Polarimetry as a Window into Supernova Explosions and Progenitors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

polarimetry as a window into supernova explosions and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Polarimetry as a Window into Supernova Explosions and Progenitors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Polarimetry as a Window into Supernova Explosions and Progenitors Jennifer L. Hoffman University of Denver @astroprofhoff SN 1994D Why do we care about supernova polarization? (Linear) polarization results from asphericity, so It


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Polarimetry as a Window into Supernova Explosions and Progenitors

Jennifer L. Hoffman University of Denver @astroprofhoff

SN 1994D

slide-2
SLIDE 2

(Linear) polarization results from asphericity, so…

  • It yields insight into collapse/explosion mechanisms.
  • It tells us about the stellar winds and circumstellar material
  • f progenitor stars.
  • It helps us probe stellar evolution in

faraway galaxies.

  • It has potential implications for

the use of some supernovae as cosmological probes.

SN 2008aq

Why do we care about supernova polarization?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

All types of supernovae can be polarized!

< 10 M

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Leonard+ 2007

Very hot ejecta ⇒ electron scattering is the polarizing mechanism.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SN 2004dj (II-P)

A polarized SN continuum indicates aspherical ejecta.

Leonard+ 2006

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Polarization in spectral lines probes distribution of elements in the ejecta and surroundings.

SN 2001el (Ia) Kasen+ 2003

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Rel. Flux Pol. (%) PA (º) Wavelength (Å) Hα

Next frontier in SN studies : time-domain spectropolarimetry!

Hoffman+ 2008 SN 1997eg (IIn)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SN 1997eg (IIn) Hoffman+ 2008

Next frontier in SN studies : time-domain spectropolarimetry!

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SN 1997eg (IIn) Hoffman+ 2008

Next frontier in SN studies : time-domain spectropolarimetry!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SN 1997eg (IIn) Hoffman+ 2008

Next frontier in SN studies : time-domain spectropolarimetry!

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SN 1997eg (IIn) Hoffman+ 2008

Next frontier in SN studies : time-domain spectropolarimetry! With this technique, we can probe pre-existing CSM and infer progenitor properties.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

6.5-m MMT, Mt. Hopkins 2.3-m Bok, Kitt Peak 61” Kuiper, Mt. Bigelow

The SNSPOL project (led by U. Arizona) is creating the largest database of supernova polarization evolution to date.

DU grad student Leah Huk @MMT

slide-13
SLIDE 13

50+ SNe of all types observed so far, most at multiple epochs.

Ia SN 2011 fe (16) SN 2012cg (11) SN 2012ht (3) SN 2013fw (1) SN 2014ao (4) SN 2014J (7) Ib SN 2012 au (19) iPTF13bvn (3) Ic PTF12gzk (5) SN 2012ej (8) SN 2012fh (16) SN 2013ff (7) SN 2013ge (8) SN 2014as (2) SN 2014ad (7) SN 2014L (10) II SN 2011bv (2) SN 2013am (12) SN 2013bu (9) SN 2013ee (5) SN 2013hj (3) IIb SN 2011dh (4) SN 2012fg (12) SN 2013ak (5) SN 2013df (4) ASASSN-14az (5) II-P SN 2012A (22) SN 2012aw (24) SN 2012ch (2) SH 2012ec (20) SH 2012ho (1) SN 2013ab (12) SN 2013bi (11) SN 2013ej (11) SN 2013fs (9) SN 2014A (3) SN 2014bc (1) IIn SN 2009ip (12) SN 2010jl (30) SN 2011cc (1) SN 2011ht (7) PTF11iqb (1) SN 2012ab (2) SN 2014ab (17) II-L SN 2014G (8)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2012a Vabs=-14.5 2012b Vabs=-18

Mauerhan+ 2013

SN 2009ip: Multiple maxima over several years suggest pre-explosion LBV eruptions. What caused the two 2012 peaks?

2012a Vabs=-14.5 2012b Vabs=-18

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The two 2012 maxima showed orthogonal polarization angles, implying they were not due to successive shell ejections.

Mauerhan+ 2014

High %P at 2012b is typical of CSM interaction.

SN 2009ip, V band

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mauerhan+ 2014

The picture from spectropolarimetry: ejecta asphericity plus interaction with pre-existing equatorial CSM.

Torus geometry is often seen around LBVs, B[e] supergiants, etc.

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Modeling: individual objects, object classes,

time evolution

  • Better statistics: more objects, greater

wavelength and time coverage

  • Classification: illuminate relationships

among subtypes

SN 2004dj

  • Late stellar evolution: draw connections

with potential progenitors What’s next for polarized supernovae?

  • GMT polarimetry not ruled out, but needs

community push! (Want to help?)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

Pol (%)

90 100 110

Position Angle (deg)

O III Bowen H I N III Bowen N II

1.8 1.0 0.2

Intensity (arb units) Wavelength (Ang)

3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500

What’s next for polarized supernovae?

Robert Stobie Spectrograph (RSS) at SALT (11-m): Polarimetry commissioning will start in 2015. ← T Pyx 2011 nova outburst, R ~ 800.

Nordsieck 2012

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Polarimetry as a Window into Supernova Explosions and Progenitors

Jennifer L. Hoffman University of Denver @astroprofhoff

SN 1994D

SNSPOL:

  • G. Grant Williams (MMTO)

Chris Bilinski (Steward Obs) Luc Dessart (U. de Nice) Douglas C. Leonard (SDSU) Jon Mauerhan (UC Berkeley) Peter A. Milne (Steward Obs) Nathan Smith (Steward Obs.) Paul S. Smith (Steward Obs.) NSF AST-1210599 RSS: Kenneth H. Nordsieck (U. Wisconsin) Marsha Wolf (U. Wisconsin) Jeff W. Percival (U. Wisconsin) Kurt P. Jaehnig (U. Wisconsin) Michael P. Smith (U. Wisconsin)