Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
- J. J. Sanz Cillero
Padé Theory and Phenomenology
- f Resonance Poles
J.J. Sanz-Cillero ( UAB – IFAE ) CIRM, September 28th 2009
Pad Theory and Phenomenology of Resonance Poles J.J. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CIRM, September 28th 2009 Pad Theory and Phenomenology of Resonance Poles J.J. Sanz-Cillero ( UAB IFAE ) Pad Theory and Resonance Poles J. J. Sanz Cillero Determining hadronic parameters QCD observables Determination of
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
J.J. Sanz-Cillero ( UAB – IFAE ) CIRM, September 28th 2009
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Determining hadronic parameters
But, with resonances, couplings of what lagrangian? No general agreement about the right formulation (if any)
Important: Universal for all processes with the same quantum numbers
[ do not depend on a Lagrangian realization ]
much model dependence in some cases
( what theory do we use? )
Extrapolation to the complex plane Non-trivial
E.g., the σ-pole (I=J=0 ππ-scat.)
[Leutwyler’07 ]
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Resonant amplitudes:
Padé-Approximants as a model independent description 1.) Example of amplitudes with resonant spectral functions:
The ππ-VFF and the extraction of <r2>V , cV From Euclidean data (but not to recover the ρ-meson pole)
2.) Padés have been sometimes used as unitarizations
(in a pretty sloppy way) :
BUT!!
Either improper determinations of the poles Or inaccurate values for LECs
3.) However, properly used PA’s may recover the poles in a theoretically safe way
MR and ΓR determinations
[ Masjuan, Peris, SC’08] [ Masjuan, SC, Virto’08] [ SC, work in progress ]
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Goal:
in the space-like [ Q2 = -(p-p’)2 > 0 ]
NOT our aim:
(e.g. mass predictions)
(here, physical NC=3 quantities)
[ Masjuan, Peris, SC’08 ]
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
PN
M(q2) =QN(q2) / RM(q2) :
M(q2) - F(q2) = O((q2) N+M+1)
around q2=0
The polynomials, unable to handle singularities (branch cuts…)
The Padés, partially mimic them
[Masjuan, SC & Virto’08]
T0
0(s)
in LSM
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
q2= - Q2
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
q2= - Q2
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
q2= - Q2
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
(but not info from Q2=∞)
q2= - Q2
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
rather more related to bumps of the spectral function than to hadronic poles in the complex plane
(resonances?)
From this perspective, VMD
[ F(Q2) = (1+Q2/M2)-1 ]
is just a Padé P0
1, the 1st term of a sequence PL 1
q2= - Q2
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
essentially provided by the rho peak
suggesting the use of PL
1
π
and
π
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
INPUTS:
Playing with a phenomenological-model
with the right threshold behaviour given by
[ Guerrero & Pich’97 ] [Pich & Portolés’01 ]
[ Masjuan, Peris & SC’08 ]
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
which at low energies recover the taylor coefficients ak :
F(q2) = 1 + a1 q2 + a2 q4 + a3 q6 + …
±1.5% ±10%
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
a1 = 1.92 ± 0.03 GeV-2 a2 = 3.49 ± 0.26 GeV-4 <r2> = 6 a1=0.4486 ± 0.008 fm2
2 ± MρΓρ
The Padé tends to reproduce the ρ peak line-shape but, obviously, no complex resonance pole can be recovered
[ Masjuan, Peris & SC’08 ]
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
in the data region but it diverges afterwards (like (Q2)L-1)
P1 P1
1
P1
2
P1
3
P1
4
JLAB, NA7, Bebek et al.’78, DESY’79, Dally et al.’77
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
PA2
L
PT1
L
PT2
L (ρ,ρ’)
PT2
L (ρ,ρ’’)
PT3
L (ρ,ρ’ ,ρ’ ’)
PP1,1
L (ρ)
a1
(GeV-2) 1.924 ± 0.029 1.90 ± 0.03 1.902 ± 0.024 1.899 ± 0.023 1.904 ± 0.023 1.902±0.029
a2
(GeV-4) 3.50 ± 0.14 3.28 ± 0.09 3.29 ± 0.07 3.27 ± 0.06 3.29 ± 0.09 3.28 ± 0.09
which, after combination, leads to a1= 1.907 ± 0.010sta ± 0.030sys GeV-2 , a2= 3.30 ± 0.03sta ± 0.33sys GeV-4
[Masjuan,Peris,SC’08] [Caprini’04]
[Troconiz, Yndurain’05] [Bijnens et al’98] [Pich,Portolés’01] [Boyle’08]
<r2> (fm2)
0.445±0.002± 0.007 0.435±0.005 0.432±0.001 0.437±0.016 0.430±0.012 0.418±0.031
a2
(GeV-4) 3.30±0.03± 0.33 …. 3.84±0.02 3.85±0.60 3.79±0.04 ….
