Proposed Teacher Compensation Model September 4, 2014 highly e ff e - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Jun 08, 2023 131 likes •223 views

Proposed Teacher Compensation Model September 4, 2014 highly e ff e ct ive Jeffco has five different licensed salary schedules Entry level salary should be determined for each effective Model does not outline proposed salary

SLIDE 1

Proposed Teacher Compensation Model

September 4, 2014

SLIDE 2

2014-15 Compensation $ highly effective Salary increase effective current salary $38K bonus < $38K Over market 2013-14 Salary $ Teacher: $38,000 Teacher Librarian: $39,219 Counselor: $40,032 Special Providers: $38,950 Warren Tech: $44,346

Jeffco has five different licensed salary schedules
Entry level salary should be determined for each
Model does not outline proposed salary placements for new

hires who bring experience with them

SLIDE 3

2014-15 Compensation $ highly effective Salary increase effective current salary $38K bonus < $38K Over market 2013-14 Salary $

Annual APA salary comp work demonstrated that Jeffco salary schedule was below

market at entry points and above market for Level 5

APA study was diagnostic, but not prescriptive.
Is ‘market’ the maximum base salary to be earned? Or an ‘average’ salary over which

base salary building does not occur? If the latter, what happens to teachers in Jeffco already paid in excess of that ‘market’ rate? Frozen? Teacher: $81,031 Teacher Librarian: $83,631 Counselor: $85,364 Special Providers: $83,057 Warren Tech: $94,562

SLIDE 4

2014-15 Compensation $ highly effective Salary increase effective current salary $38K bonus < $38K Over market 2013-14 Salary $

In strategic compensation schools, additional pay is

referenced as a ‘stipend.’

This is consistent with strategic compensation and within

that program has been considered PERA includable. bonus stipend

SLIDE 5

Cost Modeling, Year 1

Model 1: Highly effective salary increases 50% higher than effective Model 2: Highly effective salary increases 75% higher than effective Ineffective evaluation rating 0% 0% Partially effective Non‐probationary contract 0% 0% Partially effective Probationary contract 1% 1% Effective 2.6% 2.43% Highly Effective 3.9% 4.25%

Target expenditure for salary increases, raising entry level salaries, and all associated benefit costs: $11.1M

SLIDE 6

Evaluation Questions and Concerns

Teacher evaluations have several moving parts:

– Rubric – Forms and on‐line system – Process (number of observations, timing, length) – Scoring – Student data piece

The evaluation system has been a work in

progress since the introduction of the professional practices rubric in 2008.

SLIDE 7

Evaluation Questions and Concerns

Last school year, 2013‐2014, is the first year all five parts have been in place for all teachers. Last fall, teachers received a ‘hold harmless’ message from their school administrators.

SLIDE 8

Proposed Teacher Compensation Model

September 4, 2014

Cost Modeling, Year 1

Target expenditure for salary increases, raising entry level salaries, and all associated benefit costs: $11.1M

Evaluation Questions and Concerns

– Rubric – Forms and on‐line system – Process (number of observations, timing, length) – Scoring – Student data piece

progress since the introduction of the professional practices rubric in 2008.

Evaluation Questions and Concerns

Last school year, 2013‐2014, is the first year all five parts have been in place for all teachers. Last fall, teachers received a ‘hold harmless’ message from their school administrators.

Tentative Agreement item from Spring 2014