philosophical ethics philosophical ethics
play

Philosophical Ethics Philosophical Ethics an introduction George - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Philosophical Ethics Philosophical Ethics an introduction George Matthews 2020 1 / 17 The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley


  1. Philosophical Ethics Philosophical Ethics an introduction George Matthews 2020 1 / 17

  2. The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are �ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is one worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw the switch. 2 / 17

  3. The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are �ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is one worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw the switch. Would you throw the switch? 2 / 17

  4. The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are �ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is one worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw the switch. Would you throw the switch? Should you throw the switch? 2 / 17

  5. The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are �ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is one worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw the switch. Would you throw the switch? Should you throw the switch? WHY? 2 / 17

  6. Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics 3 / 17

  7. Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas? 3 / 17

  8. Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas? What psychological and sociological explanations account for our ethical thinking and behavior? 3 / 17

  9. Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas? What psychological and sociological explanations account for our ethical thinking and behavior? How might ethical thinking and behavior vary with circumstances, upbringing, culture or education? 3 / 17

  10. Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas? What psychological and sociological explanations account for our ethical thinking and behavior? How might ethical thinking and behavior vary with circumstances, upbringing, culture or education? Cases like the runaway trolley have been studied extensively by moral psychologists. One result: most people say they would throw the switch. 3 / 17

  11. Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics 4 / 17

  12. Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems? 4 / 17

  13. Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems? What justi�cations are there for our moral claims and assumptions? 4 / 17

  14. Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems? What justi�cations are there for our moral claims and assumptions? How can we use critical rationality to establish ethical norms? 4 / 17

  15. Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems? What justi�cations are there for our moral claims and assumptions? How can we use critical rationality to establish ethical norms? Many of us assume that the consequences of our actions determine their rightness or wrongness. Is this a correct assumption? Do better consequences really make an act morally right? 4 / 17

  16. Another runaway trolley Another runaway trolley You are standing on a bridge over a railroad track railroad when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are �ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is a rather large person next to you and if you push him in front of the trolley it will stop the trolley but kill him. 5 / 17

  17. Another runaway trolley Another runaway trolley You are standing on a bridge over a railroad track railroad when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are �ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is a rather large person next to you and if you push him in front of the trolley it will stop the trolley but kill him. Most people would not push the person off the bridge to save the children. 5 / 17

  18. Another runaway trolley Another runaway trolley You are standing on a bridge over a railroad track railroad when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are �ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is a rather large person next to you and if you push him in front of the trolley it will stop the trolley but kill him. Most people would not push the person off the bridge to save the children. Why not, given that the consequences are the same in this case and the last? 5 / 17

  19. Meta-ethics Meta-ethics 6 / 17

  20. Meta-ethics Meta-ethics How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking? 6 / 17

  21. Meta-ethics Meta-ethics How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking? Are ethical claims about the facts, are they opinions or are they something else entirely? 6 / 17

  22. Meta-ethics Meta-ethics How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking? Are ethical claims about the facts, are they opinions or are they something else entirely? Is there any hope for rationally settling con�icts in ethics? 6 / 17

  23. Meta-ethics Meta-ethics How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking? Are ethical claims about the facts, are they opinions or are they something else entirely? Is there any hope for rationally settling con�icts in ethics? Are facts and opinions the only kinds of statements we can make? Or can we make other kinds of claims and what exactly might they be? 6 / 17

  24. Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics 1. Appeal to reason 2. Attempt at universality 3. Commitment to impartiality 4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles Philosophers trust reason as a method of discovering truth and producing genuine conviction. That might strike you as naive, but if you argue, aren't you relying on reasoning? 7 / 17

  25. Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics 1. Appeal to reason 2. Attempt at universality 3. Commitment to impartiality 4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles Ethics aspires to �nd principles that transcend individual cases and apply to all relevantly similar situations. 8 / 17

  26. Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics 1. Appeal to reason 2. Attempt at universality 3. Commitment to impartiality 4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles Right and wrong shouldn't depend on who you are, should they? 9 / 17

  27. Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics 1. Appeal to reason 2. Attempt at universality 3. Commitment to impartiality 4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles If ethics is about what is fundamentally right and wrong it overrides preference, customs and convenience. 10 / 17

  28. Our plan of attack Our plan of attack logic logic Before anything else we need to know something about toolkit used by philosophers -- the critical assessment of arguments and the ways in which we often get things wrong in reasoning. 11 / 17

  29. Our plan of attack Our plan of attack logic logic ethical ethical theory theory Next we consider various theoretical approaches ethics. Here we examine the nature of and justi�cation for ethical norms. 12 / 17

  30. Our plan of attack Our plan of attack logic logic ethical ethical theory theory applied applied ethics ethics Finally we see how all of this plays out in the real world. Here we will examine many particular cases where values are at stake. 13 / 17

  31. Socrates on Self-con�dence Socrates on Self-con�dence Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness - Socrates on Self-Con�d Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness - Socrates on Self-Con�d… 14 / 17

  32. What is the right thing to do? What is the right thing to do? Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 01 "THE M Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 01 "THE M… From Michael Sandel's course at Harvard, "Justice." 15 / 17

  33. Find out more Find out more The Trolley Problem: an account of some recent rearch on the problem. It's impossible to lead a totally ethical life: Ephrat Livni re�ects on ethics and everyday life. Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics, ed. George Matthews. A free textbook, part of a series edited by Christina Hendricks. 16 / 17

  34. Credits Credits Built with: Rstudio xarignan html presentation framework Photos by: James Matthews editorial suggestions and comments: requires a (free) GitHub account. 17 / 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend