Pasteurized milk Peeler, J.T. & Bunning, V.K. ( 1994 ). Hazard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pasteurized milk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pasteurized milk Peeler, J.T. & Bunning, V.K. ( 1994 ). Hazard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantitative risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and milk products O. Cerf & M. Sanaa Alfort Veterinary School Pasteurized milk Peeler, J.T. & Bunning, V.K. ( 1994 ). Hazard assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Quantitative risk assessment

  • f Listeria monocytogenes in

milk and milk products

  • O. Cerf & M. Sanaa

Alfort Veterinary School

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pasteurized milk

Peeler, J.T. & Bunning, V.K. (1994). Hazard assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in processing of bovine milk.

n Journal of Food Protection 57: 689-702.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Peeler & Bunning (1994)

Aim

n Product aspect of exposure assessment n L. monocytogenes in pasteurized milk

placed onto the market

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Peeler & Bunning (1994)

Packaging Pasteurization Silo storage Bulktank transport Bulktank storage Pipeline transport Milking

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Peeler & Bunning (1994)

« The calculations were performed using conservative estimates of each variable. »

n 95th percentiles, except one median

« The calculated results, based on the above assumptions, showed that even under a system breakdown, low levels of L. monocytogenes would occur infrequently. » « Probability is <2 in 100 that one Listeria cell would occur in 5.9 x 1010 gallons »

n 4.5 x 10-15 cell/ml

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pasteurized milk

Cassin, M.H., Paoli, G.M., McColl, R.S. & Lammerding, A.M. (1996). A comment on "Hazard assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in the processing of bovine milk", J. Food Prot. 57:689-697 (1994).

n Journal of Food Protection 59: 341-342.

Response

n Journal of Food Protection 59: 342-343.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cassin et al. (1996)

Three sources of errors

n

Estimation of the 95th percentile of random variables as values which were 2 standard deviations from the mean

n

Compounding conservatism 1

n

Compounding scenario exclusion 2

1.

« prudence excessive »

2.

« exclusion des cas les plus graves »

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cassin et al. (1996)

8.3 x 10 - 5 1.6 x 10 – 8 2.8 x 10 – 8 0.447 0.016 4.5 x 10 – 15 Monte Carlo (Cassin et al.) estimate of risk Peeler & Bunning estimate of risk Concentration/ ml

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Raw milk soft cheese

Bemrah, N., Sanaa, M., Cassin, M.H., Griffiths, M.W. & Cerf, O. (1998). Quantitative risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in soft cheeses made from raw milk.

n Preventive Veterinary Medicine 37 129-

145.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Bemrah et al. (1998)

Aim

n Assessment of the risk of listeriosis

from consumption of Camembert type cheeses made from raw milk in France in 1990 - 1992

n According to the Codex Alimentarius

framework (1995)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Instantaneous prevalence

  • f milk contamination

Fraction of farms with L.monocytogenes mastitis

Milk production

Herd size Milk-contamination status Presence of cow with L.monocytogenes mastitis Concentration in bulk-tank milk, environmental origin Concentration in milk, intramammry source

Storage before collection

Storage temperature before collection Storage time before collection Increase in concentration before transport Concentration in milk before collection

Transport

Temperature during transport Collection time Increase in concentration during transport

Storage in manufacture

Storage temperature Storage time in manufacture Increase in concentration in manufacture

Concentration in the tanker truck before transport Final concentration in milk before cheese processing

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cheese processing

Number of L.monocytogenes in one vat of 1000 l Number of L.monocytogenes in 2.2 l of milk Number of L.monocytogenes in 250 g of cheese

Final concentration in milk before cheese processing

Number of L.monocytogenes

in a typical serving of 31 g Consumption

Average consumption of soft cheese Size of a typical serving Number of servings consumed Proportion of virulent strains

Probability of illness from a single exposure

high-risk subpopulation low-risk subpopulation

Individual Annual Cumulative Risk

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Dose – response: Farber, Ross & Harwig (1996)

0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 WG (PR) WG (PN)

Log10(dose) Probability

slide-14
SLIDE 14

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

  • 12
  • 11.5
  • 11
  • 10.5
  • 10
  • 9.5
  • 9
  • 8.5
  • 8
  • 7.5
  • 7
  • 6.5
  • 6
  • 5.5
  • 5
  • 4.5
  • 4
  • 3.5

log10 (risk / serving) Probability

  • 12
  • 11.5
  • 11
  • 10.5
  • 10
  • 9.5
  • 9
  • 8.5
  • 8
  • 7.5
  • 7
  • 6.5
  • 6
  • 5.5
  • 5
  • 4.5
  • 4
  • 3.5

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

Probability

  • 12
  • 11.5
  • 11
  • 10.5
  • 10
  • 9.5
  • 9
  • 8.5
  • 8
  • 7.5
  • 7
  • 6.5
  • 6
  • 5.5
  • 5
  • 4.5
  • 4
  • 3.5

log10 (risk / serving)

Risk of illness associated with the consumption of one serving of cheese by people in high-risk (a) and typical healthy (b) populations. (a) (b) Bemrah et al. (1998)

  • 7
  • 11.5
  • 3.5
  • 7.5
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bemrah et al. (1998)

Number of cases, general (at risk) population Number of servings/capita.year Mean 99 % 50 57 (0.5) 74 (3) 50 (no mastitis) 11 (0.1) 20 (1) Triangular(10,20,50) 31 (0.2) 44 (2) 20 a 23 (0.2) 33 (2)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Ready-to-eat foods

Anonymous (2001). Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Risk Assessment of Microbiological Hazards in Foods. Risk characterization

  • f Salmonella spp. in eggs and broiler

chicken and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods.

n FAO: Rome, WHO: Geneva

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FAO/WHO (2001)

