Patrick Henry School and Recreation Center Community Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
patrick henry school and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Patrick Henry School and Recreation Center Community Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 21, 2023 227 likes •839 views

Patrick Henry School and Recreation Center Community Meeting Wednesday, April 6, 2016 6:30 PM www.acps.k12.va.us Agenda Introductions RECAP: Project History RECAP: March Community Meeting Recent Developments

slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.acps.k12.va.us

Patrick Henry School and Recreation Center

Community Meeting Wednesday, April 6, 2016 6:30 PM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.acps.k12.va.us

2

Agenda

  • Introductions
  • RECAP: Project History
  • RECAP: March Community Meeting
  • Recent Developments
  • Evaluating Current Design Options
  • Discussion and Feedback (Breakout Groups)
  • Polling Questions
  • Wrap Up / Next Steps

HOLD ALL QUESTIONS FOR THE DISCUSSION AND FEEDBACK BREAKOUT GROUPS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.acps.k12.va.us

3

Patrick Henry School and Recreation Center Project Update

  • June 11, 2015 –School Board Approves Construction of the New Building
  • June 23, 2015 – City Council Approves Neighborhood Recreation Center

Approach

  • September 2015 – Award Project Management (PM) Contract
  • January 2016 – Anticipated Architect/Engineering (AE) Award
  • February 2016 – Design team begins to develop schematic designs
  • March 2016 – Development Special Use Permit (DSUP) and City Council

review begins

  • June 2016 – School Board to approve schematic design
  • Fall 2016 – Public Hearing for DSUP
  • June 2017 – Construction phase begins
  • Fall 2018 –School and Recreation Center open/ Ribbon Cutting
slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.acps.k12.va.us

4

March Community Meeting Recap

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.acps.k12.va.us

5

March Community Meeting Recap

E

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.acps.k12.va.us

6

March Community Meeting Recap

Presentation of 3

  • ptions

Breakout groups and feedback Community polling

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.acps.k12.va.us

7

March Community Meeting – Polling Results

Rank Polling Topic Meeting* Online** Total 1 Amount and Usability of Outdoor Green Space 245 136 381 2 Accommodating Neighborhood Scale 221 151 372 3 Promoting Biking and Walking Through Safe Site Access 234 124 358 4 Optimum Access from Building to Exterior Amenities 213 122 335 5 Distinguishing Physical Presence for School and Rec Center 236 97 333 6 Minimizing Traffic on N Latham St. 172 149 321 7 Minimizing Traffic on Taney Ave. 190 100 290 8 Separating Vehicle Entrances for School and Rec Center 189 91 280

*60 Attendees at March 16 Community Meeting **34 Respondents to Online Poll SCALE: 1 = Not Important 2 = Slightly Important 3 = Somewhat Important 4 = Very Important 5 = Extremely Important

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.acps.k12.va.us

8

March Community Meeting – Key Feedback

Option A - Strengths Neighborhood Scale ∙ Access to and Quality of Outdoor Spaces ∙ Separate School & Rec Parking ∙ Distinguishing School & Rec Presence ∙ Impact to N. Latham St. Concerns regarding demolition of recreation center gym and the effect

  • n daily operations and safety during

construction Option A and Option C “Splits” Safe Pedestrian/Bike Access ∙ Impact to Taney Ave. Traffic

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.acps.k12.va.us

9

March Community Meeting – Key Feedback

Option A - Strengths Neighborhood Scale ∙ Access to and Quality of Outdoor Spaces ∙ Separate School & Rec Parking ∙ Distinguishing School & Rec Presence ∙ Impact to N. Latham St. Concerns regarding demolition of recreation center gym and the effect

  • n daily operations and safety during

construction Option A and Option C “Splits” Safe Pedestrian/Bike Access ∙ Impact to Taney Ave. Traffic

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.acps.k12.va.us

10

Recent Developments

ACPS School staff ∙ Operations & Maintenance ∙ Administration RPCA Centers Staff ∙ Senior Managers ∙ Operations & Maintenance City (DSUP) Reviewers Planning & Zoning ∙ Traffic & Environmental ∙ Public Safety Project Design Review Team Architect ∙ Project Manager ∙ ACPS & City Staff

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.acps.k12.va.us

11

Developments – Design Priorities/Differentiators

Indicates origin of priority

  • Adv. Group

Community ACPS RPCA City (DSUP) Reviewers Promoting Biking and Walking / Safe Site Access Distinguishing Physical Presence for School and Rec Neighborhood Scale Amount and Usability of Outdoor Green Space Traffic Flow on Site / Impact on Neighborhood Traffic

Impact on N. Latham St. Impact on Taney Ave. (and Bike Lane)

Construction Phasing / Impact to Daily Operations Access from Building to Outdoor Amenities Separating Entries/Parking for School and Rec

slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.acps.k12.va.us

12

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.acps.k12.va.us

13

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building

1 1.5 2 3

  • N. Latham St.

Foxchase Apartments

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.acps.k12.va.us

14

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-15
SLIDE 15

www.acps.k12.va.us

15

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-16
SLIDE 16

www.acps.k12.va.us

16

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.acps.k12.va.us

17

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.acps.k12.va.us

18

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-19
SLIDE 19

www.acps.k12.va.us

19

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-20
SLIDE 20

www.acps.k12.va.us

20

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-21
SLIDE 21

www.acps.k12.va.us

21

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-22
SLIDE 22

www.acps.k12.va.us

22

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-23
SLIDE 23

www.acps.k12.va.us

23

Reviewing “Option A”

Option A – Strengths

  • Neighborhood scale
  • Access to and quality of outdoor spaces
  • Distinguishing school & rec spaces
  • Separate school & rec parking
  • Least impact to N. Latham St. Traffic

Option A – Concerns

  • Overlaps existing building
  • Three driveways off Taney Ave.
  • Bus loop conflict with Taney bike lane
  • Continuity of green space
  • EVE lane not ideal outdoor space
  • Play areas away from building
slide-24
SLIDE 24

www.acps.k12.va.us

24

Iterative Design Process

slide-25
SLIDE 25

www.acps.k12.va.us

25

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-26
SLIDE 26

www.acps.k12.va.us

26

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

www.acps.k12.va.us

27

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.

1 1.5 2 3

  • N. Latham St.

Foxchase Apartments

slide-28
SLIDE 28

www.acps.k12.va.us

28

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-29
SLIDE 29

www.acps.k12.va.us

29

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

www.acps.k12.va.us

30

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-31
SLIDE 31

www.acps.k12.va.us

31

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-32
SLIDE 32

www.acps.k12.va.us

32

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike

lane Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-33
SLIDE 33

www.acps.k12.va.us

33

Developing “Option A.1”

Option A.1 – Strengths

  • No overlap with existing building
  • Maintains neighborhood scale
  • Play areas more accessible from

building

  • Improved outdoor green space
  • Same distinguishing school & rec

presence

  • Same separate school & rec parking
  • Improved separation of vehicles and

buses

  • Less impact to Taney Ave. and bike lane

Option A.1 – Concerns

  • Added driveway off N. Latham St.
slide-34
SLIDE 34

www.acps.k12.va.us

34

Evaluating “Option A”

Design Priority

Biking and Walking Access School and Rec Physical Presence Neighborhood Scale Outdoor Green Space Access to Outdoor Amenities Traffic Flow on Site / Neighborhood Impact Impact on N. Latham St. Traffic Impact on Taney Ave. / Bike Lane) Phasing / Impact to Daily Operations Separating Entries/Parking

  • Most favorable condition
  • Moderately favorable condition
  • Least favorable condition
slide-35
SLIDE 35

www.acps.k12.va.us

35

Evaluating “Option A.1”

Design Priority

Biking and Walking Access School and Rec Physical Presence Neighborhood Scale Outdoor Green Space Access to Outdoor Amenities Traffic Flow on Site / Neighborhood Impact Impact on N. Latham St. Traffic Impact on Taney Ave. / Bike Lane) Phasing / Impact to Daily Operations Separating Entries/Parking

  • Most favorable condition
  • Moderately favorable condition
  • Least favorable condition
slide-36
SLIDE 36

www.acps.k12.va.us

36

Evaluation of Option A and A.1

Design Priority

  • Adv. Group

Community ACPS RPCA City (DSUP) Reviewers

A A.1

Biking and Walking Access School and Rec Physical Presence Neighborhood Scale Outdoor Green Space Access to Outdoor Amenities Traffic Flow on Site / Neighborhood Impact Impact on N. Latham St. Traffic Impact on Taney Ave. / Bike Lane) Phasing / Impact to Daily Operations Separating Entries/Parking

slide-37
SLIDE 37

www.acps.k12.va.us

37

Polling Topics

We will be asking all community members to tell us how important each of these factors are and then which of the three current design options best addresses each factor:

  • 1. The A.1 design achieves the balance of the various design priorities in the most

effective way.

