Primary Project Team Primary Project Team COLLEGE TOWNSHIP, CENTRE - PDF document

328 INNOVATION BUILDING 328 INNOVATION BUILDING Primary Project Team Primary Project Team COLLEGE TOWNSHIP, CENTRE COUNTY, PA COLLEGE TOWNSHIP, CENTRE COUNTY, PA ` Owner of Record: RMP Co . Anthony Pacitti Jr. Development Of Record : Innovation Capital Partners, LP Structural Emphasis Architect : Robert L. Kimball & Associates Engineer: Robert L. Kimball & Associates General Contractor : Poole Anderson Spring 2005 Senior Thesis MEP : Subcontracted by Poole Anderson Department of Architectural Engineering Consultant: Dr. Memari Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Existing Floor System Existing Floor System Typical Bay Consists of: Typical Bay Consists of: � Location: Location: � College Township, Centre County, Pennsylvania College Township, Centre County, Pennsylvania � � 3- 3 -W16 X 26 Interior Beams W16 X 26 Interior Beams � � � Cost: Cost: � 2- 2 - W24 x 26 Girders W24 x 26 Girders � � $10.1 Million for all onsite work, including tenant fit up allowances of $9.80 ances of $9.80 $10.1 Million for all onsite work, including tenant fit up allow 1- 1 - W16 x 26 , 1 W16 x 26 , 1- - W18 x 40 W18 x 40 � � � � Connecting Into Columns per rentable square foot per rentable square foot Connecting Into Columns 3 inch Slab + 3 inch Deck 3 inch Slab + 3 inch Deck � � Size: Size: � � 3 stories with 73,943 sq. ft 3 stories with 73,943 sq. ft of tenant space of tenant space � � � Functions: Functions: � Research and Development Research and Development 10,000 sq. ft 10,000 sq. ft � � Laboratories Laboratories 20,000 sq. ft 20,000 sq. ft � � Corporate Office Space Corporate Office Space 43,943 sq. ft 43,943 sq. ft � � � Project Delivery Method Project Delivery Method: : � Negotiated firm price with a General Contactor, including a share of cost Negotiated firm price with a General Contactor, including a shar e of cost � � savings, provided the cost is lower than an established bench mark. savings, provided the cost is lower than an established bench ma rk. Figure 2--Typical bay (30’-0” -39’-0”) Existing Roof Structure Existing Roof Structure Existing Foundation Existing Foundation K Joist Roof System K Joist Roof System � Square Footing and Strip Footing Square Footing and Strip Footing � Square Footings Ranging in size from Square Footings Ranging in size from � � 3 3’ ’- -0 0” ” x 3 x 3’ ’- -0 0” ” to 12 to 12’ ’- -0 0” ” x 12 x 12’ ’- -0 0” ” 22 K 4 Joists supported by W24 x 68 22 K 4 Joists supported by W24 x 68 � � Girder Strip Footing Ranging in size from Strip Footing Ranging in size from Girder � � 1’ ’- -2 2” ” to 2 to 2’ ’- -0 0” ” 1 W16 x 26 Exterior Beam W16 x 26 Exterior Beam � � 1- 1 -1/2 1/2” ” 20 Gauge Type B Deck 20 Gauge Type B Deck � � 2 W 24 x 55 Beams Were Added to 2 W 24 x 55 Beams Were Added to � � Support the VAV Mechanical Systems Support the VAV Mechanical Systems Typical Bay of Roof Existing Foundation Plan 1

Existing Lateral System Redesigned Building Outline Existing Lateral System Redesigned Building Outline � Structural System Structural System � � 6 Braced Frames 6 Braced Frames � � Flat Plate System without beams Flat Plate System without beams � � 4 4- -North/South Direction North/South Direction � • Floor system Floor system • � 2 2- -West/East Direction West/East Direction • Columns • Columns � � Seismic Controls Seismic Controls • • Shear Walls Shear Walls � Typical Frames Are Composed of : � Typical Frames Are Composed of : � � Construction Schedule � Construction Schedule � 2 2- -W 10 Columns W 10 Columns � Rescheduled for Concrete System Rescheduled for Concrete System � � � Variety of W12, W16, W21, W24 Variety of W12, W16, W21, W24 � and HSS Compression and Tension and HSS Compression and Tension � Electrical System Electrical System � Members Members � Resize Main Distribution Panel Resize Main Distribution Panel � Existing Lateral System � Resize BUS Resize BUS- -DUCT to Each Floor and In the Main Distribution Panel DUCT to Each Floor and In the Main Distribution Panel � � Resize Breakers Resize Breakers � Goals for New Design Goals for New Design Redesigned Building Size Redesigned Building Size � Direct Effect on the Schedule Direct Effect on the Schedule � 5 5- -Story Building Story Building � � � Total Height = 75 Total Height = 75’ ’- -0 0” ” � Lower Overall Cost Lower Overall Cost � � � 14 14’ ’- -0 0’ ’ Floor to Floor Height Floor to Floor Height � � More tenant Space with the More tenant Space with the � � Additional 50,000 sq. ft of Floor Area Additional 50,000 sq. ft of Floor Area � Additional 2 Stories Additional 2 Stories � Increase Floor to Floor Height Increase Floor to Floor Height � Design Loads Direct Design Criteria Design Loads Direct Design Criteria � � MINIMUM OF THREE CONTINUOUS SPANS IN EACH MINIMUM OF THREE CONTINUOUS SPANS IN EACH DIRECTION DIRECTION � DEAD LOAD = 165 PSF � DEAD LOAD = 165 PSF � LONG � LONG- -SPAN/ SHORT SPAN/ SHORT- -SPAN RATIO NOT GREATER SPAN RATIO NOT GREATER THAN 2 THAN 2 (12” ”/12)(150PSF)+(15PSF) /12)(150PSF)+(15PSF) FLOORING (12 FLOORING � SUCCESSIVE SPAN LENGTHS IN EACH DIRECTION SUCCESSIVE SPAN LENGTHS IN EACH DIRECTION � � � LIVE LOAD = 80 PSF LIVE LOAD = 80 PSF SHALL NOT DIFFER BY MORE THAN ONE 1/3 THE SHALL NOT DIFFER BY MORE THAN ONE 1/3 THE LONGER SPAN LONGER SPAN � Fy = 60,000 PSI � Fy = 60,000 PSI � ALL LOADS MUST BE DUE TO GRAVITY ONLY ALL LOADS MUST BE DUE TO GRAVITY ONLY � � � SERVICE LIVE LOAD SHALL EXCEED TWO TIMES THE SERVICE LIVE LOAD SHALL EXCEED TWO TIMES THE � F F’ ’c = 4,000 PSI c = 4,000 PSI SERVICE DEAD LOAD SERVICE DEAD LOAD � 2