Policy and legal tools for ecosystem restoration in Flanders - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

policy and legal tools for ecosystem restoration in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Policy and legal tools for ecosystem restoration in Flanders - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Policy and legal tools for ecosystem restoration in Flanders (Belgium) Erika van den Bergh CBD workshop on Ecosystem restortation, Vilm, 2-6 june 2014 Belgium 30.530 km 11 milj inhabitants 3 languages 7 governments Flanders: 470/km


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Policy and legal tools for ecosystem restoration in Flanders (Belgium)

Erika van den Bergh CBD workshop on Ecosystem restortation, Vilm, 2-6 june 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Belgium

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

2

30.530 km³ 11 milj inhabitants 3 languages 7 governments Flanders: 470/km² Brussels: 7200/km² Wallonia: 210/km²

Environmentel issues are regional competence CCEP: CCEP: CCEP: CCEP: Coordination Coordination Coordination Coordination Comite Comite Comite Comite for for for for Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Policy Policy Policy Policy

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Land use cover in Flanders

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

3

cropland urban (production) grasland (production) woods (road)infrastruct ure water industry park & recreation

  • ther nature

types

‘Urban network’

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Policy framework for ecological restoration

Spatial planning and zonation maps

12 % with ‘green’ destination Small and fragmented

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

4

Land use in ‘green destination’

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Policy framework for ecological restoration

Flemish Ecological Network (1997-2003) part

  • f Nature decree 1997

VEN: 125.000ha of coherent interconnected network with nature as primary function IVON: 150.000ha multifunctional green space as support Designation in 2008: VEN 70%, IVON 1%

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

5

Land use in VEN, 2008

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Policy framework for ecological restoration

EU legislation

Natura 2000

Conservation goals (adopted april ‘14) Management plans

WFD

GES/GEP

Ramsar convention CBD

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Policy instruments for ecological restoration

Land acquisition for nature reserves

Subsidies for NGO’s Agency for Nature and forest has right of pre- emption in VEN (within price limits)

Management agreements and plans

Agreements between administrations New Nature decree (april ‘14) Subsidies for NGO’s, farmers, companies and private persons according to ambitions the plan

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Policy instruments for ecological restoration

Article 6 of the habitats directive

Appropriate assessment Mitigation Compensation

Integration of large public works (win-win)

flood control navigation Road infrastructure Port development sand & gravel extraction

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Policy instruments for ecological restoration

Land development schemes (Flemish Land Agency) Comprehensive land consoloditation: regrouping of agriculture parcels (insert small landscape elements) Land development: to facilitate transition from land use to spatial planning destination. (insert connectivity projects) Land development for nature (coordination between ANB-VLM Agri-environmental agreements Local land bank to re-allocate rather than expropriate EU life projects Regional landscapes Collaboration between municipalities to promote nature recreation, eduacation and conservation (small landscape elements) Public awareness and involvement

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

10

Comprehensive land consoloditation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

11

Land development schemes for nature

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

12

Regional Landscapes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Policy instruments for ecological restoration

Land development schemes (Flemish Land Agency)

Comprehensive land consoloditation: regrouping of agriculture parcels (insert small landscape elements) Land development: to facilitate transition from land use to spatial planning destination. (insert connectivity projects) Land development for nature (coordination between ANB-VLM Agri-environmental agreements Local land bank to re-allocate rather than expropriate

EU life projects Regional landscapes

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

14

Some examples

The Schelde estuary Port of Antwerp

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Freshwater: < 0,5 PSU, Brackish zone: 0,5 - 18 PSU, Salty zone: > 18 PSU.

Salinity zones

Polyhaline Mesohaline Oligohaline Freshwater Freshwater

The Schelde estuary

Zeeschelde westerschelde

slide-16
SLIDE 16

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

16

Schelde Estuary Rehabilitation plan

1999 Rehabilitation vision for the Zeeschelde, part of agreement with NGO following implementation of SIGMA flood control plan (Flanders) Conceptual restoration model based on problem analysis Identification of potential restoration sites Definition of restoration measures, combined with flood control measures

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Schelde Estuary Rehabilitation plan

3 scenario’s defined

Estuarine development Alluvial enhancement Basic ecological quality

No financial plan

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Antwerpen Gent Vlissingen Terneuzen Durme Lokeren Rupel Zenne Dijle Nete Kleine Nete Grote Nete

Dutch-Belgian border

Schelde

B NL GB

Het Schelde estuarium LTVS 2030

Accessibility Safety Ecosystem health

Long term Long term Long term Long term Vision Vision Vision Vision For the For the For the For the Schelde (LTVS) Schelde (LTVS) Schelde (LTVS) Schelde (LTVS)

Dutch-Belgian managerial project (1999-2001) Quality targets for 2030

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Schelde estuary restoration plan

