pressure vessel design for hpgtpc
play

Pressure Vessel Design for HPgTPC Prashant Kumar, Vikas Teotia, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pressure Vessel Design for HPgTPC Prashant Kumar, Vikas Teotia, Sanjay Malhotra Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Trombay, India Topics discussed in previous meeting on 31.5.19 Alloys of Al 5083 Pressure Vessel Thickness calculations by a.


  1. Pressure Vessel Design for HPgTPC Prashant Kumar, Vikas Teotia, Sanjay Malhotra Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Trombay, India

  2. Topics discussed in previous meeting on 31.5.19 • Alloys of Al 5083 • Pressure Vessel Thickness calculations by a. Design rule and b. design by analysis • Deflection and Stress calculation of Pressure Vessel with Hemispherical closure were presented

  3. Outline of presentation • Pressure Vessel Shell thickness calculation • Design and Analysis for Torispherical Head • Design and Analysis for Elliptical Head • Comparison of Elliptical Heads based on ratio of Major to Minor axis • Analysis of Support for Pressure Vessel • Summary • Future Work

  4. Pressure Vessel with Torispherical Closure 40

  5. Torispherical Head Design Stresses at Junction of Crown and Knuckle Stresses at Junction of Crown To minimise local stresses at junction: ASME Specifies As > is Compressive 1. Knuckle radius > = 6 % of Rc 2. Crown radius < 0.8 to 0.9 of ID Therefore, there will be localised stress and Buckling Reference: UG-32 of ASME Section VIII Div 1

  6. Torispherical Head Design Deflection = 6.086 mm Stress = 143.482 MPa Crown Radius = 5152.5 mm Knuckle Radius = 343.5 mm Thickness of Head = 45 mm Yield Strength = 205 MPa Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 Design Factor = 1.4 Small Knuckle > Higher Localized stresses

  7. Reduction of localized stresses at Knuckle / Cont.… R350 Deflection = 5.074 mm Stress = 121.243 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Thickness of Head = 45 mm Design Factor = 1.7 Material = Equivalent to Al 5083

  8. Stress Conc. at Junction of Flange & Knuckle end Deflection = 4.998 mm Stress = 85.955 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Inner Rc = 5152.5 mm Inner Rk = 350 mm Design Factor = 2.4

  9. Ellipsoidal Head Design At Equator At Crown Courtesy: Theory and Design of Pressure Vessels by John F. Harvey

  10. Ellipsoidal Head Design Thickness of Head = 40 mm a = 2862.5 b = 2000 a / b = 1.43 Deflection = 3.43 mm Von-Mises Stress = 52.375 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 Design Factor = 3.9

  11. Ellipsoidal Head Design / Cont... a = 2862.5 b = 2000 a / b = 1.43 Thickness of Head = 35 mm Deflection = 3.9 mm Stress = 59.66 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 Design Factor = 3.4 For 0.7 – 1.5 Mpa Design Pressure Most Preferred

  12. Comparison of Ellipsoidal Heads a = 2862.5 mm a = 2862.5 mm a = 2862.5 mm b = 1431.25 mm b = 2000 mm b = 954 mm a / b = 2 a / b = 1.43 a / b = 3 Deflection = 3.9 mm Deflection = 9.5 mm Deflection = 23.87 mm Stress = 59.66 Mpa Stress = 107.287 Mpa Stress = 259 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Thickness of Head = 35 mm Thickness of Head = 35 mm Thickness of Head = 35 mm Material = Equivalent to Al Material = Equivalent to Al Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 5083 5083

  13. Vessel Assembly with Ellipsoidal Head Maximum Von Mises Stress = 62.226 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 MPa Maximum Deflection = 4.234 mm

  14. Ellipsoidal Head with Nozzle Deflection = 3.556 mm Without Nozzle Stress = 52.375 Mpa With Nozzle Stress = 95.792 Mpa Yield Strength = 205 Mpa Thickness of Head = 35 mm Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 Design Factor = 2.1 Remarks: Not Satisfying ASME Section VIII Div I Criteria Therefore, Reinforcement near the Nozzle Section required

  15. Stress Conc. around circular hole in Cylindrical Shell 2.5 σ 1.006 σ r = a r = 3a How Far to reinforce ?

  16. Nozzle Reinforcement Analysis • Shell is weakened around nozzles, and must also support eccentric loads from pipes • Principle of Area Compensation • Usually weld reinforcing pads to thicken the shell near the nozzle. Area of reinforcement = or > area of nozzle Deflection = 2.9 mm Up to 2r from the 600 mm center Maximum Von Mises Stress = 55.386 Mpa 0.25r along the Yield Strength = 205 Mpa nozzle Design Factor = 3.7 600 mm

  17. Saddle Support Analysis Deflection = 0.508 mm Saddle Contact Angle = 120 Degree Maximum Von-Mises Stress = 20.709 Mpa Approximate Weight of Vessel Yield Strength = 205 MPa including Heads = 22 Ton Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 Total Weight of Support = 675 Kg Design Factor = 9.9 Conclusion: Over-conservative

  18. Saddle Support Optimization Analysis Deflection = 8.8 mm Saddle Contact Angle = 120 Degree Maximum Von-Mises Stress = 38.479 Mpa Approximate Weight of Vessel Yield Strength = 205 MPa including Heads = 22 Ton Thickness of Head = 35 mm Total Weight of Support = 470 Kg Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 Design Factor = 5.3

  19. Saddle Support Optimization Analysis Deflection = 1.69 mm Saddle Contact Angle = 120 Degree Maximum Von-Mises Stress = 17.033 Mpa Approximate Weight of Vessel Yield Strength = 205 MPa including Heads = 22 Ton Thickness of Head = 35 mm Total Weight of Support = 488 Kg Material = Equivalent to Al 5083 Design Factor = 12 187 Kg Materials is saved compared to previous Design

  20. Support Optimization / Cont.… Deflection = 5.894 mm Saddle Contact Angle = 120 Degree Maximum Von-Mises Stress = 59.587 Mpa Approximate Weight of Vessel Yield Strength = 206.8 MPa including Heads = 22 Ton Material = AISI 304 Total Weight of Support = 436 Kg Design Factor = 3.4 Further 52 Kg Materials is saved compared to previous Design

  21. Summary and Conclusion • Shell Thickness calculation done for Al 5083 • Initial Torispherical Head Design were carried out • Initial Ellipsoidal Head Design were carried out • Analysis for Nozzle reinforcement done partially • Pressure Vessel Support System have been optimized Note: In all calculation Joint efficiency were considered 1

  22. Future Work • Shell thickness calculation to be tried with other competing materials • Rigorous analysis for both Torispherical Head & Ellipsoidal Design to be carried out (Design by Rules & Design by Analysis) • Nozzle reinforcement to be detailed (Design by Rule in particular) • More configuration for Pressure Vessel Support System can be tried • Joint Efficiency to be considered as per ASME BPV Code in further calculation

  23. Thank You For Your Kind Attention

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend