One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG 2) Overview Region Regions - PDF document

3/16/2017 Call Call for Proje for Projects Worksh Workshop op Welcom Welcome and introduct e and introduction ons 1. 1. OBAG 2 OBAG 2 over overview 2. 2. Call Call for project for projects 3. 3. Application p lication process ess 4. 4. Q&A Q&A 5. 5. March 16, March 16, 2017 2017 1 One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG 2) Overview  Region Region’s federal funding framew ’s federal funding framework ork to to support support CA clim CA climat ate law and Plan Bay Area law and Plan Bay Area  Rewards j rds jurisdictions that p risdictions that provide ide ho housing ing  Ta Targets i ets invest vestments ments in the r region’ gion’s P Priorit iority Developmen velopment Ar Areas ( eas (PDAs) s)  Provides Provides ~45% ~45% of overall fundin of overall funding for g for Coun County ty Progra Program  Gives f ves flexibi exibility to lity to su support ort local p al priorities iorities  Co Conditions el nditions eligibili igibility o ty on l local j al jurisdictions risdictions align alignment of t of gen genera ral plan plan housin housing and and co complete str mplete streets p eets policies licies  Conges Congestion tion Manag Management Agen Agencies es selec select county projects county projec ts 2 1

3/16/2017 Projected Funds Available and Eligible Sponsors Fiv Five-y -year program: ear program: Fiscal Y Fiscal Year ars (FYs) s (FYs) 20 2017/1 /18 – 8 – 202 2021/22 1/22  FY 2017/18 programming most likely only for ongoing projects, non-infrastructure projects or pre-construction phase of infrastructure projects Only publi Only public agenc agencies that alre that already ady ha have a a co-op agreement co-op agreement with with Caltra Calt rans are are eligible t eligible to apply apply 3 Eligible Projects  Transit e ansit expansion, re nsion, reliab liability and ility and acce access imp ss improvements ovements  Smart syst Smart system em manage management nt  Transportation demand management Transportation demand management  Safety and Safety and s streetscap reetscape imp e improvements ovements  Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to School  PDA plann PDA planning and impl and implementati tion 4 2

3/16/2017 Screening Criteria  Fully funded, stand-alone project  Consistent with the intent of OBAG and its broad eligible uses  Eligible federal-aid sponsor  Minimum of $500k  Consistency with Plan Bay Area and SF Transportation Plan  Local match (11.47%) or propose use of toll-credit  Street resurfacing ONLY: Based on Pavement Management System analysis  SRTS set-aside ONLY: Coordinated with SRTS Coalition SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 5 Prioritization Criteria – Location-Specific  Priority Development Area (PDA)  High Impact Area  Community of Concern  Air District’s Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) Community  Near affordable housing development in PDA Check out where your project lands! http://ar http ://arcg.is/2lET g.is/2lETwHc Hc SAN F SA FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 6 3

3/16/2017 Pri Priority Dev rity Developm pment ent Areas (3 pts) (3 pts) 70% of OBAG 2 funds must be programmed to projects located in or serving PDAs Extra consideration: Project is included in: Transportation • Investment Growth Strategy Major Project List or MTC-funded PDA Plan • 7 High Impact High I pact Are Areas (2 pts) (2 pts) Project located in or provides proximate access to high impact area 8 4

3/16/2017 Comm Commun unitie ities of s of Concer Concern (3 pts) (3 pts) Project located in or provides proximate access to COC Extra consideration: Project is identified in Muni Equity Strategy 9 CARE Comm CARE Community ity (2 pts) (2 pts) Project located in or provides proximate access to CARE community Project must also employ best management practices to mitigate exposure 10 10 5

3/16/2017 PD PDA with af A with affordable le housi housing g preser preservati tion strat on strategy (3 pts)* (3 pts) Project located within a PDA and adjacent • within 1/8 mile • within 1/4 mile • of a proposed affordable housing development with 75% or more affordable units *MTC criteria adapted for SF 11 11 Prioritization Criteria – Project-Specific  Proje Project readin readiness (10 pts) ss (10 pts)  Project development status  Schedule  Cost estimate  Funding plan  Environmental clearance  Public review  Project delivery track record  Air Distr Air District’ ct’s Plann Planning for Healt for Healthy Place Places (2 pts) (2 pts)  TDM strategies  Traffic management strategies to reduce vehicle emission  (While meeting all OBAG eligibility requirements) promotes the use of zero emission vehicles and alternative fuels SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 12 12 6

3/16/2017 Prioritization Criteria – Project-Specific  Safety (4 pts) Safety (4 pts)  Vision Zero locations  High injury locations - supported by other data  Extent of safety improvements  Mu Multi-mod lti-modal Be l Bene nefits ( fits (3 p pts)  Pedestrians, cyclists, transit passengers, motorists  Multi Multiple proje project coordi t coordinati tion (1) on (1)  To mitigate construction impacts and/or achieve cost savings  Related project needs to be clearly identified SAN F SA FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 13 13 Prioritization Criteria – Project-Specific  Community s mmunity support ( ort (3)  Clear and diverse support  Evidenced in documentation, e.g. community based plans, letters of support, walking audit for SRTS  Core capacity Core capacity (6) (6)  Percentage and absolute number increase in person throughput and/or reliability  Core Capacity Transit Study list  Access to Access to alternate alternate funding source (3) funding source (3)  Other considerations: Other considerations: PDA 70% requirement, project sponsor priority, geographic equity SAN F SA FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 14 14 7

3/16/2017 Application – Scope/ Schedule/ Cost  Scope - how does the project meet the OBAG 2 program goal of supporting focused growth? Tip: Provide the level of detail needed to best demonstrate project readiness and provide a strategy to resolve any foreseen issues SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 15 15 Application - Funding  Funding source by phase, including OBAG 2 request  Funding status  Allocated - approved for expenditure by the funding authority  Programmed - assigned but not yet approved for expenditure  Planned - not yet committed SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 16 16 8

3/16/2017 Application – Major Line Item Budget  Major Line Item Budget  Capital project: All phases through construction  Non-infrastructure project: Budget by agency, by task Tip: Sample formats are provided, but any format is OK as long as it includes all the required information SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 17 17 Application - Screening and Prioritization Criteria  The application questions Tip: Click the link next to each correspond directly to the box for corresponding maps, documents, and resources. scoring rubric These are also available on www.sfcta.org/obag2. SAN F SA FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 18 18 9

3/16/2017 General OBAG 2 Application Tips  Take care to check all boxes and fill in all narrative boxes when requested  Feel free to provide additional/supporting information, but make sure to note all attachments on first page  Additional instructions in the non-print areas to the right of the form  References to maps, documents, project lists in the form and on the webpage  Interactive mapping tool! http://ar ://arcg.is/2lET g.is/2lETwHc  Please let us know if you find a bug in the form so we can address it and flag it for others  Don’t hesitate to contact us with questions SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 19 19 Call for Projects Schedule Applications due to Transportation Authority April 26 Review of applications and questions to April 27- May 18 sponsors Project recommendations released to TWG May 18 Project recommendations to CAC May 24 Project recommendations to Board June 27 County OBAG 2 recommendations due to July 31 MTC MTC Commission approval Fall 20 20 10

3/16/2017 Question Questions? s? Amber Crabbe amber.crabbe@sfcta.org / (415) 522-4801 March 16, March 16, 2017 2017 21 21 11