EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION BUDGET WORK SESSION APRIL 4, 2013 TOPICS FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

employee compensation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION BUDGET WORK SESSION APRIL 4, 2013 TOPICS FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION BUDGET WORK SESSION APRIL 4, 2013 TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION COMPENSATION APPROACH DEMOGRAPHICS OF WORKFORCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FY 2014 CHANGES BENEFITS 1 TOTAL COMPENSATION APPROACH Promote the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION  COMPENSATION APPROACH  DEMOGRAPHICS OF WORKFORCE  PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT  FY 2014 CHANGES  BENEFITS

1

EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION BUDGET WORK SESSION

APRIL 4, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Promote the compensation philosophy with the strategic plan

 Continue to recognize the value of all employees by ensuring pay systems are equitable and compensation is competitive when compared to the regional labor market  Create a balanced and sustainable benefits plan  Begin shift to a pay for performance approach

2

TOTAL COMPENSATION APPROACH

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Roughly 71% of the workforce consists of General Schedule employees, and 29% are Uniform Personnel  87% of all City employees work full-time

3

DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE WORKFORCE

Child, Youth and Family 33% Transportation and Community Development 14% Internal Services 12% Public Safety 41%

FTEs by Lines of Business

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE WORKFORCE

100 200 300 400 500 600

0-5 Yrs 6-10 Yrs 11-15 Yrs 16-20 Yrs 21-25 Yrs >25 Yrs Employee Count

Employee Years of Service

General Schedule Public Safety

Represents all Regular Active Full and Part-time Employees as of January 2013

100 200 300 400 500 600

25 or less 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-65 66 or greater

City-Wide Age Distribution

General Schedule Public Safety

19% GS, 38 % PS 53% GS, 56% PS 28% GS, 6% PS

Represents all Regular Active Full and Part-time Employees as of January 2013

51% GS, 47% PS 29% GS, 25% PS 20% GS, 28% PS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Since 2009 the City has added 141.1 FTEs and eliminated 261.3 FTEs  The majority of the reductions over the past five years occurred during FY 2010 and FY 2011 in response to lower City revenue growth than previous years

5

DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE WORKFORCE

2,665 2,581 2,540 2,533 2,549 2,545 2,450 2,500 2,550 2,600 2,650 2,700 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

FTE Count

Citywide FTEs

FTEs

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 13.0 19.8 26.0 13.3 45.9 23.1 12.9 103.8 66.7 20.1 30.0 27.8 FTE Count

Historical FTE Changes

Added Eliminated

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

CITYWIDE TURNOVER

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

General Schedule Multi-Year Turnover Summary

Turnover Retirement 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Public Safety Multi-Year Turnover Summary

Turnover Retirement

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

ALEXANDRIA IS FINANCIALLY SUSTAINABLE, EFFICIENT, COMMUNITY ORIENTED AND VALUES ITS EMPLOYEES

Objective: Maintain a competitive compensation program that attracts, retains and motivates a workforce that can deliver quality services and programs to the community, reflects the diversity of that community, and provides for the fair and equitable treatment of all those employees.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

ResultsAlexandria

  • 1. Plan & Define

Measures

  • 2. Allocate

Resources to Accomplish the Plan

  • 3. Deliver Services to

Accomplish the Plan and Measure Performance

  • 4. Evaluate and

Implement Ideas to Improve the City

  • 5. Report to and

Engage with the Public

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Align work with the Strategic Plan

 Provides employees with greater understanding

  • f how their work contributes to the Strategic

Plan

 Foster accountability  Amend pay practices and policies  Recognize and reward performance

9

WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

ALIGN WORK WITH THE STRATEGIC PLAN

City Strategic Plan Work Plans

>Bus. plans

Job Desc.

The City’s “destination” which defines the long term benefit and results of the City’s services to the public with measurable outcomes to track our performance The “roadmap” of how departments will achieve the City’s strategic plan including indicators to track performance Definitions of job duties so that employees know what work they are responsible for and how it contributes to accomplishing the work plans

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

RECRUIT, RETAIN, RECOGNIZE

Amend Pay Policies and Practices

Pay Compression Promotion Policy

Pay For Performance

Merit Pay Career Ladders Innovation Fund Executive Pay Bands Professional Development Fund

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Public Safety Work Groups (PSWG) identified compression issues in Police and Sheriff  FY 2013 $400,000 allocated to address public safety pay compression  Will impact 50 employees in Police and Sheriff

  • 34 Police Supervisors expected to receive an average salary increase of 7%
  • 16 Sheriff Supervisors expected to receive an average salary increase of 7.5%

 Elevations anticipated to occur April 2013 with pay retroactively adjusted to March 2, 2013  PSWG’s identified need to amend current pay policies to ensure compression does not continue in the future

12

ADDRESSING PAY COMPRESSION

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

ENHANCING CITY PAY POLICY

Problems with current pay policies and systems:  Results in backward movement on pay scale  Pay increases are not consistent across the pay scale  Creates a disincentive to promote  Causes leapfrogging and pay compression

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

ENHANCING CITY PAY POLICY

 Mitigate pay compression issues and eliminate the disincentive to promote.  Will increase the cumulative earnings of employees who show leadership and move upward in the organization.  Will enhance the City’s competitive position.  Will be applied city-wide and also allows for the implementation of public safety pay compression solution.

 Increase between grades is approximately 5%  Recommending promotional pay cap of 20% plus placement.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Career Ladders

Improve Service to Public Develop Highly Skilled Workforce Incentive to Increase Skills and Competencies Provide Career Path Growth within Organization Increase Flexibility to Manage Staff Resources Recruit and Retain Top Talent

15

CAREER LADDER PROGRAM

Career ladders provide upward mobility to employees who grow in skill and capability and demonstrate a readiness for increased job responsibilities.

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Currently we have 21 career ladders with 753 employees

in the ladders

  • Elevated 116 Employees (91 Positions in Public Safety)
  • Annualized cost of FY13 incorporated into FY14 budget

FY 2013 $500,000 PROVIDED TO ELEVATE EMPLOYEES IN EXISTING CAREER LADDERS

  • Expand career ladder program within General Schedule
  • Begin phased approach to the implementation of a

multi-level career ladders for Fire Fighters, Medics, and Deputy Fire Marshals

  • FY14 increase pay grades to align existing jobs with

the market

  • FY15 Fund full development and implementation of

additional career ladder levels

FY 2014 $900,000 PROVIDED TO CONTINUE COMMITMENT TO CAREER LADDER IMPROVEMENTS AND EXPANSIONS

16

CAREER LADDER EXPANSION

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 Introduction of two new pay bands 1) Deputy City Managers and 2) Department Heads  In FY 2014 employees within new pay bands will be reviewed for merit adjustments based on the current system  Places emphasis on performance management and accountability for those charged with leading the City’s strategic mission  Will serve as a pilot program to determine how pay bands could be expanded to other levels of the organization

17

EXECUTIVE PAY BANDS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 Full merit between 2.3%-5% for all eligible employees

 Average of 3.1% for General Scale and 3.6% for Public Safety

 Top of grade 2.3% one-time merit payment for all eligible employees on their anniversary date  No across the board salary adjustment since FY 2008

 There will be a 1% pay scale adjustment for VRS changes through FY 2017 for a total cost of $5.8 million

18

FY 2014 PROPOSED SALARY ADJUSTMENTS

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 HEALTH INSURANCE  VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM  PUBLIC SAFETY PENSION  OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB)

19

BENEFITS

slide-20
SLIDE 20

In prior years, the City worked to keep the health insurance plan designs consistent while addressing any increase in costs through annual premium increases Going forward, in an effort to provide a sustainable health insurance plan and give employees greater flexibility with how to spend their money, the City is now making a philosophical shift to plan redesign coupled with lower premiums

20

HEALTH INSURANCE DESIGN

slide-21
SLIDE 21

HEALTH INSURANCE WITH NO PLAN REDESIGN

$0 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 $45,000,000 $50,000,000

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Projected FY14 Projected FY15 Projected FY16 Projected FY17 Projected FY18 Projected FY19 Projected

$2.6 $2.7 $3.6 $4.4 $5.9 $6.5 $7.1 $7.8 $8.5 $9.3 $10.2 $17.4 $17.7 $18.3 $18.6 $22.1 $24.2 $26.5 $29.0 $31.8 $34.8 $38.1

Multi-Year Projected Health Costs

FY 2009 to 2012 - actual spending FY 2013 - FY 2019 - projected spending Employee Health Cost City Health Cost

53% or $10.7 million increase 9.5% or $2.7 million increase

*Does not factor in changes from Affordable Care Act ($ Millions)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

 Plan design and renegotiation with Kaiser and UHC

 Included the introduction of deductibles and increased copays for certain services within the plan

 The proposed budget reflected a 7.9% increase over FY 13; this included a savings of $1.6 million for the City

 This estimated savings provided funding for compensation adjustments (i.e., merit-step increases in FY14)

 Following the proposed budget, continued negotiations with health care providers is expected to result in additional premium savings of roughly $950K ($750K City; $200K Employee)

 The $750K City share will be used to reduce employee premiums and adjust the HMO City/Employee contribution ratio from an 80/20 split to 83/17

22

HEALTH INSURANCE METHOD FOR REDUCING COSTS

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

HEALTH INSURANCE IMPACT ON PREMIUMS

(the numbers below are proposed and represent the average City salary) Employee Share Only

  • Avg. Kaiser & United

9.5% Premium Increase No Plan Design Change Revised Proposed March Projections Premium Decrease +Cost 83/17% Plan Design Change Plan Plan Type Average Annual FY13 Premium Average Annual $ Change FY13-14 Proposed Average Annual $ Change FY13-14 HMO Individual $1,311.85 $124.63 ($241.48) Employee + One $2,623.70 $249.25 ($482.97) Family $3,359.28 $319.13 ($618.11) UHC PPO Individual $2,770.75 $263.21 ($256.34) Employee + One $6,501.02 $617.62 ($529.79) Family $8,356.22 $793.90 ($680.81)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

HEALTH INSURANCE WITH PLAN REDESIGN

$0 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 FY13 App. Budget FY 13 Final Cost Est FY14 Prelim. Estimate FY14 Proposed FY14 Revised

$5.9 $5.9 $6.5 $6.1 $5.1 $21.0 $22.1 $24.2 $22.6 $22.6

Budgeted Total Health Costs

Employee Health Cost City Health Cost

($ Millions)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

 All out-of-pocket expenses, excluding prescriptions, can accumulate towards the $400 and $800 plan year deductible  Employees will never pay more than their plans out-of-pocket maximum  The family $800 deductible can be met collectively by all members of the plan  No one member of the family will be required to satisfy a deductible greater than $400

25

HEALTH INSURANCE

EXPLAINING EMBEDDED DEDUCTIBLES

slide-26
SLIDE 26

For FY 2014

 Exploring an out-of-pocket assistance program to help mitigate the impact of deductibles for those who need it

 One-time Annual Leave/Comp Time cash payout (maximum $200)  All active employees who are enrolled in a City health care plan and have the available leave balances are eligible  Average General Schedule Salary of $67,212 equals about 6.25 hours of leave

 One-time support will only be available in FY 2014 to assist with plan design transition

Going Forward

 Pursue changing FSA Schedule to coincide with City’s Plan dates (July through June)  A Healthcare Steering Committee has been established to continue to evaluate ways the City can reduce premiums while providing employees with quality health care options

26

HEALTH INSURANCE INITIATIVES TO MITIGATE IMPACT

slide-27
SLIDE 27

PLAN 1

(Hired before 7/1/10)

BASE FY 2013 (1%) FY 2014 (2%) FY 2015 (3%) FY 2016 (4%) FY 2017 (5%) Salary $67,212 $67,884 $68,563 $69,249 $69,941 $70,640 VRS ($679) ($1,371) ($2,077) ($2,798) ($3,532) Net Pay $63,415 $63,370 $63,318 $63,259 $63,192 $63,117

27

VRS EMPLOYEE IMPACT

PLAN 2

(Hired after 7/1/10)

BASE (4%) FY 2013 (5%) FY 2014 (5%) FY 2015 (5%) FY 2016 (5%) FY 2017 (5%) Salary $67,212 $67,884 $68,563 $69,249 $69,941 $70,640 VRS ($2,688) ($3,394) ($3,428) ($3,462) ($3,497) ($3,532) Net Pay $64,524 $64,490 $65,135 $65,787 $66,444 $67,108

The charts below demonstrate the impact of the mandate by the General Assembly requiring all Plan 2 members to contribute 5% towards their retirement and that all Plan 1 members start to contribute 1% towards their retirement each year for five years starting in FY 2013 until they are also contributing at least 5% towards their retirement

slide-28
SLIDE 28

 The total cost of the fire police pension and disability plan has risen from $6 million in 2004 to $10 million in FY 2013, or 56%

28

PUBLIC SAFETY PENSION PLAN

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014* Employer Contribution Employee Contribution Total Contribution

*FY2014 Employee/Employer contribution split is tentative.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 2011 City Council appointed an advisory board to review options to address the plan increases  The Ad Hoc Retirement Benefit Advisory Group recommended keeping the defined benefit plan, if an adjustment mechanism was put in place

 The change could be in contribution, benefit accrual, or both  Subcommittee did not reach consensus on a cost sharing model prior to the proposed budget

 FY 2014 proposed budget recommends increase in employee contribution from 8% to 10% which is one of the cost sharing models the subcommittee discussed  Change is meant to contain the costs of the pension plan now, safeguard the plan and ensure its sustainability  Employee labor groups working on alternative including changes to plan which will be considered if they are presented

29

PUBLIC SAFETY PENSION PLAN

slide-30
SLIDE 30

 FY 2014 proposed budget continues multi-year funding plan toward future OPEB obligations  FY 2014 funding includes $2.4 million from the General Fund and the remaining $0.2 million from the $10.7 million fund balance that was set aside prior to FY 2007  Funding now allocated to department budgets in lieu of Non- Department budget  FY 2014 is last year to use any fund balance because the 2007 amount set aside has been exhausted  FY 2015 100% General Fund  No change to retiree health insurance subsidy

30

OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The following initiatives were undertaken to inform and receive feedback from employees on the changes taking place in FY 2014 Employee Outreach Conducted by City Manager

 Two Employee Telephone Town Halls and Six In-Person Town Halls with Q&A sessions  Citywide Open House with Activities on Guiding Principles  Departmental Presentations  AlexNet (Employee Intranet Site) Forums

Compensation and Benefits Communications

 Weekly pension meetings for nine months with Police/Firefighters board members  HR and the Public Safety Work Groups have been meeting regularly since July 2012 to discuss public safety compensation issues  Health Insurance Explanation Supported with Video Message, Comparison Tool, Salary Estimator, and FAQs

31

GETTING THE MESSAGE OUT

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Questions?

32