proton ceramic steam electrolysers
play

Proton Ceramic Steam Electrolysers Einar Vllestad 1 , R. Strandbakke - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Proton Ceramic Steam Electrolysers Einar Vllestad 1 , R. Strandbakke 1 , Dustin Beeaff 2 and T. Norby 1 1 University of Oslo, Department of Chemistry, 2 CoorsTek Membrane Sciences AS Theoretical considerations on electrolysis operation


  1. Proton Ceramic Steam Electrolysers Einar Vøllestad 1 , R. Strandbakke 1 , Dustin Beeaff 2 and T. Norby 1 1 University of Oslo, Department of Chemistry, 2 CoorsTek Membrane Sciences AS  Theoretical considerations on electrolysis operation  Development and performance of tubular Proton Ceramic Electrolysers (PCEs)

  2. Literature data for Proton Ceramic Electrolysers (PCEs) Key question: What is the origin of the low faradaic efficiencies observed in many PCEs? η (%) Electrolyte Anode T emperature i ASR Ref (mA cm 2 ) ( Ω cm 2 ) SSY541 SSC 600 100 4 ~80 Matsumoto, 2012 BCZY53-Zn BSCF 800 55 20 50 Li, 2013 BZCY72 LSCF 700 100 6 50 Babiniec, 2015 BCZY53-Zn LSCM- 700 2000 6-8 22 Gan, 2012 BCZYZ BCZY62 BSCF 600 1050 0.5 99 (?) Yoo, 2013 BCZY53 SSC-BCZY 700 400 1 - He, 2010 Degradation and decomposition in H 2 O

  3. Operating Principles of Proton Ceramic Electrolysers (PCEs) e - U 2H 2 O O 2- 4H + 2H 2 O  O 2 + 4H + +4e - 4H + +4e -  2H 2 Z el,a R ion Z el,c O 2 R e- h + 0  e - + h + e - + h +  0 Electrolyte Anode Cathode

  4. Potentials through a solid oxide electrolyser Electrolyte E F SOEC OCV E F SOFC H 2 O 2 x

  5. Electronic conductivity distribution during PCE operation Electrolyte σ p SOEC σ p ∝ p O 2 1/4 ∝ exp( E F /4) σ p,OCV σ e H 2 O 2 x

  6. The effect of partial electronic conductivity on faradaic efficiency 2.0 30 H 2 production (mL min 20 t e = 0 Voltage 1.5 10 t e = 0 -1 ) 1.0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Current

  7. The effect of partial electronic conductivity on faradaic efficiency 2.0 30 H 2 production (mL min 20 t e = 0 t e = 0.25 Voltage 1.5 10 t e = 0 -1 ) t e = 0.25 1.0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Current

  8. The effect of partial electronic conductivity on faradaic efficiency 2.0 30 H 2 production (mL min 20 t e = 0 t e = 0.25 t e = 0.5 Voltage 1.5 10 t e = 0 -1 ) t e = 0.25 t e = 0.5 1.0 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Current

  9. Electrode performance and steam content significantly influence faradaic efficiency Steam content dependence with fixed t H = 0.8 Anode dependence for with fixed t H = 0.8 90 p H2O = 0.95 Faraday efficiency (%) Faraday efficiency (%) 80 80 p H2O = 0.75 70 p H2O = 0.5 60 Anode performance 60 1.25 1.50 1.75 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Voltage (V) Voltage U N Z el,a R ion Z el,c R e-

  10. Tubular half-cell production Wet milling of precursors Extrusion of BZCY72-NiO support Spray-coating BZCY72 electrolyte Dip-coating suspensions NiO based paste Solid State Reactive Sintering

  11. Dense tubular half-cells achieved Dense electrolyte @ 1550 ° C – 24h 1610 ° C – 6h 40 microns

  12. Steam electrode processing on reduced tubes Cap and seal segment using 1. glass ceramic from CoorsTek Deposit Ba 0.7 Gd 0.8 La 0.5 Co 2 O 6- δ as 2. steam electrode by paint brush Firing in dual atmosphere: 3.  1000°C  2% O 2 outside, 5% H 2 inside  E cell = 1.4 V during firing Cell 1 Gold paste applied as current 4. collector

  13. Electrolysis with single phase BGLC electrode Current (A) 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 5 700°C 650°C n -1 ) o 4 600°C i t c H 2 production (NmL min u d 550°C o Faradaic efficiencies vs cell potential r p 700°C H 2 3 c i a 650°C d a 100 r a 600°C F 2 550°C 550°C 600°C Faradaic efficiency (%) 650°C 1 700°C 80 0 2.0 60 Potential (V) 1.5 700°C 650°C 600°C 550°C 40 Anode: 1.0 1.5 2.0 Cathode: p tot = 3 bar 1.0 Potential (V) p H 2 O = 1.5 bar p tot = 3 bar p O 2 = 80 mbar p O 2 = 30 mbar p H 2 = 0.3 bar 0 50 100 150 200 -2 ) Current density (mA cm

