primordial magnetic fields
play

Primordial magnetic fields: Fluctuating . . . HI signal: CDM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Post-recombination . . . The . . . Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History Global HI signal Primordial magnetic fields: Fluctuating . . . HI signal: CDM Fluctuating . . . Cosmological implications Detectability of the signal


  1. Post-recombination . . . The . . . Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History Global HI signal Primordial magnetic fields: Fluctuating . . . HI signal: ΛCDM Fluctuating . . . Cosmological implications Detectability of the signal Magnetic fields and . . . Thermal evolution: . . . Ionization evolution based on Sethi and Subramanian, JCAP, 2009 Formation of . . . Sethi, Haiman, and Pandey, ApJ, 2010 Formation of first SMBHs Pandey and Sethi, ApJ, 2011 Weak Gravitational . . . Pandey and Sethi, ApJ, 2012 Power Spectrum . . . Cosmological weak . . . March 12, 2013 Cosmological weak . . . Constraints on . . . Conclusions Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 1 of 29 Go Back

  2. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 1. Primordial magnetic fields: Motivation Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . • Scalar and tensor perturbation were generated at the HI signal: ΛCDM time of inflation. Is it not conceivable that a process Fluctuating . . . existed then (breaking of conformal invariance?) that Detectability of the signal led to the generation of magnetic fields? (Turner and Magnetic fields and . . . Widrow 1988, Ratra 1992) Thermal evolution: . . . • Magnetic field coherent at scales � 10 kpc exist in Ionization evolution galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Can they be Formation of . . . explained using amplification of a small seed ∼ 10 − 20 G using dynamo mechanism? Formation of first SMBHs < magnetic field Weak Gravitational . . . Not clear. Evidence of µG magnetic field at z ≃ 2 Power Spectrum . . . and synchrotron emission at super-cluster scales Cosmological weak . . . favour primordial field hypothesis. Cosmological weak . . . • Magnetic fields of strength ≃ 10 − 9 G interesting from Constraints on . . . the point of view of observed fields in galaxies, Conclusions clusters of galaxies and cosmology. Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  3. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 2. Direct probe of magnetic field at large scales Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . • Detection of synchrotron radiation from structures larger HI signal: ΛCDM than clusters (e.g Kim et al. 1989). Difficult as the gas Fluctuating . . . density falls and diffuse low-surface brightness emission is Detectability of the signal difficult to image with radio interferometers. Magnetic fields and . . . • Correlation of Faraday rotation of high Thermal evolution: . . . redshift radio sources : Such correlation can reveal Ionization evolution the presence of magnetic field coherent on very large Formation of . . . scales ( > 100 Mpc) (e.g. Kollat 1998, Sethi 2003). Not Formation of first SMBHs possible so far owing to lack of homogeneous samples of Faraday rotation measurement. Upcoming interferometers Weak Gravitational . . . such as LOFAR will create such a sample with 10 5 Power Spectrum . . . sources. This is one of the primary goals of SKA, which Cosmological weak . . . will be able to reliably observe 10 7 Faraday rotations. Cosmological weak . . . Constraints on . . . Conclusions Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  4. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 3. Tangled Magnetic fields Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . • Statistically homogeneous and isotropic tangled HI signal: ΛCDM magnetic fields: Fluctuating . . . � ˜ B i ( q ) ˜ B ∗ j ( k ) � = δ 3 � δ ij − k i k j /k 2 � D ( q − k ) M ( k ) (1) Detectability of the signal Magnetic fields and . . . • The magnetic fields are further assumed to be Thermal evolution: . . . Gaussian and therefore their statistical properties are Ionization evolution completely described by power spectrum: M ( k ) with Formation of . . . M ( k ) = Ak n (2) Formation of first SMBHs Weak Gravitational . . . with the spectral index of power spectrum n > ∼ − 3. Power Spectrum . . . • Time evolution : In an expanding universe: Cosmological weak . . . Ba 2 = const, flux-frozen: Bρ − 2 / 3 = const Cosmological weak . . . • Normalization : Normalized to the present, B 0 refers Constraints on . . . to RMS using the cut-off scale k c = 1 Mpc − 1 . Conclusions Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  5. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 4. Early structure formation with tangled magnetic Global HI signal fields Fluctuating . . . HI signal: ΛCDM • Magnetic fields generate density perturbations in the Fluctuating . . . post-recombination era (Wasserman 1978). Detectability of the signal • For nearly scale-invariant power spectrum of magnetic Magnetic fields and . . . fields, the matter power spectrum P ( k ) ∝ k . At scales Thermal evolution: . . . ∼ 1 Mpc − 1 this could dominate corresponding to k < Ionization evolution over the inflation-era produced density perturbations. Formation of . . . • Important scales : Comoving Formation of first SMBHs � 10 − 9 G � Weak Gravitational . . . k max ≃ 235 Mpc − 1 B 0 Power Spectrum . . . � 10 − 9 G � Cosmological weak . . . k J ≃ 15 Mpc − 1 (3) B 0 Cosmological weak . . . Constraints on . . . k J is independent of time. Conclusions • Magnetic fields can aid early structure formation. Title Page How early and at what scales? ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  6. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 5. Matter power spectrum Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . HI signal: ΛCDM Fluctuating . . . Detectability of the signal Magnetic fields and . . . Thermal evolution: . . . Ionization evolution Formation of . . . Formation of first SMBHs Weak Gravitational . . . Power Spectrum . . . Cosmological weak . . . Cosmological weak . . . Constraints on . . . Conclusions Title Page (Gopal and Sethi 2003) ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  7. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 6. Post-recombination effects of magnetic fields Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . • Early structure formation : The redshift of collapse HI signal: ΛCDM depends strongly on the spectral index of magnetic Fluctuating . . . field power spectrum. All models other than nearly Detectability of the signal scales invariant n ≃ − 3 are ruled out by these Magnetic fields and . . . considerations. The collapse redshift is not sensitive to the value of the magnetic field. Thermal evolution: . . . Ionization evolution • Dissipation of magnetic fields : Tangled magnetic Formation of . . . fields can dissipate by ambi-polar diffusion and Formation of first SMBHs decaying turbulence in the post-recombination era. Weak Gravitational . . . This can lead to an altered ionization and thermal Power Spectrum . . . history (Sethi and Subramanian 2005). Cosmological weak . . . • Molecular Hydrogen formation : Can be significantly Cosmological weak . . . altered in the IGM and in the collapsing haloes Constraints on . . . (Sethi, Nath, and Subramanian 2008, Schicheler et al. Conclusions 2009, Sethi, Haiman, Pandey 2010) Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  8. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 7. The post-Recombination Era Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . HI signal: ΛCDM Fluctuating . . . Detectability of the signal Magnetic fields and . . . Thermal evolution: . . . Ionization evolution Formation of . . . Formation of first SMBHs Weak Gravitational . . . Power Spectrum . . . Cosmological weak . . . Cosmological weak . . . Constraints on . . . Conclusions Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  9. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 8. Primordial magnetic fields and reionization: Global HI signal semi-analytic models Fluctuating . . . HI signal: ΛCDM • Press-Schechter formalism to determine the mass Fluctuating . . . function. Most haloes are close to 1– σ in this case as Detectability of the signal opposed to the usual case. Magnetic fields and . . . • Choose halo UV luminosity, clumping factor, to solve Thermal evolution: . . . for the radius of evolving Stromgren sphere around Ionization evolution each source. Formation of . . . • Compute the evolution of ionized fraction. Formation of first SMBHs Weak Gravitational . . . • Normalize to WMAP results. Power Spectrum . . . • magnetic field v/s the usual case : f eff f esc ≃ 0 . 01 Cosmological weak . . . in the usual case. It could be two orders of magnitude Cosmological weak . . . smaller for B 0 ≃ 3 × 10 − 9 G. Constraints on . . . Conclusions Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  10. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 9. Ionization History Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . HI signal: ΛCDM Fluctuating . . . Detectability of the signal Magnetic fields and . . . Thermal evolution: . . . Ionization evolution Formation of . . . Formation of first SMBHs Weak Gravitational . . . Power Spectrum . . . Cosmological weak . . . Cosmological weak . . . Constraints on . . . Conclusions Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

  11. Primordial magnetic . . . Ionization History 10. Global HI signal Global HI signal Fluctuating . . . HI signal: ΛCDM Fluctuating . . . Detectability of the signal Magnetic fields and . . . Thermal evolution: . . . Ionization evolution Formation of . . . Formation of first SMBHs Weak Gravitational . . . Power Spectrum . . . Cosmological weak . . . Cosmological weak . . . Constraints on . . . Conclusions Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend