persuasive performance feedback the effect of framing on
play

Persuasive Performance Feedback: The Effect of Framing on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AMIA 2013 Persuasive Performance Feedback: The Effect of Framing on Self-Efficacy Eun Kyoung Choe, University of Washington, USA Bongshin Lee / Microsoft Research, USA Sean Munson, Wanda Pratt, Julie A. Kientz / University of Washington, USA Eun


  1. AMIA 2013 Persuasive Performance Feedback: The Effect of Framing on Self-Efficacy Eun Kyoung Choe, University of Washington, USA Bongshin Lee / Microsoft Research, USA Sean Munson, Wanda Pratt, Julie A. Kientz / University of Washington, USA Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 1

  2. Self-monitoring technology Activity Fitbit Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 2

  3. Self-monitoring technology Sleep Zeo Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 3

  4. Self-monitoring technology Activity & Sleep Lark Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 4

  5. Self-monitoring technology Activity & Sleep BodyMedia Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 5

  6. Self-monitoring technology Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 6

  7. Feedback design is underexplored Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 7

  8. Example—fitbit’s step count “Get 268 steps more to hit your daily goal” Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 8

  9. Inspiration Framing Effects [Tversky & Kahneman, 1981] half empty? half full? Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 9

  10. Odds of a grueling operation “90 out of 100 patients are alive after five years” “10 out of 100 patients are dead after five years” [Marteau, 1989] Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 10

  11. Power of positive valence framing ✔ “90 out of 100 patients are “90 out of 100 patients are alive after five years” alive after five years” “10 out of 100 patients are dead after five years” [Marteau, 1989] Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 11

  12. Goal Persuasive performance feedback to nudge people toward healthier behaviors [Thaler & Sunstein, Nudge, 2008] Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 12

  13. Hypothetical scenario 4:30 PM, weekday 10,000 steps Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 13

  14. Achieved steps I’ve walked 2,500 steps! 2,500 steps 10,000 steps Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 14

  15. Remaining steps 7,500 more steps to take! 7,500 steps 10,000 steps Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 15

  16. Three types of framing Valence of Performance Presentation Type Data Unit Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 16

  17. Three types of framing Valence of Performance achieved vs. remaining 2,500 steps achieved 7,500 steps remaining Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 17

  18. Three types of framing Valence of Performance Presentation Type text-only vs. text with visual 2,500 steps achieved Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 18

  19. Three types of framing Valence of Performance Presentation Type Data Unit raw vs. percentage 2,500 steps achieved 25% achieved Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 19

  20. Distance to the goal Low achievement vs. High achievement 25% 75% Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 20

  21. Feedback manipulation Between-subjects Factors (2x2x2) Within-subjects Factor (x2) Distance to the goal Valence Presentation Data Unit Low achievement (25%) High achievement (75%) Condition 2,500 steps achieved 7,500 steps achieved Raw 1 Text-only Condition Percentage 25% achieved 75% achieved 2 Achieved Condition Raw 3 Text with visual Condition Percentage 4 Condition Raw 7,500 steps remaining 2,500 steps remaining 5 Text-only Condition 75% remaining 25% remaining Percentage 6 Remaining Condition Raw 7 Text with visual Condition Percentage 8 Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 21

  22. Dependent measures Self-efficacy (per feed (per feedback) back) [Bandura, 1990] Rate how confident you are that you can achieve your daily goal as of now ( 4:30 PM, weekday ). 0 = Certain I cannot meet my goal 10 = Certain I can meet my goal Interest level in taking 10,000 steps every day (per subject) (per subject) 0 = Not at all interested 10 = Very interested Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 22

  23. Study procedure Filtering Q1-1 Interest level Q Filtering Q2 Self-efficacy Q1 Feedback A Self-efficacy Q2 Feedback B Filtering Q1-2 Demographic Q Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 23

  24. Results Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 24

  25. Participants (N = 400) Convenience sampling (N = 511) • Recruited from researchers’ social network (e.g., post on facebook, email) • Skewed toward highly educated, motivated, technical population Removed 111 participants • Did not understand the feedback correctly (70 participants) • Outside of U.S. (25 participants) • Did not pay attention to the survey (9 participants) • iPhone/iPad user (7 participants) Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 25

  26. Participants (N = 400) Gender ¡Ra)o ¡ Pedometer ¡Use ¡ Female No Yes Male 47% 57% 43% 53% Participants’ ages ranged from 19 to 68 (M = 32.7) Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 26

  27. Main effect of valence framing p = .04 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 27

  28. Main effect of valence framing Achieved framing Remaining framing 2,500 steps achieved 7,500 steps remaining 25% achieved 75% remaining … ¡ … ¡ Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 28

  29. Main effect of presentation type p = .007 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 29

  30. Main effect of presentation type Text-only Text with visual 2,500 steps achieved 25% achieved 7,500 steps remaining 75% remaining … ¡ … ¡ Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 30

  31. Interaction effect: Data Unit x Distance to the goal p = .002 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 31

  32. Interaction effect: Data Unit x Distance to the goal p = .02 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 32

  33. Interaction effect: Data Unit x Distance to the goal 2,500 steps achieved 25% achieved This effect was not observed for the distance to the goal at 75% level Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 33

  34. Discussion Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 34

  35. Discussion Give feeling of bigger achievement for higher self-efficacy Highlight what people achieved Data unit can contribute to this High-interest sampling bias supports our findings further Less likely to observe framing effects in intrinsically motivated people Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 35

  36. Future Work Embedding persuasive performance feedback in real-world situations and testing through deployment studies Testing at more extreme cases toward the both ends of the goal (e.g., 5%, 95%) Using judgmental / exaggerated visuals for stronger framing effect Sedentary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Active Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 36

  37. Contributions Feedback design matters—context dependent Leverage framing effect Empirical guidance to create influential, persuasive feedback Many application domains Health communication campaign Self-monitoring technology interface design Privacy… Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 37

  38. Thank you! Eun Kyoung Choe (eunky@uw.edu) Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 38

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend