Other Important Factors affecting Swine Production and Advancement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Other Important Factors affecting Swine Production and Advancement - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Other Important Factors affecting Swine Production and Advancement in Swine Farming Katsumasa Kure Japanese Association of Swine Veterinarians, Value Farm Consulting Co., Ltd Todays Objectives 1. To review the principles of other
Today’s Objectives
- 1. To review the principles of other
important factors affecting swine production and advancement in swine farming
- 2. To share the information to deepen
the discussion on this workshop
Today’s Topics
- 1. Pig Flow
- 2. Biosecurity
- 3. Veterinary Services
- 4. Environment Control
- 5. Mother to Pig Infection Control
- 6. Genetics and Nutrition
- 7. AMU & AMR
- 8. Others
Pig Flow
- 1. Straight Line Distribution/No Commingling
GN⇒Multipliers⇒Sow Farms⇒G&F Farms
GN
M SF M SF SF SF
G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F
GN
M SF M SF SF SF
G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F G F
Ideal Bad
Pig Flow
- 1. Straight Line Distribution/No Commingling
GN⇒Multipliers⇒Sow Farms⇒G&F Farms
- 2. All in All out; The effect is bigger as follows
Site > Buildings > Building > Room
Source: D.L.HARRIS, MULTI-SITE PIG PRODUCTION
Pig Flow
- 1. Straight Line Distribution/No Commingling
GN⇒Multipliers⇒Sow Farms⇒G&F Farms
- 2. All in All out; The effect is bigger as follows
Site > Buildings > Building > Room
- 3. Age Segregation; restrict age groups on site
Batch production (4 wks , 3 wks), Multi sites
140 Sows Batch Farrowing Farms
Farrowing Nursery
Finisher 280 heads 280 heads 280 heads 28 crates 280 heads 280 heads Isolation G・M 280 heads 280 heads
3 weeks Batch (7 Groups) 4 weeks Batch (5 Groups)
Farrowing
20 Crates 20 Crates
Nursery
200 heads 200 heads 200 heads 200 heads 200 heads Finisher 200 heads 200 heads Isolation G・M 200 heads 200 heads
Pig Flow
- 1. Straight Line Distribution/No Commingling
GN⇒Multipliers⇒Sow Farms⇒G&F Farms
- 2. All in All out; The effect is bigger as follows
Site > Buildings > Building > Room
- 3. Age Segregation; restrict age groups on site
Batch production (4 wks , 3 wks), Multi sites
- 4. Segregated production
Two site system, Multi site system
Segregated Production
Site1 Site2
Finisher G ・ M Farrowing Nursery
Site1 Site2 (nursery/Finisher site) nursery Finisher nursery Finisher nursery
Farroming
nursery Finisher Finisher Finisher nursery Finisher nursery Finisher nursery Finisher
G ・ M
nursery
Two Site System ① Multiple Site System
Site1 Site2
Finisher G ・ M Farrowing Nursery Finisher
Two Site System ②
Pig Flow
- 1. Straight Line Distribution/No Commingling
GN⇒Multipliers⇒Sow Farms⇒G&F Farms
- 2. All in All out; The effect is bigger as follows
Site > Buildings > Building > Room
- 3. Age Segregation; restrict age groups on site
Batch production (4 wks , 3 wks), Multi sites
- 4. Segregated production
Two site system, Multi site system
- 5. Routine Partial Depopulation
Biosecurity
- 1. National Level; Animal Quarantine Service
- 2. Local (Prefectural) Level;
・ Local Animal Health Station Network ・ Swift and Accurate Diagnosis
- 3. Farm Level; National Standard of Livestock
Rearing must be met first. Then Biosecurity chains should be tightened rigidly ・ Pigs・Semen introduction ・ Pig transportation ・ Human ・ Supplies ・ Dead pigs disposal ・ Feed ・ Water ・ Manure ・ Vermin and Insects ・ Air
Biosecurity Chain
Biosecurity Chain: As strong as the weakest link
Veterinary Services
Swift and Accurate Diagnosis is the key
- 1. National Level; For TADs
・ National Institute for Animal Health
- 2. Local (Prefectural) Level; For reportable diseases
・ Local Animal Health Station Network
- 3. Private Level; For other diseases
・ Local Animal Health Station ・ Univercity and private diagnostic lab
Effective Veterinary Services to Swine Farms ・Routine herd visits by veterinary consultants not
- nly for health control but also for advice such
