Philosophical Ethics Philosophical Ethics an introduction George - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Nov 12, 2023 208 likes •572 views

Philosophical Ethics Philosophical Ethics an introduction George Matthews 2020 1 / 17 The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley

SLIDE 1

Philosophical Ethics Philosophical Ethics

an introduction George Matthews 2020

1 / 17

SLIDE 2

The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley

You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is

ne worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw

the switch.

2 / 17

SLIDE 3

The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley

You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is

ne worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw

the switch. Would you throw the switch?

2 / 17

SLIDE 4

The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley

You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is

ne worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw

the switch. Would you throw the switch? Should you throw the switch?

2 / 17

SLIDE 5

The case of the runaway trolley The case of the runaway trolley

You are standing near a switch next a railroad track when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear you. There is

ne worker on the other track where the trolley would go if you threw

the switch. Would you throw the switch? Should you throw the switch? WHY?

2 / 17

SLIDE 6

Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics

3 / 17

SLIDE 7

Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics

How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas?

3 / 17

SLIDE 8

Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics

How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas? What psychological and sociological explanations account for our ethical thinking and behavior?

3 / 17

SLIDE 9

Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics

How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas? What psychological and sociological explanations account for our ethical thinking and behavior? How might ethical thinking and behavior vary with circumstances, upbringing, culture or education?

3 / 17

SLIDE 10

Descriptive ethics Descriptive ethics

How do people actually respond to ethical dilemmas? What psychological and sociological explanations account for our ethical thinking and behavior? How might ethical thinking and behavior vary with circumstances, upbringing, culture or education? Cases like the runaway trolley have been studied extensively by moral psychologists. One result: most people say they would throw the switch.

3 / 17

SLIDE 11

Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics

4 / 17

SLIDE 12

Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics

How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems?

4 / 17

SLIDE 13

Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics

How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems? What justications are there for our moral claims and assumptions?

4 / 17

SLIDE 14

Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics

How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems? What justications are there for our moral claims and assumptions? How can we use critical rationality to establish ethical norms?

4 / 17

SLIDE 15

Prescriptive ethics Prescriptive ethics

How should we respond to ethical dilemmas and problems? What justications are there for our moral claims and assumptions? How can we use critical rationality to establish ethical norms? Many of us assume that the consequences of our actions determine their rightness or wrongness. Is this a correct assumption? Do better consequences really make an act morally right?

4 / 17

SLIDE 16

Another runaway trolley Another runaway trolley

You are standing on a bridge over a railroad track railroad when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear

you. There is a rather large person next to you and if you push him in

front of the trolley it will stop the trolley but kill him.

5 / 17

SLIDE 17

Another runaway trolley Another runaway trolley

You are standing on a bridge over a railroad track railroad when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear

you. There is a rather large person next to you and if you push him in

front of the trolley it will stop the trolley but kill him. Most people would not push the person off the bridge to save the children.

5 / 17

SLIDE 18

Another runaway trolley Another runaway trolley

You are standing on a bridge over a railroad track railroad when you notice a runaway trolley coming down the tracks in your direction. There are ve children playing on the track below too far away to hear

you. There is a rather large person next to you and if you push him in

front of the trolley it will stop the trolley but kill him. Most people would not push the person off the bridge to save the children. Why not, given that the consequences are the same in this case and the last?

5 / 17

SLIDE 19

Meta-ethics Meta-ethics

6 / 17

SLIDE 20

Meta-ethics Meta-ethics

How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking?

6 / 17

SLIDE 21

Meta-ethics Meta-ethics

How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking? Are ethical claims about the facts, are they opinions or are they something else entirely?

6 / 17

SLIDE 22

Meta-ethics Meta-ethics

How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking? Are ethical claims about the facts, are they opinions or are they something else entirely? Is there any hope for rationally settling conicts in ethics?

6 / 17

SLIDE 23

Meta-ethics Meta-ethics

How do ethical language and thinking differ from other ways of speaking or thinking? Are ethical claims about the facts, are they opinions or are they something else entirely? Is there any hope for rationally settling conicts in ethics? Are facts and opinions the only kinds of statements we can make? Or can we make other kinds of claims and what exactly might they be?

6 / 17

SLIDE 24

Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics

1. Appeal to reason
2. Attempt at universality
3. Commitment to impartiality
4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles

Philosophers trust reason as a method of discovering truth and producing genuine conviction. That might strike you as naive, but if you argue, aren't you relying on reasoning?

7 / 17

SLIDE 25

Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics

1. Appeal to reason
2. Attempt at universality
3. Commitment to impartiality
4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles

Ethics aspires to nd principles that transcend individual cases and apply to all relevantly similar situations.

8 / 17

SLIDE 26

Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics

1. Appeal to reason
2. Attempt at universality
3. Commitment to impartiality
4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles

Right and wrong shouldn't depend on who you are, should they?

9 / 17

SLIDE 27

Elements of philosophical ethics Elements of philosophical ethics

1. Appeal to reason
2. Attempt at universality
3. Commitment to impartiality
4. Insistence on overriding character of ethical principles

If ethics is about what is fundamentally right and wrong it overrides preference, customs and convenience.

10 / 17

SLIDE 28

logic logic

Our plan of attack Our plan of attack

Before anything else we need to know something about toolkit used by philosophers -- the critical assessment of arguments and the ways in which we often get things wrong in reasoning.

11 / 17

SLIDE 29

logic logic

ethical ethical theory theory

Our plan of attack Our plan of attack

Next we consider various theoretical approaches ethics. Here we examine the nature of and justication for ethical norms.

12 / 17

SLIDE 30

logic logic ethical ethical theory theory

applied applied ethics ethics

Our plan of attack Our plan of attack

Finally we see how all of this plays out in the real world. Here we will examine many particular cases where values are at stake.

13 / 17

SLIDE 31

Socrates on Self-condence Socrates on Self-condence

Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness - Socrates on Self-Cond Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness - Socrates on Self-Cond…

14 / 17

SLIDE 32

What is the right thing to do? What is the right thing to do?

From Michael Sandel's course at Harvard, "Justice."

Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 01 "THE M Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 01 "THE M…

15 / 17

SLIDE 33

Find out more Find out more

The Trolley Problem: an account of some recent rearch on the problem. It's impossible to lead a totally ethical life: Ephrat Livni reects on ethics and everyday life. Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics, ed. George Matthews. A free textbook, part

f a series edited by Christina Hendricks.

16 / 17

SLIDE 34

Credits Credits Built with: Rstudio xarignan html presentation framework Photos by: James Matthews editorial suggestions and comments: requires a (free) GitHub account. 17 / 17