R ELAPSED OR R EFRACTORY M ULTIPLE M YELOMA (RRMM) A ILAWADHI S 1 , S - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

r elapsed or r efractory m ultiple m yeloma rrmm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

R ELAPSED OR R EFRACTORY M ULTIPLE M YELOMA (RRMM) A ILAWADHI S 1 , S - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

F RACTIONATED D OSING OF CLR 131 IN P ATIENTS WITH R ELAPSED OR R EFRACTORY M ULTIPLE M YELOMA (RRMM) A ILAWADHI S 1 , S TIFF P 2 , I BRAHIM E 3 , V ALLURUPALLI A 4 , C ULL E 5 , G REEN DJ 6 , O LIVER K 7 , L ONGCOR J 7 1 M AYO C LINIC F LORIDA ; 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FRACTIONATED DOSING OF CLR 131 IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM)

AILAWADHI S1, STIFF P2, IBRAHIM E3, VALLURUPALLI A4, CULL E5, GREEN DJ6, OLIVER K7, LONGCOR J7

1MAYO CLINIC FLORIDA; 2LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CARDINAL BERNARDIN CANCER CENTER; 3REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; 4UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS CANCER CENTER; 5GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM; 6FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER; 7CELLECTAR BIOSCIENCES

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • Phospholipid ether (PLE) molecules are

utilized to deliver cytotoxic molecules to tumors

E A B C D F G

Caki-2 NFA

H

F, G and H show in vitro uptake of fluorescently labeled PLE. F=colorectal; G=glioma; H is co-culture A, B, C, D, E demonstrates presence of lipid rafts on various tumors . A=prostate; B=pancreatic; C=renal; D=lung; E is co-culture of lung tumor and normal fibroblasts and treated or 24 hours. Staining is with cholera toxin B. In vivo uptake in colorectal xenograft model. Image is 24 hours post infusion utilizing a near infra-red fluorescently labeled PLE.

  • PLEs show preferential uptake in broad

range of tumor cells; particularly hematologic cancers

  • Targeted in vivo delivery has been

demonstrated

  • Preclinical studies demonstrate that the

PLEs provide delivery of the I-131 to a wide range of tumors, including lymphoma

  • PLEs bind and enter tumor cells via lipid

rafts; lipid rafts have been shown to be more prevalent and stabilized in tumor cells

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Rationale in RR Multiple Myeloma

  • CLR 131 is a targeted radiotherapeutic leveraging PLE molecules to provide targeting of an

I-131 payload

  • CLR 131 has been administered to over 80 patients (Phase 1/Phase 2 studies, hematologic

and solid tumors)

  • CLR 131 has

demonstrated significant uptake and efficacy in preclinical multiple myeloma models with a single dose

  • Here we provide initial

clinical trial data on the benefits of fractionated dosing

Selective uptake of radioiodinated CLR 124 in MM flank xenograph tumors. Selective uptake of radioiodinated CLR 124 in a disseminated MM model. Confirmatory CD138 staining:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Dosing Regimen Rationale

Analysis of Bexxar and DeNardo Data

  • It was demonstrated that 75cGy should be the

target absorbed dose to be efficacious with I-131 (Bexxar)1

  • Patients with rapid clearance will require higher

doses to achieve the appropriate area under the curve to create the absorbed dose of 75cGy1

  • The majority of patients require 90mCi or greater

to achieve 75cGy absorbed dose 1

– 70% response rate when 75cGy achieved

  • Fractionated dosing demonstrated an ability to

increase the total body dose (and efficacy) without increasing the toxicity2

– Tumor absorbed dose was increased – Bone marrow absorbed dose was decreased – Strategy allowed for treatment of patients with greater bone marrow involvement

  • 1. Seldin, DW. Techniques for Using Bexxar for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J Nuc Med Tech. 2002; 30(3): 109-114.
  • 2. DeNardo, GL., et al. Rationale, Evidence and Design Considerations for Fractionated Radioimmunotherapy. Cancer. 2002; 94(4): 1332 - 1347
slide-5
SLIDE 5

CLR 131 RR Hematologic Studies Overview

(Phase 1: NCT02278315; CLOVER-1: NCT02952508)

Phase 1 RRMM

Data presented focuses on relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients receiving CLR 131 either as a single bolus dose at 31.25mCi/m2 or one of two fractionated doses (31.25mCi/m2 split in 2 or 37.5mCi/m2 split in 2) + low dose dexamethasone (40mg/week for 12 weeks).

  • ECOG 0-2; expected survival no less than 6 months
  • No limit to number of prior therapies
  • Designated study period: 85 days. Patients received weekly labs and AE assessments. Could be done locally.

Phase 2 RR B-cell Malignancies

Up to 10 patients with a CBR

  • f ≥20% in each cohort

Denotes Ongoing

15 mCi/m2 x 2 20 mCi/m2 x 2

Follow-up (≥ 1yr After Last Dose)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RRMM Fractionated Dose Patient Characteristics

Bolus dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=3 Fractionated Dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=10 Fractionated Dose 37.5mCi/m2 n=6 All Fractionated MM Subjects n=16 Median Age 67 69 74 71 Min 59 51 59 51 Max 70 75 83 83 Female 2 4 2 6 Male 1 6 4 10 Median Prior Therapies 5 5 4 4 Min 3 2 2 2 Max 8 13 6 13 Quad-refractory or greater (%) 66% 43% 80% 58% Cytogenetics at Diagnosis High Risk 1 3 3 6 Not High Risk 2 4 2 6 Unknown 3 1 4

Data as of 30Jul2019

Fractionated Cohorts Together:

  • Median age: 71 years
  • Average bone marrow plasma cell

involvement: 23% (Range 1%-60%)

  • Majority of patients are quad

refractory or greater

‒ 37.5mCi/m2 cohort at 80%

  • Quad- or more refractory:

Refractory to 4 or more out of lenalidomide, bortezomib, pomalidomide, carfilzomib or daratumumab

  • Cytogenetics shows even split

between high risk and not high risk

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Safety Population - Summary of TEAEs

(Treatment Emergent AE / Regardless of Causality) >20%

Data as of 30Jul2019

Event term Bolus Dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=3 (%) Fractionated Dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=10 (%) Fractionated Dose 37.5mCi/m2 n=6 (%) All Fractionated Subjects n=16 (%) Thrombocytopenia 3 (100) 7 (70) 4 (67) 11 (69) Fatigue 3 (100) 6 (60) 4 (67) 10 (63) Anemia 3 (100) 5 (50) 2 (33) 7 (44) Neutropenia 3 (100) 5 (50) 2 (33) 7 (44) Lymphocyte count decreased 3 (100) 6 (60) 1 (17) 7 (44) White blood cell count decreased 3 (100) 6 (60) 1 (17) 7 (44) Dyspnea 1 (33) 5 (50) 2 (33) 7 (44) Nausea 3 (100) 2 (20) 2 (33) 4 (25) Weight decreased 1 (33) 3 (30) 1 (17) 4 (25) Headache 3 (30) 1 (17) 4 (25)

  • CLR 131 demonstrates limited “off-target” effects

− No peripheral neuropathy, no changes in liver enzyme, and no renal toxicities − Cytopenias are the most common AE (Growth factor and transfusion support was as per institutional guidelines)

  • Fractionated dosing demonstrates improved tolerability as compared to bolus dosing

− Reduction in cytopenias

Bolus Dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=3 (%) Fractionated Dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=10 (%) Fractionated Dose 37.5mCi/m2 n=6 (%) All Fractionated Subjects n=16 (%) 3 (100) 7 (70) 4 (67) 11 (69) 2 (66.6) 1 (10) 0 (0) 1 (6) 3 (100) 3 (30) 2 (33) 5 (42) 3 (100) 5 (50) 2 (33) 7 (44) 3 (100) 6 (60) 1 (17) 7 (44) 3 (100) 5 (50) 1 (17) 6 (37) 1 (33) 2 (20) 0 (0) 2 (12.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Grade 3/4 Only All Grades

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CLR 131 Safety Population - Cytopenia Trends

50 100 150 200 250 Screening Day 1 Day 8 Day 15 Day 22 Day 29 Day 36 Day 43 Day 50 Day 57 Day 64 Day 71 Day 78 Day 85

Average Platelet Count

Average 31.25 Bolus Average 31.25 Fractionated Average 37.5 Fractionated 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 Screening Day 1 Day 8 Day 15 Day 22 Day 29 Day 36 Day 43 Day 50 Day 57 Day 64 Day 71 Day 78 Day 85

Average Hemoglobin

Average 31.25 Bolus Average 31.25 Fractionated Average 37.5 Fractionated

Assessment Ongoing

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tumor Assessment & Disease Control Rates (During 85 Day Study Assess. Period)

Tumor Response (n=16)

Bolus Dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=3 (%) Fractionated Dose 31.25mCi/m2 n=7 (%) Fractionated Dose 37.5mCi/m2 n=6 (%) All Fractionated MM Subjects n=13 (%) Partial Response 1 (33) 1 (14.3) 3 (50) 5 (30.8) Minimal Response 3 (42.9) 3 (50) 6 (46.1) Stable Disease 2 (66) 3 (42.9) 3 (23.1%) Progressive Disease

Data as of 30Jul2019

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Partial Response Minimal Response Stable Disease Progressive Disease Bolus Dose 31.25mCi/m2 Fractionated Dose 31.25mCi/m2 Fractionated Dose 37.5mCi/m2

  • Mean follow up of patients on fractionated dosing (n=13): 4.4 months
  • Overall response rate (ORR):

‒ All patients presented (n=16): 31.3% ‒ Fractionated dosing (n=13): 30.8% ‒ Fractionated dosing at 37.5mCi/m2: 50%

100% Disease Control

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Waterfall Plot of Best Patient Responses

  • 100
  • 80
  • 60
  • 40
  • 20

20 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Patients

Minimal Response Partial Response

31.25mCi/m2 Bolus 31.25mCi/m2 Fractionated 37.5mCi/m2 Fractionated

Stable Disease

Fractionated dosing results in greater reduction in M-protein or FLC versus bolus dosing

slide-11
SLIDE 11

20 40 60 80 100 120 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Percent of Patient Weeks

Progression Free Survival

Kaplan Meier Curve of Progression Free Survival

31.25mCi/m2 bolus 31.25mCi/m2 fractionated

  • 37. 5mCi/m2 fractionated
  • All 3 dosing regimens show CLR 131

progression free survival (PFS) is consistent with other RRMM drugs

− To date, median PFS approximately 3-4 months in all three doses

  • Fractionated dosing appears to

improve progression free survival

− Both fractionated doses have patients exceeding 6 months of PFS

  • Majority of patients are quad

refractory or greater

− 37.5mCi/m2 cohort: 80%

  • Patients alive at the time of data cut
  • ff: 13
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pharmacokinetics By Dosing Regime of CLR 131

  • Increased plasma exposure has demonstrated increased tumor uptake and increased responses
  • Cycle two could more than double the plasma exposure further increasing tumor uptake and potentially

increasing overall responses, durability of responses, progression free survival and overall survival

25mCi/m2 31.25mCi/m2 37.5mCi/m2 fractionated 30mCi/m2 fractionated x 2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusions

  • CLR 131 is well tolerated with cytopenic events being the majority of TEAE reported

– Fractionated dosing improves tolerability over bolus dosing

  • CLR 131 demonstrates efficacy in late line, heavily pretreated and multiple-agent

refractory multiple myeloma patients

– Approximately 30% ORR observed across all doses – 50% ORR with 37.5mCi/m2 fractionated dose – 100% disease control rate across all doses (over the study period)

  • Fractionated dosing demonstrates increasing response rates vs. bolus dose
  • The efficacy data is comparable to certain other novel agents in combination with

dexamethasone, with the advantage of non-continuous dosing and predictable AEs.

  • This data warrants further clinical development of CLR I 131. Ongoing clinical trials will

pave the way for future studies including combination therapies, and repeat dosing.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acknowledgements

Mayo Clinic Florida1,2 Redlands Community Hospital2 University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center1,2 University of Rochester2 Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University1,2 Prism Health Cancer Center2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center2 Ochsner Cancer Institute2 University of Kansas2 Northwestern - Warrenville2

1Phase 1 (NCT02278315); 2Phase 2 CLOVER-1 (NCT02952508)

Additionally, we would like to thank all of the patients and their families for their participation and support of clinical trials