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
[Thanks to J.Virto for his help with the slides]
[ Identical result obtained from disp. relations + χPT matching of the l.h.c. ]
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
A counter-example: The σ in the LSM
, with Mσ the renormalized mass parameter in the Lagrangian
1.) Computation of the actual σ−pole
[ Masjuan, Virto, SC’08 ]
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
2.) Low-energy limit of the LSM
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
3.) Unitarization of the low-energy LSM
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Analyticity properties
Then, the Taylor series converges to f(x) for N∞
[ with ak=f(k)(0) / k! ]
f(0) , f’(0) … can be extracted from successive polynomial fits PN(x) δ
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
sp What if it is analytical but for a single pole ?
If one constructs a series of single-pole Padé Approximants PN
1 ,
Then the sequence of Padés
f(x) when N∞
Hence, also the Padé pole xp=aN/aN+1 sp
δ
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
f(0), f’(0) …. but with experimental points { xj , fj , Δfj }
the rational functions PN
1(x) as fitting functions
(as we did before with the polynomials)
1(x) gives an estimate of the series of derivatives
{ f(k)(0) } and hence, sp which are expected to converge to the actual ones for N∞
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Usually: Padés around q2=0
E.g., 4mπ
2
in ππ-VFF
(mA+mB)2 I-Riemann sheet
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Usually: Padés around q2=0
E.g., 4mπ
2
in ππ-VFF
(mA+mB)2 I-Riemann sheet
Mink.data F(q2+i0+) Eucl.data: F(q2<0)
F(q2<0)
( This is what we used before)
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Alternatively: Padé centered over the branch cut q2>(mA+mB)2
analytical extension of F(q2) E.g., the range 4mπ
2 4 mK 2
in ππ-VFF
[ notice that the Padé coefficients ak are now complex numbers ]
(mA+mB)2
I-Riemann sheet II-Riemann sheet
(m’A+m’B)2
Exp.data F(q2+i0+)
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
1
Padé-approximants can be used for the description of the amplitude in the disk It is possible to locate the pole in a model independent way
(mA+mB)2
I-Riemann sheet II-Riemann sheet
(m’A+m’B)2
Exp.data F(q2+i0+)
sp
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Testing the method with models
ρ-like resonance models: pole at sp=(Mp–iΓp/2)2 + Log singular. at q2=0
Model A) Model B) Model C)
with M and Γ chosen to produce the pole at the physical sρ(770) ≈ (0.77 – i 0.15 / 2)2 GeV2
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
(A, for instance ) and generate a series of “data” points with 0 error
(in an ideal experimental situation All theoretical error )
For the modulus ONE GETS THE FITS PN
1
For the phase-shift
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
from the fitted Padé pole sfit=(Mfit–iΓfit/2)2 to the “physical” sp=(Mp–iΓp/2)2
Model A) Model B) Model C)
where we defined the distance dist = [ (Mfit–Mp)2 + (Γfit-Γp)2 ]1/2
10-1 MeV accuracy 10-1 MeV accuracy
N=3 N=3
10-1 MeV accuracy
N=3
M M M Γ Γ Γ
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Application to data
( in the region 4 mπ
2<q2<4 mK 2 )
+ ππ−phase-shift δππ
11
(= ππ-VFF phase-shift in the elastic region 4 mπ
2<q2<4 mK 2 )
1 the 68% C.L. regions:
Always compatible for N ≥ 3 Enlarged as the # of param. grows
750 755 760 765 770 775 780 120 130 140 150 160 170
N=3 N=4 N=5 N=6 N=7
[ including δππ(s=4 mπ
2) ]
M Γ
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
750 755 760 765 770 775 780 120 130 140 150 160 170
Application to data
( in the region 4 mπ
2<q2<4 mK 2 )
+ ππ−phase-shift δππ
11
(= ππ-VFF phase-shift in the elastic region 4 mπ
2<q2<4 mK 2 )
1 the 68% C.L. regions:
Always compatible for N ≥ 3 Enlarged as the # of param. grows
N=3 N=4 N=5 N=6 N=7
[ not including δππ(s=4 mπ
2) ]
N=2
M Γ
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Increases with N (statistical)
Decreases with N (systematic)
N=4 as the best estimate:
( no new info with respect to P4
1 )
< 10-110-2 MeV
( negligible compared to the O(1 MeV) exp.errors )
|Fππ|2 δππ
Padé Theory and Resonance Poles
Including δππ(s=4 mπ
2)
Mfit= 763.5 ± 0.9 MeV, Γfit= 144.5 ± 1.8 MeV
Without δππ(s=4 mπ
2)
fit= 763.4 ±
= 763.4 ± 0.9 M 0.9 MeV, Γfit
fit= 142.9 ±
= 142.9 ± 2.2 M 2.2 MeV
[ Annanthanarayan,Colangelo,Gasser,Leutwyler’01 ] [ Zhou,Qin,Zhang,Xiao,Zheng’05 ] [ Pich,SC’03 ]
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
(e.g., <r2>V , cV in the ππ−VFF )
Euclidean
(e.g. the ρ(770) mass and width ) s1st-th. < s < s2nd-thr. data range Minkowsky
(Taylor expansion doesn’t)
Otherwise, the extracted parameters maybe are NOT the right ones (e.g. our LSM study of “Padé”-unitarizations )
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF
Some uses of Padé approximants: The VFF