  14. Electrolysis with single phase BGLC electrode Current (A) 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 5 700°C 650°C n -1 ) o 4 600°C i Impedance at 600°C for increasing t c H 2 production (NmL min u d 550°C o r p 700°C galvanostatic bias H 2 3 c i a 650°C d a r a 600°C F 2 550°C -1 1 0 0 2 ) // ( Ω cm 2.0 1 OCV Poor adhesion and delamination of the Z Potential (V) 50 100 2 1.5 electrode layer observed in post 300 700°C 650°C 600°C 550°C 3 characterization Anode: Cathode: p tot = 3 bar 1.0 p H 2 O = 1.5 bar p tot = 3 bar - Improved processing route needed 4 5 6 7 8 p O 2 = 80 mbar p O 2 = 30 mbar p H 2 = 0.3 bar / ( Ω cm 2 ) Z 0 50 100 150 200 -2 ) Current density (mA cm

  15. Steam electrode processing on unreduced tubes BZCY72- Ba 0.5 Gd 0.8 La 0.7 Co 2 O 6- δ 1. applied as steam electrode  Fired in air at 1200°C for 5h  Infiltrated with nanocrystalline Ba 0.5 Gd 0.8 La 0.7 Co 2 O 6- δ  Thin Pt layer current collection Capped and sealed at 1000°C 2.  Semi-dual atmosphere to keep BGLC layer intact Cell 2 NiO reduction at 800°C in 10% 3. H 2 for 24h  Kept in electrolytic bias during reduction to avoid re-oxidation

  16. Electrolysis with composite BZCY-BGLC electrode -2 ) Current Density (mA cm 0 100 200 20 Faradaic H 2 production -1 ) EIS at 300mA galvanostatic operation H 2 production (NmL min 600°C 15 Z real ( Ω ) 500°C 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10 4 700°C 400°C 5 600°C 2 0 -Z im 500°C 2.0 700°C 400°C 0 400°C 500°C Voltage (V) 600°C 700°C 1.5 -2 Anode: Cathode: p tot = 3 bar p H 2 O = 1.5 bar p tot = 3 bar 1.0 4 5 6 7 8 9 p O 2 = 30 mbar p O 2 = 30 mbar p H 2 = 0.5 bar Z real ( Ω cm 2 ) 0 1 2 3 Current (A)

  17. Electrolysis with composite BZCY-BGLC electrode -2 ) Current Density (mA cm 0 100 200 20 Faradaic H 2 production -1 ) H 2 production (NmL min 600°C 15 Calculated ASR from IV curves 500°C 10 700°C 10 Calculated from d V / d I 400°C 5 500°C 8 2 ) 0 ASR ( Ω cm 6 2.0 600°C 400°C 500°C Voltage (V) 600°C 4 700°C 700°C 1.5 Anode: 2 Cathode: p tot = 3 bar p H 2 O = 1.5 bar p tot = 3 bar 1.0 0 1 2 3 p O 2 = 30 mbar p O 2 = 30 mbar p H 2 = 0.5 bar Current (A) 0 1 2 3 Current (A)

  18. Improved faradaic efficiency primarily due to enhanced electrode kinetics 2.0 100 600C 4 -2 80 30 mA cm Faradaic efficiency (%) Voltage (V) 2 ) 60 1.5 // ( Ω cm 2 Cell 1 40 Z 0 20 Cell 1 1.0 Cell 2 Cell 2 -2 0 0 50 100 150 200 4 5 6 7 8 9 -2 ) / ( Ω cm Current density (mA cm 2 ) Z

  19. Conclusions  Proton Ceramic Electrolysers may suffer from electronic leakage during operation due to relatively high p-type conductivity in oxidizing conditions Operation at high overpotentials will induce higher electronic conductivity  within the electrolyte material Improved electrode performance and higher steam pressures may reduce  electronic leakage  Tubular PCEs were made based on BZCY-NiO tubular supports, spray coated BZCY72 electrolytes and BGLC steam electrodes Enhanced faradaic efficiencies observed with improved anode performance  Current densities of 220 mA cm -2 at 600 °C observed with > 80% faradaic  efficiency Contact resistance may still contribute significantly to the ohmic resistance of the  electrolyser

  20. Acknowledgements The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) for the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Technology Initiative under grant agreement n° 621244.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend