Radon-EDM Experiment Eric Tardiff, Tim Chupp, Wolfgang Lorenzon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

radon edm experiment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Radon-EDM Experiment Eric Tardiff, Tim Chupp, Wolfgang Lorenzon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Radon-EDM Experiment Eric Tardiff, Tim Chupp, Wolfgang Lorenzon (University of Michigan) John Behr, Matt Pearson, Gordon Ball, Greg Hackman, Martin Smith (TRIUMF) Carl Svensson, Andrew Phillips, Mike Hayden (SFU) Norbert Pietralla, Georgi


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Radon-EDM Experiment

Eric Tardiff, Tim Chupp, Wolfgang Lorenzon (University of Michigan) John Behr, Matt Pearson, Gordon Ball, Greg Hackman, Martin Smith (TRIUMF) Carl Svensson, Andrew Phillips, Mike Hayden (SFU) Norbert Pietralla, Georgi Rainovsk, Gene Sprouse (SUNY Stony Brook)

TRIUMF

Canada's National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics

E-929 Collaboration (Guelph, Michigan, SFU, TRIUMF) Funding: NSF-Focus Center, DOE, NRC (TRIUMF), NSERC

TRIUMF E929

Spokesmen: Timothy Chupp & Carl Svensson

slide-2
SLIDE 2

P or T

+

_

gd > 0 gd < 0

Atomic Electric Dipole Moment

Separation of Charge along J: <d>=gd<J>

EDM Motivations

Undiscovered Study CP violation: mass scale Signal of NEW PHYSICS (beyond SM - CKM) Cosmological Baryon Asymmetry <d> = e<r> = e ∫ rρ d3r We measure gd <J•E> . E

if T is a symmetry, gd=-gd

d=e r <d> = gd<J> <r> = ___ <J>

gd e

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Octupole Deformation-Parity Doublets

(see Feynman vol 3.) NH3 |b> |a> |ψ±>= ____ ( |a> ± |b> ) 1 √ 2 S ~ <+|ηr3cos θ|-> ~ ηβ2β2

3ZA2/3r0 3

E+ - E- E+ - E-

β3 E

J

  • +

+ + +

  • -
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Nuclei with Octupole Deformation/Vibration

(Haxton & Henley; Auerbach, Flambaum, Spevak; Engel et al., Hayes & Friar, etc.)

S ~ <+|ηr3cos θ|-> ~ ηβ2β2

3ZA2/3r0 3

E+ - E- E+ - E-

Ref: Dzuba PRA66, 012111 (2002) - Uncertainties of 50% *Based on Woods-Saxon Potential † Nilsson Potential Prediction is 137 keV E

J

  • +

+ + +

  • -

NOTES: Ocutpole Enhancements Engel et al. agree with Flambaum et al. Even octupole vibrations enhance S (Engel…, Flambaum& Zelevinsky)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

βdecay Studies of Rn Structure 8 π @ TRIUMF

  • Very high-level density in the odd-A Rn isotopes within the β decay Q-value window
  • (e.g. ~ 3.2 MeV for 223At → 223Rn).
  • Many/most of the transitions will be highly converted.
  • Long chain of radioactive daughters requires flexible collect, count, move, cycles.
  • In this environment a γ-ray or electron singles spectrum is of little use in establishing

structure

  • (i.e. a decay scheme).
  • High statistics β: γ-γ, γ-e, e-e are required (and then some painstaking spectroscopy).
  • The 8π Spectrometer at ISAC is certainly the world’s best facility for such studies.
  • Timeline Issues: At beams at ISAC – late 2008 or 2009(?) is probably the earliest
  • : Although the experiments themselves could be short (< 1 week),
  • expect at least a year of spectroscopic analysis before definitive

structure results are obtained.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

8-π detector array

TRIUMF

Canada's National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics

E-929 Collaboration (Guelph, Michigan, SFU, TRIUMF)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

P or T

+

_

gd > 0 gd < 0

Atomic Electric Dipole Moment

B E 2µ.B-d.E

Precision: (σd)-1 = 4EΓ−1 (S/N) S/N =√ A2 NRn

T2 RF power B homogeneity E- E+

Γ

  • 1.0
  • 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 signal (volts) 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 time (µsec)

Δω Need high radon polarization and long relaxation.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Spin-Exchange Optical Pumping

  • Optically pump the Rb with

circularly polarized laser light.

  • Spin-exchange collisions

transfer the polarization to the radon nuclei.

Buffer gas collisions 1/2 1/2

2/3 1/3

5s1/2 5p1/2

ms=-1/2 ms=+1/2

Rb Rb

209Rn 209Rn

Binary Collision: τ~10-12 sec. Rb Rb

209Rn 209Rn

N2 N2 van Der Waals Molecule: τ is dependent on 3rd body (N2) pressure.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

8-Trigress detectors Magnetic Shielding (Active + Passive)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Gamma Ray Anisotropies

  • Polarized nuclei emit gamma rays with

calculable directional distributions.

W () = 1 4 1+ 3 2 ji(2 ji 1) mi

2ami 1

3 ji( ji +1)

mi

  • P

2(cos)

  • jf=ji-1 pure dipole transition

jf=ji jf=ji+1 δ

(W(0º)-W(90º))/(W(0º)+W(90º)) for jf=ji+1

W(θ) W(θ) θ θ δ δ

slide-11
SLIDE 11

14x10

3

12 10 8 6 Counts per bin 60 50 40 30 20 10 Time (s)

12x10

3

10 8 Counts per bin 20 18 16 14 12 10 Time (s) 12x10

3

10 8 Counts per bin 20 18 16 14 12 10 Time (s)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Gamma Anisotropy (A=0.2 0.1) T2 = 30 s E=5 kV/cm Statistics Limited by HPGe Count Rate

W () = 1 4 1+ 3 2 ji(2 ji 1) mi

2ami 1

3 ji( ji +1)

mi

  • P

2(cos)

  • jf=ji

jf=ji+1

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Beta Asymmetry

  • No count rate limit (current detection mode)
  • Discriminate species only by frequencies
  • Scattered betas (lower effective A, Background)
slide-14
SLIDE 14

REDM

We’ve started setting up at TIRUMF

slide-15
SLIDE 15

44.0 43.5 43.0 42.5 42.0 41.5 41.0 Bx (mG) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Time (Hours)

Romote Tracking of Laboratory Fields: (magnetometer at TRIUMF, Control in Michigan)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tigress Detectors have arrived

slide-17
SLIDE 17

120Cs (30 keV)

no radon at TRIUMF yet

  • 1. Bombard foil
  • 2. Heat foil: release to target chamber
  • 3. Freeze to cold finger
  • 4. PUSH to cell (buffer gas)

Maximum efficiency: εmax=75%

Progress: High efficiency tranfer of 120Xe at TRIUMF: from millstones to milestones

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Before Push After Push 43% efficiency NIM A vol 533 p 275 (2004)

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

209Fr (50 s) 197Au

heating

~100 MeV 16O

5 kV

  • 1. Make 209Fr and implant in foil
  • 2. 209Fr (50s) _> 209Rn (28.5 m)
  • 3. Heat foil: release to target chamber
  • 4. Freeze to cell
  • 5. Get about 500,000 209Rn in cell

HPGe2 HPGe1

Studies with 209Rn @ Stony Brook

Laser: LDA

slide-21
SLIDE 21

209Rn (28.5 m)

160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 800 700 600 500 400 300 600 500 400 300 200 100 800 700 600 500 400 300

337 keV 408 keV 511 keV 689 keV 745 keV

After transfer ~ 500,00 209Rn Before transfer

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The 209Rn Decay Scheme

(7/2)- 7/2- 7/2- 9/2- 1097.64 5/2- 209Rn 209At 745.78 408.33

1% 44% 15%

E.C.

