CTP for PANA draft-bournelle-pana-ctp-00.txt Julien Bournelle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ctp for pana
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CTP for PANA draft-bournelle-pana-ctp-00.txt Julien Bournelle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CTP for PANA draft-bournelle-pana-ctp-00.txt Julien Bournelle Maryline Laurent-Maknavicius Hannes Tschofenig Yacine El Mghazli Gerardo Giaretta Outline Problem Aim of this I-D Issues Re-authentication from scratch ? nAR/EP


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CTP for PANA

draft-bournelle-pana-ctp-00.txt Julien Bournelle Maryline Laurent-Maknavicius Hannes Tschofenig Yacine El Mghazli Gerardo Giaretta

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Problem
  • Aim of this I-D
  • Issues
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Re-authentication from scratch ?

nPAA will authenticate PaC whereas it has already been authenticated by pPAA

pPAA pAR/EP nPAA nAR/EP PaC

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Basic ideas

  • Use of CTP should improve handover

performance in mobile environments

  • PANA specs handle this problem in section 4.12

“Mobility handling” and mention use of CTP

  • This draft tries to detail procedure and specify

what should be transferred as required in CTP. “Contexts are identified by FPT code, which is a 16-

bit unsigned integer. The meaning of each context type is determined by a specification document and the context type numbers are to be tabulated in a registry maintained by IANA [IANA]...”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2 cases to be considered

  • Reactive case

– CTP after the IP handover

  • Predictive case

– CTP before the IP handover

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Reactive case

  • PaC has already performs its IP handover

pPAA pAR/EP nPAA nAR/EP Trigger from the PaC CTD-PANA CT-Request

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Predictive case

  • PaC knows its nAR/EP
  • After handover, PaC must confirm

Trigger from the PaC pPAA pAR/EP nPAA nAR/EP CTD-PANA CT-Reply

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Various issues (I)

  • CTP mentions use of CTAR message to trigger

the transfer.

– seems necessary in predictive case – may be avoided in reactive case (cf. PANA spec)

  • Who enables the transfer ?

– in CTP: MN and pAR shares a key. The pAR validate

an authentication token (CTAR)

– if PAA (PANA module): can we still talk about

CTP ?

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Do we need to introduce new state in state

machine ? (in which state is the PAA during CTP transfer)

  • PAAs are not ARs (CTP mentions ARs)
  • Should we handle inter-domain scenario ?

Various issues (II)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thanks

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Backup Slides

slide-12
SLIDE 12

PANA Context

  • Session-Lifetime Elapsed
  • AAA-Key-int
  • AAA server who performed the authentication
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Reactive case: 3 approaches

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Seamoby CTP friendly (#1)

PaC nPAA pPAA PSA CTAR CT-Req CTD-PANA CTAA PSR

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Our proposal (#2)

PaC nPAA pPAA PBA PSA-CTAR CT-Req CTD-PANA PBR PSR

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PANA specs proposal (4.12) (#3)

PaC nPAA pPAA PAB PSA CT-Req CTD-PANA PBR PSR

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Predictive case

  • PaC sends a CTAR to pPAA
  • PaC must activate the context at nPAA: nPAA

must validate this request

pPAA nPAA CTD-PANA CT-Reply