March 3, 2016
Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in a model cheese system based - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in a model cheese system based - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in a model cheese system based on pH, moisture, and acid type Sarah Engstrom , Christie Cheng Principal Investigator: Dr. Kathleen Glass Food Research Institute, UW-Madison July 10, 2018 March 3, 2016
ILSI 2005; Batz 2011; USDA-ERS 2016.
- Made via acid and/or rennet
addition (no starter)
- Standard of Identity not
established for some varieties
- Refrigeration is typically only
post-manufacturing hurdle
- 287 million lbs Latin-style
cheese produced in 2017 (316% increase from 1997)
Soft, unaged cheeses
- Ubiquitous organism with 20%
fatality
- Psychrotrophic (-0.4°C / 31.1°F
min)
- Main concern = post-
processing contamination
- $60M to $2B annual cost due
to illness from dairy foods
- L. monocytogenes
Forever Cheese Ricotta Salata Roos Foods 16 Latin- style Oasis Brands 6 Latin- style Karoun Dairies Queso fresco/blanco, feta, mozzarella La Nica Products 2 Latin- style Panera Cream cheese 2012 2018
CDC 2012-2018.
Acid pH Citric 5.25 Lactic 5.50 Acetic 5.75 Propionic 6.00 Moisture 50% 56%
To determine the effect of pH, moisture, and acid type on the growth of
- L. monocytogenes in a model cheese system
4 acid types 4 pH values 2 moistures Salt constant (1.25%) 32 cheeses
Objective
Methods – Model System
- Model soft cheese system:
- Cream (pasteurized, 40% fat)
- Micellar casein
- Sterile water
- Lactose
- Salt
- pH adjustment using organic acids
(citric, lactic, acetic, or propionic)
Methods – Inoculation
- Inoculated with 3-log CFU/g (0.5% v/w) 5-strain L. monocytogenes cocktail:
LM 108 - hard salami LM 301 - cheddar LM 310 - goat’s milk cheese R2-500 - food outbreak R2-501 - clinical isolate
- Mixed 2 minutes to distribute
- 25 g portions vacuum-sealed
- Each formulation replicated in duplicate trials
Methods – L. monocytogenes Enumeration
Triplicate samples 1:2 dilution in 0.1% peptone 30 sec Serial dilutions in 0.1% peptone Modified Oxford agar 2 days 35°C
Samples stored at 4°C and plated at time 0 and weekly through 8 weeks
+
1:2 dilution in 0.1% peptone 30 sec Serial dilutions in 0.1% peptone
Methods – Uninoculated Sample Enumeration
Duplicate samples Plate Count agar 2 days 35°C MRS agar 2 days 35°C Potato dextrose agar 5 days 21°C
+
pH measured weekly
Samples stored at 4°C and plated at time 0, 4, and 8 weeks
Salt
Methods – Proximate Analysis
pH Moisture aw
Uninoculated 0-time samples of each treatment were analyzed to confirm target parameters
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
log CFU/g Weeks at 4°C
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
log CFU/g Weeks at 4°C
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
log CFU/g Weeks at 4°C
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
log CFU/g Weeks at 4°C
Citric Acid Lactic Acid Acetic Acid Propionic Acid
Data Handling – DMFit
64 curves fitted for Lag and Growth Rate
Full Model
- Independent variables: acid type, target pH, target moisture, target
pH*target moisture interaction, trial
- Dependent variables: Lag, Growth Rate
Reduced Model
- Independent variables: acid type, target pH
- Dependent variables: Lag, Growth Rate
Lag Phase (weeks)
Citric A Lactic B Acetic C Propionic C
Growth Rate (log CFU/g per week)
Citric A Lactic A Acetic B Propionic B
Tukey’s HSD
Example - cheese pH 5.6
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
log CFU/g Weeks at 4°C
Citric Lactic Acetic Propionic
1-log L. monocytogenes growth at:
- 1 week – citric
- 3.5 weeks – lactic
- >8 weeks – acetic or propionic
Conclusions
- L. monocytogenes growth is dictated by acid type and
pH in model cheeses of 50-56% moisture
- Efficacy of organic acids follows pKa value
- Citric 3.13, Lactic 3.83, Acetic 4.75, Propionic 4.88
- Acetic and propionic model cheeses performed similarly
- Our model cheese system can be used to screen
antilisterial ingredients
Acknowledgements
- Funding: National Dairy Council
- Technical: Randy Brandsma (Schreiber);
Gina Mode, Mike Molitor, John Lucey (CDR)
- Modeling: Dennis Seman (Meat
Science)
- Lab: Makala Bach, Morgan Brown,
Christie Cheng, Max Golden, Quinn Huibregtse, Jie Yin Lim, Kori Scherer, Sam Trotter, Megan Wagner, and Brandon Wanless
16
THANK YOU
Phase I Results
TEST
Cheese pH Acid % Undissociated Total Acid (mM) Undissociated Acid (mM) 5.25 Citric Lactic Acetic Propionic 0.7 4.7 25.0 27.2 29.93 140.40 99.09 117.70 0.21 6.87 24.76 32.00 5.50 Citric Lactic Acetic Propionic 0.4 2.4 15.8 19.5 18.52 72.14 60.61 80.65 0.08 1.73 9.57 15.69 5.75 Citric Lactic Acetic Propionic 0.3 1.3 10.6 11.7 10.23 41.99 38.38 40.11 0.03 0.56 4.08 4.68 6.00 Citric Lactic Acetic Propionic 0.1 0.7 5.6 6.8 3.67 14.08 12.41 14.82 0.01 0.10 0.70 1.00
Acid pKa Citric 3.13 Lactic 3.83 Acetic 4.75 Propionic 4.88
Mani-Lopez 2012.
TEST
Higher pKa, higher antimicrobial activity
Antimicrobial Activity of Organic Acids
Antimicrobial Activity of Organic Acids
Citric pKa’s: 3.13, 4.76, 6.40 0.7% Lactic pKa: 3.86 4.7% Acetic pKa: 4.76 25.0% Propionic pKa: 4.87 27.2%