Prime Wetlands: Study, Designation and Thereafter Sandy Crystall, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

prime wetlands study designation and thereafter
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Prime Wetlands: Study, Designation and Thereafter Sandy Crystall, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Prime Wetlands: Study, Designation and Thereafter Sandy Crystall, PWS Wetlands Bureau Nov 2009 Introduction Wetlands and their protection in New Hampshire Why designate prime wetlands? Process and effect of designation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Prime Wetlands: Study, Designation and Thereafter

Sandy Crystall, PWS

Wetlands Bureau Nov 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Wetlands and their protection in New

Hampshire

  • Why designate prime wetlands?
  • Process and effect of designation
  • Permitting after designation
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Law: RSA 482-A:1

“It is found to be for the public good ... to protect and preserve its submerged lands ... and its wetlands ... from despoliation and unregulated alteration because ... that would affect the value of these areas ...”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Wetlands Dredge and Fill Law: RSA 482-A:1... For the Public Good

  • Commerce, recreation and aesthetic

enjoyment.

  • Adequate groundwater levels.
  • Ability to handle the runoff of waters.
  • Natural ability of wetlands to absorb flood

waters and silt.

  • Habitats and reproduction areas for plants,

fish and wildlife.

  • Sources of nutrients for finfish, crustacea,

shellfish and wildlife.

  • Interests of the general public.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Protected Resources

  • Freshwater wetlands
  • Tidal wetlands
  • Surface waters and banks
  • Sand dunes
  • Upland tidal buffer zone (100 feet)
  • Uplands adjacent to prime

wetlands (100 feet)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Wetland Delineation

  • Water at or near the surface
  • Hydric soils

– Poorly drained – Very poorly drained

  • Prevalence of wetland vegetation

1987 US Army Corps of Engineers manual 2004 v3 NEIWPCC- Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils 1988 US Fish & Wildlife Service Plant List

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What Activities are Regulated in Most Jurisdictional Areas?

Dredge Fill Construction

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RSA 482 RSA 482-

  • A:15

A:15

Any municipality may undertake to designate, map, and document prime wetlands lying within its boundaries.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What Qualifies as a Prime Wetland?

  • In general, the “wetter” wetlands....

– Must have at least 50% very poorly drained soils (changed in 1992 from 100% vpd req’ment)

  • Of substantial significance

– Size – Unspoiled character – Fragile condition – Other relevant factors

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why Designate Prime Wetlands?

  • Prime wetland buffer protects the functions and

values of the wetland.

  • Affords an increased level of protection... in

general...

  • Specific permitting requirements

– More information required – Process provides for greater scrutiny – Public involvement

  • Educational component
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Municipally Designated Prime Wetlands

  • Communities can designate high value wetlands

as prime wetlands after study and vote by residents.

  • DES applies more protective rules to most

projects that impact areas in or within 100 feet of prime wetlands (Chapter Env-Wt 700):

– ... the proposed activity, either alone or in conjunction with other human activity, will not result in the significant net loss of any of the values ... in RSA 482- A:1 – Classified as major projects (sometimes...)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Prime Wetlands Public Hearing

No Longer Required Only existing standards of RSA 482-A:8

  • Public hearing is required only for

projects:

– With significant impact on the resources, or – Of substantial public interest.

New!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Functions of Buffers

  • Water quality
  • Water quantity
  • Wildlife habitat
  • Recreational
  • pportunities
  • Aesthetics
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Why a 100-foot Buffer?

  • On average, a 100 foot buffer will remove in the

neighborhood of 70% of the pollutants.

  • Buffers help protect against invasive species.

– Mark Bertness and coworkers have shown an association between Phragmites australis at the upper edges of salt marshes and houses along the upland edge.

  • A 100-foot buffer is more effective in protecting a

wetland from pollutants than from the loss of wildlife habitat function.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Municipally Designated Prime Wetlands

  • Currently 29

municipalities have designated prime wetlands

slide-16
SLIDE 16

How are wetlands evaluated for designation as prime?

