Effects of Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Matter Prospects for Supernova - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

effects of muons in hot neutron star matter
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Effects of Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Matter Prospects for Supernova - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bridging Nuclear and Gravitational Physics: the Dense Matter Equation of State ECT* Workshop, Trento, June 59, 2017 Effects of Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Matter Prospects for Supernova Explosions in 3D Hans-Thomas Janka Hans-Thomas Janka


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Effects of Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Matter

Prospects for Supernova Explosions in 3D

Bridging Nuclear and Gravitational Physics: the Dense Matter Equation of State

ECT* Workshop, Trento, June 5−9, 2017

Hans-Thomas Janka Hans-Thomas Janka for the Team for the Team

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Compact Object Mergers:

Gravitational Waves, Nucleosynthesis, and Transients

Neutron-star EoS and neutrino physics are crucial ingredients in NS-NS/BH merger simulations.

(Ruffert & Janka 1999; Just et al., MNRAS 448 (2015) 541)

h+ (x 10–22) at 20 Mpc Time [ms]

(Bauswein, THJ, et al., PRL 108 (2012) 011101, PRD 86

(2012) 063001, PRD 90 (2014) 023002, EPJA 52 (2016) 56)

r-process nucleosynthesis in NS-NS/BH merger ejecta Ringdown GW signal after NS-NS merger

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Stellar Collapse and Supernova Stages

adapted from A. Burrows (1990)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

(Janka, Supernova Handbook, 2017)

Neutrino-driven SN Explosions 200 km

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Predictions of Signals from SNe & NSs

(nuclear) EoS neutrino physics progenitor conditions dynamical models LC, spectra neutrinos gravitational waves explosion asymmetries, pulsar kicks nucleosynthesis hydrodynamics of stellar plasma relativistic gravity explosion energies, remnant masses

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Neutrino Reactions in Supernovae

Beta processes: Neutrino-neutrino reactions: Thermal pair processes: Neutrino scattering:

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Growing Set of 2D CCSN Explosion Models

Average shock radius

Progenitor models: Woosley et al. RMP (2002)

Decrease of mass-accretion rate at Si-O composition-shell interface allows for onset of explosions. All cases computed with RPA NN correlations!

  • F. Hanke (2014, PhD Thesis, TUM);
  • A. Summa, F. Hanke, HTJ, et al., ApJ 825, 6 (2016)

Mass accretion rate

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2D and 3D Morphology

(Images from Markus Rampp, RZG)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

O'Connor & Ott, ApJ 730:70 (2011)

Progenitor Density Profiles

slide-10
SLIDE 10

3D Core-Collapse SN Explosion Models

9.6 Msun (zero-metallicity) progenitor (Heger 2010)

Melson et al.,

ApJL 801 (2015) L24

Fe-core progenitor (Heger 2012) with ECSN-like density profile and explosion behavior.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11.2, 20, 27 Msun progenitors (WH 2007) Florian Hanke, PhD project (2014)

3D Core-Collapse SN Explosion Models

Shock radii (max., min., avg.) vs. time Neutrino luminosities 3D 2D Time scale ratio 2D 3D 2D 3D 20 Msun 2D 3D 11.2 Msun 27 Msun

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What could facilitate robust explosions in 3D?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

3D Core-Collapse SN Explosion Models

Oak Ridge (Lentz et al., ApJL 2015):

15 Msun nonrotating progenitor (Woosley & Heger 2007)

Tokyo/Fukuoka (Takiwaki et al., ApJ 2014):

11.2 Msun nonrotating progenitor (Woosley et al. 2002)

Caltech/NCSU/LSU/Perimeter (Roberts et al., ApJ 2016):

27 Msun nonrotating progenitor (Woosley et al. 2002)

Garching/QUB/Monash

(Melson et al., ApJL 2015a,b; Müller 2016; Janka et al. 2016):

9.6, 20 Msun nonrotating progenitors (Heger 2012; Woosley & Heger 2007) 18 Msun nonrotating progenitor (Heger 2015) 15 Msun rotating progenitor (Heger, Woosley & Spuit 2005, modified rotation) 9.0 Msun nonrotating progenitor (Woosley & Heger 2015)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3D Core-Collapse SN Explosion Models

20 Msun (solar-metallicity) progenitor (Woosley & Heger 2007)

Melson et al., ApJL 808 (2015) L42

Effective reduction of neutral-current neutrino-nucleon scattering by ~15%

Currently favored theoretical & experimental (HERMES, COMPASS) value: gas ~ ‒0.1 We use: ga = 1.26 gas = ‒0.2

Explore uncertain aspects of microphysics in neutrinospheric region:

Example: strangeness contribution to nucleon spin, affecting axial-vector neutral-current scattering of neutrinos on nucleons

slide-15
SLIDE 15

3D Core-Collapse SN Explosion Models

20 Msun (solar-metallicity) progenitor (Woosley & Heger 2007)

Melson et al., ApJL 808 (2015) L42

slide-16
SLIDE 16

3D Core-Collapse SN Explosion Models

20 Msun (solar-metallicity) progenitor (Woosley & Heger 2007)

Melson et al., ApJL 808 (2015) L42

slide-17
SLIDE 17

3D CCSN Explosion Model with Rotation

15 Msun rotating progenitor (Heger, Woosley & Spruit 2005)

Explosion occurs for angular velocity of Fe-core of 0.5 rad/s, rotation period of ~12 seconds (several times faster than predicted for magnetized progenitor by Heger et al. 2005). Produces a neutron star with spin period of ~1‒2 ms.

  • A. Summa (2015);

Janka, Melson & Summa, ARNPS 66 (2016), arXiv:1601.05576

slide-18
SLIDE 18

3D Core-Collapse SN Progenitor Model

18 Msun (solar-metallicity) progenitor (Heger 2015)

3D simulation of last 5 minutes of O-shell

  • burning. During accelerating core contraction

a quadrupolar (l=2) mode develops with convective Mach number of about 0.1. This will foster strong postshock convection and could thus reduce the criticial neutrino luminosity for explosion.

  • B. Müller, Viallet, Heger, & THJ, ApJ 833, 124 (2016)

151 s 270 s 294 s

slide-19
SLIDE 19

3D Core-Collapse SN Explosion Model

18 Msun (solar-metallicity) progenitor (Heger 2015)

3D simulation of last 5 minutes of O-shell

  • burning. During accelerating core contraction

a quadrupolar (l=2) mode develops with convective Mach number of about 0.1. This fosters strong postshock convection and could thus reduces the criticial neutrino luminosity for explosion.

  • B. Müller, PASA 33, 48 (2016);

Müller, Melson, Heger & THJ, arXiv:1705.00620

1.4 s post bounce Onset of collapse Onset of collapse 1.4 s post bounce

δρ/ρ ~ Maconv

Si Si

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • B. Müller, arXiv:1702.06940
slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 2D models with relativistic effects (2D GR and approximate GR)

explode for “ soft” EoSs, but explosion energies tend to low side.

  • 3D modeling has only begun. No final picture of 3D effects yet.
  • M < 10 Msun stars explode in 3D.

First 3D explosions of 15−20 Msun progenitors

(with rotation, 3D progenitor perturbations or slightly reduced neutrino-nucleon scattering opacities).

  • 3D simulations still need higher resolution for convergence.
  • Progenitors are 1D, but shell structure and initial progenitor-core

asymmetries can affect onset of explosion.

(cf. Couch et al. ApJL778:L7 (2013), arXiv:1503.02199; Müller & THJ, MNRAS 448 (2015) 2141)

  • Uncertain/missing physics ?????

Status of Neutrino-driven Mechanism in 2D & 3D Supernova Models

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Muon rest mass much larger than electron rest mass:
  • Therefore muons have traditionally been ignored in SN and NS-merger

modeling.

  • But: Temperatures T > 30 MeV and electron chemical potentials

μe > 100 MeV can be reached easily.

  • Consequence: muon abundance is not negligibly small.

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

, Project with

  • R. Bollig, G. Martinez-Pinedo, A. Lohs, C. Horowitz, & T. Melson
slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Muons participate in weak equilibrium by a variety of neutrino

processes, in particular charged-current reactions with nucleons:

  • At equilibrium, the corresponding relation for between the chemical

potentials holds for both electrons and muons:

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

with standing for electrons or muons.

.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

Proto-neutron star

at 400 ms after core bounce

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Tauon Number in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

  • Huge tauon rest mass suppresses tauon formation:
  • But different cross sections for neutrino-nucleon scattering (due to

recoil and weak-magnetism corrections)

  • Leads to diffusive build-up of tau lepton number in neutrino-cooling

neutron stars:

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Tauon Number in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

Horowitz & Li, PLB (1998)

Tmax = 35 MeV 0.02 sec. 1.0 sec. Tau neutrino chemical potential

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Evolution equations for electron and muon number density have to be

integrated:

  • Neutrino transport for all six neutrino species individually has to be

solved:

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Additional reactions of neutrinos with muons need to be included and

couple neutrinos of different flavors:

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Neutrino-driven supernova explosions are favored by appearance of muons!

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Neutrino-driven supernova explosions are favored by appearance of muons!

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

SFHo EoS; no muons SFHo EoS; with muons

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

Proto-neutron star

at 400 ms after core bounce: Due to presence of muons the EoS is softened and the NS radius shrinks

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium

Muon formation softens EoS and NS radius shrinks: Therefore also electron neutrino and antineutrino luminosities and neutrino heating is enhanced, can trigger SN explosion.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Muons in Hot Neutron-Star Medium: Consequences

  • Affect explosion mechanism of supernovae
  • Affect gravitational instability of hot NSs to BHs
  • Affect compactness of hot NSs
  • Change neutrino emission
  • May affect neutrino oscillations
  • Should be included in SN and NS-NS/BH merger simulations
  • Require full six-species neutrino transport with coupling of

different neutrino flavors