Three questions:

n Estimate the risk for consumers in different

susceptible population groups relative to the general population.

n Estimate the risk from L. monocytogenes in foods

that support growth and foods that do not support growth under specific storage and shelf-life conditions

n Estimate the risk from L. monocytogenes in food

when the number of organisms ranges from absence in 25 grams to 1000 colony forming units (CFU) per gram, or does not exceed specified levels at the point of consumption.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FAO/WHO (2001)

1 0.5

slide-19
SLIDE 19

FAO/WHO (2001)

1 / 100 0.03 1 / 50 0.3 1 / 17 3 1 / 5 32 1 / 1 316 5 / 1 3 160 25 / 1 31 600 2130 / 1 Present situation Predicted number of cases/number of years, USA Maximum number of L. monocytogenes cells per serving at consumption Absence in 25 g <0.04 Lm/g <100Lm/g + analytical tolerance

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Relative risk ranking

Whiting, R. (Team Leader) (2003) Quantitative assessment of relative risk to public health from foodborne Listeria monocytogenes among selected categories of ready-to-eat foods.

n FDA – Center for food safety and applied nutrition,

USDA – Food safety and inspection service, Center for disease control and prevention.

n http://www.foodsafety.gov/~dms/lmr2-toc.html

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Relative risk ranking (USA)

w

Overall burden of listeriosis (severe illness) on public health

w

Use as a tool

w

to evaluate the effectiveness of current policies and programs

w

to guide in reducing L. monocytogenes contamination of foods

w

to identify specific areas on which to focus future initiatives

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Relative risk ranking (USA)

Cases (median) 3.2x10 - 14 Cultured Milk Products 22 1.8x10 - 9 Soft Unripened Cheese 8 4.5x10 - 15 Hard Cheese 23 5.1x10 - 12 Soft Ripened Cheese 17 6.5x10 - 12 Semi – soft Cheese 16 1.7x10 - 10 Fresh Soft Cheese Low Risk 10 1.0x10 - 9 Pasteurized Milk 9 2.7x10 - 8 Other Dairy Products Moderate Risk 7 7.1x10 - 9 Unpasteurized Milk High Risk 4 Per Serving Per Serving Basis Relative Risk Ranking

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Relative risk ranking (USA)

Cases (median) <0.1 Cultured Milk Products 22 56.4 Other Dairy Products 3 <0.1 Hard Cheese 23 <0.1 Soft Ripened Cheese 16 <0.1 Semi – soft Cheese 15 <0.1 Fresh Soft Cheese Low Risk 14 3.1 Unpasteurized Milk 7 7.7 Soft Unripened Cheese Moderate Risk 5 90.8 Pasteurized Milk High Risk 2 Per Annum Per Annum Basis Relative Risk Ranking

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pasteurized Milk (USA)

« Contamination frequency at retail for this category

is low (average of 0.4%) due to pathogen inactivation during pasteurization. However, this is offset somewhat by the large serving sizes associated with this product and high potential for growth of Listeria monocytogenes in the product during storage. The median amount consumed per serving is 244 g which is substantially larger than the serving sizes of most

  • ther foods considered in this risk assessment. The

frequency of serving (8.7x1010) is also the highest among the food categories. »

slide-25
SLIDE 25

« Soft Ripened Cheese »

High moisture (>50%), ripened cheeses such as mold surface-ripened cheeses (Brie, Camembert), pickled (white brined) cheeses, feta, and soft Italian-style cheeses (mozzarella). Median size of serving is 28 g, annual number of servings is 1.9x109. 50% of the Camembert and Brie Cheese and 20% of the feta cheese sold in the United States are imported. Data not available on the proportion of United States

  • r imported cheese that is made from unpasteurized

fluid milk.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

« Soft Ripened Cheese »

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Raw milk hard cheese

Schaffner, E., Mühlemann, M., Spahr, U. & Schällibaum, M. (2003). Quantification of the probability of milk contamination by Listeria monocytogenes during manufacture of hard cheese

n Rev. Epidemiol. Santé Publique 51 493 - 503

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Schaffner et al. (2003)

  • Proba. of milk being contaminated: 0.07

n Resulting Listeria monocytogenes concentration in

green cheese: 4.6 cfu/kg

Discussion :

n not found in ripened cheese at the time of

consumption;

n due to recontamination

recontamination during packaging, distribution or preparation by the consumer, expert evaluation: 1 to 10 cells/portion

« Extremely low but existent existent risk, especially for people with deficient or diminished immune system »

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Raw milk soft cheese

Sanaa, M., Coroller, L. & Cerf, O. (2004). Risk assessment of listeriosis linked to the consumption of two soft cheeses made from raw milk: Camembert of Normandy and Brie of Meaux.

n Risk Analysis (April 2004).

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Sanaa, Coroller & Cerf (2004)

Data purposely collected in 2000 – 2001 Modeling of growth accounting for temperature – pH interaction Lag – time based on in vivo and in vitro studies Growth in colonies (no spread of daughter cells) FAO/WHO (2001) dose – response curve

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Sanaa, Coroller & Cerf (2004)

10 20 30 40 2 4 6 Log CFU/27 g Percent of Total

In the 12% of servings that are Lm positive

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Sanaa, Coroller & Cerf (2004)

Lm conc. in selected raw milk divided by 104 since 1992 Assuming no contamination during ripening, transport, distribution and consumption stages

n No L. monocytogenes in 88% of servings n Estimated median number of cases of

listeriosis per year ≈ 10 - 3

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Future

Skill is available to estimate risks

n Of listeriosis from any milk products n Of other microbial diseases communicable

by milk and milk products

n USA, France, Switzerland

Example of software

n AnaRisk (CNIEL, Paris:France)