Optimizing Resources For Improved Performance CIPEC Energy Summit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Optimizing Resources For Improved Performance CIPEC Energy Summit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Optimizing Resources For Improved Performance CIPEC Energy Summit 2018 GAY LEA FOODS CO-OPERATIVE LTD MAY 30, 2018 ZBIGNIEW EWERTOWSKI , P.ENG. DIRECTOR, OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY GAY LEA FOODS CO-OPERATIVE LTD. 5200 Orbitor Drive Mississauga,
ZBIGNIEW EWERTOWSKI, P.ENG.
DIRECTOR, OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY
GAY LEA FOODS CO-OPERATIVE LTD. 5200 Orbitor Drive Mississauga, Ontario
2
GAY LEA FOODS briefly:
- 11 manufacturing facilities: 9 in Ontario, 1 in Manitoba, 1 in
Alberta
- 662,000,000 litres of milk processed in F2017 (bovine and goat
combined)
- Employees: 1,012
- Sales in F2017: 788 M
3
Gay Lea range of products:
4
Fluid milk, Cream, Whipped Cream, Various Cheeses, Cottage Cheese, Sour Cream, Butter, Milk Powder, Yoghurt
SPECIFIC NATURE OF DAIRY INDUSTRY
1. Biologically active substrates – dynamic in nature 2. Perishable foods 3. Shear sensitive 4. Heat treatment to destroy pathogenic microorganisms and extend shelf life:
- Pasteurization and sterilization
- Refrigeration and freezing
- Concentration and Drying
- 5. Sanitary aspects
- 6. CFIA compliance
5
SAVING ENERGY AND WATER
SAVING ENERGY AND WATER MAKES SENSE FROM A BUSINESS & ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE
6
ENVIRONMENT
Environmental issues specifically associated with dairy processing facilities include the following:
- Wastewater
- Solid waste
- Emissions to air
- Energy consumption
7
BENCHMARKING PROCESS
- By benchmarking energy and water intensity against a known
reference dairy process we can evaluate the energy and water efficiency of our processes
- The reference dairy process is based on existing and proven
practices and technologies identified from available sources.
- Benchmarking can be used as an energy management strategy
8
BENCHMARKING cont’d
- The benchmark score values can be used to indicate relative
performance of our dairy process compared to the most efficient process identified e.g. European BAT (Best Available Technology).
- The outcomes from comparisons may become a basis to
evaluate potential for savings and to consider future improvements
9
KPI
We develop KPIs for what we can control at the plant operations
- level. Key metrics include reducing kWh of electricity, m³ of
natural gas and water, and kg of BOD concentrations
10
EXAMPLES FROM THE BENCHMARKING PROCESS
11
PLANT "A" Electricity Usage (2016)
12
0.138 0.137 0.150 0.136 0.161 0.167 0.180 0.163 0.168 0.171 0.148 0.222 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 kWh adj./Litre Milk Month Electricity (kWh adj./L) Average
Plant "A" Natural Gas Usage (2016)
13
0.022 0.025 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.018 0.015 0.017 0.018 0.020 0.021 0.027 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 Cubic Meter/Litre Milk Month Gas (m3/L) Average
Plant "A" Water In Usage (2016)
14
3.388 3.696 4.026 3.502 3.995 3.732 3.694 3.310 3.650 3.899 3.422 5.187 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 Litre Water/Litre Milk Month Water In (L/L) Average
Plant "A" Wastewater Generation (2016)
15
3.082 2.750 2.877 2.520 2.890 2.804 2.823 2.555 2.785 3.162 2.810 4.827 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 Litre Water/Litre Milk Month Water Out (L/L) Average
GAY LEA FOODS’ RESOURCES SAVING INITIATIVES
16
WATER
- Reduction of demand for water in processing
- Reduction of demand for water in cleaning
- Reduction of demand for water in utilities
- Water recycling and reuse
- Wastewater treatment processes
17
ENERGY: ELECTRICITY AND HEAT
- Conducted Audits to identify opportunities
- Implementation of the findings in the compressed air and
steam
- Heat recovery
18
YIELD OPTIMIZATION AND PRODUCT RECOVERY
- Sources of product loss
- The cost of product loss
- Efficient processing and process control
- Minimizing waste
- Maximizing product recovery
19
GOAL
Reduce first, Recover-Reuse last
20
Q&A
21