as pig flow, biosecurity, housing and nutrition
Environment Control
- 1. No Pollution and Sustainability
・Effective treatment of feces and urine ・Cooperation with crop farms 2.Composting of feces 3.Water treatment of Urine 4.Feed management ・Digestive amino acids formulation ・Pellet and other heat treatments of feed ・Mineral, Enzyme ・Probiotics
High tech water treatment system at Hakusan Farm
Mother to Pig Infection Control
・Complex diseases can not be easily controlled
・Successful mother to pig infection control simplifies the health situation on farms ・Production of healthy weaned pigs is the center
- f good pig production and mainly influenced by
mother to pig infection control ・The most relevant examples are PRRS and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae
Productivity and Economic Impact of IAV-S, PRRS, and M hyopneumoniae
Pathogen/combination Difference from baseline in % MCT 1 Difference from baseline in ADG Difference from baseline in loss per head placed M hyo 2.15% 0.04 $0.63 PRRS 1.68%
- 0.11
$5.57 IAV-S 1.87%
- 0.04
$3.23 PRRS and M hyo 5.43%**M**P
- 0.14*M*P
$9.69 PRRS and IAV-S 4.34%**S**P
- 0.16**S
$10.41 IAV-S and M hyo 3.46%**M*S
- 0.18**S
$10.12 **M,P,S = combinations vs. M/P/S; P<0.05 *M,P,S = combinations vs. M/P/S; P<0.1 1 = Mortality, culls, tail enders
Haden et al. 2012 27
Mother to Pig Infection Control
- 1. Herd Immunity Stabilization
・ Health status of replacement gilts
・ Vaccination and Acclimatization ・ Age at introduction and recovering time
- 2. Assuring Colostrum Intake
- 3. Weaning age
・ Maternal antibody decay
・ Infection rate at weaning
- 4. Pig Flow
・ Isolated weaning and AIAO
- 5. AMU for lactating sows and pigs
Genetics and Nutrition
- 1. Rapid Genetic Improvement
・Reproductive, growth and carcass
performance ・ Disease resistant; marker assisted selection exists and gene editing is a new hope
Genetics and Nutrition
- 1. Rapid Genetic Improvement
・Reproductive, growth and carcass
performance ・ Disease resistant; marker assisted selection exists and gene editing is a new hope
- 2. Nutrition to match genetics
・ to meet amino acids requirements ・ to meet local pork market needs ・ to use local feed ingredients
AMU & AMR
- 1. Reduction of AMU to reduce AMR
・ One Health approach
・ AMR action plan ・ Survey of AMU
- 2. Research Effort
・ Factors affecting AMU
・ Relation between Biosecurity and AMU
- 3. Benchmarking
・ Ranking individual farm’s AMU level
・ Showing the way of reduction
Farms JASV NARO
- Data on antibiotic usage
- Sampling faces
Return the results Pig INFO Bio System
Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance
Our future plan:
Data Analysis
10 20 30 40 50
Tetracycline
Total usage of antibiotics
45.4% 4.3% 12.5% 0.1% 8.3% 0.1% 11.6% 2.2% 1.0% 0.3% 5.5% 8.9% 0.0%
Tetracycline Thiamphenicol Penicillin Cephem Sulfonamides
Benchmarks for antibiotics
(By courtesy of Dr. I. Yamane of NARO)
Others
- 1. Production Benchmarking
- 2. Good management practice
・ Easy and understandable SOP ・ Early Individual treatment and culling if necessary ・ Continuous education and motivation up ・ Herdsman ship
- 3. GAP and HACCP
Our Benchmarking System : Pig INFO
20 16 8 7 5 8
JASV Data from Farm NARO Data Analysis
Veterinarians
2 4 6 8 10 12
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
戸 数 ( 戸 )
Daily gain Trends of productivity
Improve productivity at the farm
1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,200 2,400 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
中央値 上位10% 下位10%
PED発生
= 1 farm
(Since 2010)
(By courtesy of Dr. I. Yamane of NARO)
Pigs weaned (pigs/sow/year)
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
13.2 15.4 17.6 19.8 22.0 24.2 26.4 28.6 30.8 33.0
Number of Farms
Carcass weight (kg/sow/year)
1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,200 2,400 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
850 1,020 1,190 1,360 1,530 1,700 1,870 2,040 2,210 2,380
Number of Farms
1st prize winner farm
in 2016
2016 2016
(By courtesy of Dr. I. Yamane of NARO)