γ-ray Energy Intensity δ (Mixing Ratio) 337.45 14.5 ∞ 408.32 50.3 0 689.26 9.7 >3.57 745.78 22.8 >2.86

2 = a1

2

a2

2

a1 =1 pure dipole a2 =1 pure quadrupole require : a1

2 + a2 2 =1

from Table of Isotopes

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Normalize 337 keV to 408 keV T=130° C Uncoated Pyrex Laser off Laser on

  • 0.06
  • 0.04
  • 0.02

0.00 0.02 Laser On - Laser Off 80 60 40 20 Theta

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5

  • P2(cos )

0.42 0.40 0.38 0.36 0.34 N337/N408 80 60 40 20 Theta

Alignment≈20%

  • f maximum

(bootstrap)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Spin Exchange Pumping

Laser Intensity Profile Optical pumping rate Rb polarization Absorption Rate Spin destruction rate Gas concentration Radon polarization Total magnetic moment Pressure broadening Spin Exchange Rate Buffer gas concentration Rb Concentration Radiation Trapping radon relaxation (quadrupole)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Modeling Polarization

  • Can calculate the expected

angular distribution of gamma rays as a function of spin- exchange and relaxation rates.

  • The spin-exchange rate γSE

depends on the Rb density, which depends on cell temperature.

  • The dipole and quadrupole

relaxation rates, Γ1 and Γ2, must be determined from data.

  • 5/2
  • 3/2
  • 1/2

1/2 3/2 5/2

1/7γSE 8/35γSE 9/35γSE 8/35γSE 1/7γSE 1/21Γ1 8/105Γ1 3/35Γ1 8/105Γ1 1/21Γ1 1/35Γ2 1/28Γ2 9/140Γ2 1/14Γ2 1/35Γ2 1/28Γ2 1/14Γ2 9/140Γ2

2(T) = 2

eE / kT

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Shows T2~4.5 h, dominated by Quadrupole Interactions (Γ 2>>Γ1)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Modeling Polarization

  • Quadrupole relaxation should be the dominant mechanism.
  • As a first approximation, set Γ1=0, calculate γSE for a given

T, and calculate the expected anisotropies.

W(0º)/W(90º) W(0º)/W(90º) Γ1 Γ1 Γ2 Γ2

jf=ji+1 jf=ji

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Fit for Γ2 (Ta=300°K) 0.05 Hz for uncoated 0.03 Hz for coateds Use 2.5x10-21 cm2 Improved by extensive measurements of PRb under varying conditions

slide-29
SLIDE 29

EDM Cell Development

We want a single cell @ 200C Problems: leakage currents, materials Silica (Fused Quartz) or Sapphire IN PROGRESS (Celia Cunnigham)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Backgrounds

Build-up of decay products for γ-anistropy probe Change cells (weekly?) - good for systematics Scattered betas (beta asymmetry detection) σω =

___ ______ = ____ ________________

2 1 2 1 T2 (S/N) T2 √ A2(1-B)2Nγ

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Systematics

Leakage currents -- must be minimized: Multiple species Electric quadrupole moment (gradients/walls) Change cells, cell shape/orientation: Multiple species Electric field effects on shields, electronics, etc. Check and measure with E=0 E2 and |E| effects (Stark shifts) Multiple Species: J=1/2, 3/2, etc. Motional effects <vxE> (negligible in gas cells) Δ

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

What’s next?

Cell development: coatings/electrodes/temperatures Laser Development Cell characterization with natural xenon:

  • 27% 129Xe (J=1/2); 21% 131Xe (J=3/2)

TRIUMF set up (EDM) measurements with xenon isotopes Measure Rn nuclear structure (8-π) Build up to RADON EDM measurements (~ 3 years)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Radon EDM Summary

Gamma Anisotropy (A=0.2 0.1) T2 = 30 s E=5 kV/cm

223Rn EDM projections

Production rates: 1x107 (ISAC)