on voting in congressional and presidential elections
play

on Voting in Congressional and Presidential Elections Jon A. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

American Public Opinion on Climate Change and Its Impact on Voting in Congressional and Presidential Elections Jon A. Krosnick, Bo MacInnis, Ana Villar Stanford University Funded by Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University ABC


  1. American Public Opinion on Climate Change and Its Impact on Voting in Congressional and Presidential Elections Jon A. Krosnick, Bo MacInnis, Ana Villar Stanford University Funded by Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University ABC News Time Magazine The Washington Post The Associated Press Reuters National Science Foundation New Scientist Magazine MassINC Polling Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ohio State University Electric Power Research Institute with Resources for the Future

  2. “The strong scientific consensus on the causes and risks of climate change stands in stark contrast to widespread confusion and complacency among the public.” John D. Sterman, Science (October, 2008)

  3. Headlines: October, 2009  Belief in GW existence  Fewer Americans Believe in Global Warming  Certainty  Americans More Confused About Climate  Concern  Concern About Climate Change Waning  Cute  U.S. Belief in Global Warming is Cooling

  4. December, 2010 “The number of Americans who agree the earth is warming because of man- made activity has been in free fall.” Bloomberg Businessweek

  5. February, 2011 “Why don’t Americans believe in global warming?” The Economist

  6. What Does the Public Believe?

  7. National Surveys • 1997 thru 2011 • Representative samples of American adults. • Interviewed by telephone. • Extensive interviewer training and supervision. • Unbiased, balanced questions. • Surveys not described as about global warming.

  8. Today I: American Public Opinion on Climate Change: 1997-2011 II: Regional Differences? III: The 2008 and 2010 Elections

  9. Part I: A Portrait of Public Opinion 1997 - 2010

  10. Know a Lot or a Moderate Amount About Global Warming 80% 58% 62% 63% 66% 68% 66% 70% 60% 50% 42% 43% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1997 1998 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Nov-10

  11. Our Question • "You may have heard about the idea that the world's temperature may have been going up slowly over the past 100 years. What is your personal opinion on this? Do you think this has probably been happening, or do you think it probably has not been happening?"

  12. Has Global Warming Been Happening? 100% 79% 81% 85% 84% 80% 75% 74% 75% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1997 1998 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Nov-10

  13. Extremely/Very Sure Global Warming Has Been Happening 60% 52% 49% 47% 50% 45% 45% 44% 44% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1997 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Nov-10

  14. Human Action Has Been Causing Warming 100% 90% 83% 80% 77% 75% 75% 80% 70% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Nov-10

  15. 5 degrees in 75 years would be bad 70% 64% 62% 60% 59% 59% 56% 60% 55% 54% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1997 1998 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Nov-10

  16. The Federal Government Should Do More to Deal with Global Warming 80% 68% 70% 70% 56% 60% 62% 61% 60% 49% 47% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1997 1998 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Nov-10

  17. The Federal Government: A Great Deal or Quite a Bit 70% 59% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Should Do Is Doing November, 2010

  18. The Federal Government: A Great Deal or Quite a Bit 70% 59% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 16% 10% 0% Should Do Is Doing November, 2010

  19. Differences Between States?

  20. Separate Results by State • GW has been happening: 66% to 99%

  21. 66%

  22. Separate Results by State • GW has been happening 66% to 99% • Human caused 64% to 99%

  23. Separate Results by State • GW has been happening 66% to 99% • Human caused 64% to 99% • Government should do more 43% to 92%

  24. 43% 54% 65%

  25. High Employment in Coal and Oil Industries 86% 65%

  26. Separate Results by State • GW has been happening 66% to 99% • Human caused 64% to 99% • Government should do more 43% to 92% • Limit greenhouse gas emissions 65% to 96%

  27. 65% 69% 66%

  28. Change: 2010 to 2011? Massachusetts Only MassINC Polling Group and Stanford

  29. Has GW Been Happening? 100% 84% 90% 82% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  30. Extremely/Very Sure That GW Has Been Happening 100% 90% 80% 70% 63% 60% 50% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  31. Extremely/Very Sure That GW Has Not Been Happening 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 35% 35% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  32. Very or Somewhat Serious Problem for the USA 100% 90% 82% 76% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  33. Very or Somewhat Serious Problem for the World 100% 86% 85% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  34. GW Issue Public Membership 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 22% 15% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  35. Change: 2010 to 2011? The Entire U.S. Reuters and Ipsos with Stanford

  36. Has GW Been Happening? 100% 90% 83% 75% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  37. Extremely/Very Sure That GW Has Been Happening 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 53% 48% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  38. Extremely/Very Sure That GW Has Not Been Happening 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 53% 50% 35% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  39. Human Activity Has Been Causing Warming 100% 90% 75% 80% 72% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  40. GW Issue Public Membership 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 15% 14% 20% 10% 0% 2010 2011

  41. Change: 2010 to 2011? The European Union

  42. Eurobarometer • August-September, 2009, vs. June, 2011 • 27 Countries • Probability samples • Face-to-face interviewing • The European Commission • TNS Opinion & Social

  43. How serious a problem do you think climate change is at this moment? Please use a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 would mean that it is not at all a serious problem, and 10 would mean that it is an extremely serious problem.

  44. Seriousness Ratings 7-10 100% 90% 80% 68% 64% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2009 2011

  45. Candidate Choice • Memory based evaluation vs. online updating • Thin slice evaluations of appearance • Evaluation ingredients – Party identification – Performance of the incumbent – Health of the nation – Interests of social groups – Perceptions of candidates’ personalities – Emotions evoked by candidates – Candidate policy positions

  46. Voting Based on Policy Issues • Rare? – Converse, 1964 – People lack real preferences on policy issues? – Candidates rarely stake out clear positions – Candidates often hug the middle • An alternative theory: Issue publics – Converse, 1964 – A small group of citizens are passionate about each issue – Issue public members: • Pay close attention to candidate statements • Infer candidate differences even when not stated explicitly • Vote based on the issue

  47. Attitude Attitude Extremity Impact on Other Self-interest Attitude Attitudes, Selective Accessibility Perceptions, Social Attitude Exposure and Attitude Identification Importance and Behavior Consistency Elaboration with Values Values Resistance to Knowledge, Attitude Quantity, Change Accuracy, (and Stability) and Organization

  48. Climate Change?

  49. Doubling of the “Issue Public” Since 1997 (38 million people now) 20% 18% 18% 17% 16% 16% 16% 15% 14% 14% 12% 11% 10% 8% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 1997 1998 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

  50. Issue Publics in the United States Abortion 31% Government Social Services Programs 21% Gun Control 17% U.S. Military Spending 16% Global Warming 15% Capital Punishment 14% Women’s Rights 12% Race Relations 10% Unemployment 9% Other Sources: National Election Studies, General Social Surveys

  51. The Issue Public’s Opinions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Global Warming Has Been Happening 94% 94% 94% 92% 88% Caused by Human Action 88% 97% 91% 77% 88% Government Should Do More 90% 93% 91% 86% 84%

  52. Did climate change influence voting in 2010 and 2008?

  53. Headlines After the 2010 Election • Democrats Who Took Risk and Voted For Climate Bill Pay Price • Cap- and Trade Didn’t Kill the Dems • It’s Not the Climate Bill, Stupid • Ignoring Evidence, Politico Spins Climate Vote as Electoral Loser

  54. What Did the Candidates Say During Their Campaigns? • Content analysis of campaign websites. • Green? Not-green? Nothing?

  55. Democrats - Senate 90 80 70 57 60 50 43 40 30 20 10 0 0 Silence Green Not Green

  56. Republicans - Senate 90 83 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 9 9 10 0 Silence Green Not Green

  57. Democrats - House 90 80 70 60 60 50 40 40 30 20 10 1 0 Silence Green Not Green

  58. Republicans - House 90 78 80 70 60 50 40 30 16 20 6 10 0 Silence Green Not Green

  59. Did Climate Strategy Correlate with Victory Rates?

  60. Percent of Democrats Who Won 80 69 68 70 60 50 40 30 18 17 20 10 4 0 0 D Silent - R D Green - D Green - D Green - D Silent - R D Silent - R Silent R Silent R Not- R Green Not-Green Green Green

  61. What Caused What?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend