 6,100 Total € 602,392

18

€ - € 20,00 € 40,00 € 60,00 € 80,00 € 100,00 € 120,00 € 140,00 € 160,00

CZ DK EE FR DE HU IT NO PL ES SE CH UK IKC Value Planned Current Estimate

In-Kind Estimates by Country

19

ESS In-Kind Process

ESS Projects

WPs/WU 1 WPs/WU 2 WPs/WU 3 WPs/WU 4

EOI response

ESS + Potential party discussion Contract proposal

IKRC + Council approval

IKC frame contract + technical annex Design, Production

ESS + Partner follow up and review

Delivery

(Integration commissioning, acceptance test)

ESS + Partner final acceptance

IKRC + Council approval Transfer of

• wnership

IKC Value crediting to member country

The ILO Network Role in In-Kind

Play an important role in raising awareness for ESS in their respective partner countries. The members of the ILO Network come from different facilities and backgrounds, thus semi-annual ILO Network meetings provide an

• pportunity for them to exchange

best practices and liaison with other ILOs.

20

Industrial Liaison Officers ESS Project In-kind Partner In-Kind Review Committee

ESS Council

Funding Agency Industrial Partner

The purpose of the ILO officers is to provide first-hand information on business and collaboration opportunities from within our Partner Countries.

Sweden 35.0 % Denmark * 12.5 % Germany * 11.0 % United Kingdom 10.0 % France 8.0 % Italy 6.0 % Spain * 5.0 % Switzerland 3.5 % Norway 2.5 % Poland 2.0 % Hungary 1.5 % Czech Rep. 0.3 % Estonia 0.25 % Total 97.55 %

Sep 2014: Ground Break

Important Symbolic Act Signals “start” to stakeholders and partners

22

Oct 2014: Foundation Stone Ceremony

23

24

Civil Construction – Time of the Groundbreaking

September 2014

June 2015 Progress on civil construction

July 2015 Progress on civil construction

Progress on civil construction September 2015

28

Progress on civil construction

29

Tunnel May 2015

ESS AB transitioned into European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC)

19 August 2015 The European Commission formally adopted its decision to establish the European Spallation Source (ESS) as a European Research Infrastructure Consortium, or ERIC. 28 August 2015 Decision entered into force

30

ERIC Founding Members Czech Republic Denmark Germany Estonia France Italy Hungary Norway Poland Sweden Switzerland ERIC Founding Observers Belgium Spain Netherlands United Kingdom ERIC Potential Members Greece Latvia Turkey Lithuania Portugal Iceland Finland

ESS AB transitioned into European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC)

31

ESS AB

• Swedish limited liability

corporation

• wned by the Swedish and

Danish governments

ESS ERIC

• European Research

Infrastructure Consortium

• Sole governing body: the

European Spallation Source ERIC Council, comprised of representatives from the Member and Observer Countries transfer of assets,

• bligations and

personnel by Oct 1, 2015

Turn Observers into Members Get MoU countries on board

32

Enlargement of Membership

Enlargement of Membership – Objectives

33

Europe ESS Partner Countries 1.Close the Gap/ Economic Evaluation 1.Stronger (Expertise) Programme / for Construction and Science 2.Contribution to Operations 3.Political support at European level

• 1. Scientific - Support existing

community and build new capacity 2.RI Participation 3.Macroeconomic situation 4.Political Motivation/Commitment Worldwide

34

Thank you!