Overview of the Center-Based Monitoring Review Process Presenter: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

overview of the center based monitoring review process
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Overview of the Center-Based Monitoring Review Process Presenter: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Overview of the Center-Based Monitoring Review Process Presenter: Linda Morales, Manager CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction AGENDA TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent Purpose of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction

Overview of the Center-Based Monitoring Review Process

Presenter: Linda Morales, Manager

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

AGENDA

  • Purpose
  • CMU Reviews
  • CMU Pilot
  • Overview of the Reference Guides
  • Overview of the Database Manual
  • Overview of the Database
  • Outcome of the Pilot
  • Next for CMU
  • Questions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this workshop is to better acquaint participants with the Center-Based Monitoring Unit and explain its mandates, functions, and tasks.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU STAFF

Child Development Division Center-Based Monitoring Unit

  • Linda Morales, Manager

– Patty Wagoner, Analyst – Paul Saucedo, Analyst – Bounthay Bouttavong, Analyst – Aurora Alvarez, Analyst

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CENTER-BASED MONITORING UNIT (CMU) REVIEWS

The CMU team reviews center-based contractors including:

  • California State Preschool Program (CSPP) (Full-day

Programs)

  • General Child Care and Development (Center-Based)

Program (CCTR)

  • Family Child Care Home Education Networks (CCTR

and CFCC)

  • Handicapped Child Care and Development Program

(CHAN)

  • State Migrant Child Care and Development Program

(CMIG)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU REVIEWS

  • Contractors selected are usually

– Large contractors (MRA of $500,000 or more) with a “need” component – Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) Reviews – Contract Monitor Reviews (CMRs) with the field service consultants

  • CMU selects a sample of basic family data and analyze

that sample to estimate rates of administrative errors in

– Eligibility – Need – Family Fee – Attendance

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU REVIEWS

Two types of Errors: Material and File Error Material Error

  • A material error is an error that results in the improper

reimbursement of services. A material error occurs when the requirements in statutes or regulations are either misapplied and/or when there is insufficient or conflicting documentation File Error

  • A file error occurs when federal and state requirements are

not met, but do not result in an improper reimbursement of

  • services. However, a systemic issue may result in a

noncompliance finding

slide-8
SLIDE 8

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU REVIEWS

When a contractor is selected for a CMU Review

  • A notification letter will be sent out at least

three (3) weeks before the review and will provide the following information

– Give the week of the review – Give the date and time of the Entrance Meeting – Give the month that will be reviewed – Give information on how to prepare for the review – Request a staff person be present during the review

  • The list of family files to be reviewed will be

sent out three (3) days before the review

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU REVIEWS

During the week of the review CMU will

  • Conduct an Entrance meeting
  • Review family files
  • Answer questions
  • Provide technical assistance
slide-10
SLIDE 10

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU REVIEWS

Conclude the review with

  • Pre-exit Meeting

– At the end of each day or the day before the Exit Meeting – Summarize the findings – Provide technical assistance

  • Exit Meeting we will provide the contractor with

– Summary of Findings – Error Rate Percentage Worksheet – Detailed Error Notes Worksheet

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU REVIEWS

CDE is required to report statewide error rates for the child care programs annually to the Legislature and the Governor

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU 2011-12 REVIEWS

Completed 39 CMU Reviews

  • Overall Error Rate Percentage is

28.7%

– Eligibility = 21.4% – Need = 6.0% – Family Fee = 0.2% – Attendance = 1.1%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU 2011-12 REVIEWS

The most common errors: Eligibility

  • The lack of sufficient documentation in the file

to support the families’ eligibility – For example: The presence or absence of a parent was not documented or parent did not provide a month’s worth of their most current income

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU 2011-12 REVIEWS

Need

  • Were generally caused by the contractor

inaccurately certifying the hours of need based

  • n the documentation in the file

– For example: The need documentation shows the parent’s need is half-time but the contractor certified family for full-time services

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU 2011-12 REVIEWS

Attendance

  • Were generally caused from parents and/or

authorized representatives not documenting excused absences

– For example: child is out sick, parent calls in but there is no documentation indicating the excused absence signed by parent or representative

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU 2011-12 REVIEWS

Family Fee

  • Were attributed to miscalculations of monthly

income or family size

– For example: calculating income at bi-monthly when it should be bi-weekly will cause a miscalculation of income which might generate a family fee

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

Error Rate Reduction Plans

The error rate percentage threshold for center- based contractors is 18%

  • Error Rate Reduction Plan (ERRP) is required

if a contractor exceeds the threshold

  • Contractors are expected to develop quality

assurance systems

  • The ERRP involves intensive technical

assistance by CDD staff

  • Contractors are expected to improve

administrative error rates during their follow-up review

slide-18
SLIDE 18

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

Error Rate Reduction Plans

The CMU ERRP procedure includes:

  • Assisting contractors in reducing their error

rate percentage

  • Working with the assigned consultant
  • Communicating with contractors by email and

phone

  • When necessary, provide 1-2 days of training

and technical assistance to follow-up on their ERRP

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU PILOT

  • The CMU was given a task to develop a

Reference Guide that would assist contractors in preparation for an CMU Review

  • That tasked morphed into not only a

Reference Guide but also a companion Database

slide-20
SLIDE 20

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU PILOT

  • The purpose of the Pilot Project was to have

contractors pilot the Reference Guide and its companion Database and provide feedback in

  • rder for CDD to enhance the resource tools
  • The participants were able to use these tools

along with the same family file sampling procedures used by the Child Development Division to determine an agency’s error rate percentage

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU PILOT

From October 2011 – January 2012 the CMU along with the APMU piloted the following resources:

  • CMU Reference Guide
  • Companion database
slide-22
SLIDE 22

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU PILOT

The next few slides will give you a brief

  • verview of the:

– Reference Guide – File Review Database Manual – File Review Database

slide-23
SLIDE 23

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

REFERENCE GUIDE

The Reference Guide:

  • Identifies the process on how to identify errors

when reviewing family files

  • Defines material and file errors
  • Ensures consistency among reviewers
  • Includes tools that can be used to do a CMU

Review manually, without the use of the database

slide-24
SLIDE 24

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

REFERENCE GUIDE

The Reference Guide states every test question along with the legal authority

slide-25
SLIDE 25

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

DATABASE MANUAL

An instructional tool to assist staff when using the Family Review Database to do the following:

  • Unzipping and opening the database
  • Entering data into the database
  • Importing/exporting data from multiple users
  • Producing an error rate report
slide-26
SLIDE 26

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

DATABASE

  • Replaces the use of the family worksheet
  • One Database for center-based and

alternative payment contractors

  • Allows you to make notes
  • Let’s you know if you have an error and

possibly the need to look further

  • Will produce an Error Rate Percentage Report
  • Allows more than one person to work on the

files and merge information for one report

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

DATABASE

  • The Database has ten (10) tabs for information

that we look at when we do a family file review

  • Each tab (except for Tab 1) will have a notes

section on the bottom

– The note section is where you can describe in detail what was found or what did not meet regulations – The CMU transfers all notes to Tab 10 to create an Excel Error Notes Spreadsheet for the Exit Meeting and/or for planning purposes citing the proper regulation

  • Material Error: 5 CCR, Section
  • File Error: 5 CCR, Section
slide-28
SLIDE 28

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

Let’s open up the Database to show you how it works

slide-29
SLIDE 29

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU PILOT

  • CMU sent out a survey to the 18 contractors

that participated in the pilot

  • With the questions or concerns on the survey

we made a few changes to the Database and Reference Guide

  • Plan to send to all contractors in the fall of

2012

slide-30
SLIDE 30

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CMU PILOT

Things to remember:

  • Our resources are optional
  • If you are planning to use CDD’s Database,

you will still need to collect sufficient family documentation for the hard file to show the family is eligible for services

  • We are always just a phone call or email away

if you have questions

slide-31
SLIDE 31

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

NEXT FOR CMU

  • Conduct baseline CMU reviews of

all center-based contractors in California

  • Provide technical assistance and
  • r trainings for all contractors that

have an ERRP

slide-32
SLIDE 32

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

QUESTIONS

slide-33
SLIDE 33

TOM TORLAKSON

State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

CONTACT INFORMATION

Linda Morales, Center-Based Monitoring Unit lmorales@cde.ca.gov

Thank you for your participation