  • 2. The A.1 design incorporates the community concerns effectively.
  • 3. If a concern was not incorporated, it has been communicated clearly as to why.
  • 4. The design process has evaluated all potential site layout options.
  • 5. The overall community engagement process during this phase of the design

process has been effective. SCALE: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree

slide-38
SLIDE 38

www.acps.k12.va.us

38

Feedback / Q&A

  • Process related questions?
  • Break into groups of 5-10
  • Tables led by project team members
  • Discuss options
  • Recap from each table
slide-39
SLIDE 39

www.acps.k12.va.us

39

Polling Topics – Demographics

Q1: What is your gender? 1. Male 2. Female 3. Prefer not to answer

slide-40
SLIDE 40

www.acps.k12.va.us

40

Polling Topics – Demographics

Q2: What is your age range? 1. 18-25 2. 26-55 3. 56 and over 4. Prefer not to answer

slide-41
SLIDE 41

www.acps.k12.va.us

41

Polling Topics – Demographics

Q3: Where do you live? 1. In the immediate Patrick Henry area (see streets highlighted to right) 2. Elsewhere in the Patrick Henry and Polk ES school district area, which is generally…

  • East of I-395
  • South of Seminary Road
  • West of Gordon Street
  • West of St. Stephens Road
  • North of Duke Street

3. Elsewhere in the City of Alexandria 4. Outside the City of Alexandria

slide-42
SLIDE 42

www.acps.k12.va.us

42

Polling Topics – Demographics

Q4: What best describes your interest and participation in the Patrick Henry Project? 1. Advisory Group member 2. Parent/guardian of a student (current or future) 3. Active recreation center user (current or future) 4. Both a parent/guardian AND a recreation center user 5. Community member

slide-43
SLIDE 43

www.acps.k12.va.us

43

Polling Topics

Q5: The A.1 design achieves the balance of the various design priorities in the most effective way. 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4. Agree 5. Strongly Agree

slide-44
SLIDE 44

www.acps.k12.va.us

44

Polling Topics

Q6: The A.1 design incorporates the community concerns effectively. 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4. Agree 5. Strongly Agree

slide-45
SLIDE 45

www.acps.k12.va.us

45

Polling Topics

Q7: If a concern was not incorporated, it has been communicated clearly as to why. 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4. Agree 5. Strongly Agree

slide-46
SLIDE 46

www.acps.k12.va.us

46

Polling Topics

Q8: The design process has evaluated all potential site layout options. 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4. Agree 5. Strongly Agree

slide-47
SLIDE 47

www.acps.k12.va.us

47

Polling Topics

Q9: The overall community engagement process during this phase of the design has been effective. 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4. Agree 5. Strongly Agree

slide-48
SLIDE 48

www.acps.k12.va.us

48

Proposed Advisory Group and Community Meeting Schedule

APR 6, 6:30 pm Advisory Group + Community Announce selected site plan option APR 13, 6:15 pm Advisory Group Update on design APR 27, 6:30 pm Advisory Group + Community Update on design

slide-49
SLIDE 49

www.acps.k12.va.us

49

Next Steps

  • Advisory Group Meeting April 13
  • DSUP Concept II Submission Mid-May
  • Hire Construction Manager Late May
  • Continuous review and incorporation of feedback
slide-50
SLIDE 50

www.acps.k12.va.us

50

Additional information about the project can be found online at: http://www.acps.k12.va.us/facilities/ph/

slide-51
SLIDE 51

www.acps.k12.va.us

51

Question and Answers

slide-52
SLIDE 52

www.acps.k12.va.us

52

Community Engagement Process

slide-53
SLIDE 53

www.acps.k12.va.us

53

Community Engagement Process

slide-54
SLIDE 54

www.acps.k12.va.us

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

www.acps.k12.va.us

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

www.acps.k12.va.us

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

www.acps.k12.va.us

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

www.acps.k12.va.us

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

www.acps.k12.va.us

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

www.acps.k12.va.us

60