Progress on HPPS optics J. Alabau-Gonzalvo 131210
Dispersion contribution underestimated + 4mm (pipe) + 2mm (orbit errors) How to ameliorate this? Lower dispersion Hard due to arc constraints Lower energy spread From 9e-3 to 6.64e-3 Lower horizontal emittance From 15um.rad to 8um.rad Laslett detuning limit -0.25 Radius at QH2 near 120mm
FOIL INJECTION g_trans = 12.48i Qx = 13.23 Qy = 9.23
FOIL INJECTION 50 GeV Ex = 8 um.rad Ey = 15 um.rad 75 GeV Ex = 5 um.rad Ey = 9 um.rad
FOIL INJECTION 50 GeV Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 2 57 -0.92 QH1 1.5 58 -0.64 MQFS1 2 57 -0.46 MQFS2 2 51 -0.25 MQDS2 2 53 0.19 QH2 1.5 93 1.15 MQDS1 2 53 0.70 QH4 2 62 1.03 Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 -1.01 QH1 -0.51 MQFS1 62 -0.51 MQFS2 -0.31 2 MQDS2 0.22 QH2 93 0.86 MQDS1 0.83 62 QH4 1.03 89(h) DIPOLE 3.76 2.1 54 (v)
FOIL INJECTION 75 GeV Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 2 45 -1.09 QH1 1.5 52 -0.86 MQFS1 2 45 -0.55 MQFS2 2 40 -0.30 MQDS2 2 42 0.22 QH2 1.5 85 1.57 MQDS1 2 43 0.87 QH4 2 58 1.46 Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 -1.41 QH1 -0.72 MQFS1 58 -0.71 MQFS2 -0.44 2 MQDS2 0.31 QH2 85 1.18 MQDS1 1.16 58 QH4 1.46 81 (h) DIPOLE 3.76 3.1 43 (v)
LASER INJECTION g_trans = 12.86i Qx = 13.27 Qy = 10.27
LASER INJECTION 50 GeV Ex = 8 um.rad Ey = 15 um.rad 75 GeV Ex = 5 um.rad Ey = 9 um.rad
LASER INJECTION 50 GeV Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 2 59 -0.97 QH1 1.5 55 -0.63 MQFS1 2 49 -0.63 MQFS2 2 51 -0.49 MQDS2 2 49 0.20 QH2 1.5 92 1.14 MQDS1 2 58 1.11 QH4 2 62 1.02 Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 -1.01 QH1 -0.53 MQFS1 62 -0.79 MQFS2 -0.60 2 MQDS2 0.24 QH2 92 0.85 MQDS1 1.20 62 QH4 1.03 87(h) DIPOLE 3.76 2.1 55 (v)
LASER INJECTION 75 GeV Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 2 47 -1.14 QH1 1.5 51 -0.86 MQFS1 2 39 -0.75 MQFS2 2 40 -0.58 MQDS2 2 39 0.23 QH2 1.5 83 1.55 MQDS1 2 47 1.36 QH4 2 58 1.44 Name Length[m] R[mm] Bpt [T] QH3 -1.42 QH1 -0.74 MQFS1 58 -1.11 MQFS2 -0.84 2 MQDS2 0.34 QH2 83 1.16 MQDS1 1.68 58 QH4 1.44 79(h) DIPOLE 3.76 2.1 44 (v)
Recommend
More recommend
