3 - 1/16/15 BHR Presentation - Employee Compensation
Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:44 AMBureau of Human Resources
State Employee Compensation Presentation to the Joint Committee on Appropriations January 16, 2015 Laurie R. Gill, Commissioner
Presentation Overview South Dakota's State Workforce Employee - - PDF document
3 - 1/16/15 BHR Presentation - Employee Compensation Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:44 AM Bureau of Human Resources State Employee Compensation Presentation to the Joint Committee on Appropriations January 16, 2015 Laurie R. Gill, Commissioner
3 - 1/16/15 BHR Presentation - Employee Compensation
Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:44 AMBureau of Human Resources
State Employee Compensation Presentation to the Joint Committee on Appropriations January 16, 2015 Laurie R. Gill, Commissioner
Presentation Overview
South Dakota's State Workforce
Workforce by Location
16% in Black Hills 21 % in Pierre
43% in 1-29 Corridor
4Workforce at a Glance
n
Baby Boomers (1946-1964)- 38.2% or 2,821 emps
emps
emps
Data as of November 2014 for Executive Branch agencies under the direct co trol of e Governor. Does not include Board o Regents.Workforce Years of Service
60.0%55.1%
50.0% 40.0% 30.0%23.6%
20.0%15.1%
10.0% 0.0% 0-10 yrs 11-20 yrs 21-3Dyrs Data as of ovember 2014 for Executive Branch agencies under the direct co rol of the Governor. Does no inc I ude Board of Regents.6.2%
31 yrs and upWorkforce Retirement Eligibility
efficiencies
Data from the South Dakota Retirement System.Workforce Turnover
15.0% 14.0% 13.0% 12.0% 11.0%10.5%
10.0% 9.0% 8.0% FY06 FY07 FYOS FY09 FY10 FY1 1 FY12 Data as of ovember 2014 for Executive Branch agencies under the direct co rol of the Governor. Does no inc I ude Board of Regents. FY13 FY14Compensation Philosophy
Compensation Philosophy Statement
administration of compensation plans in the State of South Dakota
why
strategy
Compensation Philosophy Components
Management Accountability
Compensation Philosophy Highlights
across the state
aligned with workforce planning
equity and comparable to relevant markets
pay, benefits, lump sum payments, and allowances
Compensation Philosophy Highlights
used as a basis for compensation
intervals
affordable
Total Remuneration Study
Remuneration Study Objectives
market competitiveness and salary to benefits mix
to the State's salary and benefits programs
movement and administration, as well as benefits program changes
Remuneration Study Data
groups and pay grades
central payroll were included in these benchmark jobs
employers
Remuneration Study Sample Occupations
Accounting Asst
$37,700 Chem Depend $36,400
$42,200 Counselor $20,600
$28,400 $59,800
$70,100 $34,700 0% $34,700 Practical Nurse $86,900
$122,200 Sr Staff Attorney $65,700
$98,100
Data for Executive Branch agencies under the direct control of the Governor. Does no include Board of Regents.$48,100 $24,600 $82,300 $39,000 $97,300 $74,000
Remuneration Study Results
The majority of the State's
the median of the market. Benefits +7.8%
The State's benefits program is competitive. Total
% Low base salaries result in a below Remuneration market median (P50) position.
Data for Executive Branch agencies under the direct control of the Governor. Does no include Board of Regents.State Employee Compensation
Compensation Background
adopted in FY92
going focus on market competiveness
increases
significant market pressures
to its own market
Compensation Overview
positions
experiencing significant market pressure
n
L Structure - Law Enforcement positions
Engineers, and Information Technology
Career Band History
jobs
private sector
Career Band Criteria
Career Band Salary Policy Components
and the band was adjusted by that percentage
the probationary period
beyond the market value
score of 3.00 considered successful performance
Career Band Pay for Performance Distribution Results for FY15
546
500 400 300225
200 10075
93
92 47
II
4.25% 4.5%Career Band Statistics
December 2014
least 10°/o behind the market
.2% behind market target
Career Band Results
years
declining interviews or job offers reduced by two-thirds
fully staffed with Software Engineers for the first time
Compensation Structure Proposal
Career Band structures
Investigation
Engineers, and Information Technology
General Pay Structure Proposal
grades driven by market competitiveness
General Pay Structure Proposal
Minimum* $21,080 $24,800 $29,760
C
$23,375 $27,500 $33,000 D $26,435 $31 ,100 $37,320 E $29,070 $34,200 $41 ,040 F
$31,875 9
~~
$45,000 G $35,275 ' 0 $49,800 H $36,720
ij5,
$55,080 $40,400 $50,500 $60,600
j
$44,880 $56,100 $67,320
K
$50,560 $63,200 $75,840
General Pay Structure Proposal
Minimum* $57,040 $71 ,300 $85,560 M $65,680 $82,100 $102,625 N $75,920 $94,900 $118,625 $83,840 $104,800
$1 31 ,00
p
$92,080 $115,100 $143,875 Q $98,720 $123,400 $154,250 R $108,080 $135,100 $168,875
Medical Structure Proposal
structure for high level medical positions
groups of similarly evaluated jobs
Medical Structure Proposal
Occupation Occupational Therapist Physical Therapist Psychologist Veterinarian Epidemiologist Physician Assistant Nurse Practitioner State Veterinarian State Epidemiologist Pharmacist Dentist Chief Dentist Physician Psychiatrist Medical Director
Min* $58,500 $65,700 $70,650 $76,500 $76,500 $82,800 $86,400 $99,000 $99,000 $103,500 $109,350 $131 ,220 $194,400 $252,000 $274,500 Market Value $65,000 $73,000 $78,500 $85,000 $85,000 $92,000 $96,000 $110,000
$1 10,000 $1 15,000
$121,500 $145,800 $216,000 $280,000 $305,000 $71 ,500 $80,300 $86,350 $93,500 $93,500 $101 ,200 $105,600 $121 ,000 $121 ,000 $126,500 $133,650 $160,380 $237,600 $308,000 $335,500
Law Enforcement Structure Proposal
some Board of Regents Law Enforcement
Law Enforcement Structure Proposal
Minimum* 02 $36,880 $46,1 00 $57,625 03 $40,560 $50,700 $63,375 04 $44,960 $56,200 $70,250 05 $54,240 $67,800 $84,750 06 $62,800 $78,500 $94,200 07 $69,520 $86,900 $104,280 08 $75,400 $94,300 $113,1 60 09 $89,920 $112,400 $134,880
Compensation Proposal Components
and pay ranges will be adjusted by the same amount
through their pay range toward market value
Salary Policy Recommendations
Salary Policy Proposal for FY16
Structures
Salary Policy Proposal for FY16
South Dakota State Employee Health Plan
Health Plan Overview
company
Health Plan Challenges
Health Plan Opportunities
Health Plan Options
* Pharmacy - $50.00 deductible per person
4Health Plan Qualifications for the Lowest Deductible
activities to accumulate 75 points
qualifications are eligible to enroll in the $750 Deductible Health Plan
Health Plan Participation
includes actives, pre-65 retirees, and COBRA-13, 149
South Dakota State Employee Health Plan
an alternative group health plan
Health Plan Members by County
25
CORSOti Mcl'HEIISON HARDING27
IIROWN l'8Ulll1S ED 1 UN°i515 1,377 57
F
~O
eum
Z IElll,(]j Sl'INK187 659
HAND2 131
PelNINGTON OJSTER 36134
f.11.LIII\IEJ!260 23 42 33
172
90
O~Y121
Gfll,NT ~4'49
ClAIIK 72%,i,29
DEUEL f~MUN58 ,048 29
Health Plan Full Accrual Basis Financial Statement
Revenue Cantribuiions to Plsn Employer Paid Employer Rate Retiree, COS RA, sn.d E mplo;·ee Paid to.r D epend e.nts Adm ini strative Fee lme re st Revenue- Refund of Prio Yes.rs Expenses"' To:al Re-venue Expense s Adm ini stration To~ a I Expenses Res.er,-e Ob gs. ·on. Current Year O•,er/(Und e rrecove Prior Peri od Adjus'.merc: Overststeme.nt of FY13 C ims·· Prior Ye. sir 0•1erl(Unde.rrecovery) Cum ulstive Overl(Underrecover/)'" ... IBNP-lncu ed Blri Not Paid included in cl9im.s sHealth Plan Full Accrual Basis Financial Statement
Revenue Contributions to P ra n E mplo yer Pai d Employer Rate Reti ree , COBRA, and E m p lo y ee Ps id fo r Dep endents Ad mi n istrativ e Fee Interest Revenue Refund o f P rior Years E xpenses"" T ots l Rev enu e Expense s Claims Admi n isira tion T ota l Expenses Reserve Obligation Current Y ea r Over/(Underrecove ry) P ri o r Year O ver/(Underreco ve ry) Cum ula ti ve O ver/( U nd e rrec e v e ry)"'" IB NP-lnc urred But Not Paid i nc luded i n claims amountQuestions
P oto courtesy of South Dakota Tounsm.