particle ! physics ! 6. experiments to detect ! invisible particles ! - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

particle physics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

particle ! physics ! 6. experiments to detect ! invisible particles ! - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Experimental particle ! physics ! 6. experiments to detect ! invisible particles ! Marco Delmastro ! Experimental Particle Physics ! 1 ! A bit of neutrino history ! 1930 Neutrino postulated ! Pauli ! 1934 Neutrino name and


slide-1
SLIDE 1 Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 1!

particle! physics!

Experimental

6.

experiments to detect! “invisible” particles!

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A bit of neutrino history…!

  • 1930 Neutrino postulated!
  • 1934 Neutrino name and interaction theory!
  • 1938 Solar neutrino flux calculation!
  • 1946 Idea of neutrino chlorine detector!
  • 1956 Neutrino observation!
  • 1957 Idea of neutrino oscillation!
  • 1958 Neutrino are Left-Handed!
  • 1962 There are (at least) 2 neutrino species: nmu, ne!
  • 1968 Solar neutrino deficit!
  • 1973 Neutral Current neutrino interactions observed !
  • 1975 Tau lepton and the third neutrino!
  • 1986 Solar deficit again: maybe atmospheric?!
  • 1987 Neutrino from SN1987A!
  • 1989 There are only 3 light neutrino families!
  • 1991 Still solar deficit!
  • 1998 Atmospheric neutrino oscillation!
  • 2002 Solar neutrino oscillation confirmed!
  • 2004 Atmospheric oscillation confirmed at accelerator !
  • Pauli!
  • Fermi!
  • Bethe !
  • Pontecorvo !
  • Reines & Cowan !
  • Pontecorvo !
  • Goldhaber !
  • Lederman, Schwartz & Steinberger !
  • Davis!
  • Gargamelle!
  • Perl !
  • Kamiokande !
  • Kamiokande, IMB !
  • LEP Collaborations !
  • Gallex, SAGE!
  • Super-Kamiokande !
  • SNO, KamLand !
  • K2K !
Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 2!
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Neutrino interactions!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 3!

νe + e− → νe + e− νµ + e− → νµ + e− ντ + e− → ντ + e− ¯ νe + e− → µ− + ¯ νµ ¯ νe + e− → τ− + ¯ ντ νe + n → e− + p ¯ νe + p → e+ + n νµ + n → µ− + p ¯ νµ + p → µ+ + n ντ + n → τ − + p ¯ ντ + p → τ + + n Neutron detection only via weak interaction ... Possible reactions:

Charged Current Reactions: Neutral Current Reactions:

...

Remark: Neutral Current νN-interactions not usable due to small energy transfer

n p e e W

Z0

Neutrino nucleon x-Section: [examples] 10 GeV neutrinos: σ = 7⋅10–38 cm2/nucleon Solar neutrinos [100 keV]: σ = 7⋅10–45 cm2/nucleon Interaction probability for 10 m Fe-target: R = σ⋅NA [mol-1/g]⋅d⋅ρ = 3.2⋅10-10 with NA = 6.023⋅1023 g-1; d = 10 m; ρ = 7.6 g/cm3 Interaction probability for earth: R = σ⋅NA [mol-1/g]⋅d⋅ρ ≈ 4⋅10-14 with NA = 6.023⋅1023 g-1; d = 12000 km; ρ = 5.5 g/cm3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Neutrino interactions: ν-e!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 4!

Process !! Total Cross section!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Neutrino interactions: ν-nucleon !

  • Interaction happens with whole nucleon!

" Nucleon can at best undergo an isospin transition in case of charged current (quasi-elastic scattering)! " In case of neutral current, scattering is perfectly elastic!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 5!
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Neutrino interactions: quasi-elastic ν-nucleon !

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 6!

Threshold is of course different for different neutrino flavors…!

E << mn! E > 1 GeV! ! σ ~ constant!

Paolo Lipari, Maurizio Lusignoli, Francesca Sartogo, “The neutrino cross section and upward going muons” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9411341!

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A neutrino interaction…!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 7!

ICARUS!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Another neutrino interaction…!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 8!

ICARUS!

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Neutrino interactions: a summary!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 9!

close to thresholds…!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Neutrino interactions: a summary!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 10!
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Neutrinos from the Sun!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 11!
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Neutrinos from the Sun!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 12!

Solar

e Energy Spectrum

[J.N. Bahcall, http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb]

(cm-2 s-1)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The “solar electron neutrino” problem!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 13!
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Neutrino oscillation!

Imagine we send a neutrino on a long journey. Suppose neutrino is created in the pion decay! ! ! so that at birth it is a muon neutrino. Imagine that this neutrino interacts via W exchange in a distant detector, turning into a charged lepton. If neutrinos have masses and leptons mix, then this charged lepton need not be a muon, but could be, say, a tau. !

  • Neutrinos have masses # there is some spectrum of neutrino mass eigenstates νi with mass

mi!

  • Leptons mix # neutrinos of definite flavor, νe, νμ, and ντ , are not mass eigenstates νi. !

! !

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 14!
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Probability of neutrino oscillation!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 15!

For full calculation see for instance Boris Kayser “Neutrino Oscillation Physics” http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4325!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Probability of neutrino oscillation!

Let’s forget the imaginary part of U (neutrinos and antineutrinos behave the same) and suppose only 2 flavors…!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 16!
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Probability of neutrino oscillation!

… and calculate!! ! ! ! ! Being able to observe oscillations implies phase variation ~ 1.! Given L and E, accessible range is thus Δm2 [eV2] > E[GeV] / L[km] ! !

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 17!
slide-18
SLIDE 18 Raymond Davis Jr. [Homestake] Masatoshi Koshiba [Kamiokande] Riccardo Giacconi [X-Ray Sources]

Nobel Prize 2002!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 18!

The Nobel Prize in Physics 2002 was divided, one half jointly to Raymond Davis Jr. and Masatoshi Koshiba "for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, in particular for the detection of cosmic neutrinos" and the other half to Riccardo Giacconi "for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, which have led to the discovery of cosmic X-ray sources".! !

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 19!
slide-20
SLIDE 20

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 20!
slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 21!
slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 22!
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Experimental details:

37Cl + νe ➛ 37Ar + e

Neutrino capture:

Detection of 37Ar via e–-capture [37Ar(e,νe)37Cl]; τ ≈ 35 days results in Auger-electron @ 2.82 keV which after extraction is detected in proportional counter Lifetime: 35 days
  • 615 tons of C2Cl4
  • Threshold: 814-keV threshold
  • Bubble He gas through to extract Ar

[every 2-3 month]

  • Ar trapped in cold trap
  • Proportional Counter filled with

Ar gas (7% methane)

  • Important: 37Cl is 24% abundant.

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 23!
slide-24
SLIDE 24

The Chlorine Experiment

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 24!
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Some very approximate numbers ...

  • 615 tons C2Cl4 (Tetrachloroethelene)
  • About 5 x 1029 Chlorine Atoms (37Cl)
  • Prediction: 8 x 10-36 ν-reactions/atom/sec

i.e.: about 60 37Ar-atoms/month; but: half-life = 35 days ➛ 30 atoms/month

  • Expect: 60 atoms every 2 month out of
  • ca. 1030 Tetrachloroethelene molecules
  • After 25 years:

Expectation: ~ 5000 37Ar-Atoms expected Observation: ~ 2200 37Ar-Atoms produced

37Ar-Extraction Efficiency: ~ 95% 37Ar-Detection Efficiency: ~ 45% [875 counted; 776 after background subtraction] 6 Atoms/Molecule

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 25!
slide-26
SLIDE 26 Pulse height Spectra from first runs [1968]

2.82 keV

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 26!
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Result of 25 years of running

[after implementation of rise time counting]

2.56 SNU

The Homestake experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 27!
slide-28
SLIDE 28 Superkamiokande Detector 1 Neutrino-interaction every 1.5 hours 50 Million liter ultra-pure water Water tank 1.6 km below ground Neutrino detection via Cherenkov light

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 28!
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 29!
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 30!
slide-31
SLIDE 31

g

5-20 MeV

Super-Kamiokande !Sun

cos !Sun Event/day/bin

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 1 2

SK-I: 8B Solar Neutrino Flux

[May 31st, 1996 – July 15, 2001]

22400 ± 230

νe + e ➛ νe + e [ES]

[comparably high x-sec. due to Z-exchange]

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 31!
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 32!
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 33!

Muon event

[603 MeV]

Observation of clean Cherenkov ring with sharp edges Flight direction from timing measurements [blue: early; red: late] Energy from amount

  • f light observed in PMTs

νμ

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 34!

