promise resource reservation
play

Promise Resource Reservation 09 November 2015 Peter Lee, ClearPath - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Promise Resource Reservation 09 November 2015 Peter Lee, ClearPath Networks, PTL Ildik Vncsa, Ericsson Gerald Kunzmann, DOCOMO Euro-Labs OPNFV Summit 2015 1 Content Overview Uses Cases and Requirements Architectural


  1. Promise Resource Reservation 09 November 2015 Peter Lee, ClearPath Networks, PTL Ildikó Váncsa, Ericsson Gerald Kunzmann, DOCOMO Euro-Labs OPNFV Summit 2015 1

  2. Content Overview • Uses Cases and Requirements • Architectural Considerations • Implementation Design and Demo • Summary and Next Steps • Q&A 2

  3. Promise overview • Key requirement (short-term goal) – Guarantee that at start time of a reservation, all reserved resources of that reservation are ready to be used/allocated • As-Is: Without reservation, when trying to allocate resources required for a (complex/composed) network service (NS), it may happen that during the individual allocation requests (for compute/storage/network) an error occurs, as not sufficient resources with the requested characteristics are available, and the overall instanstiation of the service may fail. – Assumption: NFVI has limited resources • Long-term goal – Efficient resource usage, e.g. • Before start time, allow for other usage of the resources before start time, instead of immediate allocation. • After start time, resources may be used for „ best effort “ services, but shall immediately be made available for the reserved service at time of the allocation of the reserved resources. • Use cases / scenarios (see also ETSI NFV IFA010) – Scheduled event: e.g. rock concert or football match with expected peak traffic – Detailed capabilities: VIM holds detailed information about managed NFVI resources and their availability, whereas the NFVO only holds abstracted information. – 5G services: many virtualized service that have to share limited resources – Disaster: valuable limited time after e.g. tsunami warning – Multi-tenant deployment: avoid resource management race conditions 3

  4. High level flow with ETSI NFV architecture incl. allocation 3. LCM operation granting OSS/BSS Orchestrator (reservationId , …) (NFVO) 1. ResourceReser- vationRequest VNF VNF (start, end, expiry, Manager EMS 1 EMS 2 EMS 3 VNF Manager resources, amount, Manager 2. ResourceReser- attributes) vationResponse VNF 1 VNF 2 VNF 3 (reservationId, Or-Vi message) 4. ComputeAllocation NFVI Request (reservationId, Virtual Virtual Virtual flavour, attributes , …) Compute Storage Network Virtual 5. NotifyAllocated Virtualization layer Infrastructure Manager Nf-Vi Hardware resources 4

  5. Challenges • Back to the Future effect – Simultaneous handling of reservation and immediate allocation requests – Reserve/allocate resources without end time • Complexity of OpenStack – Complex, multi-dimensional resource model – No feature loss by introducing reservation as a feature • Integration – Multiple OpenStack components to integrate with (Nova, Cinder, …) – OpenStack is not ready 5

  6. Shim-layer approach • Pros – Flexible API update Consumer A Consumer B – No direct need for integration with OpenStack modules Reservation + – alloc./termin. requests Multi-site support for reservation Shim-layer • Cons (w/ allocation+reserv. logic+policies) – Synchronization Allocation/termination • API changes Sync capacity • System state OpenStack – No handling of complex, structured resources (Nova, Neutron, Cinder) – No affinity/anti-affinity rule support – Hides VIM I/Fs 6

  7. OpenStack integrated approach • Pros – Pure extended VIM I/Fs – No synchronization need Consumer A Consumer B • VIM APIs are used • Code changes in VIM are synchronized automatically – Reservation + The solution is maintained by the upstream alloc./termin. requests community – No need to remodel resource structure in VIM • Cons OpenStack + BlazarX w/ policies for dealing with – Integration with multiple OpenStack resources reserved resources – Nova scheduler is not ready – Blazar project is on hold 7

  8. Evolution of the solutions • Shim-layer approach as a prototype – API definition Shim-layer – Basic functional testing (w/ allocation+reserv. logic+policies) – Gap analysis in OpenStack in parallel • OpenStack integrated approach OpenStack + BlazarX – As a next step w/ policies for dealing with – Optimize the solution in steps reserved resources • Block reserved resources • Reuse reserved resources • Introduce priorities – Collaborate with OpenStack projects like Nova, Neutron and Cinder 8

  9. Implementation Overview • Intent-driven N/B Interfaces – create/update/cancel/query reservation – increase/decrease/query capacity – create/destroy instance • Supported Interfaces – CLI, REST/JSON, WEBSOCKET, BROWSER • Model-driven Implementation – YANG (data model schemas) – YAML (control logic definitions) – JSON (configuration data) – JSX* (visualization schemas) 9

  10. Data Model Hierarchy ResourcePool ResourceInstance ResourceContainer ResourceCollection ResourceReservation ComputeElement Models… ResourceAllocation ResourceElement NetworkElement Models… StorageElement Models… • Everything is a ResourceElement – Attributes and Behavior Inheritance – Polymorphic Relationships • ResourceCollection contains temporal attributes – start and end • ResourcePool represents what’s available between a given time window • ResourceReservation represents what’s planned for use between a given time window • ResourceAllocation represents what’s currently being consumed 10

  11. Modular and Portable Design REST/JSON External Integration Promise Models Data Web Synchronization Sockets YangForge Automation CLI User Interaction Node.js Web Browsers Visualization Browser User Interaction • Promise runs on YangForge – YANG schemas • opnfv-promise.yang, nfv-infrastructure.yang, nfv-mano.yang, etc … – YAML control definitions • opnfv-promise.yaml – JSON configuration data • opnfv-promise.json • YangForge runs on Node.js and Web Browsers 11

  12. Promise Live Demonstration • Create Reservation • Query Capacity • Create Instance • Visualizations • … and More! OPNFV Project Theater Thursday 2:25 - 2:45pm Promise - Planning the Future Peter Lee, ClearPath Networks Gerald Kunzmann, DOCOMO 12

  13. Summary and Next Steps • Promise is all about the Future – Seamless integration with VIMs – Moving beyond capacity to capture Elements – Proactive and Reactive Notifications – Interactive and Dynamic Visualizations – Scenario planning with Simulations • Come and see the live demo @ 2:25pm • Join the Promise project! 13

  14. Promise Info 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend