Preliminary Design Review Agenda Mission Success Criteria - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

preliminary design review agenda
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Preliminary Design Review Agenda Mission Success Criteria - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

49er Rocketry Team The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Preliminary Design Review Agenda Mission Success Criteria Launch Vehicle Recovery Payload Primary Payload - Unmanned Aerial System Mid-air and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

49er Rocketry Team The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Preliminary Design Review

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Mission Success Criteria
  • Launch Vehicle

○ Recovery

  • Payload

○ Primary Payload - Unmanned Aerial System ○ Mid-air and Ground Deployment ○ Retention

Secondary Payload - Computer Vision

  • Safety
  • Project Plan

Agenda

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Vehicle Mission Success Criteria

3

Item Criteria VMSC 1 The launch vehicle must successfully house the payload until deployment. VMSC 2 The launch vehicle will reach the target altitude within 100 ft. VMSC 3 During ascent, the computer vision (CV) will successfully track the location of the sample recovery area VMSC 6 Each altimeter will have its own dedicated power supply VMSC 7 Drogue parachutes will deploy no later than 2 sec. after apogee. VMSC 8 All pieces of the launch vehicle will land within 90 sec.

Complete vehicle success requirements are located in Sections 3.1.2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Booster section

○ Will house: motor, modular fin can, recovery system

  • Payload section

○ Will house: payload, payload deployment, ground orientation and stabilization, computer vision, and recovery system

Launch Vehicle

4

Specifications Values

Length 106.7 in. Weight 63 lbs Max velocity 600 ft/s Loaded Stability 2.55

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • LD-Haack series

○ Low drag coefficient ○ Reduced pressure and wave drag

  • Length to diameter ratio of 1.5
  • Additively manufactured from ABS

Nosecone

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Payload airframe will be constructed of 6 in. ID carbon fiber tube with 1/16th in. wall thickness
  • Total weight of 38lbs.
  • Clearance holes for cameras to recess into airframe and for passage of wiring.
  • The recovery system will utilize dual deployment from the parachute bay located above

the avionics bay.

Payload Section

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Comprised of motor, motor retainer, modular fin can,

and recovery system

  • Loaded weight : 24.7 lbs
  • Unloaded weight : 14.2 lbs
  • Utilizes reloadable motor casing capable to fitting

primary and secondary motors

  • 5 in. carbon fiber tube used for its high strength to

weight ratio

Booster Section

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Booster transitions from 5 to 6 in. ID with 1/16 in. wall thickness
  • Separation occurs just above and below the recovery section
  • Altimeter Bay

○ High strength to weight ratio ○ Shields altimeters from stray interference

Booster Recovery

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Modular Fin Can

9

  • Fins are able to be modified or replaced quickly

and with minimal tooling

  • Modular fin design allows for more control over the

stability of the rocket

  • Consists of modular fins and fin retainer
  • Fins will be polycarbonate for dimensional stability

and high strength to weight ratio

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • 75 mm motor chosen for thrust performance compared to

projected vehicle weight

  • Quick turnaround time
  • Aero Pack RB75P motor casing
  • Boattail threads into retainer cap to fully secure motor

○ Boattail and retainer cap are printed from ULTEM due to relative location to extreme heat

Motor Retention

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Four externally mounted cameras collect visual data

during launch

  • Cameras angled at 35 degrees from vertical
  • Cameras recessed into airframe to reduce protrusion
  • Verification of flight dynamics to ensure minimal impact to

vehicle center of pressure or stability

Camera Vision Mounts

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Stability margin was calculated using OpenRocket and Barrowmans equations Handbook Criteria:

  • Minimum Static Stability - 2.0

No Computer Vision

  • OpenRocket - 3.06
  • Calculated - 2.95

With Computer Vision

  • OpenRocket - 2.62
  • Calculated - 2.55

Motor Burnout

  • OpenRocket - 3.23
  • Calculated - 3.16

Stability Margin

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Handbook Criteria

  • Maximum Impulse: 5120 N-s (L-Class)
  • Minimum Velocity at Rail Exit: 52 ft/s

Simulated Data:

Motor Selection

13

Primary: Aerotech L2200 Secondary: Cesaroni L2375 Motor Average Apogee (ft) Thrust to Weight Rail Exit Velocity (ft/s)

  • Max. Velocity

(ft/s) Max. Acceleration (ft/s²) L2200 4135 7.88 66.3 529 338 L2375 3949 8.77 63.6 526 284

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Simulation Results

  • Table is comprised of data averaged from 5 simulations
  • Assumed rail cant of 7.5 degrees
  • Mass distribution was simulated in OpenRocket to increase accuracy of simulations

Flight Simulations

14

Wind Speed (mph) 5 10 15 20 Apogee (ft) 4256 4214 4161 4086 4032 Time to Apogee (s) 16.8 16.7 16.6 16.4 16.2 Rail Velocity (ft/s) 67.1 67.1 67.1 67.1 67.1

  • Max. Velocity (ft/s)

529 529 529 528 527

  • Max. Acceleration

(ft/s²) 337 338 338 338 338

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

1. Initial separation. 2. Booster section drogue deployment. 3. Payload section drogue deployment with bagged main parachute.

  • 4a. Booster main parachute release at 500 ft.
  • 4b. Payload main parachute release at 500 ft.

5. The UAS deployment upon RSO approval. 6. Landing

Recovery Overview

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Drogue Parachutes Main Parachutes

Parachute Selection

16

Type Classic Elliptical Diameter (in) 15 Cd 1.5 Section Booster Payload Type Iris Ultra Compact Iris Ultra Compact Diameter (in) 96 144 Cd 2.2 2.2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Both Altimeter bays will include:

  • Two PerfectFlite StratologgerCFs
  • Aluminum Charge Wells

○ 4 for booster, 2 for payload

  • 9V Batteries
  • Altimeter Sled
  • Carbon Fiber Bulkhead

Payload specific additions include:

  • Aluminum Bulkhead
  • Tender Descender
  • Deployment Bag
  • Altus Metrum TeleMega

Altimeter Bay Hardware

17

Booster Recovery Altimeter Bay

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Vehicle Separation

18

Section Booster Main Booster Drogue Payload Main Black Powder Charge Size (g) 1.2 .4 1.0

Full ejection charge calculations are located in Section 3.4.2

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Drift Calculations

19

Wind Speed (mph) Booster (ft) Payload with UAS (ft) Payload deploying UAS (ft) 5 508.9 539.1 565.5 10 1017.9 1078.2 1131.1 15 1526.8 1617.3 1696.6 20 2035.7 2156.4 2262.2

Full drift calculations are located in Section 3.5.4

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Descent Times and KE

20

Section Times (s) Booster 69.4 Payload with UAS 73.51 Payload Deploying UAS 77.12 Section Mass (lbm) KE (ft-lbf) Nosecone 3 .47 Payload 35.1 64.77 Payload deploying UAS 29.1 44.52 Booster Recovery 11.2 14.86 Booster 13.5 21.53

Complete calculations are located in Sections 5.4.4-5

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Requirement Verifications

21

Item Requirement Verification Method Verification Plan 3.8 Each altimeter will have its own dedicated power supply. Inspection & Demonstration Each altimeter will be wired to its own 9V battery housed within the altimeter bay. 3.1.2 Drogue parachutes will be deployed no more than two seconds after apogee. Demonstration The drogues will be set to deploy 1 sec. and 2 sec. after apogee for the booster and payload sections respectively. 3.11 Descent time will be no more than 90 sec. Test The booster section will land in 69.4 sec. and the payload section will land in 77.1 sec.

Complete Recovery verifications are located in Sections 7.1.3

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Team Derived Recovery Requirements

22

Item Requirement Verification Method Verification Plan TDVR 9 The recovery system must allow for the option of mid-flight deployment

  • f payload

Inspection The recovery system of the payload section will be designed to allow for

  • ne side of the payload

bay to be accessible during descent. TDVR 10 Altimeters must be able to be armed and disarmed without disassembly

  • f the launch vehicle

Inspection & Demonstration The altimeter switches will be designed to be accessible through the vehicle airframe.

Complete Team Derived Recovery tables are located in section 5.4

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Payload Mission Success Criteria

Complete Mission Success Criteria is located in section 4.1.2

23

Item Criteria PMSC 1 The UAS travels autonomously to the SRA using a combination of GPS coordinates and CV. PMSC 2 The UAS autonomously avoids objects and collisions using onboard sensors and CV. PMSC 4 Flight and control of the UAS is assisted using the ACS. PMSC 6 The UAS and deployment system will be capable of both mid-air deployment and ground deployment. PMSC 7 The ground deployment stabilization system orients the UAS within ±5 degrees normal to the ground. PMSC 9 A minimum of 15 mL of ice simulant sample is collected and retained during the mission.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Payload Overview

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS

25

  • UAS weight - approx. 6 lbs
  • Flight time - 8 minutes
  • Thrust to weight ratio - 3.7
  • Features:

○ Auxiliary control surfaces ○ Folding propellers ○ Hinged camera mount ○ Autonomous flight with manual override

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS - Folded Dimensions

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS - Unfolded Dimensions

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Three tiered carbon fiber plate construction
  • H-frame configuration
  • Spring-loaded folding motor arms
  • Overhead motor arms
  • Spacers used for electronics mounting

UAS - Structure

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Force UAS away from vehicle immediately

following mid-air deployment

  • Allow forward or backward movement

without pitching the airframe

  • Can aid in slowing UAS during its descent
  • Servo actuated

UAS - Auxiliary Control Surfaces

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS - Deployment Components

30

Stabilization Doors Sealant Cap Deployment Rail

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS - Ground Deployment

31

3. 1. 2. 4. 1. Initial 1. Stabilization 1. Ground Clearance 1. Deployed

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS - Mid-air Deployment

32

1. 3. 2. 4. 1. Main Parachute Opens 1. Sealant Cap Opens 1. Ejection 1. Deployed

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Axial retention

○ Lead screw threaded into rear of UAS

  • Radial retention

○ Rollers mounted to bottom plate, slotted into payload bay, prevents UAS motion off of the plate

  • Redundancies

○ Servo actuated pin to prevent lead screw rotation ○ Payload bay lid will retain UAS in case of critical retention failure ○ Shift of UAS location in payload bay disconnects deployment control, defaults to ground deployment

UAS - Retention

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Collect and retain a 10 mL sample of lunar ice

simulant

○ Semi-cylinder will rotate 180 degrees and scoop the collected sample ○ Powered by a micro spur gear motor

UAS - Sample Collection and Retention

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS - Systems Overview

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • 12 inch folding propeller

○ 5 lbs of thrust per motor

  • NTM 3542 Propdrive V2

○ 1000 KV ○ Max current of 47 A ○ 5.47 oz

  • Grayson Hobby 50 A Electronic Speed Controller

○ 50 A max continuous current ○ 55 A max < 30 sec ○ 7.2 V to 11.1 V input ○ 1.7 oz

UAS - Flight Systems

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • NanoPi Neo Core2 SBC

○ Runs Linux OS ○ Run programs and scripts written in Python and C/C++

  • 2x HolyBro Pixhawk 4 Autopilot

○ Control UAS motors ○ Control Auxiliary Control Surfaces (ACS) ○ Runs ArduPilot flight stack ○ Supports autonomous flight through MAVLink protocol

UAS - Flight Systems

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • The SRA detection system will be handled

by a color camera

  • Camera mount will rotate downwards to

locate SRA site

  • CV algorithm will filter image by SRA

markings

  • NanoPi SBC will run CV algorithms
  • penCV library will be used
  • penCV offers hardware acceleration for

faster processing

UAS - SRA Detection Systems

38

25 ft

slide-39
SLIDE 39

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Object avoidance done by using a

stereoscopic vision algorithm

  • Dual cameras on the camera mount

creates depth map

  • Depth map used to detect objects and

avoid them

  • Processing done by NanoPi SBC
  • SBC calculates path around object

UAS - Object Avoidance

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • FrSky Taranis X9D Plus Transmitter

○ 2.4 GHz ○ 16 channels ○ Programmable switches ○ For manual control of UAS

  • FrSky Taranis X8R Receiver

○ 2.4 GHz ○ 8 Channels ○ SBus compatible ○ .59 oz

UAS - Wireless Communications

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Digi XBee-Pro 900HP

○ 902-928 MHz ○ 200 Kbps up to 4 miles ○ 250 mW transmit power ○ Used for both transmitter and receiver

  • TE Connectivity AMP Connector 1513168-1

○ Deployment receiving antenna ○ 902 - 928 MHz ○ 0 dBi gain ○ 10 W max power

UAS - Wireless Communications

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Yagi-Uda Ground Antenna

○ Handheld for deployment signal ○ 902-928 MHz ○ 15 dBi ○ 50 W max output power ○ 2.54 lbs ○ Connects to XBee-Pro

UAS - Deployment Communications

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

UAS - Power Budget

43

Component Current Draw (mA) Quantity Operation Time (min) Current Consumed (mA) Motors 12000 4 8 9000.00 Control Surface Servo 250 4 2 167.00 Flight Controller 3000 2 10 500.00 NanoPi SBC 2000 1 8 334.00 STM32 Blue Pill microcontroller 100 1 10 100.00 Cameras 185 2 8 62.00 Sample Collection Servo 250 1 2 9.00 Total Current (mAh) 10,172

Complete calculations are located in Sections 4.6.3

slide-44
SLIDE 44

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Battery voltage (11.1V nominal) reduced to proper

voltages for seperate systems

  • DC-DC converters used to step down voltage
  • To save power on UAS, a quick connect used

○ UAS will be in low-power mode until deployment ○ UAS siphons power from battery on Vehicle until deployment ○ Microcontroller switches between the two batteries

UAS - Power Systems

44

Device Power rail requirement NanoPi SBC 5V / 2A rail STM32 Blue Pill 3V / 0.5A rail Servos for stereo vision 5V / 0.5A rail Motors for propulsion 11.1V / 50A rail

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Locate SRA site as vehicle is ascending to

apogee

  • Four cameras to view land surrounding

launch site

  • GPS and CV locate ground location
  • Altitude sensor to calculates distance from

ground location

  • Compass obtains heading of SRA site
  • Uses ODroid-N2 SBC to process footage

Secondary Payload

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Payload Requirements

46

Item Requirement Verification Method Verification Plan 4.3.2 A sample recovery site will be located

  • n the surface of the launch field.

Demonstration, Test The UAS will utilize sensors and computer vision to determine the sample recovery site. A secondary payload will assist in location of recover sites using computer vision. The autonomous navigation to sample recovery sites will be tested prior to and in the full scale test launch. 4.3.7.4 Shear pins will not exclusively be used for retention. Demonstration The retention system will not use shear pins.

Complete Payload Requirements located in section 6.1.3

slide-47
SLIDE 47

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Payload Team Derived Requirements

47

Item Requirement Verification Method Verification Plan TDPR 1 UAS weight will be less than 7 lbs. Analysis CAD design for estimate, measure using scale for actual. TDPR 5 UAS control surfaces will be able to rotate ±30 degrees normal of the axis

  • f thrust.

Test Ground and full-scale testing. TDPR 8 The payload bay will protect the UAS and deployment system from recovery charges. Test Ground and full-scale testing.

