Outline / Objectives Pregnancy in the U.S. Epidemiology of GDM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

outline objectives
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Outline / Objectives Pregnancy in the U.S. Epidemiology of GDM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6/9/2018 Disclosures Gestational Diabetes: Pill or Shot? An Evidence-Based Update No financial disclosures related to this topic Medical Advisor to Mindchild, Celmatix Bobs Red Mill Aaron B. Caughey, MD, PhD Professor and Chair ACOG


slide-1
SLIDE 1

6/9/2018 1

Gestational Diabetes: Pill or Shot? An Evidence-Based Update

Aaron B. Caughey, MD, PhD Professor and Chair Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Oregon Health & Science University

Disclosures

No financial disclosures related to this topic Medical Advisor to Mindchild, Celmatix Bob’s Red Mill ACOG

Outline / Objectives

 Epidemiology of GDM  Management of GDM

 Diet and exercise  Insulin  Oral hypoglycemic agents  Controversy

Epidemiology of Diabetes during Pregnancy in the U.S.

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34 ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42

 154,000 (4%) of all pregnancies

 135,000 (88%) due to GDM  12,000 (8%) due to Type 2 DM 

7,000 (4%) due to Type 1 DM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

6/9/2018 2

 GDM associated with

 Gestational hypertension  Preeclampsia  Operative deliveries  Postpartum development of Type 2 DM

GDM: Obstetric Considerations

Crowther CA et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2477-86. Casey BM et al. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:867-73. Yang X et al. Diabetes Care 2002;9:1619-24.

 GDM associated with

 Fetal macrosomia  Birth trauma  Metabolic abnormalities

 Hypoglycemia  Hyperbilirubinemia/polycythemia  Hypocalcemia

 Respiratory distress syndrome  Preterm delivery  Perinatal mortality

GDM: Perinatal Considerations

Crowther CA et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2477-86 Casey BM et al. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:867-73 Yang X et al. Diabetes Care 2002;9:1619-24

 Metabolic syndrome evaluated in a longitudinal

cohort of 179 children (at age 6,7,9,11)

GDM: Postnatal Considerations

Boney CM et al. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: Association with birthweight, maternal

  • besity and GDM. Pediatrics 2005;115:e290-6
slide-3
SLIDE 3

6/9/2018 3

GDM: Universal Screening

USPSTF - Recommendations and Evidence The USPSTF recommends screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in asymptomatic pregnant women after 24 weeks of

  • gestation. (B recommendation)

The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for GDM in asymptomatic pregnant women before 24 weeks of gestation. (I statement)

Management of GDM

 Nutrition therapy

 Home self glucose monitoring  Medical therapy if glycemic control not

achieved with diet/exercise

 Subcutaneous insulin  Oral hypoglycemic agents

 Glyburide  Metformin

 Antenatal monitoring

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001 ACOG practice bulletin #190. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 20017, 2018 Gabbe SG. Management of diabetes mellitus by ObGyn. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1229-34

Treatment of GDM

Crowther et al. Effect of treatment of GDM on pregnancy outcomes. NEJM 2005;256:2277-86

Treatment of GDM

Crowther et al. Effect of treatment of GDM on pregnancy outcomes. NEJM 2005;256:2277-86

slide-4
SLIDE 4

6/9/2018 4

Treatment of GDM

Landon MB et al. NEJM 2009;361:1339-48

Goals of Glycemic Control

 Blood glucose goals during pregnancy

 Fasting < 95mg/dL  1-hr postprandial < 130-140mg/dL  2-hr postprandial am < 120mg/dL  2am < 120mg/dL

Question

After one week of suboptimal blood sugars – 3/7 post lunch values 140-150 and 3/7 post dinner values 140-150 what would you recommend?

  • A. Exercise and diet
  • B. Insulin
  • C. Glyburide
  • D. Metformin

E x e r c i s e a n d d i e t I n s u l i n G l y b u r i d e M e t f

  • r

m i n

44% 23% 18% 15%

Question

After three weeks of suboptimal blood sugars – 5/7 fasting values 95-110 and 4/7 post breakfast values 140-150 what would you recommend?

  • A. Exercise and diet
  • B. Insulin
  • C. Glyburide
  • D. Metformin

E x e r c i s e a n d d i e t I n s u l i n G l y b u r i d e M e t f

  • r

m i n

4% 37% 23% 36%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

6/9/2018 5

Treatment of GDM

 Diet

 Carbohydrate Controlled (not kcals)  Meals - 30-45 gms / 45-60 gms / 45-60 gms  Snacks – 15-30 gms

 Exercise

 Daily per routine  Also, 15 minute walks after each meal  Strategize – Behavioral Economics

Treatment of GDM

Adapted from ADA: Clinical Education Program “Insulin Therapy for the 21st Century”

Oral Agents

 Glitazones - Decrease insulin resistance  1st gen sulfonylureas - Augment insulin

release

 Concentrated in the neonate - hypoglycemia

 Glyburide (2nd gen sulfonylurea)

 Low transplacental transfer

 Metformin – decreases insulin resistance

 Crosses placenta

Langer 2000: Insulin vs. Glyburide

Langer et al. 2000

 Randomized controlled trial (n=404)  Similar glycemic control  “Similar” neonatal outcomes Langer O et al. A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with GDM. N Engl J Med 2000;242:1134-8

Neonatal Outcome Glyburide % (n) Insulin % (n) p-value Birth weight > 4000 gms 7% (14) 4% (9) 0.26 Lung complications 8% (16) 6% (12) 0.43 Hypoglycemia 9% (18) 6% (12) 0.25 Hyperbilirubinemia 6% (12) 4% (8) 0.36

  • Composite

30% 20% 0.05

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6/9/2018 6

Insulin vs. Oral Agents

 Jacobson et al 2005

 Retrospective cohort study (n=504)

Jacobson GF et al. Comparison of glyburide and insulin for the management of GDM. AJOG 2005;193:118-24

Neonatal Outcome Glyburide

% (n)

Insulin

% (n)

p-value Preeclampsia 12 % (28) 6 % (16) <0.05 Birth wt > 4000 gms 24 % (63) 25 % (60) NS Mean birth weight 3661 gms 3599 gms NS Birth injury 3 % (8) 1 % (3) 0.08 Phototherapy 9 % (21) 5 % (12) <0.05

Oral Agents vs. Insulin - CA

Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, education level, GA at delivery, GA at GDM diagnosis, BMI, and gestational weight gain – Cheng et al. AJOG, 2007 abs

OR=0.51 Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 IUFD PTD <34w PTD <37w NICU LGA >90% Bwt >4kg

Adjusted Odds Ratio

OR=1.35 OR=2.19 OR=1.52 OR=1.40 OR=1.24 OR=1.08

Oral Agents v. Insulin: Education < 9yrs

Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, education level, GA at delivery, GA at GDM diagnosis, BMI, and gestational weight gain - Cheng et al. AJOG, 2007 abs

OR=0.51 Adjusted Odds Ratio 1 2 3 4 5 IUFD PTD <34w PTD <37w NICU LGA >90% Bwt >4kg

Adjusted Odds Ratio

OR=1.23 OR=0.69 OR=2.30 OR=2.63 OR=1.10 OR=1.52

Oral Agents v. Insulin: Spanish Language

Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, education level, GA at delivery, GA at GDM diagnosis, BMI, and gestational weight gain - Cheng et al. AJOG, 2007 abs

OR=0.51 Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 IUFD PTD <34w PTD <37w NICU LGA >90% Bwt >4kg

Adjusted Odds Ratio

OR=1.48 OR=0.49 OR=1.66 OR=2.06 OR=1.47 OR=1.19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6/9/2018 7

Insulin v. Glyburide - Meta

Balsells, BMJ, 2015

Insulin vs. Metformin

 Rowan et al. NEJM, 2008  Prospective RCT – New Zealand /

Australia

 363 metformin vs. 370 insulin  46.3% of metformin pts required insulin  8.8% of pts had GI side effects – 1.9%

stopped

Insulin vs. Metformin

Rowan et al. NEJM, 2008

Insulin v. Metformin - Meta

Balsells, BMJ, 2015

slide-8
SLIDE 8

6/9/2018 8

Insulin v. Metformin – Long Term

Rowan, BMJ Open, 2018

 Begin with diet / walk after each meal  If borderline/mild elevations, consider

metformin (start 500 qd), or insulin

 Counsel about increased PTD rates  Pt diagnosed in third trimester 26-32 wks  Unlikely pre-existing DM

 Otherwise, or if metformin fails, insulin  Insulin NPH and humalog/novalog

Potential Management of GDM

 ACOG Practice Bulletin:

 No oral agents other than glyburide have been

shown to be safe and effective in GDM

 Further study recommended before use of

newer oral hypoglycemic agents can be supported for use in pregnancy

 Needs to be updated

Medical Management of GDM - 2010

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34

GDM ACOG PB - 2013

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2013

slide-9
SLIDE 9

6/9/2018 9

Insulin v. Glyburide - Meta

Balsells, BMJ, 2015

Insulin v. Metformin - Meta

Balsells, BMJ, 2015

GDM ACOG PB - 2017

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34

GDM SMFM - 2017

SMFM Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018

slide-10
SLIDE 10

6/9/2018 10

GDM ACOG PB - 2018

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2018

GDM ACOG PB - 2018

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2018

GDM ACOG PB - 2018

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2018

 Gestational Diabetes

 Screening and Diagnosis

 Universal screening

 Management

 Diet/exercise, nutritional consult  Self-monitoring of blood glucose  Insulin  Oral hypoglycemic agents controversial

Diabetes and Pregnancy: Summary

slide-11
SLIDE 11

6/9/2018 11 Questions?

Thank You

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

 Insulin resistance first recognized

during pregnancy

 Prevalence: 1-14% of all pregnancies

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34 ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42

GDM: Diabetogenic hormones

Insulin Resistance Human Placental Lactogen

Progesterone

Growth Hormone

Corticotropin- Releasing Hormone

GDM: β cell dysfunction?

Inadequate Insulin Response

β cell hypertrophy in first trimester Block β cell hypertrophy

Increased Insulin Response

slide-12
SLIDE 12

6/9/2018 12

Risk Factors for GDM

 Maternal age >25 years  Body mass index >25 kg/m2  Race/Ethnicity

 Latina  Native American  South or East Asian, Pacific Island ancestry

 ? African American

 Personal/Family history of DM  History of macrosomia

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34 ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42

Risk Factors for GDM

 Paternal Race/ethnicity

Mom / Dad

Asian / Asian N= 3,226 Asian / Caucasian N = 690 Caucasian / Asian N = 178 Caucasian / Caucasian N = 5,575

GDM 5.7% aOR: 4.7 (3.6 – 6.2) 3.9 % aOR: 2.6 (1.7 – 4.1) 3.4 % aOR: 2.4 (1.1 – 5.8) 1.6 %

  • Nystrom MJ, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ, Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY. Perinatal Outcomes Among Asian,

Caucasian, and Asian-Caucasian Interracial Couples. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:385-7.e1-5

Risk Factors for GDM

Caucasian GDM % African American AOR (95% CI) Hispanic AOR (95% CI) Asian AOR (95% CI) Native American AOR (95% CI) Maternal race/ Ethnicity 3.4% referent 0.88 (0.75-1.03) 1.24 (1.11-1.38) 1.52 (1.41-1.62) 1.31 (0.85-2.01) Paternal race/ ethnicity 3.9% referent 1.13 (0.99-1.29) 1.29 (1.20-1.39) 1.41 (1.30-1.53) 1.40 (1.00-1.96)

