SSM St. Clare Health Center St. Louis County, MO Final Thesis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SSM St. Clare Health Center St. Louis County, MO Final Thesis Presentation Christopher Brandmeier Advisor: Dr. Aly Said, Dr. Linda Hanagan SSM St. Clare Health Center St. Louis County, MO Overview of Site and Existing Structure
– Site Plan – Existing Structure
Site Location Pre-Construction Post-Construction
– Site Plan – Existing Structure
Structurally Isolated Building Segments Structural Grid, Typical Bays
– Site Plan – Existing Structure
Typical Bay
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
– 14”x26” Typ.
– 24”x26” Typ.
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
– Torsion governed transverse reinf. – l/600 for masonry deflections
– Shear governed transverse reinf.
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
– Iterative process – 4 column sections – Max 4% long. reinf.
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
Original LFRS Layout Redesign LFRS Layout
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
Seismic Base Shear Comparison Modal Mass Participation (25 Modes)
– Flat Slab with Drop Panels – Beams – Columns – Lateral System
– Weight – Cost – Schedule
Structural Weight Comparison
– Weight – Cost – Schedule
Reinforced Concrete Estimate Composite Steel Estimate
– Weight – Cost – Schedule
Typical Schedule per floor of Reinforced Concrete Structure
– 377 days
– 381 days – Account for sufficient curing time – 4 pours per floor
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
– “DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings”
– Minimize mass casualties
– Identify probable threats – Provide safe standoff distances
Standard Standoffs for Billeting and Assembly Structures
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
Non-Compliant Site Features
– Min. 82 ft. Standoff – No parking – No trash Receptacles
– No foliage below 3’ – No partial enclosures
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
Control Perimeter and Access Control Facilities
– Min. 207’ Standoff
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
– Approach Zone – Access Control Zone – Response Zone
Non-Compliant Site Features
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
Micro-Design of “Unobstructed Zone” Garden
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
Typical Charge Weight – Standoff Diagram Typical Exterior Wall Section
– UFC Standoff Distances – Control Perimeter – Access Control Facilities – Uninterrupted Zone Landscaping – Design Validation
Blast Response Criteria Comparison SBEDS Generated Charge-Weight – Standoff Diagram
– Feasible Design
– Feasible Design – Save $687,820.00 – Comparable schedule to within 4 days
– Feasible Design – Provides moderate level of protection – Meets UFC design criteria