Photo Sustainable Remediation of a Peatland Impacted by Petroleum - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

photo
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Photo Sustainable Remediation of a Peatland Impacted by Petroleum - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Photo Sustainable Remediation of a Peatland Impacted by Petroleum Hydrocarbons Presented by Sylvain Hains, P.Eng., M.Sc. April 27, 2016 Presentation Outline Site Description and Conceptual Site Model Emergency Measures Improvement of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sustainable Remediation of a Peatland Impacted by Petroleum Hydrocarbons Presented by Sylvain Hains, P.Eng., M.Sc. April 27, 2016

Photo

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

April 27, 2016 2

Site Description and Conceptual Site Model Emergency Measures Improvement of Site Conditions Remedial Options Assessment Remediation Works – North Sector Remediation Works – South Sector Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

April 27, 2016 3

Site Location

In 2004

  • About 225,390 L of petroleum

products released (diesel / gasoline);

  • Sensitive ecological environment
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Site Habitats

May 5, 2016 4 4

Open Fen Wooded Fen Bog Forest Wooded Bog Lagg

South Sector North Sector

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Site Conceptual Model (2004)

May 5, 2016 5

Impacted Area Topography Stratigraphy

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Tripod mounted drilling Technician training Collaboration with Academics Monitoring of natural attenuation indicators Biodiversity monitoring Consultation with Stakeholders Indicators – soc. env. econ Negotiation with regulator Collaboration with site

  • wners

Continued collaboration with academics Access for the public Uses of renewable energy Limit impacts to vegetation Uses of local personal Continued collaboration with academics Local personal H&S workers / public Receptors and resources protection Limit impacts to vegetation

Characterization / Monitoring Remedial Options Assessment Remedial Action Plan Emergency Measures

SD Best Practices and Benefits

Integration of SD principles in all phases of the project life-cycle. Some examples….

April 27, 2016

slide-7
SLIDE 7

April 27, 2016

Emergency Measures

Emergency measures

  • ptimised:

Limit impacts to

vegetation;

Protect sensitive

receptors and resources;

Protect public and

workers

Optimised Recovery Techniques Optimised drilling techniques to avoid impacts to vegetation Confining measures to limit impacts to resources Optimised Recovery Techniques

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Site Monitoring – North Sector

April 27, 2016

2004 2009

Damages to vegetation following the spill in 2004. Improvement to vegetation – colonization by native plants.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Site Monitoring – South Sector

April 27, 2016

2005 2009

Damages to vegetation following the spill in 2004. Improvement to vegetation – recovering of sphagnum cover.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Site Conditions Before Remediation

April 27, 2016 10

South 2005

2013

South Sector North Sector North 2005

slide-11
SLIDE 11

GoldSET : Sustainability Evaluation Tool

Site Description

  • Conceptualization of

site conditions

  • Evaluation is site

specific

  • Objective definition

Scoring Interpretation & Reporting Option Description

  • Fatal flaw analysis:
  • Objectives
  • Cost
  • Duration
  • Technical
  • Legal

Indicators

Includes:

  • Int’l Standards &

Best Practices

  • Corp. Objectives
  • Legal Requirements

Environmental

  • Natural Resources,

Ecological Integrity, Energy, Waste, etc. Social

  • Health & Safety,

QOL, Culture, Regulations Economic

  • NPV, ROI,

Technological Regiments, etc. Quantification of indicators:

  • Specific to client

requirements Evaluation of Options based on “Triple Bottom Line” Structured system for ranking options:

  • Tailored scoring and

weighing schemes

  • Results are given by

ternary diagram Eco-efficiency Cost Benefit Analysis Stakeholder Concerns

OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D

Recommendations to support decision making:

  • Tangible
  • Transparent
  • Optimized

Automated reporting (web version)

April 27, 2016 13

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Issues and Stakeholders

May 5, 2016 12

Commun Objectives:

Limit environmental, social and economical impacts

MDDELCC and Environment Canada

Regulation Public health protection Environmental quality (soil, water, habitat, etc) and natural resources protection

Propriétaires des lots adjacents

Land value Quality of life Environmental quality (soil, water, habitat, etc) Site safety

Société de conservation et de mise en valeur de la Grande Plée bleue

Environmental quality (soil, water, habitat, etc) Protect site usages for the public Protect habitats

Expertise

CN

Railway safety and uses H&S workers / public Costs Litigation Social sensibility response Environmmental quality Regulation

Consultant

Academics

slide-13
SLIDE 13

April 27, 2016 13

Remedial Options Assessment

Three Remedial options have been assessed: Monitored Natural Attenuation Excavation, in situ treatment, and, impraticability Site-wide excavation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ENVIRONMENTAL

  • Soil Quality
  • Groundwater Quality
  • Surface water Quality
  • Water Usage
  • Soil Vapour Intrusion
  • Free Product
  • Drinking Water
  • Impacts on Biodiversity
  • Impacts on Natural

Habitats

  • GHG Emissions
  • Energy Consumption
  • Wastes
  • Hazardous Wastes
  • Air Emissions

SOCIAL

  • Public Safety
  • Worker Safety
  • Quality of Life
  • Project Duration
  • Use for the Public
  • Natural Heritage
  • Local resources
  • Economic Advantages

for the Local Community

  • Social Sensibility

Response

  • Environmental

Regulation

  • Impacts on Landscape
  • Management

Innovation

ECONOMIC

  • Net present value
  • Litigation Potential
  • Financial

Recoveries

  • Environmental

Reserve

  • Train Service

Reliability and Performance

  • Local Economic

Benefits

  • Technical

Uncertainty

  • Logistics

Selected Indicators

April 27, 2016 16

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Remedial Options Assessment Results

Monitored Natural Attenuation Excavation, in situ treatment and, impraticability Site-wide Excavation

April 27, 2016

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Remediation Program

April 27, 2016 16

2004 2005 2015 South Sector

  • Excavation and revegetation
  • Vegetation monitoring

North Sector

Impracticality Notice

  • In situ treatment pilot testing
  • In situ treatment or

excavation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Indicator Category:

Environmental

Objective : to prevent impacted

water offsite migration

Open Fen Excavation BMP Application

Excavation Infrastructure development Sand bag dam Shutter balls Indicator Category : Economic Objective : technological

uncertainty relative to the peat bearing capacity

Excavator matting

April 27, 2016 19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Indicator Category : Social Objective : Clean peat was

supplied by a local peatland in Saint-Charles-de-Bellechasse - Les Tourbes Nirom Peat Moss inc.

Clean Peat Installation

Open Fen Excavation BMP Application

Indicator Category: Social Objective : to hire a local work

force

Chaudière-Appalaches Region Sub- Contractor

April 27, 2016 20

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Indicator Category :

Environmental

Objective : to control short-, mid-

and long-term excavation impacts

Post-remediation Monitoring

Open Fen Excavation BMP Application

Seeding using site plants and site- specific seeds Indicator Category :

Environmental

Objective : to enhance

revegetation and restore the ecosystem

April 27, 2016 21

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Open Fen Excavation Summary

April 27, 2016 20

The vegetated cover quickly established between the excavation in 2014 and the

first monitoring in 2015

No invasive species were identified Suitable site vegetated cover composition Trees and bushes satisfying survival rate (88 %)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

South Sector – In Situ Treatment Pilot Testing

April 27, 2016 21

Pilot Test Configuration

Solar Panels CT-14-03 CB-14-03 Unit CB-14-02 CT-14-02 CT-14-01 Sidewalks CB-14-01

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

In Situ Treatment Pilot Testing BMP Application

April 27, 2016

Sidewalks construction Indicator Category :

Environmental

Objective : to prevent damages

to the vegetation due to trampling

Use of solar power for the blower energy feeding Indicator Category :

Environmental

Objective : to reduce GHG

emissions

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

In Situ Treatment Pilot Testing BMP Application

April 27, 2016

Groundwater monitoring Indicator Category :

Environmental

Objective : to confirm that

contaminants do not migrate

  • ffsite due to the treatment

Non destructive treatment strategy Indicator Category : Social Objective: to reduce impacts on

landscape and site usage relative to an excavation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusion

Multiple stakeholder consultation; Sustainable development BMPs integrated since the emergency

intervention and for the whole project lifecycle;

Actions taken to reduce or eliminate negative impacts in the use of an

intrusive technique (excavation);

In situ treatment conception integrating sustainable development ideas.

April 27, 2016 24