Proposed Teacher Compensation Model September 4, 2014
highly e ff e ct ive • Jeffco has five different licensed salary schedules • Entry level salary should be determined for each effective • Model does not outline proposed salary placements for new Salary increase hires who bring experience with them 2014-15 Compensation $ current salary $38K bonus Teacher: $38,000 Teacher Librarian: $39,219 Counselor: $40,032 Over market < $38K Special Providers: $38,950 Warren Tech: $44,346 2013-14 Salary $
• Annual APA salary comp work demonstrated that Jeffco salary schedule was below highly e ff e ct ive market at entry points and above market for Level 5 effective • APA study was diagnostic, but not prescriptive. Salary increase • Is ‘market’ the maximum base salary to be earned? Or an ‘average’ salary over which base salary building does not occur? If the latter, what happens to teachers in Jeffco already paid in excess of that ‘market’ rate? Frozen? 2014-15 Compensation $ current salary $38K bonus Teacher: $81,031 Teacher Librarian: $83,631 Counselor: $85,364 Over market < $38K Special Providers: $83,057 Warren Tech: $94,562 2013-14 Salary $
highly e ff e ct ive effective Salary increase 2014-15 Compensation $ current salary $38K bonus bonus stipend • In strategic compensation schools, additional pay is referenced as a ‘stipend.’ Over market < $38K • This is consistent with strategic compensation and within that program has been considered PERA includable. 2013-14 Salary $
Cost Modeling, Year 1 Target expenditure for salary increases, raising entry level salaries, and all associated benefit costs: $11.1M Model 1: Model 2: Highly effective salary Highly effective salary increases 50% higher increases 75% higher than effective than effective Ineffective evaluation rating 0% 0% Partially effective 0% 0% Non ‐ probationary contract Partially effective 1% 1% Probationary contract Effective 2.6% 2.43% Highly Effective 3.9% 4.25%
Evaluation Questions and Concerns • Teacher evaluations have several moving parts: – Rubric – Forms and on ‐ line system – Process (number of observations, timing, length) – Scoring – Student data piece • The evaluation system has been a work in progress since the introduction of the professional practices rubric in 2008.
Evaluation Questions and Concerns Last school year, 2013 ‐ 2014, is the first year all five parts have been in place for all teachers. Last fall, teachers received a ‘hold harmless’ message from their school administrators.
Tentative Agreement item from Spring 2014 8
Recommend
More recommend
