PULSAR FORMATION RATES HOW HOW ? ? - - PDF document

pulsar formation rates
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PULSAR FORMATION RATES HOW HOW ? ? - - PDF document


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PULSAR FORMATION RATES

HOW HOW ? ?

✂✁ ✄ ☎ ✆ ✁ ✝ ✞ ✆ ✟ ✄ ✠ ✄ ✡ ✟ ✆ ✁ ☛ ✆ ☞ ✟ ✌ ✍ ☎ ✎✏✆ ✄ ☞ ✆ ✎ ✞✒✑ ✓ ✄ ✠ ✔✖✕ ✗✙✘ ✟ ✚ ✁ ☛ ✆ ✛ ✟ ✆ ✎ ✆ ✜ ✝ ✞ ✄ ✑ ✆ ✠ ✠ ✆ ✜ ✝ ✟ ✢ ✄ ✁ ✁ ✆ ✜ ✝ ✞ ✄ ✑ ✠ ✌ ✜ ✝ ✄ ✁ ✟ ☞ ✚ ✆ ✝ ✄ ✆ ✍ ✞ ✟ ✟ ✞ ✄ ✑ ☎ ✁ ✄ ✜ ✆ ✟ ✟ ✆ ✟ ✣ ✤✦✥ ✧ ★✪✩ ✫ ★✭✬ ✤✯✮ ✰ ✧ ★ ✤✯✱ ✬ ★ ✰ ✩ ✲ ★ ✩ ★ ✬ ✳ ✮ ✴ ✱ ✫ ✰ ✥ ✵ ✶ ✰ ✮ ✩ ✫ ★ ✬ ✤✯✮ ✰ ✧ ★ ✤ ✱ ✬ ★ ✰ ✩ ✲ ✥ ✬ ★ ✰ ✵ ✷ ✞ ✠ ✆ ✝ ✞ ✍ ✆ ✆ ✟ ✝ ✞ ✍ ✌ ✝ ✆ ✟
slide-2
SLIDE 2

PULSAR FORMATION RATES

HOW HOW ? ?

✸✺✹ ✻ ✼ ✽✦✾ ✻ ✾ ✿ ❀ ✽ ❁ ✹ ❀ ✾ ✿ ❂ ❃❅❄ ❆ ❇ ❈ ❉✦❊ ❋
❈✒❍ ■ ❉ ❄ ❏ ❄ ❇ ❉ ❈✒❑ ▲ ❉ ❄ ▼ ◆ ❉ ■ ❄ ❆ ❖ ❑ P ❄◗ ▼ ◆ ❘✖❙ ❚ ❇ ❈ ❆ ❉ ■❅❄ ▲ ❯ ▲ ❱ ❊ ◆ ▼ ◗ ❄ ❲ ❄ ◗ ❊ ▼ P ❇ ❄ ◗ ❲ ❄ ❏ ▼ ❆ ❄ P ▲ ❇ ❄ ❏ ▼ ❆ ❳ ❨ ❳ ❑ ▲ ❱ ▲ ◗ ❍ ❖ ❑ ❄ ❆ ❉ ❇ ❩ ❙ ❬ ▲ ❯ ❄ ◆ ▲ ❬ ❉ ▼ ◗ ❩ ❬ ▲ ❯ ❬ ❖ ❯ ▲ ❉ ❈ ▼ ❆ ❭ ❈ ❆ ❲ ❄ ◗ ❇ ❄ ❪ ◗ ▼ P ❯ ❄ ❑
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Radio Pulsars in NS-NS binaries NS-NS Merger Rate Estimates

❫❵❴ ❛ ❜❞❝ ❡ ❝ ❢❤❣ ❴ ✐ ❥ ❦ ❧ ❣ ❴ ♠ ❧ ❣ ❢ ❜ ❛ ❡ ❢ ❧ ✐ ❝ ❦ ❧ ❥ ❢ ❡ ❜❞❝ ❢ ❜ ❧ ❣ ❜ ♥ ❧ ❝ ❢ ❜ ♠ ❜ ❧ ♥♣♦

small - number observed sample (2 NS -NS in Galactic field) PSR population dominated by faint objects Robust lower limit for the MW: 1 per Myr Upward correction factor for faint PSRs: ~ 1-500

Narayan et al. '91; Phinney '91; Curran & Lorimer '95; Arzoumanian et al. '99; VK et al. '01

Scale-factor calculations:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Statistical "Forward" Approach Calculation

  • f Rate

Probability Distribution

It is pos s ible to as s ign s tatis tical s ignificance to NS-NS rate es timates with Monte Carlo s imulations

q rts s ✉ ✈ ✇②① ③ ✉ ④⑤ ⑥ ✈ ⑦ ⑧⑩⑨ ❶ ❷❹❸ s ✉ ❷ ❺❼❻ ❽ ❷ ✉ ❺❿❾ ❷ ➀ ⑨ ❺ ❷ s ❸ ✇ s ④ ⑨ ⑧ ⑤ ❺ ✈ ➁ ⑤ ⑧ ⑤ ➂ ❻ ➃ ❷ ❺ r ➄➆➅➈➇ ➅ ➉ ➉ ➊ ➋ ➊ ➌➎➍ ➊ ➏➑➐ ⑧ ❷ ➒ ✈ ➓ ➓ ④ ⑨ ⑧ ✉ ⑤ ❾ ✉ ① ❷ ❶ ⑨ ⑧ ⑤ ❺ ✈ ✇ ① ③ ✉ ⑨ ❾ ➔ ✈ ❻ ❽ ✈ ❺ ✈ ⑥ ❺ ❷ s ❸ ⑤ ❸ ❽ ④ ❾ s ❽ ⑨ ⑥ ✈ s ➀ ✉ ✈ ❾ ➔ ✈ ❽ ✉ ⑤ ❶ ④ ⑧ ✈ ✉ → ❷ ✉ ❺❿❾ ❷ ➀ ⑨ ❺ ❷ s ❸ s ➣ ➄ ➇ ↔❹↕ ➣ s ❾ ⑤ ➙ ❷ ➔ ✈ ❸ ➄➆➅ ➇ ➅ ➛ ✇ s ❷ ✉ ✉ s ❸ q ⑤ ⑧ ⑥ ⑨ ⑧ ⑤ ❺ ✈ ✇ ➜ ➊➞➝ ➄ ➅ ➇ ➅ ➟ ➣ s ❾ ➀ ✈ ✉ ❺ ➐ ➣ ❷ ❺ ❺ ❷ ❸ ➙ ✇ s ❷ ✉ ✉ s ❸ ❽ ❷ ✉ ❺ ❾ ❷ ➀ ⑨ ❺ ❷ s ❸ → ✈ ❾ ❷ ➔ ✈ ✇ ➜ ➄ ➅➈➇ ➅ ➟ ➜ ➠ ⑤ ❻ ✈ ✉ ❷ ⑤ ❸ ⑤ ❸ ⑤ ⑧ ❻ ✉ ❷ ✉ ➟ ⑤ ❸ ❽ ✇ ➜ ③➑➡ ➢ ➡ ➤ ➟ ③ ✈ ④ ✈ ⑤ ❺ ➣ s ❾ ➊ ➥ ➌ ➦ ➍ ➊ ➧ ⑤ ❸ ❽ ❽ ✈ ❾ ❷ ➔ ✈ ✇ ➜ ③➩➨➭➫ ➨ ➟

Kim, VK, Lorimer '03

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PSR B1913+16 Distribution of number

  • f objects
➯ ➲ ➳❤➵

in

  • bserved samples:

Poisson

➸ ➺ ➯ ➲ ➳ ➵ ➻ ➼ ➽➚➾ ➾ ➼ ➪➹➶ ➘t➴ ➷ ➬ ➮ ➱✙✃ ➼ ❐ ❒ ➶ ➘ ➴ ❮

Likelihood of current sample:

P(1 ;

) =

exp(-

)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The mean of the Poisson distribution

❰ Ï Ð ÑtÒ Ó

is linearly proportional to the total number of PSRs in the Galaxy:

Ô Õ Ö × Ø Ù✖Ú Û Ô Ü ×ÞÝ❿ß Ý

Using Bayes' theorem we calculate the probability distribution:

à á × Ý ß Ý âäã ã Ü

2

× åçæ åéè ê ë á✙ì Ü × Ý ß Ý â

and the most likely value is:

× í î ï ð

= 1/

Ü

PSR B1913+16

slide-7
SLIDE 7 ñ➑ò ó ôöõ ÷ õ øúùüû ý þ ÿ ✁ ✂☎✄ ✆ ó ñ õ ÷ õ ✁ ò ò ✆ ó ñ✞✝ ✁ ✆ ó ñ ✟ ✁ ø✡✠ ☛✌☞ ✍ ☛ ☞ ✎✑✏ ✒ ✓✕✔ ✖ ✗ ✔ ✘ ✗ ✔ ✙ ✒ ✚ ✔ ✛

Using the probability distribution we can calculate the most likely rate

✜ ✢ ✣ ✤ ✥

as well as the ranges

  • f rates at various

confidence levels

slide-8
SLIDE 8 ✦★✧ ✩ ✪✬✫ ✭ ✮ ✪ ✯✱✰ ✩✳✲ ✲ ✲

Dependence of most likely coalescence rate

  • n the PSR LF

parameters:

✴✶✵ ✴✸✷ ✹✻✺ ✴✽✼ ✴ ✾ ✿❁❀

Rpeak is mostly insensitive to the spatial distribution parameters

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Current expectations for most likely advanced (initial) LIGO detection rates of NS-NS inspiral events

❂ ❃ ❄❆❅ ❃ ❄ ❇ ❅ ❃ ❈ ❇ ❂ ❉ ❊ ❃ ❊ ❋
❄■❍

Rdet 4-100

(1/yr) (1-25) x 10-3

Typical uncertainties:

❏✡❑ ▲ ▼❖◆ P ◆ ◗ ❘ ❙❚ ❙ ❯❆❱ ❲ ❳ ❯ ❨❬❩ ❙ ◗ ❭ ❘ ❪ ❘ ▲ ▼ ◆ P ◆ ◗ ❭ ❘ ❪ ❪ ▲ ▼ ◆ P ◆ ◗ ❏❴❫
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Radio Pulsars in NS-WD binaries NS-WD Merger Rate Estimates

❵ ❛ ❜❞❝ ❡ ❢ ❣ ❤ ✐ ❥❧❦ ❡ ❢ ❦ ♠ ❜ ♥ ♦ ❥ ❜ ♣❁q ♥ ❜❞r q ❦ s t r ❤ ❡ ❢ ❡ ❛ ❥ q t ❢ ❦ ♦ t ❢ ♥ q ❢ ♥ ♦ ❡ ❝ ❡ ✉ ✐ ❛ ❛ ❥ q ♥ ❜❞r q ❡ ❢ q ✈ ❝ t ♠ ❝ ❜ ❝ ♥ ♦ q ✇ ❡ ❥ ❡ ① ❣ ②

PSR J0751+1807 PSR J1757- 5322 PSR J1141- 6545 PSR J1141- 6545

③⑤④ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧ ⑨ ⑨ ⑩ ❶ ❷❸ ❹ ③ ❺ ❻★❼ ❽ ❶ ❾ ④ ❼ ⑧ ❾ ③ ❿ ⑦ ❺ ③❞➀ ⑦ ⑩ ❿ ⑩ ❷ ❾ ⑨ ➁ ➂ ➃ ➄ ⑨ ⑧ ➅ ③ ❺ ➆ ⑩ ➀ ③ ❷ ❼ ❺ ⑦ ④ ❺ ❻ ⑦ ➇ ➈➊➉ ➋ ➌ ⑧ ❼ ❺ ⑦ ➍ ⑨ ❿ ❼ ⑧ ➎

(Edwards & Bailes '01) (Kaspi et al. '00) (Lundgren et al. '95)

slide-11
SLIDE 11 ➏■➐ ➑ ➒ ➓ ➑ ➔✬➐ → ➣ ↔ ↕✸➙ ➐ ➛ ➜➞➝ ➛ ➟ ➠ ➔ ➡➤➢ ➥ ➔ ➑ ➦ ➝ ➧ ➐ ➑ ➨ ➠ ➦➩ ➫ ➢ ➛ ➛ ➐ ➫ ➔ ➠ ➢ ➦ ➭✌➯■➲ ➳ ➵ ➸ ➢ ➑ ➺ ➐ ➻ ➫ ➐ ➦ ➫ ➐ ➓ ➑ ➔ ➐
slide-12
SLIDE 12 ➼➾➽ ➚ ➪ ➶➘➹ ➴➬➷ ➪ ➷ ➚ ➹ ➮ ➮ ➮ ➱❐✃ ❒ ❮✬❰ ÏÑÐ ÒÓ ÏÑÐ ❮ Ï Ô✽Õ ÖØ× Ô Ù ❰ Ö Ô Ó ✃ Õ Ú Ó × Û ❰ ❮ Õ Ð Û × Ó Ú Ô ❮ Ð Õ Ü ✃ Ï Ù Ô ✃ Ü × Ý Ó × Ù Ô Ö ❒ Þ Ü × Ü ❒ Ö Ð × Ô Õ Ö Ô ❒ Õ ß Û Û ❮ Ý × Ü Ö Ð ❒ Ó ✃ Õ Ö × Ü Ô ✃ Ö Õ Ó ✃ Û Ó Û ❰ ❮ Ü Ö Ô Ó ✃ Õ Ý ✃ Ö Þ Ð Õ Ô✽Õ Ò Ó Ï Ð ❮ Õ à Ù Ö Ü Ô ✃ ✃ ❰ Ò Ù Ð × Ð Õ Ö Ô Ò Ü Ö Ð Õ Ú Ó × Û ❰ ❮ Õ Ü × Õ Ô ✃ á ❮ Ó Ù ❰ ❮ Ü × ❒ ❮✬❰ Õ Ö Ð × Õ