Electron event

[492 MeV]

Observation of Cherenkov ring with fuzzy edge

[from e.m. shower]

Flight direction from timing measurements [blue: early; red: late] Energy from amount

  • f light observed in PMTs
Flight direction close to view direction
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Solar neutrino

[12.5 MeV]

Unusually nice, well-defined Flight direction from timing measurements [blue: early; red: late] Energy from amount

  • f light observed in PMTs

Super-Kamiokande!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 35!
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Other solar neutrino experiments!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 36! 37Cl→37Ar 71Ga→71Ge 8B ν flux (SNU) (SNU) (106cm−2s−1) Homestake (CLEVELAND 98)[20] 2.56 ± 0.16 ± 0.16 — — GALLEX (HAMPEL 99)[21] — 77.5 ± 6.2+4.3 −4.7 — GNO (ALTMANN 05)[22] — 62.9+5.5 −5.3 ± 2.5 — GNO+GALLEX (ALTMANN 05)[22] — 69.3 ± 4.1 ± 3.6 — SAGE (ABDURASHI. . .02)[23] — 70.8+5.3+3.7 −5.2−3.2 — Kamiokande (FUKUDA 96)[24] — — 2.80 ± 0.19 ± 0.33† Super-Kamiokande (HOSAKA 05)[25] — — 2.35 ± 0.02 ± 0.08† SNO (pure D2O) (AHMAD 02)[4] — — 1.76+0.06 −0.05 ± 0.09‡ — — 2.39+0.24 −0.23 ± 0.12† — — 5.09+0.44 −0.43 +0.46 −0.43 ∗ SNO (NaCl in D2O) (AHARMIM 05)[11] — — 1.68 ± 0.06+0.08 −0.09 ‡ — — 2.35 ± 0.22 ± 0.15† — — 4.94 ± 0.21+0.38 −0.34 ∗ BS05(OP) SSM [13] 8.1 ± 1.3 126 ± 10 5.69(1.00 ± 0.16) Seismic model [18] 7.64 ± 1.1 123.4 ± 8.2 5.31 ± 0.6 [PDG 2008]

37Cl ➙ 37Ar

[Homestake]

Exp: ~ 2.6 SNU BS05: ~ 8.1 SNU

37Ga ➙ 37Ge

[Gallex, GNO, Sage]

Exp: ~ 70 SNU BS05: ~ 126 SNU

8B ν-flux

[Kamikande, SNO]

Exp: ~ 2.4 SNU BS05: ~ 5.7 SNU

νe only
slide-37
SLIDE 37

The SNO experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 37!
slide-38
SLIDE 38

The SNO experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 38!
slide-39
SLIDE 39

The SNO experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 39!
slide-40
SLIDE 40

! !

The SNO experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 40!
slide-41
SLIDE 41 0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 5 10 15 0.05 0.1 0.15 5 10 15 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 5 10 15

CC ES NC T/MeV

0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 0.5 1 1.5 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.5 1 1.5 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.5 1 1.5

T/MeV (R/RAV)3

0.02 0.04

  • 1

1 0.2 0.4

  • 1

1

AV

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04

  • 1

1 Probability

Probability Probability

CC ES NC

Analysis strategy:

Determine size of CC, ES and NC signals via a fit of the data to probability distributions Simulation reconstructed neutrino direction w.r.t. sun Effective
  • kin. energy
Reconstr. Event Rad.

cosθo .

The SNO experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 41!
slide-42
SLIDE 42

The SNO experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 42!
  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 Events per 0.05 wide bin 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 cos ES CC NC + bkgd neutrons Bkgd

(a)

500

θ

SNO data

reconstructed neutrino direction w.r.t. sun
slide-43
SLIDE 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 )

  • 1

s

  • 2

cm

6

(10

e

φ )

  • 1

s

  • 2

cm

6

(10

τ µ

φ

SNO NC

φ

SSM

φ

SNO CC

φ

SNO ES

φ

φCC = 1.76+0.06

−0.05 (stat.)+0.09 −0.09 (syst.) × 106 cm−2s−1

φES = 2.39+0.24

−0.23 (stat.)+0.12 −0.12 (syst.) × 106 cm−2s−1

φNC = 5.09+0.44

−0.43 (stat.)+0.46 −0.43 (syst.) × 106 cm−2s−1

.) × 106 cm−2s−1

φ(νe) = 1.76+0.05

−0.05 (stat.)+0.09 −0.09 (syst.)

φ(νµτ) = 3.41+0.45

−0.45 (stat.)+0.48 −0.45 (syst.)

ve-flux too low! Oscillations!

The SNO experiment!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 43!
slide-44
SLIDE 44

CNGS!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 44!
slide-45
SLIDE 45

CNGS!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 45!
slide-46
SLIDE 46

TPC as neutrino detectors!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 46! http://cds.cern.ch/record/117852/files/CERN-EP-INT
  • 77-8.pdf!

Why LAr for neutrino detectors? !

  • Excellent insulant, very weakly

electronegative: free electrons produced by ionisation drift long distances!

  • Produces many electron-ion pairs:

measurement of energy deposited in liquid; !

  • Good scintillator: measurement of energy
  • f luminous flash produced by event,

event localisation!

  • Available in sufficient quantity!
slide-47
SLIDE 47

ICARUS (Imaging Cosmic And Rare Underground Signals)!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 47!
slide-48
SLIDE 48

ICARUS!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 48!
slide-49
SLIDE 49

ICARUS!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 49! http://icarus.lngs.infn.it/photos/NeutrinoEventsGallery/!
slide-50
SLIDE 50

OPERA (Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus)!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 50!
slide-51
SLIDE 51

OPERA!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 51!
slide-52
SLIDE 52

OPERA!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 52!
slide-53
SLIDE 53 Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 53!
slide-54
SLIDE 54

Dark matter astronomical evidence!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 54!
slide-55
SLIDE 55

WIMP detection: cryogenic experiments!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 55! mχ MK

WIMPs = Weakly interacting massive particles ...

Dark matter particles; must be neutral, i.e. must neither interact via electromagnetic nor strong interactions; WIMPs must be heavy, i.e. non-relativistic (cold dark matter) in order to allow for galaxy formation ... Assumed mass range: 10 GeV - 10 TeV Mass limits dependent on cross section ...

[e.g.: σχp = 1.6 · 10−7 pb yields mWIMP > 60 GeV]

Detection via elastic χp-scattering ...

Assume WIMP velocity: vχ ≈ 300 km/s, i.e. β=10–3 ...

Solar system speed w.r.t. to milky way: v = 250 km/s Velocity of earth moving w.r.t solar system: v = 30 km/s

Maximum energy transfer: MK = 100 GeV ➛ TKmax ≈ 100 keV T max

K

= 2 m2

χ MK c2

(mχ + MK)2 β2 ≈ 2MKv2

χ

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Transferred energy of recoiling nuclei generally much smaller (< 10 %) ... Need detector that allows nuclei detection below keV range ... Energy resolution requires: Nexcite ≫ 1 i.e. Eexcite ≪ 1 eV Remember: Gases – ionzation energy ≈ 30 eV Silicon – electron/hole pair creation ≈ 3 eV Better possibilities: Phonon excitation:

Maximum phonon energy in Si is 60 meV; roughly 2/3

  • f the energy required for electron-hole formation goes

into phonon excitation ... Superconducting detectors: In superconductors the energy gap 2∆ is equivalent to the band gap in semiconductors; absorption of energy > 2∆ (typically 1 meV) can break up a Cooper pair ...

Cryogenic detectors: Detect low energies with very good resolution ...

How to detect WIMP?!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 56!
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Cryogenic detectors!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 57!

Phonon Detectors ...

Assume thermal equilibrium: Convert absorbed energy into phonons: C: heat capacity of the sample [specific heat × mass] E: deposited energy

∆T = E/C

Optimal detector: low heat capacity Example 1: Si-detector at room temperature ... Cspec = 0.7 J/gK; E = 1 keV; m = 1 g ➛ ∆T = 2⋅10-16 K Not very practical ... Need lower specific heat and mass ... Example 2: Si-detector at low temperature ... Cspec ∝ (T/Θ)3; Cspec = 2⋅10-15 K; T = 0.1 K; E = 1 keV; m = 15 μg ➛ ∆T = 0.04 K [possible!]

Basic configuration

  • f cryogenic calorimeter
Resolution: n = CT/kT = C/k σ0 = kT√n = √(CkT2) σE = εPh√(E/εPh) = √(kTE) σ = σ0 + σE Yields: σ < 0.2 eV [Si Semiconductor detector: σ = 20 eV]
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Dark matter detection overview!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 58!
slide-59
SLIDE 59

Dark matter detection!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 59!
slide-60
SLIDE 60

10 100 !0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 2 Ionization yield Recoil energy (keV)

Recent CDMS Results [arXiv:1011.2482]

calibration events background events candidate events

But: un-rejected background sources ...

[Limit calculation assumes all candidates to be WIMPs]

Ionization Yield Recoil Energy [keV]

No evidence claimed ... !!

Dark matter detection!

Marco Delmastro! Experimental Particle Physics! 60!