Positive ionic drift in T2K gas Preliminary, still some analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

positive ionic drift in t2k gas
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Positive ionic drift in T2K gas Preliminary, still some analysis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Positive ionic drift in T2K gas Preliminary, still some analysis ongoing Fred Hartjes NIKHEF Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting February 10, 2020 # Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 1 Setup for measuring positive ion drift


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Positive ionic drift in T2K gas

Fred Hartjes NIKHEF

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting February 10, 2020

‹#› 1 Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020

Preliminary, still some analysis ongoing

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fred Hartjes

Setup for measuring positive ion drift

■ Ions from the laser beam instantaneously induce charge on drift cathode ■ In addition ions leaking through the grid during the avalanche induce charge as well ■ Ions move towards the drift cathode, generating an induction current

■ Current terminated at arrival at the drift cathode

■ Measurements reliably triggered by laser diode ■ On the scope averaged over 32 triggers

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 2

40.0 mm Laser Drift cathode

  • HV

Digital

  • scilloscope

~30 mm avalanche

8 quad testbox

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Fred Hartjes

Setup of the charge signal collection

Instabilities/ noise from: ■ Drift field HV supply

■ => heavy RC filters at input and outlet ■ Outlet filter has time constant of 2.2 s

■ LabVIEW communication with HV supplies

■ Interrupted during data taking

■ Micro discharges at drift cathode

■ Strong dependence on magnitude drift field ■ Cannot be solved easily

■ 50 Hz pickup

■ Shielding testbox

■ Laser instability 20 – 30% rms

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 3

Drift cathode

  • HV

250 M 250 M 1n 3 kV

  • +

Oscilloscope

90p AD549J

Best scope sensitivity 1 mV/div

  • Signal was often clipped at 0.5 mV/div

Averaging over 32 laser shots

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fred Hartjes

Simplified electronic circuit

■ Values measured with test pulse

■ Through 1 pF and 100 MOhm

■ Parasitic capacity of drift cathode, Lemo cable, electronics measured as 89.5 pF ■ RC time 10 +/- 0.5 ms ■ We get the ideal integrator curve by deconvolution of the measured curve from the RC time constant

■ But for better deconvolution also the voltage change on 1 nF coupling capacitor had to be taken into account

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 4

Drift cathode

118 M

Oscilloscope

90p

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fred Hartjes

Primary ionization by laser

■ No gas gain ■ Ionizing exclusively TMPD (N, N, N’, N’ - Tetramethyl-1,4-phenylendiamin)

■ In the chamber gas as a pollution in the ppb level

■ Laser beam at about 30 mm from the drift cathode ■ Note the sharp bend when the ions are collected by the drift cathode ■ Initial drift time 8 ms

■ => velocity ~3.8 m/s ■ But possible tail of slow ions up to 40 ms ■ Phenomenon hard to measure because of instabilities

  • n the charge signal

■ Measurement with blocked laser has been subtracted

■ Integrated charge 2.5 - 3.5 mV across 90 pF => 225

  • 315 fC

■ => 1.4 - 2.0 M ions ■ => ~ 40 - 60 electrons entering each hole

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 5

Measured Average over 32 laser shots Deconvoluted curve Vgrid = -150 V Field: 280 V/cm 4-2-2020 Initially created ion cloud

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fred Hartjes

Differentiated deconvolution curve of primary ionization

■ Tail of slow ions between 8 and 40 ms may be present ■ Note that this is only relevant for the laser measurements

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 6

dV/dT dT = 0.8 ms

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fred Hartjes

With gas gain ~ 2000

■ Gas: T2K ■ Primary ionization: about 60 e-/hole

■ Gain may be still proportional ■ To be verified

■ Integrated charge: 38 mV across 90 pF

■ => 3.4 pC ■ => 21 M ions ■ Note the soft bend when the ions are collected by the drift cathode ■ => various types of ions are involved

■ Bend starting at 12 ms

■ Ending at about 22 ms

■ => drift velocity 1.8 – 3.3 m/s

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 7

Vgrid = -340 V Field: 280 V/cm 4-2-2020

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fred Hartjes

Differentiated curve

■ dT = 1 ms ■ The sharp bend of the primary ionization is well visible

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 8

Primary ionization

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fred Hartjes

Primary ionization subtracted

■ A slow ion tail runs until ~ 30 ms ■ This corresponds to 3 mV => 0.27 pC

  • r 1.7 M of 21 M ions

■ About 8% of the total charge

■ Drift time main phenomenon: 12.5 ms

■ => velocity 3.1 m/s

■ Drift time slow ions: 12.5 to 30 ms

■ => velocity 1.3 – 3.1 m/s

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 9

Slow ions

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fred Hartjes

Nature of the peaks

■ Main peak probably is identified as Ar+ arriving at 12 ms ■ Slow ions all collected at ~ 32 ms ■ Mobility 0.45 - 1.1 cm2V-1s-1 ■ Literature: Ar+ in Ar: ~ 1.5 cm2V-1s-1 ■ Mobility has some dependence on the applied field, literature measurements normally done at much higher fields ■ CF4 and iC4H10 have higher mobilities (2 – 2.5 cm2V-1s-1)

■ Expected to be hidden in the rising edge of the Ar+ curve

■ The slow ion peak may be caused by a C8Hn+ ion (Coimbra suggestion)

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 10

Slow ions Ar+ arriving at cathode

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fred Hartjes

Low drift field: 150 V/cm

■ Part of ions passing the grid hole will be still finally collected by the grid

■ => decrease of the originally induced charge

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 11

dT = 1.6 ms

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fred Hartjes

Ar+ drift velocity vs drift field

■ Still to be reanalyzed

■ Curve does not pass X, Y = 0, 0

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fred Hartjes

Ionic mobility vs drift field

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 13

■ Assuming the meain peak originates from Ar+ ions ■ Literature (Ar+ ions in Ar) (Madson, Hornstein 1967, 1951) ■ ~ 1.3 – 1.5 cm2V-1s-1 measured in 20 – 25 kV/cm range

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fred Hartjes

Increase ion charge with Vgrid

■ Slope at used extremely high ionization density (~ 60 e-/hole) vs regular (< 0.1 e- /hole) is within error margin

■ 0.0272 vs 0.0306 ■ So not too much saturation effects

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fred Hartjes

Ion leakage vs drift field

■ Data still have to be corrected for the dependence of the gain

  • n the drift field

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fred Hartjes

Conclusions

■ Leakage of ions through holes of the grid not very high

■ Assuming gain = 2000 at Vgrid = - 340 V => 0.75% is leaking

■ Main peak probably originates from Ar+

■ Faster peaks of CF4+ and C4Hn are probably hidden in the rising edge ■ But 8% of the ions have an about 3x lower mobility

■ Ions of the same type all arrive at the same time at the cathode

■ See the sharp peak of the primary laser ionization ■ But the curve of the avalanche ions has a soft edge => several types of ions are involved

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fred Hartjes

Conclusions cntd

■ Part of the ions appearing at the hole of the grid are finally captured by the grid

■ This is especially seen at low drift fields

■ There is no clear sign of saturation of the gas gain at the very high input rate (40 – 60 e-/hole)

■ Note that for the laser measurements the voltage drop across the protection layer is not too high (very low duty cycle) ■ Grid current ~ 0. 5 nA

■ Calibration of the gas gain from the measured grid current and the amount of primary ions still to be done

Nikhef/Bonn LepCol meeting, February 10, 2020 17

E = 150 V/cm