One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG 2) Overview Region Regions - - PDF document

3/16/2017 1

Call Call for Proje for Projects Worksh Workshop

• p

1. 1.

Welcom Welcome and introduct e and introduction

• ns

2. 2.

OBAG 2 OBAG 2 over

• verview

3. 3.

Call Call for project for projects

4. 4.

Application p lication process ess

5. 5.

Q&A Q&A

1

March 16, March 16, 2017 2017

One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG 2) Overview

2

 Region Region’s federal funding framew ’s federal funding framework

• rk to

to support support CA clim CA climat ate law and Plan Bay Area law and Plan Bay Area

Rewards j rds jurisdictions that p risdictions that provide ide ho housing ing Ta Targets i ets invest vestments ments in the r region’ gion’s P Priorit iority Developmen velopment Ar Areas ( eas (PDAs) s)

 Provides Provides ~45% ~45% of overall fundin

• f overall funding for

g for Coun County ty Progra Program

Gives f ves flexibi exibility to lity to su support

• rt local p

al priorities iorities Co Conditions el nditions eligibili igibility o ty on l local j al jurisdictions risdictions align alignment of t of gen genera ral plan plan housin housing and and co complete str mplete streets p eets policies licies Conges Congestion tion Manag Management Agen Agencies es selec select county projec county projects ts

3/16/2017 2

Projected Funds Available and Eligible Sponsors

3

Fiv Five-y

• year program:

ear program: Fiscal Y Fiscal Year ars (FYs) s (FYs) 20 2017/1 /18 – 8 – 202 2021/22 1/22  FY 2017/18 programming most likely only for ongoing projects, non-infrastructure projects or pre-construction phase of infrastructure projects Only publi Only public agenc agencies that alre that already ady ha have a a co-op agreement co-op agreement with with Calt Caltra rans are are eligible t eligible to apply apply

Eligible Projects

4

 Transit e ansit expansion, re nsion, reliab liability and ility and acce access imp ss improvements

• vements

 Smart syst Smart system em manage management nt  Transportation demand management Transportation demand management  Safety and Safety and s streetscap reetscape imp e improvements

• vements

 Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to School  PDA plann PDA planning and impl and implementati tion

3/16/2017 3

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 5

 Fully funded, stand-alone project  Consistent with the intent of OBAG and its broad eligible uses  Eligible federal-aid sponsor  Minimum of $500k  Consistency with Plan Bay Area and SF Transportation Plan  Local match (11.47%) or propose use of toll-credit  Street resurfacing ONLY: Based on Pavement Management System analysis  SRTS set-aside ONLY: Coordinated with SRTS Coalition

Screening Criteria

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 6

Prioritization Criteria – Location-Specific

 Priority Development Area (PDA)  High Impact Area  Community of Concern  Air District’s Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) Community  Near affordable housing development in PDA Check out where your project lands! http http://ar ://arcg.is/2lET g.is/2lETwHc Hc

3/16/2017 4

7 Pri Priority Dev rity Developm pment ent Areas (3 pts) (3 pts) 70% of OBAG 2 funds must be programmed to projects located in or serving PDAs Extra consideration: Project is included in:

• Transportation

Investment Growth Strategy Major Project List or

• MTC-funded PDA Plan

8 High I High Impact pact Are Areas (2 pts) (2 pts) Project located in or provides proximate access to high impact area

3/16/2017 5

9 Comm Commun unitie ities of s of Concer Concern (3 pts) (3 pts) Project located in or provides proximate access to COC Extra consideration: Project is identified in Muni Equity Strategy 10 10 CARE Comm CARE Community ity (2 pts) (2 pts) Project located in or provides proximate access to CARE community Project must also employ best management practices to mitigate exposure

3/16/2017 6

11 11 PD PDA with af A with affordable le housi housing g preser preservati tion strat

• n strategy

(3 pts) (3 pts)* Project located within a PDA and

• adjacent
• within 1/8 mile
• within 1/4 mile
• f a proposed affordable

housing development with 75% or more affordable units

*MTC criteria adapted for SF

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 12 12

 Proje Project readin readiness (10 pts) ss (10 pts)

 Project development status  Schedule  Cost estimate  Funding plan  Environmental clearance  Public review  Project delivery track record

 Air Distr Air District’ ct’s Plann Planning for Healt for Healthy Place Places (2 pts) (2 pts)

 TDM strategies  Traffic management strategies to reduce vehicle emission  (While meeting all OBAG eligibility requirements) promotes the use

• f zero emission vehicles and alternative fuels

Prioritization Criteria – Project-Specific

3/16/2017 7

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 13 13

 Safety (4 pts) Safety (4 pts)

 Vision Zero locations  High injury locations - supported by other data  Extent of safety improvements

 Mu Multi-mod lti-modal Be l Bene nefits ( fits (3 p pts)

 Pedestrians, cyclists, transit passengers, motorists

 Multi Multiple proje project coordi t coordinati tion (1)

• n (1)

 To mitigate construction impacts and/or achieve cost savings  Related project needs to be clearly identified

Prioritization Criteria – Project-Specific

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 14 14

 Community s mmunity support (

• rt (3)

 Clear and diverse support  Evidenced in documentation, e.g. community based plans, letters of support, walking audit for SRTS

Prioritization Criteria – Project-Specific

 Core capacity Core capacity (6) (6)

 Percentage and absolute number increase in person throughput and/or reliability  Core Capacity Transit Study list

 Access to Access to alternate alternate funding source (3) funding source (3)  Other considerations: Other considerations: PDA 70% requirement, project sponsor priority, geographic equity

3/16/2017 8

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 15 15

 Scope - how does the project meet the OBAG 2 program goal of supporting focused growth?

Application – Scope/ Schedule/ Cost

Tip: Provide the level of detail needed to best demonstrate project readiness and provide a strategy to resolve any foreseen issues SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 16 16

Application - Funding

 Funding source by phase, including OBAG 2 request  Funding status

 Allocated - approved for expenditure by the funding authority  Programmed - assigned but not yet approved for expenditure  Planned - not yet committed

3/16/2017 9

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 17 17

 Major Line Item Budget

 Capital project: All phases through construction  Non-infrastructure project: Budget by agency, by task

Application – Major Line Item Budget

Tip: Sample formats are provided, but any format is OK as long as it includes all the required information SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 18 18

 The application questions correspond directly to the scoring rubric

Application - Screening and Prioritization Criteria

Tip: Click the link next to each box for corresponding maps, documents, and resources. These are also available on www.sfcta.org/obag2.

3/16/2017 10

SA SAN F FRAN ANCI CISCO C SCO COUN UNTY TRAN ANSPORT SPORTATION TION A AUTH THORI ORITY 19 19

 Take care to check all boxes and fill in all narrative boxes when requested  Feel free to provide additional/supporting information, but make sure to note all attachments

• n first page

 Additional instructions in the non-print areas to the right of the form  References to maps, documents, project lists in the form and on the webpage  Interactive mapping tool! http://ar

://arcg.is/2lET g.is/2lETwHc

 Please let us know if you find a bug in the form so we can address it and flag it for others  Don’t hesitate to contact us with questions

General OBAG 2 Application Tips Call for Projects Schedule

Applications due to Transportation Authority April 26 Review of applications and questions to sponsors April 27- May 18 Project recommendations released to TWG May 18 Project recommendations to CAC May 24 Project recommendations to Board June 27 County OBAG 2 recommendations due to MTC July 31 MTC Commission approval Fall

20 20

3/16/2017 11

Question Questions? s?

Amber Crabbe amber.crabbe@sfcta.org / (415) 522-4801

21 21

March 16, March 16, 2017 2017