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 1. Identify Universe of Wetlands
  • Determine universe of wetlands

– Identify all wetlands greater than 2.0 acres in size. – Wetlands smaller than 2.0 acres may be identified and included in the functional ranking.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Rules/guidance are based on starting with universe of NWI Wetlands

  • NWI depicts only larger and wetter wetlands and

complexes, but hydric soils mapping is appropriate too.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

NWI Wetlands Hydric Soils

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 2. Set Threshold

Conditions

  • Municipality may set threshold conditions for one or

more measurable characteristics, such as size, or function, such as water supply.

  • A wetland that does not meet or exceed the

threshold conditions shall be dropped from further consideration unless it can be shown to support a rare species, provide critical wildlife habitat, or have known historical significance.

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 3. Evaluate Selected Wetlands
  • Identified wetlands that have not been

eliminated by threshold conditions shall be ranked for each of the adopted functional values.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Evaluation Criteria

  • Ecological integrity
  • Wetland wildlife

habitat

  • Finfish habitat

Educational potential

  • Visual or aesthetic

quality

  • Water-based

recreation

  • Flood control potential
  • Groundwater use

potential

  • Sediment trapping
  • Nutrient attenuation
  • Shoreline anchoring
  • Historical site potential
  • Urban quality of life
  • Noteworthiness
slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • 4. Post-Evaluation Selection of

Wetlands to Propose for Designation

  • Based on the ranking of relative

functional values.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Selling the Concept of Prime Wetlands

It should be the responsibility of the Conservation Commission and other residents to sell the concept of prime wetlands.

  • Educate

– Local outreach programs

  • Keep on front burner

– Articles in local newspaper – Put on Conservation Commission agenda throughout length of study and adoption process.

  • Maintain current information about prime wetland

process on town web site

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Post-study Process

  • Requirements for the adoption of prime

wetlands follow those of zoning ordinances (RSA 675:2 or 675:3)

  • Public hearing is held
  • Residents vote by ballot to accept designation
  • f prime wetlands
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Warrant Article Options

  • Create one warrant article for all wetlands

proposed for designation.

  • Create a warrant article for each wetland

proposed for designation.

  • See handouts
  • Pros and cons
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Once Approved...

Submit to DES:

  • Map of prime wetlands
  • n tax map base.
  • Report for designated

wetlands and description of process.

  • Warrant article

information (and vote).

slide-28
SLIDE 28

DES Actions

  • Reviews submission (report, score sheets,

and format).

  • Acts upon the proposed designation.
  • Acceptance published in weekly decision

report and letter sent to town.

  • Maintains them and provides public access

during regular business hours.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wetlands/prime_wetlands.htm

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Standard Dredge and Fill Application for Impacts to Prime Wetland or Buffer

(Non-Utility Maintenance Projects)

Applicant must:

  • Show need for project's impacts and address

requirements [20+ questions] in Env-Wt 302.04].

– project could not be relocated to avoid impacts without reducing public value of the project or negatively affecting public health or safety

  • Demonstrate that the proposed activity, either alone
  • r in conjunction with other human activity, will not

result in the significant net loss of any of the values.

  • Project incorporates appropriate practicable

compensatory mitigation for each function and value that is affected.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Procedures for Review of Projects Proposed in Prime Wetland or Prime Wetland Buffer

DES:

  • May conduct field inspection of site.
  • May holds public hearing (only if significant public

interest or significant impact on the resources).

  • Makes permitting decision.

– The evaluation of the impact will relate specifically to the functions and values for which the wetland was designated as prime.

Corps of Engineers:

  • Reviews project
  • Written Corps approval must be obtained for any major

project before work can begin. New!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Approved Project Example #1

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Prime Wetlands Public Hearing

No Longer Required Only existing standards of RSA 482-A:8 apply:

  • Public hearings are held only for projects

– With significant impact on the resources, or – Of substantial public interest.

New!

slide-34
SLIDE 34

HB 384 - Establishes waivers for work near prime wetlands

  • Rules will be established relative to the permit process for

forest management in and near prime wetlands.

  • A property owner may request from DES a waiver from

subparagraph (a), under rules adopted by DES, to perform forest management work and related activities in the forested portion of a prime wetland or its 100-foot buffer.

  • A waiver shall be issued only when DES is able to determine

there will be no significant net loss of wetland values as identified in subparagraph (b)(1)(C) and RSA 482-A:1.

  • If the department determines that the proposed work may

cause a significant net loss of wetland values, the department may require the submittal of additional information. The department may place conditions on the waiver that it deems necessary to protect the prime wetland resource and shall set the term of the permit.

New!

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Rules will be developed for forestry waiver process (see HB 384)

The process and criteria for considering and granting waiver requests made pursuant to RSA 482-A:11, IV(b)(1), including:

(i) Methods for determining whether a proposed forest management project may result in a significant net loss of wetland values. (ii) Conditions that may be placed on a waiver when deemed necessary to protect the prime wetland resource. (iii) Criteria for granting extensions of waiver issuances pursuant to RSA 482-A:11, IV(b)(3). (iv) Specified criteria for identifying abutters and subsequent notification.

New!

slide-36
SLIDE 36

In Summary...

  • Why protect wetlands through prime wetlands

designation?

  • Wetlands provide many functions and values – and

most of these may not be visible until they are gone!

  • Buffers are critical to the protection of the wetland's

function and values

  • Values are those things we find important!
  • Prime wetlands designation provides a mechanism

to further protect those resources your community considers valuable.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Summary...

  • How will prime wetlands designation affect

development?

– Designation may affect the scope of some projects, depending on the type of project, footprint, or activity level. – Maintains to the extent possible a 100-foot buffer, which protects water quality and other functions and values to various extents.

Last but not least...

  • Participate in rulemaking process for forestry

waiver to ensure your prime wetlands are protected!

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Publications

  • NH Nontidal Method

(5.7 Mb file - fast connection only!)

http://www.nh.nrcs.usda.gov/news/publications.html

  • Highway Methodology Workbook Supplement

http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/reg/

  • NH Towns Report

http://www.nhdfl.org/library/pdf/Natural%20Heritage/TownLists.pdf

  • Riparian Buffers

http://www.crjc.org/riparianbuffers.htm

  • Buffer Zones and Beyond, July 2001

http://www.umass.edu/nrec/pdf_files/final_project.pdf

  • The Scientific Basis for Protecting Wetland Buffers,

Robert Buchsbaum and Scott Jackson

http://www.concordma.gov/Pages/ConcordMA_NaturalResources/ THESCI~1.PPT

slide-39
SLIDE 39

References: Buffers

  • Riparian Ecological Functions

http://www.dnr.wa.gov/Publications/lm_rfrs_trainingbisson.pdf

  • ELI- Planner’s Guide to Wetland Buffers for Local Governments

http://www.elistore.org/Data/products/d18_01.pdf

  • A Review of the Scientific Literature on Riparian Buffer Width,

Extent and Vegetation, Seth Wenger, University of Georgia.

  • Papers by Raymond D. Semlitsch, including “Core Habitat, Not

Buffer Zone.”

  • Wetland Buffers: Use and Effectiveness, Washington State

DOE, February 1992 http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/92010.html

  • Bertness, M.D., P. Ewanchuck, and B.R. Silliman. 2002.

Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh

  • landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

99: 1395-1398

slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Resources

  • NH DES - Wetlands Bureau

(guidance)

  • Audubon Society of NH
  • UNH Cooperative Extension –

Community Conservation Program http://extension.unh.edu/CommDev/CCAP.htm

  • Colleges/Universities
  • Private Consultants

www.des.nh.gov/wetlands wetmail@des.nh.gov (603) 271-2147 (-4193 direct)