Clare Entwistle Urban Riparian Symposium 2017 Background: Coastal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

clare entwistle
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Clare Entwistle Urban Riparian Symposium 2017 Background: Coastal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Clare Entwistle Urban Riparian Symposium 2017 Background: Coastal Wetlands Wetlands found in coastal watersheds: tidal and non-tidal wetlands are included Coastal Wetlands offer several important ecological services Texaswetlands.org


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Clare Entwistle

Urban Riparian Symposium 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Wetlands found in coastal watersheds: tidal and non-tidal wetlands are included

 Coastal Wetlands offer several important ecological services

Background: Coastal Wetlands

Texaswetlands.org houstonchronicle.com

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 41% of people worldwide live within 100 km of the coast (Martinez et al. 2014).  1996 – 2011 estimates the US lost 1,500 sq. mi. (960,000 acres) of coastal wetlands (Dahl and Stedman, 2013).

 70+% were in watersheds surrounding the Gulf Coast (Diffenderfer, 2014).  25%-50% of the world’s coastal wetlands have been converted for anthropogenic uses (Bao, 2015).

Background: Historical Trends

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 What is the current state of wetland acreage in Galveston and Cameron County?  Use aerial photography and online databases to map wetlands.

Study Purpose

Both pictures from: Texaswetlands.org

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Galveston County

 Northern Coast  Galveston Island  $4.2 billion generated to Texas economy through travel  1/3 of Texas commercial fishing  Over half of recreational fishing

Two Study Areas

 Cameron County

 Southern Coast  South Padre Island  SPI receives more than a million visitors annually  33% Texas Shrimp Industry  Port of Brownsville  Eco-tourism

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Provides Spatial reference and specific data for a variety of land covers  16 different land cover classes  Years 2001, 2006, and 2011

National Land Cover Database

Combined with:

  • NOAA C-CAP
  • USFWS NWI
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Simplified Classification System

2001 Galveston County 2011 Cameron County

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Raster Calculator was used for change detection: no change, conversion to upland, conversion to open water.  2001 – 2006 and 2006 – 2011  Calculated percent change

Quantifying Losses & Gains

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Performed in ArcGIS 10.3 and Microsoft Excel  Aerial Photography acquired from the National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) – 2004, 2006, 2012  30 points for each classification – 90 total  Confusion Matrix was generated: Kappa coefficient, overall accuracy, errors of commission, errors of omission, producer accuracy, and user accuracy.

Accuracy Assessments

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Accuracy Assessments

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Issues with NAIP Imagery

2006 Galveston County 2006 Cameron County

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Results

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Overall Gains and Losses: Galveston County

Land Cover % Change 2001- 2006 % Change 2006- 2011 Upland 4.47% 2.84% Wetland

  • 4.59%
  • 5.10%

Open Water

  • 1.15%
  • 0.29%
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Overall Gains and Losses: Galveston County

Conversion Type 2001-2006 acreage 2006-2011 acreage Wetland to Upland 10562.82 11213.32 Wetland to Open Water 1441.34 2054.70 Upland to Wetland 5644.58 7711.51 Open Water to Wetland 2445.89 1541.19

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Overall Gains & Losses: Galveston County

2001-2006 Galveston County Land Change 2006-2011 Galveston County Land Change

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Wetland Gains: Galveston County (2001-2006)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Galveston County Gains 2001-2006 - Close Up

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Wetland Loss: Galveston County (2001-2006)

League City

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Galveston County Losses 2001-2006 – Close Up

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Wetland Gain: Galveston County (2006-2011)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Wetland Loss: Galveston County (2006-2011)

Dickinson & La Marque

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Galveston County Losses 2006-2011 – Close Up

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Overall Gains & Losses: Cameron County

Land Cover % Change 2001- 2006 % Change 2006- 2011 Upland

  • 1.1%

0.1% Wetland

  • 1.4%
  • 0.47%

Open Water 4.19%

  • .002%
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Overall Gains & Losses: Cameron County

Conversion Type 2001-2006 acreage 2006-2011 acreage Wetland to Upland 1,040.58 2,292.00 Wetland to Open Water 603.13 165.91 Upland to Wetland 56.27 1,345.71 Open Water to Wetland 10.45 592.46

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Overall Gains & Losses: Cameron County

2001-2006 Cameron County Land Change 2006-2011 Cameron County Land Change

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cameron County Wetland Loss 2001-2006: Close Up

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Wetland Loss: Cameron County (2006-2011)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Accuracy Assessments

Year Galveston County Cameron County Overall Accuracy 2001 89.89% 87.78% 2006 98.89% 82.22% 2011 95.56% 96.67% Kappa 2001 0.897 0.875 2006 0.989 0.818 2011 0.955 0.960

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 Wetland loss is greater than wetland gains.  Majority of losses were from conversion to upland areas (>80%)

 In urban areas

 Galveston County experienced an overall 10% loss between 2001 and 2011 (~5% each study period)  Cameron County experienced an overall 2% loss between 2001 and 2011 (1.5% loss 2001-2006 and 0.5% loss 2006-2011)  Our maps had above 80% accuracy in identifying between wetland, upland, and

  • pen water

 20% increase in population for both counties between 2001-2011

Summary of Results

slide-30
SLIDE 30

 Important to see the overall trends in these rapidly changing areas.  Can easily compare areas and see priority areas for wetland conservation.  Further look at policy and management practices between Galveston and Cameron County.

 Both had 20% increase in population but had different amount of wetland loss (10% - Galveston County and 2% - Cameron County)

 Fairly accurate results can be obtained by using a simplified classification system and aerial photography. Cursory knowledge of the area.

Implications of Research

slide-31
SLIDE 31

 Bao, K 2015. Coastal Wetlands: Coupling Between Ocean and Land Systems. J Coast Res 31.3 : iv.  Carle, M. 2011. Estimating Wetland Losses And Gains In Coastal North Carolina: 1994-2001. Wetlands 31.6: 1275-1285.  Dahl, TE and Stedman SM. 2013. Status and Trends of wetlands in coastal watersheds of the conterminous United States 2004 to 2009. US Dept of Int, Fisha dn Wildlife Service and NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. (46 p.)  Diffenderfer, RP. Accelerated Wetland Losses In Coastal Watersheds. J Am Water Works Assoc. 106.4: 24-26.  Galveston Bay Facts [Internet]. n.d. Available from: <http://www.tamug.edu/gbic/gbicresources/bayfacts.html>.  Galveston Bay Information Center [Internet]. 2010. Available from: <http://tamug.edu/gbic/about.html>.  Martinez ML, Mendoza-Gonzalez G, Silva-Casarin R, Mendoza-Baldwin E. 2014. Land use changes and sea level rise may induce a “coastal squeeze” on the coasts of Veracruz, Mexico. Glob Environ Chang 29:180-188.  Moulton, DW, Dahl, TE, Dall, DM. 1997. Texas Coastal Wetlands: Status and Trends, mid-1950s to early 1990s. US Fish and Wildlife Service.  South Padre Island, Texas: (TX 78597) Profile: Population, Maps, Real Estate, Averages, Homes, Statistics, Relocation, Travel, Jobs, Hospitals, Schools, Crime, Moving, Houses, News, Sex Offenders [Internet]. n.d. [accessed 02 Feb. 2016]. Available from: <http://www.city-data.com/city/South-Padre-Island-Texas.html>.

References

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Thank you

Questions & Comments