Caughey AB, Cheng YW, Stotland NE, Washington AE, Escobar GJ. Maternal and paternal race/ethnicity are both associated with gestational diabetes. In Press, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010

Screening of GDM

 ACOG: Universal screening

 Clinical history  Laboratory testing

 ADA: Selective screening

 Risk assessment at first visit

 High risk: GCT as soon as feasible  Average risk: GCT at 24-28 weeks GA  Low risk: No GCT

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34 ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42

slide-13
SLIDE 13

6/9/2018 13

Low Risk for GDM

 Maternal age < 25 years  Weight normal before pregnancy  Members of an ethnic group with a low

prevalence of GDM

 No known DM in 1st degree relatives  No history of abnormal glucose tolerance  No history of poor obstetric outcome

ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42

Universal vs. Selective Screening

 94% obstetricians reported universal testing*  Danilenko-Dixon, AJOG, 1999  If just used criteria, identify 97% GDM  Only 10% go unscreened  Age > 25 identifies 90%, but screens 82%  Other studies report better test characteristics  Davey & Hamblin, Med J Aust, 2001  99% sensitivity, only need to screen 83% of population  Caliskan et al, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2004  100% sensitivity, only screen 70% (only 14 GDM pts)

*Wilkins-Haug L et al. Antepartum screening in the office-based practice. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:483-9

Screening for GDM

 Screening test

 50gm 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT)

 Screening thresholds

 130mg/dL: 90% sensitivity (23% screen +)  140mg/dL: 80% sensitivity (14% screen +)

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34 ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42

Screening Thresholds by Ethnicity: GCT 130 - 150 mg/dL

GCT

130 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

135 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

140 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

145 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

150 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) % White

99.5 (82.5) 93.9 (87.1) 89.2 (90.7) 75.6 (92.9) 66.2 (95.0)

African American

98.8 (88.4) 96.5 (91.1) 92.9 (93.8) 81.2 (96.0) 70.6 (97.0)

Latina

98.3 (80.9) 94.1 (85.5) 89.9 (88.7) 78.2 (91.1) 65.6 (93.5)

Asian

98.5 (75.9) 93.0 (81.1) 88.8 (86.0) 79.8 (89.0) 69.0 (91.8)

Esakoff et al. Screening for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1040-4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

6/9/2018 14

GLT

130 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

135 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

140 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

145 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) %

150 mg/dL

sensitivity (specificity) % White

99.5 (82.5) 93.9 (87.1) 89.2 (90.7) 75.6 (92.9) 66.2 (95.0)

African American

98.8 (88.4) 96.5 (91.1) 92.9 (93.8) 81.2 (96.0) 70.6 (97.0)

Latina

98.3 (80.9) 94.1 (85.5) 89.9 (88.7) 78.2 (91.1) 65.6 (93.5)

Asian

98.5 (75.9) 93.0 (81.1) 88.8 (86.0) 79.8 (89.0) 69.0 (91.8)

Screening Thresholds by Ethnicity: Sensitivity of GCT 130 - 150 mg/dL

Esakoff et al. Screening for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1040-4

GCT 130 mg/dL 135 mg/dL 140 mg/dL 145 mg/dL 150 mg/dL White 17.5% 12.9% 9.3% 7.0% 5.0% African American 11.6% 9.0% 6.3% 4.0% 3.1% Latina 19.4% 14.7% 11.5% 9.1% 6.6% Asian 24.2% 19.1% 14.1% 11.2% 8.4%

Screening Thresholds by Ethnicity:

False Positive Rates of GCT 130 - 150 mg/dL

Esakoff et al. Screening for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1040-4

Diagnosis of GDM

 Diagnostic test

 FS >126mg/dL or random BG>200mg/dL  100gm 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT)