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Problem analysis

Goal

01 VlRaa 02 VlHan 03 HanGr 04 GrBur 05 BurTm 06 TmDem 07 DemGt 08 Durme 09 ZeDNe 10 strSc Buffer discharge + + ++ ++ ++ ++ tidal energy dissipation + ++ ++ ++ ++ + + + + Multiple channelsystem ++ ++

Optimise natural habitat processes

++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ minimise turbidity + + ++ ++ ++ + ++ + Optimise C cycle ++ Optimise N cycle + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise O cycle + ++ ++ + ++ + ++ Optimise Pcycle + + + ++ Optimise Si cycle + ++ ++ ++ Optimise primary production + + ++ ++ ++ + ++ + Optimise conditions for zooplankton + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise conditions for zoobenthos + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise fishmigration + + + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ Shallow low dynamic water + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ mudflats + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Lower flats dynamics ++ ++ Tidal marshes + ++ + + ++ + ++ + ++ Set back tidal marsh succession + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Non-tidal wetland + + + ++ + ++

Goal

01 VlRaa 02 VlHan 03 HanGr 04 GrBur 05 BurTm 06 TmDem 07 DemGt 08 Durme 09 ZeDNe 10 strSc Buffer discharge + + ++ ++ ++ ++ tidal energy dissipation + ++ ++ ++ ++ + + + + Multiple channelsystem ++ ++

Optimise natural habitat processes

++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ minimise turbidity + + ++ ++ ++ + ++ + Optimise C cycle ++ Optimise N cycle + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise O cycle + ++ ++ + ++ + ++ Optimise Pcycle + + + ++ Optimise Si cycle + ++ ++ ++ Optimise primary production + + ++ ++ ++ + ++ + Optimise conditions for zooplankton + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise conditions for zoobenthos + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise fishmigration + + + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ Shallow low dynamic water + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ mudflats + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Lower flats dynamics ++ ++ Tidal marshes + ++ + + ++ + ++ + ++ Set back tidal marsh succession + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Non-tidal wetland + + + ++ + ++

Goal

01 VlRaa 02 VlHan 03 HanGr 04 GrBur 05 BurTm 06 TmDem 07 DemGt 08 Durme 09 ZeDNe 10 strSc Buffer discharge + + ++ ++ ++ ++ tidal energy dissipation + ++ ++ ++ ++ + + + + Multiple channelsystem ++ ++

Optimise natural habitat processes

++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ minimise turbidity + + ++ ++ ++ + ++ + Optimise C cycle ++ Optimise N cycle + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise O cycle + ++ ++ + ++ + ++ Optimise Pcycle + + + ++ Optimise Si cycle + ++ ++ ++ Optimise primary production + + ++ ++ ++ + ++ + Optimise conditions for zooplankton + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise conditions for zoobenthos + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Optimise fishmigration + + + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ Shallow low dynamic water + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ mudflats + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Lower flats dynamics ++ ++ Tidal marshes + ++ + + ++ + ++ + ++ Set back tidal marsh succession + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ Non-tidal wetland + + + ++ + ++

problems Zone in the estuary

slide-22
SLIDE 22

C

  • d

e M a a tr e g e l b u ff_ a fv d is p _ E tu r b C N O 2 P S i p r im _ p r

  • d

z

  • ö

p l b e n th

  • s

v is v

  • g

e l h a b ita t

  • n

d _ H 2 O Grens - Burcht M2.1 sluice 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 M2.2 managed realignment 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 M2.3 lowering raised sites 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 M2.4 sluice 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 M2.5

  • ccasional sluice management

1 2 2 M4.1 inland wetland 1 1 ? 2 1 Burcht - Temse M1.09 tidal marsh fixation 2 2 1 2 M2.1 breach 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 M2.2 realignment 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 M2.3 lowering raised site 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 M2.4 FCA-CRT 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 M2.5

  • ccasional sluice management

2 2 2 ? M4.1 inland wetland 1 1 ? 2 1 M4.2 inland management 1 1 1 Temse - Dendermonde M1.09 tidal marsh fixation 2 2 1 2 M2.1 breach 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M2.2 realignment 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M2.3 lowering raised site 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M2.4 FCA-CRT 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 M2.5

  • ccasional sluice management

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 M3.1 lateral connection 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 M3.4 banks with terasses 2 2 1 2 M3.5 alternative bank reinforcement 2 2 1 2 M4.1 inland wetland 1 1 1 ? 2 1

Measures per Zone in the estuary Restoration goal

Spatial planning of measures

slide-23
SLIDE 23

« soft » protection instead of « hard engineering »

Adapted dike management

selection of measures

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Restoring land fills Dike relocation

2002 2004 2006 2004

24

selection of measures

Tidal wetland creation/restoration Dike Breach

slide-25
SLIDE 25

1990 1998

Dike breach: Sieperdaschor Dike breach: Sieperdaschor

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Paardenschor Land fill removal: Paardeschor

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Wetland creation: Brakke kreek Doel

selection of measures

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Integration with flood control

Flood Control Area FCA Flood Control Area under Controled Reduced Tide FCA-CRT

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Flood control

Dike fortification Flood control area (FCA)

Habitat creation

Tidal wetlands

realignment FCA-CRT

Inland habitat

wetland FCA-Wetland

Integration with flood control

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FCA- CRT Lippenbroek

Integration with flood control

slide-31
SLIDE 31

FCA FCA FCA FCA-

  • CRT

CRT CRT CRT FCA FCA FCA FCA-

  • wetland

wetland wetland wetland

Kruibeke-Bazel-Rupelmonde

Integration with flood control

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Hopper dredge Pontoon with diffusor Pontoon with diffusor diffusor Hopper dredge

Integration with accessibility: morphological dredging”

slide-33
SLIDE 33

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

33

Updated Sigmaplan: Flemish part of LTVS:

Integration of ecological rehabilitation and flood control

Optimal Flood control plan Optimal Ecologic Restoration plan Importance of selected space for agriculture Synthesis flood control and ecology: 3 scenario’s Flood control Agriculture check Ecology check Most desirable scenario for Updated Sigmaplan

Conservation goals

slide-34
SLIDE 34

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

34

The most The most The most The most desirable desirable desirable desirable scenario scenario scenario scenario for for for for the the the the updated updated updated updated Sigmaplan Sigmaplan Sigmaplan Sigmaplan

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be

Port of Antwerp: Natura 2000

Natura 2000

Bird Directive Area Habitat Directive Area

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Port of Antwerp: infrastructure works & compensation

Right bank of the Schelde (Antwerpen)

  • 1. Europe container terminal (1987)
  • 2. Container terminal North (1994)

Left bank of the Schelde (Antwerpen)

  • 3. Verrebroekdok (1996)
  • 4. Deurganckdok (1998)
  • NGO complaint about the lack of compensation
  • Cumulative with historical deficit
slide-37
SLIDE 37

5/06/2014

  • E. Van den Bergh, Vilm 2-6 june 2014

37

Strategic planning for the port of Antwerp

SPPA

  • INTEGRATIVE PROCESS
  • Future planning for port development
  • Including N2000 implementation
  • Compensation for port development including
  • historical deficit
  • Compensation matrix including

responsabilities

  • Conservation goals
  • Planning of conservation goals in space and

time, including temporary nature

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Compensation matrix

Slik-schor-ondiep water Weidevogelgebied Plas & oevers Riet & water Strand & Plasvlakten

Opgespoten MIDA (Z2) Vlakte Zwijndrecht (Z2) Watergangen en -randen(Z2) Aanleg kreek in ecologisch deel buffer – N (reservatiestrook buffer) Afgraven Paardenschor (Natuurgebied) Doelpolder-Noord (valleigebied) Putten West (ZTA-gebied) KBR – ontwikkeling natte weilanden Kunstmatige waterplassen in Z2-gebied Drydijck (natuurgebied) en Ecologisch deel Buffer-ZW-A (reservtiestrook voor buffer Zoetwaterkreek in ecologisch deel Buffer –ZW-B (Reservatiestrook buffer) Gedempt deel Doeldok (Z2) 25 ha 250 ha 35 ha 25 ha 200 ha 77 ha 57 ha 10 ha se 36 ha 14,5 ha 71 ha 52 ha

  • ca. 150

ha nt bep 74 ha 31,6 ha 17,8ha

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be

pioneering situations reed intertidal marshes & mudflats wet meadows

slide-39
SLIDE 39

SPPA: Meadowbirds LTVS: tidal wetland SIGMA: harmonisation

Harmonisation of plans

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Wet and structure rich meadows: Doelpolder Noord

Infrastructure projects in the port of Antwerp: Nature compensations and biological monitoring

European Context – Importance of Monitoring – Monitoring Set Up – Compensation Projects

Compensation

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Intertidal mudflats & marshes: Paardenschor

Infrastructure projects in the port of Antwerp: Nature compensations and biological monitoring

European Context – Importance of Monitoring – Monitoring Set Up – Compensation Projects

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be

Compensation

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Open water & Wet and structure rich meadows: Drijdijck

Compensation

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be Infrastructure projects in the port of Antwerp: Nature compensations and biological monitoring

European Context – Importance of Monitoring – Monitoring Set Up – Compensation Projects

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Open water Verrebroekse Plassen

Compensation

Infrastructure projects in the port of Antwerp: Nature compensations and biological monitoring

European Context – Importance of Monitoring – Monitoring Set Up – Compensation Projects

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Open water & Reed Haasop

Compensation

Infrastructure projects in the port of Antwerp: Nature compensations and biological monitoring

European Context – Importance of Monitoring – Monitoring Set Up – Compensation Projects

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Pioneering situations Vlakte van Zwijndrecht

Compensation

Infrastructure projects in the port of Antwerp: Nature compensations and biological monitoring

European Context – Importance of Monitoring – Monitoring Set Up – Compensation Projects

Ralf Gyselings, Geert Spanoghe, Erika Van den Bergh www.inbo.be