Complete Team Derived Payload Requirements located in section 6.1.2

slide-48
SLIDE 48

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Safety Officer

○ Primary: David Clifton ○ Backup: Samantha McKinney

  • Project Hazard Recognition

○ Team Safety Briefing ■ UNCC Safety Handbook ■ Safety Checklists ○ Safety Verification ■ Signature approval ○ Hazard analysis ■ FMEAs

Safety

Probability Severity 1 2 3 4 Catastrophic Critical Marginal Negligible A - Frequent 1A 2A 3A 4A B - Probable 1B 2B 3B 4B C - Occasional 1C 2C 3C 4C D - Remote 1D 2D 3D 4D E - Improbable 1E 2E 3E 4E

48

Risk Assessment Codes located in section 5.2

slide-49
SLIDE 49

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Personnel Hazards

Hazard Cause Effect Pre-RAC Mitigation Mitigation Type Post-RAC Injury from catastrophic on take-

  • ff (CATO)

Disregard of required withdrawal distances for high power rockets Severe bodily injury from expelled material 1C All team members will strictly adhere to a withdrawal distance of 300 ft Procedure 1E Injury in machine shop Lack of attention to work Serious bodily injury 1C All team members must take required safety tests and adhere to all posted machine shop rules Procedure 1E

49

Complete Personnel Hazard Analysis located in section 5.2

slide-50
SLIDE 50

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

FMEA - Vehicle

Hazard Cause Effect Pre-RAC Mitigation Mitigation Type Post-RAC CATO Manufacturer preparation and handling guidelines not followed Loss of launch vehicle 1A Motor preparations will be supervised and signed by the safety officer to ensure guidelines are followed Procedure 1E Motor retainer failure Motor retainer not secured Severe damage to or loss of vehicle 1C Motor retainer will be securely inserted into the booster section using epoxy Design, Analysis, Testing 1E

50

Complete Vehicle FMEA table located in section 5.3.1

slide-51
SLIDE 51

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

FMEA - Recovery

Hazard Cause Effect Pre-RAC Mitigation Mitigation Type Post-RAC Parachute is tangled upon deployment Poor packing of parachute allows for catching upon recovery deployment Parachute does not fully inflate 1C Packing of the parachutes will be inspected prior to launch Procedure 1E Tender descender fails to open Ejection charge not large enough to deploy Parachute cannot fully inflate 3C Ejection charge size will be calculated Analysis, Testing 3E

51

Complete Recovery FMEA table located in section 5.3.1

slide-52
SLIDE 52

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

FMEA - Payload

Hazard Cause Effect Pre-RAC Mitigation Mitigation Type Post-RAC Damage to payload due to ejection charge ignition Payload bay sealant cap cannot withstand pressure generated during recovery events

  • 1. Fracture of

sealant cap

  • 2. Ejection of

payload components 1A Ground testing of the effects of energetics on the sealant cap will be conducted to validate structural integrity Analysis, Testing 3E Loss of power

  • 1. Failure of UAS

to initialise upon deployment

  • 2. Failure of UAS

to complete mission

  • 1. Potential loss of

UAS

  • 2. Failure to meet

mission requirements 1C

  • 1. All electrical

connections will be checked prior to any launch day operations

  • 2. Batteries will

be charged and checked prior to arriving at the launch site Procedure 1E

52

Complete Payload FMEA table located in section 5.3.2

slide-53
SLIDE 53

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Launch Operations

Hazard Cause Effect Pre-RAC Mitigation Mitigation Type Post-RAC Aerial deployment not permitted by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) FAA does not permit the competition site a waiver for 14 CFR part 107: Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Payload will be restricted to a 400ft maximum deployment altitude or default to a ground deployment 1B The payload will be retained within the payload bay until below 400 ft to remain compliant with regulations 14 CFR part 107 and 49 U.S. Code 44809 Design, Procedure 1E NAR certified personnel cannot attend launch Schedules do not work for NAR certified personnel Launch must be postponed 1B Schedules will be discussed and launch days planned in advance to ensure all required personnel are present Procedure 1E

53

Complete Launch operations hazards table located in section 5.3.3

slide-54
SLIDE 54

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Environmental Hazards

Hazard Cause Effect Pre-RAC Mitigation Mitigation Type Post-RAC High winds at launch High pressure cell in area

  • 1. Drastically

change vehicle flight dynamics

  • 2. Prevent launch
  • f vehicle

1C Team will check all weather forecasts prior to launch day to determine if launch conditions are met Procedure 1E Rain Storm fronts in the area

  • 1. Damage to

critical electronics

  • 2. Cancellation of

launch 1C Critical electronics will be kept in waterproof containers until ready to be installed in launch vehicle Procedure 1E

54

Complete Environmental Hazards table located in section 5.4

slide-55
SLIDE 55

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Risks to Project

Hazard Impact Probability Quantification Mitigation Lack of funding High High Team members will participate in fundraisers, crowdfunding efforts, and additional work opportunities Inability to achieve necessary funding will require allocating

  • ther resources; leads to

delays and inability in

  • btaining necessary parts

Critical damage to sub- scale or full-scale launch vehicle High High New components will need to be constructed increasing project costs and delaying project deadlines Vehicle components and recovery systems will be tested prior to launch

  • perations

55

Complete Risks to Project Completion table located in section 5.5

slide-56
SLIDE 56

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Project Plan

56

Milestone Date Proposal September 18, 2019 Preliminary Design Review November 1, 2019 Conceptual Design Review January 10, 2020 Flight Readiness Review March 2, 2020 Vehicle Demonstration Flight March 2, 2020 Payload Demonstration Flight March 23, 2020 Launch Date April 4, 2020

Complete Project plan located in Section 7.3

slide-57
SLIDE 57

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Expected Budget

57

Category Amount Launch Vehicle $12,478.19 Payload $4,274.78 Testing $1,000.00 Outreach $500.00 Travel $9,000.00 Total $27,252.97

Complete budget is located in Section 7.3.2

slide-58
SLIDE 58

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Funding Plan

58

Funding Source Amount Niner Nation Gives $7,103 NC Space Grant $5,000 Crowdfunding $10,000 Bridge Tournament $1,000 Department and College $4,000 Senior Design $2,000 Total $29,103

Complete Funding plan can be located in section 6.2.1

  • Current expected budget: $27,252.97
  • Sustainability:

○ On campus outreach to garner interest in the team ○ Maintain workspace and resources for future teams

slide-59
SLIDE 59

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team
  • Past Events:

○ Charlotte Kids’ Fest - 6500 attendees ○ J.M. Robinson Middle School - 150 attendees ○ Explore! - 200 attendees

  • Upcoming Events:

○ Johnston YMCA ○ UNCC Athletics/Baseball Event

Educational Outreach

59

Complete Educational outreach event list is located in section 7.3.3

slide-60
SLIDE 60

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

General Requirements

60

Item Requirement Verification Method Verification Plan 1.1 The 2019-2020 49er Rocketry Team will be responsible for completing all tasks associated with the project except for handling of any ejection charges, preparation of ejection charges,

  • r preparing and installing of electric matches.

Inspection A team mentor will be designated to handle all aspects of the ejection charges and installation of electronic matches. 1.4 All team members attending the launch week activities must be submit by the CDR including students, a mentor, and no more than two adult educators. Inspection The project lead will compile and submit team information and forms to NASA. 1.7 All necessary forms and submissions to NASA project management will be submit by the team in a timely manner, in advance of deadlines. Inspection The project plan will be maintained to reflect necessary submissions to

  • NASA. The project lead will

compile and submit all information and forms for submission to the NASA project management team. Complete General Requirements located in section 6.1.3

slide-61
SLIDE 61

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 49er Rocketry Team

Questions?

61