 2 or more abnormal values

Carpenter and Coustan National Diabetes and Data Group Fasting 95 mg/dL 105 mg/dL 1hr 180 mg/dL 190 mg/dL 2hr 155 mg/dL 165 mg/dL 3hr 140 mg/dL 145 mg/dL

ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42

Diagnosis of GDM

 ADA and the 4th International Workshop-

Conference on GDM:

 Carpenter & Coustan diagnostic criteria

 Carpenter & Coustan vs. NDDG:

 Women with GDM by Carpenter and Coustan only

have higher odds of

Macrosomia Hypoglycemia Hyperbilirubinemia

ADA position statement. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:S4-42 Metzger EB et al. Diabetes Care 1998;21:Suppl 2: B161-7 Ferrara A et al. Diabetologia 2006; Cheng YW, Block-Kurbisch I, Caughey AB. Carpenter-Coustan criteria compared with the national diabetes data group thresholds for gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:326-32

No GDM

GDM by NDDG GDM by C&C only GDM by C&C

slide-15
SLIDE 15

6/9/2018 15

Diagnosis of GDM

 Women with false-positive GCT

 Retrospective cohort study (Stamilio, 2004)

 Cesarean delivery  Macrosomia  Shoulder dystocia  Composite morbidity

 Women with one elevated value on GTT

 Retrospective cohort study (McLaughlin, 2006)

 Cesarean delivery  Preeclampsia  Macrosomia  ICN admission

Stamilio et al. False positive 1-hour GCT and adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:148-56 McLaughlin et al. Women with one-elevated GTT. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:e16-9.

Diagnosis of GDM

 Continuous relationship between carbohydrate

intolerance and adverse outcome

 No single cutoff can separate

 those with high risk  those with no risk at all

 GDM diagnostic criteria validated by

 Predictive value for subsequent diabetes in the mother  Rather than ability to identify risk to the fetus/newborn

 Diagnostic criteria appropriate but arbitrary

Coustan DR, Carpenter MW. The diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21 Suppl 2:B5-8

Postpartum Follow-up

 Diagnosis of DM in non-pregnant state:

ACOG practice bulletin. Gestational Diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;93:525-34

Normal Values Impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance Diabetes Mellitus FPG <100mg/dL FPG 100-125mg/dL FPG ≥126mg/dL 75g 2hr GTT 2hr PG <140mg/dL 75g 2hr GTT 2hr PG 140-199mg/dL 75g 2hr GTT 2hr PG ≥200mg/dL Symptoms of DM & random PG ≥200mg/dL

Postpartum Follow-up

Stasenko M, Cheng YW, McLean T, Jelin AC, Rand L, Caughey AB. Postpartum follow-up rates for gestational diabetes mellitus patients. In Press, Am J Perinatol, 2010

FBG/OGTT Screen (n=845) aOR 95%CI Race/Ethnicity White African American Latina Asian 27.7% (66/238) 28.6% (16/56) 17.8% (18/101) 43.2% (146/338) 1.00 ----------- 1.53 0.74-3.21 0.84 0.44-1.61 2.68 1.74-4.11 Maternal Age <35 years ≥35 years 30.4% 38.3% 1.00 ----------- 1.71 1.17-2.49 Parity Multiparous Nulliparous 28.5% 40.2% 1.00 ----------- 1.85 1.27-2.69 Maternal education <2 years college ≥2 years college 27.9% 33.9% 1.00 ----------- 1.14 0.77-1.69

slide-16
SLIDE 16

6/9/2018 16

Postpartum Follow-up

Stasenko et al. AJOG, 2009 abs

aOR 95% CI Counseling Intervention 2.06 1.49-2.85 Race/Ethnicity White African-American Latina Asian 1.00 0.67 0.69 1.72

  • 0.34-1.31

0.41-1.16 1.21-2.43 Age ≥ 35 1.19 0.87-1.62 Insulin Use 2.13 1.54-2.95 Preterm Birth 0.80 0.68-0.94