Oxygenated volatile organic compounds in the remote marine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Oxygenated volatile organic compounds in the remote marine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Oxygenated volatile organic compounds in the remote marine troposphere: Results from the Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory (CVAO) 16 52' N, 24 52' W Lucy J. Carpenter, Katie Read, James Lee, Ally Lewis,
Measurement Method Met stations at 10, 30m Various O3 UV absorption NO/NOx/NOy Chemiluminesence CO VUV Fluorescence C2 -C8 NMHCs and DMS dc-GC-FID C1 -C5 O-VOC dc-GC-FID Halocarbons GC-MS JO1D Radiometer
Oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs)
N
Methanol Acetaldehyde Acetone
Atmospheric OVOCs
Cape Verde Atmospheric Observatory (CVAO)
Ocean: source or sink? Biogenic sources Anthropogenic and biomass burning sources
OH loss in marine boundary layer
Primary and secondary sources
CH3 C(O)O2 NO2 PAN HO2organic acids HCHO, HOx , CH3 O2 h, O2 , OH h, O2 , OH
Source of HOx , O3 and PAN
CAM‐Chem vs measurements
acetone (ppt)
Monthly averages Dominated by anthropogenic emissions (39 %‐91 %)?
Are MBL acetone concentrations controlled by anthropogenic NMHC?
10 100 1000 10 100 1000 10000
acetone (pptV) propane ( pptV)
propane (ppt)
OVOC Water Measurements
- N
- S
Acetaldehyde (nM) Latitude
- Methanol,
acetaldehyde and acetone quantified in seawater via MI- PTR/MS
Acetaldehyde in Mauritanian Upwelling (ICON)
Filament 1 Filament 2
Acetaldehyde (nM) Days since patch initiation (T0 )
AMT track
Beale, R. Quantification of oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in seawater, 2011, Ph.D thesis, University of East Anglia, UK. Manuscripts in preparation.
Role of the oceans?
CDOM CDOM
hv
OVOC
- Jacob et al. (2002)‐
- cean a
significant source of acetone
Modelled oceanic acetone fluxes
- Sea‐air flux F
= kt (Cw – Ca /H) l/kt = 1/kw + 1/Hka
How does this change model results?
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec acetone (pptV) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
01/01/2007 20/02/2007 11/04/2007 31/05/2007 20/07/2007 08/09/2007 28/10/2007
10th‐90th percentile range Mean (measurements) CAM‐Chem STD model STD‐NOANTH STD‐NOBIO STD‐NOFIRE CAM‐Chem model with ocean
Cumulative LAI (m2 m-2)
Biological (terrestrial) influences
Could model bias be due to underestimated biogenic emissions?
y = 20.02x + 0.59 R
2 = 0.39
y = 3.39x + 0.28 R
2 = 0.71
y = ‐3.08x + 3.44 R
2 = 0.83
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Fractional contribution to acetone O b s e rv e d /m od e lle d
Fractional contribution from biogenic (green), anthropogenic (purple) and biomass burning (red) sources as calculated from CAM‐Chem. Grey lines indicate 1:1 observation:model agreement.
Methanol
Modification of atmospheric methanol by oceans
Acetaldehyde
10 100 1000 1 10 100 1000 10000
acetaldehyde (pptV) propane (pptV)
Acetaldehyde modification by oceans
Impact of OVOCs on diurnal mean MBL [OH]
OVOC concentrations from: (i)observations at Cape Verde (ii)monthly‐mean CAM‐Chem model output including ocean fluxes (iii)set to zero CittyCat box model simulations
50 100 150 200 250 Oct/06 Dec/06 Jan/07 Mar/07 May/07 Jul/07 Sep/07 Nov/07 Jan/08 Mar/08 CO (ppbV)
Using nOH (fossil fuel and biomass) methane oxidation terrestrial nmhc oxidation (mainly isoprene)
- ceanic voc oxidation
terrestrial ovoc oxidation
Indirect impact: OVOC as sources of CO
Additional % contribution from summer CO emission sources not shared by ethane Reference Methane oxidation 5 % (May-October) Granier et al., 2000 NMHC oxidation 12 % (May-October) Granier et al., 2000 Terrestrial
- VOC
- xidation
20 % (June-November) Miller et al., 2008 Oceanic NMVOC
- xidation
20 % (July-September) Guenther et al., 1995
50 100 150 200 250 Oct/06 Dec/06 Jan/07 Mar/07 May/07 Jul/07 Sep/07 Nov/07 Jan/08 Mar/08 CO (ppbV)
Using nOH (fossil fuel and biomass) methane oxidation terrestrial nmhc oxidation (mainly isoprene)
- ceanic voc oxidation
terrestrial ovoc oxidation
Conclusions
- Oxygenated VOCs are a significant direct sink of OH in the
MBL
- Their abundance in the remote marine environment is
underestimated (particularly CH3 CHO)
- Marine and biological terrestrial sources of OVOCs could
explain some of this model underestimation – more work required to establish emission strength and variability
- >C3 alkanes and alkenes – chemistry and emissions
Acknowledgements
Funding: Technical support at CVAO: Luis Mendes Neves Helder Lopez
Modelled (GEOS‐5) and measured wind speed
- With a squared wind dependence for sea‐air fluxes, the difference between